INLINE RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION: FIRST EXPERIMENT WITH STAPLING DEVICE

Contrast-enhanced sonographically guided thermal ablation for treatment of solid-organ hemorrhage: preliminary clinical results

The purpose of this series was to preliminarily evaluate the use of contrast-enhanced sonographically guided percutaneous thermal ablation in the evaluation and treatment of solid-organ bleeding by retrospectively analyzing 6 cases observed in clinical practice. Six patients who underwent contrast-enhanced sonographically guided thermal ablation for treatment of solid-organ bleeding (5 in liver and 1 in spleen) from December 2005 to August 2012 were included in this series. Clinical information, contrast-enhanced sonograms before and after ablation, and the ablation method were retrospectively collected and analyzed. In 5 of the 6 patients, the location of the bleeding lesion was clearly seen. Hemostasis was successfully achieved in 4 of these 5 patients: 1 by radiofrequency ablation and 3 by microwave ablation. Ablation failed to achieve hemostasis in 1 patient who had postbiopsy splenic arterial bleeding because the bleeding vessel was a thick branch of the splenic artery. In the sixth remaining patient, who had bleeding after liver biopsy, hemostasis failed because contrast-enhanced sonography did not precisely locate the bleeding lesion; hence, the ablation zone did not cover the whole lesion. Contrast-enhanced sonographically guided ablation can be an alternative choice for treating solid-organ bleeding because of its effectiveness and minimal invasiveness. However, it should be carefully investigated for those in whom the bleeding lesion cannot be located by contrast-enhanced sonography and in those who have bleeding in a large vessel.

What is the best technique in parenchymal transection in laparoscopic liver resection? Comprehensive review for the clinical question on the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection

The continuing evolution of technique and devices used in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has allowed successful application of this minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of liver disease. However, the type of instruments by energy sources and technique used vary among each institution. We reviewed the literature to seek the best technique for parenchymal transection, which was proposed as one of the important clinical question in the 2nd International Consensus Conference on LLR held on October 2014. While publications have described transection techniques used in LLR from 1991 to June 2014, it is difficult to specify the best technique and device for laparoscopic hepatic parenchymal transection, owing to a lack of randomized trials with only a small number of comparative studies. However, it is clear that instruments should be used in combination with others based on their functions and the depth of liver resection. Most authors have reported using staplers to secure and divide major vessels. Preparation for prevention of unexpected hemorrhaging particularly in liver cirrhosis, the Pringle's maneuver and prompt technique for hemostasis should be performed. We conclude that hepatobiliary surgeons should select techniques based on their familiarity with a concrete understanding of instruments and individualize to the procedure of LLR.

What kind of energy devices should be used for laparoscopic liver resection? Recommendations from a systematic review

Transection methods and hemostasis achievement have an impact on blood loss, and consequently on outcome and survival. However, no consensus exists on parenchymal transection or hemostasis techniques in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). The aim of this review is to clarify the role of energy devices (ED) in LLR. ED is a generator of mechanic or electric energy transfer to an operating tool, used for transection, sealing or both. Searches were performed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar in human or animal experimental models. Each study quality was graded following the GRADE system. From 1996 to 2014, 30 studies were found: five comparative, one prospective, two case-control, and 16 case series and some case reports, with level of evidence ranging from Moderate to Very Low. Since 2012, the Research and Development of new tools raised quicker than clinical studies could follow. The two main techniques emerged are blind transection versus sharp dissection: due to the low quality and heterogeneity of the studies, no firm conclusion can be drawn, but meticulous dissection of vessels usually never leads to vascular damage. As a matter of fact, ED, though efficient and reliable, cannot replace the basic skills of hepatic surgery: sharp dissection, vascular control and elective sealing.

Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature

Despite the established advantages of laparoscopy, bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a liver-specific improvement. The 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection was held in October 2014 at Morioka, Japan. One of the most capital questions was: What is essential in bleeding control during LLR? In order to correctly address this question, we conducted a comprehensive review of the literature. Essential points based on personal experience of the expert panel are also discussed. A total of 54 publications were identified. Based on this analysis, the working group built these recommendations: (1) a pneumoperitoneum of 10-14 mmHg should be used as it allows a good control of the bleeding without significant modifications of hemodynamics; (2) a low central venous pressure (<5 mmHg) should be used; (3) laparoscopy facilitates inflow and outflow control; and (4) surgeons should be experienced with the use of all surgical devices for liver transection and should master laparoscopic suture before starting LLR. Precoagulation with radiofrequency can be useful, particularly in cases of atypical resection. These recommendations are mostly based on experts' opinions and on B or C quality of evidence grade studies. More prospective data are required to confirm these results.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a controlled study of bipolar inline radiofrequency ablation device in Swine

BACKGROUND

Bipolar inline radiofrequency ablation (ILRFA) is an effective way to control bleeding during parenchymal organ transection. This was investigated in a study of laparoscopic hand-assisted partial nephrectomy in swine.

METHODS

Nine Landrace pigs were divided between 2 groups; diathermy was employed in the control group for parenchymal transaction and ILRFA was applied in the experimental group through a hand-port and deployed into the resection plane. After complete coagulation, resection was performed using scissors.

RESULTS

The mean intraoperative blood loss was 32 +/- 15 mL in the ILRFA group and 187 +/- 69 mL in the control group: a 82.9% reduction ( P = .015). The mean blood loss per resection area was 2.53 +/- 0.92 mL/cm(2) in the ILRFA group compared with 17.31 +/- 9.05 mL/cm( 2) in controls; the reduction was 85.4% (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

ILRFA is effective in achieving reducing blood loss and provides a drier operative field for precise dissection.

Liver transection using vascular stapler: a review

The clinical experience using a novel technique of liver resection with vascular staplers for dissection of hepatic parenchyma, was documented most recently in a prospective manner. These data have clearly demonstrated for the first time that stapler hepatectomy is a safe and fast dissection technique in major liver surgery (e.g. hepatectomy) which is feasible in a routine clinical setting.