1
|
Germani MM, Borelli B, Boraschi P, Antoniotti C, Ugolini C, Urbani L, Morelli L, Fontanini G, Masi G, Cremolini C, Moretto R. The management of colorectal liver metastases amenable of surgical resection: How to shape treatment strategies according to clinical, radiological, pathological and molecular features. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 106:102382. [PMID: 35334281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have poor chances of long term survival, being < 15% of them still alive after 5 years from diagnosis. Nonetheless, patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may be eligible for metastases resection thus being able to achieve long-term disease remission and survival. The likelihood for patients with CRLM of being or becoming eligible for liver metastasectomy is increasing, thanks to the evolution of surgical techniques, the availability of active systemic treatments and the widespread diffusion of experienced multidisciplinary boards to manage these patients. However, disease relapse after liver surgery is common and occurs in two-thirds of resected patients. Therefore, adequate radiological staging and risk stratification is crucial for the optimal selection of patients candidate to surgery in order to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of liver metastasectomy and to individualize the treatment strategy. Based on the multidimensional assessment, three possible approaches are available: upfront liver surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy preceding and following liver surgery, and an upfront systemic treatment including chemotherapy plus a targeted agent, both chosen according to patients' and tumours' characteristics, then followed by liver surgery if indicated. In this review, we describe the most important factors impacting the therapeutic choices in patients with resectable and potentially resectable CRLM, and we discuss the most promising factors that may reshape the future decision-making process of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Maria Germani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Beatrice Borelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piero Boraschi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Antoniotti
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Clara Ugolini
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lucio Urbani
- Unit of General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriella Fontanini
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Masi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Moretto
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaur H, Hindman NM, Al-Refaie WB, Arif-Tiwari H, Cash BD, Chernyak V, Farrell J, Grajo JR, Horowitz JM, McNamara MM, Noto RB, Qayyum A, Lalani T, Kamel IR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Liver Metastases. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 14:S314-S325. [PMID: 28473088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Liver metastases are the most common malignant liver tumors. The accurate and early detection and characterization of liver lesions is the key to successful treatment strategies. Increasingly, surgical resection in combination with chemotherapy is effective in significantly improving survival if all metastases are successfully resected. MRI and multiphase CT are the primary imaging modalities in the assessment of liver metastasis, with the relative preference toward multiphase CT or MRI depending upon the clinical setting (ie, surveillance or presurgical planning). The optimization of imaging parameters is a vital factor in the success of either modality. PET/CT, intraoperative ultrasound are used to supplement CT and MRI. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harmeet Kaur
- Principal Author, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Nicole M Hindman
- Co-author, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Waddah B Al-Refaie
- Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia; American College of Surgeons
| | - Hina Arif-Tiwari
- University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - James Farrell
- Interventional Endoscopy and Pancreatic Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut; American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Joseph R Grajo
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | | | - Richard B Noto
- Brown University Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Aliya Qayyum
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tasneem Lalani
- Specialty Chair, Inland Imaging Associates and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- Panel Chair, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Vallone P, Setola SV, Granata V, Fusco R, Lastoria S, Mansi L, Petrillo A. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Assessment of Patients with Indeterminate Abdominal Findings at Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2016; 42:2717-2723. [PMID: 27495384 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Widespread use of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) in cancer imaging may result in a number of indeterminate and false-positive findings. We investigated the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a second-level option after inconclusive PET. We reviewed CEUS images acquired over 4 y, selecting the examinations performed specifically to better assess an unclear PET image. Final diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy, surgery, further imaging or follow-up. Seventy CEUS examinations were performed after a PET scan (44 PET examinations, 19 PET-computer tomography [CT] examinations and 7 PET-CECT examinations). The target organ was the liver in 54 cases, spleen in 12, gallbladder in 2 and pancreas and kidney in one each. In 6 of 70 cases, CEUS was performed because of a negative PET (no uptake) despite an abnormal finding on the CT images of the PET-CT study; CEUS allowed a correct diagnosis in all of these. In 20 of 70 cases, the PET findings were categorized as indeterminate and non-specific (non-specific fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in PET report with no standardized uptake value given); CEUS reached a correct diagnosis in 19 of the 20 cases with one false negative. In 34 of 70 cases, PET was indeterminate, but specific (fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with a standardized uptake value provided); CEUS reached a correct diagnosis in 30 of these 34 cases. In 10 of 70 cases, PET was categorized as determinate but to be investigated because of discrepancy with clinical or imaging findings; CEUS a definitive diagnosis in 9 of 10 cases. CEUS proved to be effective option in the assessment of cancer patients with indeterminate PET findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlando Catalano
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
| | - Fabio Sandomenico
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Vallone
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Vincenza Granata
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Secondo Lastoria
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Mansi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gauthé M, Richard-Molard M, Cacheux W, Michel P, Jouve JL, Mitry E, Alberini JL, Lièvre A. Role of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gastrointestinal cancers. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47:443-54. [PMID: 25766918 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a routine imaging modality for many malignancies and its use is currently increasing. In the present review article, we will summarize the evidence for FDG-PET/CT use in digestive cancers (excluding neuroendocrine tumours), and review the existing recommendations. While PET/CT is nowadays considered to be an important tool in the initial workup of oesophageal and anal cancers, new data are emerging regarding its use in assessing therapeutic efficacy, radiotherapy treatment planning, and detection of recurrence in case of isolated tumour marker elevation. Moreover, PET/CT may help decision making by detecting distant metastatic sites especially in potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, in localized gastric and pancreatic cancers. Finally, incidental focal colonic FDG uptakes require exploration by colonoscopy, as they are often associated with premalignant or malignant lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gauthé
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Cloud, France; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| | - Marion Richard-Molard
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Radiation Therapy, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Wulfran Cacheux
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Michel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, France; University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Jouve
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dijon University Hospital, University of Burgundy, INSERM U866, Dijon, France
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France; University of Versailles Saint Quentin, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Jean-Louis Alberini
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Cloud, France; University of Versailles Saint Quentin, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France; University of Versailles Saint Quentin, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
[(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET is a functional imaging tool that provides metabolic information, which has the potential to detect a lesion before it becomes anatomically apparent. This ability constitutes a strong argument for using FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the management of oncology patients. Many studies have investigated the accuracy of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT for these purposes, but with small sample sizes based on retrospective cohorts. This article provides an overview of the role of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in patients with liver malignancies treated by means of surgical resection, ablative therapy, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and brachytherapy, all being liver-directed oncologic interventions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Németh Z, Boér K, Kásler M, Borbély K. [Clinical use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal carcinoma]. Orv Hetil 2013; 154:1447-53. [PMID: 24016751 DOI: 10.1556/oh.2013.29700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Modern imaging techniques have an important role in the diagnostic procedures of malignancies, and assessing response to therapy. The 18F-FDG PET/CT revolutionized the evaluation of colorectal cancer in terms of preoperative staging and monitoring of recurrence. Conventional imaging techniques have limitations in early assessment of response to therapy. 18F-FDG PET has been shown to allow earlier treatment monitoring, because the metabolic change appears before any anatomic change occurs. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) are widely applied, but they have some limitations. There are new international guidelines for treatment response assessment using PET/CT in solid tumours. The authors review indications and the role of hybrid PET/CT in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsuzsanna Németh
- Szent Margit Kórház Onkológiai Osztály Budapest Bécsi út 132. 1032
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferrero A, Langella S, Giuliante F, Viganò L, Vellone M, Zimmitti G, Ardito F, Nuzzo G, Capussotti L. Intraoperative Liver Ultrasound Still Affects Surgical Strategy for Patients with Colorectal Metastases in the Modern Era. World J Surg 2013; 37:2655-63. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
8
|
García Vicente AM, Domínguez Ferreras E, Sánchez Pérez V, Poblete García VM, Villa Guzmán JC, Jiménez Aragón F, Pineda Pineda MD, Molino Trinidad C, Soriano Castrejón Á. Response assessment of colorectal liver metastases with contrast enhanced CT/18F-FDG PET. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:e255-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2012] [Revised: 12/24/2012] [Accepted: 12/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
9
|
Evidence-based Guideline Recommendations on the use of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Colorectal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012; 24:232-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2011] [Revised: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
10
|
van Kessel CS, Buckens CFM, van den Bosch MAAJ, van Leeuwen MS, van Hillegersberg R, Verkooijen HM. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:2805-13. [PMID: 22396005 PMCID: PMC3433675 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2300-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Chemotherapy treatment induces parenchymal changes that potentially affect imaging of CRLM. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide values of diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and FDG-PET/CT for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A comprehensive search was performed for original articles published from inception to 2011 assessing diagnostic performance of MRI, CT, FDG-PET, or FDG-PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of CRLM following chemotherapy. Intraoperative findings and/or histology were used as reference standard. For each imaging modality we calculated pooled sensitivities for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as for chemonaive patients, defined as number of malignant lesions detected divided by number of malignant lesions as confirmed by the reference standard. Results A total of 11 papers, comprising 223 patients with 906 lesions, were included. Substantial variation in study design, patient characteristics, imaging features, and reference tests was observed. Pooled sensitivity estimates of MRI, CT, FDG-PET, and FDG-PET/CT were 85.7% (69.7–94.0%), 69.9% (65.6–73.9%), 54.5% (46.7–62.1%), and 51.7% (37.8–65.4%), respectively. In chemonaive patients, sensitivity rates were 80.5% (67.0–89.4%) for CT, 81.3% (64.1–91.4%) for FDG-PET, and 71.0% (64.3–76.9%) for FDG-PET/CT. Specificity could not be calculated because of non-reporting of “true negative lesions.” Conclusion In the neoadjuvant setting, MRI appears to be the most appropriate imaging modality for preoperative assessment of patients with CRLM. CT is the second-best diagnostic modality and should be used in the absence of MRI. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET and PET-CT is strongly affected by chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin M, Wong K, Ng WL, Shon IH, Morgan M. Positron emission tomography and colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011; 77:30-47. [PMID: 20619671 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2009] [Revised: 04/30/2010] [Accepted: 04/30/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Molecular imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) is now an integral part of multidisciplinary cancer care. In this review, we discuss the role of PET in CRC including well established indications in the assessment of recurrent disease and emerging applications such as initial staging, monitoring therapy efficacy and using PET for radiotherapy planning. With rapid advancement in imaging technology, we also discuss the future potential of combining PET and magnetic resonance imaging and the use of novel radiotracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramos E, Valls C, Martinez L, Lladó L, Torras J, Ruiz S, Gamez C, Serrano T, Fabregat J, Rafecas A. Preoperative Staging of Patients with Liver Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma. Does PET/CT Really Add Something to Multidetector CT? Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:2654-61. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1670-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
13
|
|