Quality Control Indicators for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: Results from an Embedded Belgian Multicenter Prospective Registry

BACKGROUND

Quality control indicators (QCIs) can be used to objectively evaluate guideline adherence and benchmark quality among urologists and centers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess six QCIs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using a prospective registry of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Clinical data for TURBT cases were prospectively collected using electronic case report forms (eCRFs) embedded in the electronic medical record in three centers during 2013-2017. Pathological data were collected retrospectively. Patients with T0 disease or prior T2 disease were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We assessed six QCIs: complete resection (CR) status, presence of detrusor muscle (DM), re-TURBT, single instillation of mitomycin C (MMC), start of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy, and therapy ≤6 wk after diagnosis. We assessed the quality of reporting on QCIs and compliance with QCIs, compared compliance between centers and over time, and investigated correlation between compliance and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Data for 1350 TURBT procedures were collected, of which 1151 were included for 907 unique patients. The distribution of European Association of Urology risk categories after TURBT was 271 with low risk, 464 with intermediate risk, and 416 with high risk. The quality of reporting for two QCIs was suboptimal, at 35% for DM and 51% for BCG. QCI compliance was 97% for CR, 31% for DM, 65% for MMC, 33% for re-TURBT, 39% for BCG, and 88% for therapy ≤6 wk after diagnosis. Compliance with all QCIs differed significantly among centers. Compliance with MMC and re-TURBT increased significantly over time, which could be attributed to one center. Compliance with MMC was significantly correlated with RFS. The main study limitation is the retrospective collection of pathology data.

CONCLUSIONS

A TURBT registry consisting of eCRFs to collect pathology and outcome data allowed assessment of QCIs for NMIBC. Our study illustrates the feasibility of this approach in a real-life setting. Differences in performance on QCIs among centers can motivate urologists to improve their day-to-day care for patients with NMIBC, and can thus improve clinical outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our study demonstrates that quality control indicators for treatment of bladder cancer not invading the bladder muscle can be evaluated using electronic medical records. We assessed results for 1151 procedures in 907 individual patients to remove bladder tumors between 2013 and 2017 at three centers in Belgium. Compliance with the quality control indicators differed between centers, increased over time, and was correlated with recurrence of disease.

Low compliance to guidelines in nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review assessed compliance to guidelines for the management of nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC).

METHODS

The PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2019 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies incorporating a collective total of 10,575 NMIBC patients were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. We found that the rates of compliance were 53.0% with a single immediate intravesical instillation in patients with presumed low or intermediate risk, 37.1% with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin or chemotherapy in those with intermediate risk, 43.4% with performance of a second transurethral resection in high-risk patients, 32.5% with administration of adjuvant intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin in high-risk patients, 36.1% with radical cystectomy in highest-risk patients, and 82.2% with cystoscopy for follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with NMIBC guidelines remains low. Better guideline education and understanding holds the key to achieving high compliance. Strategies to improve guideline compliance at the physician level are urgently required.

Prognostic impact of non-adherence to follow-up cystoscopy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the underexplored context of cystoscopy adherent versus non-adherent patients in the follow-up of urothelial high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study (2005-2016) that evaluated patients´ demographical characteristics, histopathological data, recurrence, progression and cancer-specific mortality between adherent and non-adherents patients in the first 3 years of a proposed cystoscopy protocol.

RESULTS

Among the 198 included patients, comparing cystoscopy non-adherent (n = 36, 18%) and adherent patients (n = 162, 82%), there was no demographic or histopathological differences; the rates of disease recurrence, progression and cancer-specific mortality were 15 (41.7%) versus 68 (42.2%), p = 0.58; 12 (33.3%) versus 28 (17.9%), p = 0.014 and 4 (11.1%) versus 19 (11.7%), p = 0.98, respectively. Cystoscopy non-adherence was associated with an inferior number of urinary cytology (p < 0.001) and 2.33 HR for cancer progression, p = 0.014, (95% CI 1.18-4.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to follow-up cystoscopy in NMIBC is associated with more than twice progression risk. Future studies are needed to confirm our results and correlate cystoscopy non-adherence to other covariates.