Surgical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma originating from caudate lobe

Survival outcomes after caudate lobectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Caudate lobectomy (CLB) remains the most effective treatment for caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma (CL-HCC). However, there is controversy regarding the survival after CLB. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the survival outcomes following CLB for the treatment of CL-HCC.

METHODS

In line with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a search for all eligible studies was performed. The pooled estimates of survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies comprising 864 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 62.3% and 42.9% respectively and the pooled estimate of 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 39.3% and 24.4% respectively. CL-HCC showed inferior OS (HR:1.39, 95% CI: 0.91-1.88, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR:1.33, 95% CI: 1.10-1.56, P < 0.001) than other sites HCC. Isolated CLB showed better OS (HR:0.9, 95% CI:0.39-1.41, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR:0.76, 95% CI: 0.03-1.5, P = 0.04) than combined CLB.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival outcomes for CL-HCC after CLB are lower compared to other sites HCC. Isolated CLB offers better survival outcomes compared to combined CLB. However, choosing isolated or combined approaches should be prioritized according to patient and tumour characteristics.

Comparison of Hepatic Resection with Percutaneous Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Caudate Lobe Within Milan Criteria

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the efficacy of hepatic resection and percutaneous ablation for resectable caudate HCC within Milan criteria and to investigate the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Between August 2006 and August 2020, a total of 67 eligible patients with resectable caudate HCC within Milan criteria in three centers were retrospectively analyzed and divided into hepatic resection group (n = 46) and percutaneous ablation group (n = 21). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between groups of hepatic resection and percutaneous ablation for these resectable caudate HCC patients with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors of RFS and OS.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 97.6%, 83.6%, and 71.5% for the hepatic resection group, and 89.4%, 58.5%, and 48.8% for the percutaneous ablation group (P = 0.032). The corresponding RFS rates were 77.6%, 47.9%, and 42.6% for the hepatic resection group, and 40.5%, 23.2%, and 15.4% for the percutaneous ablation group (P = 0.010). According to the univariable and multivariable analyses, tumor type (first recurrence) (HR = 3.54; 95%CI, 1.49-8.37; P = 0.004) was a significant independent prognostic factor of RFS for caudate HCC patients after resection or ablation, while total bilirubin (HR = 1.02; 95%CI, 1.01-1.04; P = 0.006) and treatment strategy (HR = 5.97; 95%CI, 1.48-24.12; P = 0.012) were significant independent prognostic factors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection appears to outperform percutaneous ablation for caudate HCC patients within Milan criteria.

Surgical Strategy for Resecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Caudate Lobe: Isolated or Combined Lobectomy? A Single-Center Study and Meta-Analysis

Background

Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) originating in the caudate lobe remains challenging, while the optimal extent of resection is debated. We aimed to evaluate the relative benefits of combined caudate lobectomy (CCL) versus isolated caudate lobectomy (ICL) for caudate HCC.

Methods

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for caudate HCC between January 2010 and December 2018 were identified from a single-center database. Surgical outcomes of the two strategy groups were analyzed before and after propensity score matching. A systematic review with meta-analysis was also performed to compare outcomes of CCL versus ICL for caudate HCC.

Results

A total of 28 patients were included: 11 in the CCL and 17 in the ICL group. Compared with ICL, the CCL group contained patients with larger tumors and a higher incidence of vascular invasion. After propensity score matching, 6 pairs of patients were selected. In the well-matched cohort, CCL demonstrated significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.047) compared with ICL; no significant differences were noted for overall survival (OS), operation time, blood loss and morbidity rate. A total of 227 patients from nine eligible studies and ours were involved in the systematic review. Meta-analysis revealed that CCL provided better RFS (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.31–0.92) than ICL; no significant differences were observed in OS, operation time, blood loss and morbidity rate.

Conclusion

CCL confers superior RFS over ICL without compromise of perioperative outcomes and should be prioritized for patients with caudate HCC when feasible, especially for those with large-sized tumors.

Prognoses and Clinicopathological Characteristics for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Originating from the Caudate Lobe After Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate the prognoses and clinicopathological characteristics of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) originating from the caudate lobe (HCC-CL).

METHODS

We analyzed 584 patients with a solitary tumor <10 cm from January 1990 to November 2014. Patients were classified into a caudate lobe group (CL; n = 39) and a non-caudate lobe group (NCL; n = 545). We investigated the prognoses and clinicopathological characteristics of solitary HCC-CL. We compared the surgical procedures performed in these cases.

RESULTS

HCC-CL had a similar rate of portal venous invasion (PVI) as HCC-NCL (21% vs. 19%); however, the frequency of tumor thrombus at the first branch of the portal vein (PV) or extension to the trunk or the opposite side of the PV was significantly higher in HCC-CL (8% vs. 2%). HCC-CL had similar OS rates compared to HCC-NCL; however, HCC-CL showed significantly poorer RFS. Although there were no significant differences among the three surgical procedures, blood loss and complication rates tended to be higher in cases who underwent an isolated caudate lobectomy. Tumor size ≥5 cm, PVI, and liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (LF or LC) were independent unfavorable factors for both OS and RFS. PIVKA-II ≥120 mAU/ml was an independent unfavorable factor for RFS.

CONCLUSION

HCC-CL presented a poorer RFS rate. Patients with a tumor size ≥5 cm, PIVKA-II ≥120 mAU/ml, portal venous invasion, and LF or LC should be diligently followed up as these cases have a high risk of recurrence.

Ventral approach for resecting hepatocellular carcinoma in the caval portion of the caudate lobe

BACKGROUND

Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma located in the caudate lobe is challenging because this anatomical location is difficult to approach, especially the caval portion.

METHODS

We performed resection of the caval portion of the caudate lobe using a ventral approach combined with the resection of segment IV, VII, or VIII for hepatocellular carcinoma in 41 patients (extended segmentectomy group). As a control group, 138 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent segmentectomy for IV, VII, or VIII (segmentectomy group) were studied. We compared surgical outcomes, including postoperative morbidity and survival, between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

When compared with the segmentectomy group, platelet count was lower (12.8 × 10⁴/µL [range, 2.4-33.8] vs 14.8 × 10⁴/µL [3.2-41.4], P = .085), operation time was significantly longer (442 minutes [range, 184-710] vs 333 minutes [131-810], P < .001), blood loss was significantly greater (579 mL [range, 25-2688] vs 301 mL [10-3887], P = .001), and the percentage of patients with cirrhosis was greater (19 [46.3%] vs 41 [29.7%], P = .059) in the extended segmentectomy group. However, the morbidity rate (48.7% and 33.3%, P = .096) and median overall survival period (5.2 years; [95% confidence interval, 4.6-6.6] vs 6.2 years, [5.4-9.7], P = .203) were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The ventral approach for the resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in the caval portion of the caudate lobe is a viable alternative to other approaches, especially in patients with insufficient liver function.