Reoperation for recurrent coronary artery disease--a ten year experience

Reoperation for recurrent coronary artery disease: results of 200 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

It is well known that reoperation for recurrent coronary artery disease is more difficult than primary coronary artery bypass grafting. However, it is possible to reduce the morbidity and mortality of reoperation to the same level as the initial procedure with careful surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective study of the first 200 patients who underwent redo coronary bypass grafting was undertaken.

RESULTS

In the first 200 cases of redo coronary bypass grafting at St George Hospital, Sydney (August 1986-January 1995), there were five in-hospital deaths (2.5%). There was one case of sternal infection (0.5%), which required surgical debridement, three cases of stroke (1.5%), one case of postoperative bleeding (0.5%), which required a return to theatre and six cases (3%) required mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h. The need for major postoperative support (such as intra-aortic balloon pumping/adrenaline infusion) was significantly affected by the degree of urgency and the degree of pre-operative ventricular impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate of redo coronary artery bypass grafting in this series is similar to that of primary surgery described in other reports.

Long-term clinical outcome after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the role of stent implantation in vein grafts by evaluating the long-term clinical outcome and estimated event-free survival at 5 years in 62 patients and by comparing our data with those of other treatment modalities previously reported.

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass graft surgery pose a problem. Stent implantation has been advocated in an effort to avoid repeat operation and to address the limitations of balloon angioplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing stenting of a vein graft were entered into a dedicated data base. They were screened for death, infarction, bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty. Procedure-related events were included in the follow-up analysis. Survival and event-free survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 93 stents (84 Wallstent and 9 Palmaz-Shatz) were implanted in 62 patients. During the in-hospital period seven patients (11%) sustained a major cardiac event: two deaths (3%), two myocardial infarctions (3%) and three urgent bypass surgeries (5%). The clinical success rate, therefore, was 89%. During the follow-up period (median 2.5 years, range 0 to 5.9), another five patients (8%) died, 14 (23%) sustained a myocardial infarction, 12 (20%) underwent bypass surgery, and 14 (23%) underwent angioplasty. The estimated 5-year survival and event-free survival rates (free from infarction, repeat surgery and repeat angioplasty) were (mean +/- SD) 83 +/- 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73% to 93%) and 30 +/- 7% (95% CI 16% to 44%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-hospital outcome of patients who underwent stent implantation in a vein graft is acceptable, but the long-term clinical outcome is poor. It is unlikely that mechanical intervention alone will provide a satisfactory or definite answer for the patient with graft sclerosis over the long term.

The risk of an unplanned return to the operating room in Australian hospitals

BACKGROUND

The unplanned return of the patient to the operating room (OR) after a previous procedure has implications concerning the quality of surgery, but little has been written on this subject.

METHODS

The relationship of bed-size and hospital type (private or public) was studied using data on this clinical indicator submitted to the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Care Evaluation Program (ACHS CEP) by hospitals presenting voluntarily for accreditation in 1993.

RESULTS

The mean rate of an unplanned return to OR was 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.5-0.7). After adjusting for potential confounders in a logistic model, the risk of unplanned return to OR did not significantly differ by type of hospital (private or public), and location (rural, metropolitan). The risk of unplanned return to OR was higher in large compared with small hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of the risk of the event being greater in large compared with small hospitals is likely to be a reflection of casemix. An interval review of results (for any facility) is obviously necessary. With some operations a higher incidence of return to the OR may indicate vigilance in peri-operative management.