Experience with the Gianturco-Roubin stent for abrupt vessel closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Coronary artery stenting: indications and cost implications

The practice of coronary stenting is evolving rapidly, with new stent designs, deployment techniques, and adjunctive therapy. In many respects, clinical practice is changing in advance of the availability of supporting data. The consistent excellent angiographic result with stent deployment exceeds that achieved by any other previous interventional device, and the extent to which this accounts for the exponential increase in stent utilization cannot be accurately determined but is undoubtedly considerable. Controlled randomized trials have confirmed that stent deployment is superior to balloon angioplasty in certain lesion subsets or clinical scenarios. These include focal de novo native vessel lesions, lesions with late recoil after balloon angioplasty, acute closure after balloon angioplasty, and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions. In addition, observational data is persuasive in focal coronary saphenous vein graft lesions and aorto-ostial lesions. On the other hand, the evidence supporting the use of stents strictly to improve on a suboptimal result, possibly the most frequent indication, is indirect and circumstantial. Stents are expensive, but it was anticipated that with the reduction in restenosis not only would they be cost-effective but also ultimately would reduce costs. This hope has not as yet been realized. However, there is little question that the introduction of intracoronary stents has been the most significant and exciting development since the introduction of percutaneous revascularization almost 20 years ago. It has revitalized the field.

Management of intracoronary thrombosis complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

With technological advances in equipment and increased experience of operators, the success rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) now exceed 90%. However, acute periprocural occlusion continues to complicate approximately 6% of all procedures, and many of these occlusions are due to intracoronary (IC) thrombus. Patients at highest risk for this complication include those with acute ischemic syndromes or with angiographically apparent thrombus. These individuals may be candidates for the use of prolonged heparin infusions prior to dilatation, intracoronary thrombolytic therapy, or monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. All patients undergoing PTCA should receive adequate antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin, and heparin with dosing monitored by activated clotting times (ACT). In addition, some recommend the use of ionic contrast material. When IC thrombus accumulates following intervention, initial therapy should include IC nitroglycerin followed by a combination of redilatation and IC urokinase infusion. Prolonged balloon inflations may be useful, particularly with the use of autoperfusion catheters. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists may prove to be beneficial in this situation as well. If the patient's clinical status deteriorates in spite of these measures, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery may be required.