Risk factors for development of hepatocellular carcinoma among Australians with hepatitis C: a case-control study

Real impact of liver cirrhosis on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in various liver diseases-meta-analytic assessment

Background

It is well known that the incidence of developing hepatocelluler carcinoma (HCC) is increased in liver cirrhosis of different etiologies. However, comparison of HCC incidence in various liver diseases has not yet been estimated. We surveyed this comparison.

Methods

The PubMed database was examined (1989‐2017) for studies published in English language regarding the prospective follow‐up results for the development of HCC in various liver diseases. A meta‐analysis was performed for each liver disease.

Results

The annual incidence (%) of HCC in the non‐cirrhotic stage and cirrhotic stage, and the ratio of HCC incidence in the cirrhotic stage/non‐cirrhotic stage were as follows. (a) hepatitis B virus liver disease: 0.37%→3.23% (8.73‐fold), (b) hepatitis C virus liver diseases: 0.68%→4.81% (7.07‐fold), (c) primary biliary cholangitis (0.26%→1.79%, 6.88‐fold), (d) autoimmune hepatitis (0.19%→0.53%, 2.79‐fold), and (e) NASH (0.03%→1.35%, 45.00‐fold). Regarding primary hemochromatosis and alcoholic liver diseases, only follow‐up studies in the cirrhotic stage were presented, 1.20% and 2.06%, respectively.

Conclusions

When the liver diseases advance to cirrhosis, the incidence of HCC is markedly increased. The development of HCC must be closely monitored by ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography, irrespective of the different kinds of liver diseases.

Association between anti-HBc positivity and hepatocellular carcinoma in HBsAg-negative subjects with chronic liver disease: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to ascertain to what extent hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative/anti-hepatitis B core (anti-HBc)-positive subjects with chronic liver disease are at a higher risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than the anti-HBc-negative.All studies included had to fulfill the following characteristics and inclusion criteria: they investigated the relationship between HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive serology and the occurrence of HCC, whether a case-control or cohort study, they provided relative risk (RR) or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were available as a full text written in English, and were published and indexed up to April 2015.Twenty-six original studies met the inclusion criteria, allowing a meta-analysis on 44,553 patients. The risk of HCC among the 9986 anti-HBc-positive subjects was 67% higher than in the 34,567 anti-HBc-negative (95% CI = 1.44-1.95, P < 0.0001). The results were similar when groups of patients with a different stage of liver disease (patients with chronic liver disease, patients with cirrhosis), with different ethnicity (Asian and non-Asian) and etiology (HCV and non-HCV) were considered. The risk of HCC was significantly higher in the 651 anti-HBs/anti-HBc-positive patients (RR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.17-1.58, P = 0.03) and in the 595 anti-HBs-negative/anti-HBc-positive subjects (RR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.58-2.92, P < 0.0001) than in the 1242 anti-HBs/anti-HBc negative. However, the RR from 8 studies indicated that the risk of HCC was 35% lower among the anti-HBs/anti-HBc-positive subjects compared to the anti-HBs-negative/anti-HBc-positive (RR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.52-0.8, P < 0.0001).This meta-analysis shows that in HBsAg-negative subjects with chronic liver disease, anti-HBc positivity is strongly associated with the presence of HCC, an association observed in all subgroups according to the stage of the disease, etiology, and ethnicity.

Meta-analysis of the association between anti-HBc seropositivity and a poor prognosis of chronic HCV infection

AIM

  The impact of serological HBsAg- and anti-HBc+ on the prognosis of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is unknown. We conducted a systematic review to analyze whether anti-HBc positivity imposes any effect on the course of HCV-related chronic liver disease.

METHODS

  We retrieved references from online databases that included PubMed and EMBASE. Data were gathered with regard to demographic information, disease progression and prognosis, and the results of serological tests. The development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the endpoint of follow-up of all cohort studies.

RESULTS

  Eighteen references were included in this study, of which four were cohort studies. Twelve studies were retrospective, observational and non-interventional studies. According to our meta-analysis, the rate of serological HBsAg- and anti-HBc+ was higher among HCC patients compared with non-HCC patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.98). HCV patients that were anti-HBc+ had a greater chance of developing HCC than their anti-HBc- counterparts (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.34-3.47).

CONCLUSIONS

  The serological status of HBsAg- and anti-HBc+ appears to be correlated with a poor prognosis for chronic HCV infection. Though the general quality of these references was low, and multiple confounding factors existed, the likelihood of a poorer outcome of HCV patients that are positive for anti-HBc should be considered by their physicians.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 1b as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma development: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a known risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but whether the risk varies among patients infected with different HCV genotypes is still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify whether the genotype 1b is associated with a higher risk of HCC than other genotypes.

METHODS

We identified 57 relevant papers through a literature search to December 2007 but, since age could represent a major confounder, we focused the meta-analysis on the 21 studies presenting age-adjusted risk estimates for HCV genotype 1b vs. other genotypes. We used random-effects models with the DerSimonian-Laird method and assessed heterogeneity between studies and publication bias.

RESULTS

Patients infected with HCV genotype 1b have almost double the risk to develop HCC than those infected with other genotypes (Relative Risk (95% Confidence Intervals) = 1.78(1.36-2.32)). The pooled risk estimate was somewhat lower when we restricted the analysis to the eight studies conducted in patients with liver cirrhosis (1.60;1.07-2.39) or considering the 36 studies presenting only crude data (1.63;1.30-2.06). In seven studies excluding patients with liver cirrhosis, the RR (95% CI) increased to 2.46(1.69-3.59).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that HCV genotype 1b plays an important role in HCC development, especially in patients with early stage liver disease.

Viral interaction and clinical implications of coinfection of hepatitis C virus with other hepatitis viruses

Coinfection with other hepatitis viruses modifies the viral profile in serum and leads to more liver damage and more rapid progression during the course of hepatitis C virus infection. The viral interference is not only carried out by virus-virus or by virus-cell interactions but also by an enhanced immune response. A superinfecting viral infection does not crossactivate protective immune responses to the pre-existing virus albeit the latter can become undetectable. The induced cytokine stimulation might enhance the hepatic inflammation. Moreover, hepatitis B virus coinfection increases the risk of development of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C virus patients through common necro-inflammatory pathways or by direct oncogenic activity of hepatitis B virus. Viral interaction also complicates the management of the coinfection because hepatitis C virus impairs the humoral response to hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus vaccines, and because pharmacological suppression of hepatitis C virus endangers dually infected patients with reactivation of coinfected hepatitis B virus. Optimized strategies and follow-up are thus necessary in the treatment of infection with multiple viruses. It seems thus necessary to look for markers of hepatitis B virus and/or hepatitis D virus infection in chronic hepatitis patients positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies but negative for hepatitis C virus RNA, and equally well to search for hepatitis C virus RNA in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients with a low level of serum hepatitis B virus DNA.

Chronic Hepatitis C and Genotyping: The Clinical Significance of Determining HCV Genotypes

Chronic hepatitis C, attributed to infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), is a global health problem. The overall prevalence of viral hepatitis worldwide is estimated to be 3–5% with over 175 million people infected with HCV. Clinically, HCV can establish a persistent, chronic infection contributing to progressive liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), requiring intensive treatment regimens, possible liver transplantation and long-term care. Due to the chronic nature of HCV infection and the tremendous burden on healthcare resources, clinicians and laboratorians have looked for key epidemiological, pathological and viral characteristics that may provide insight into disease progression, severity and response to therapy to permit the administration of effective therapeutic regimens as well as long-term management of infected individuals. Determination of viral genotype has been identified as one parameter that could provide direction in the clinical management of patients with chronic HCV infections. The following review provides background on determination of HCV genotypes and the relevance of viral genome characterization in the current clinical setting.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a new era of disease control

The management of chronic viral hepatitis has changed significantly with the availability of effective antiviral agents. There is now a high probability that timely intervention can arrest development of cirrhosis, thereby preventing mortality from portal hypertension, liver failure and liver cancer. This two-part review discusses the implications of this new era of antiviral therapy for physicians. The present review is about chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV); a similar review that considers the treatment of hepatitis B virus will be published in a later issue of the Internal Medicine Journal. Chronic HCV infection is common, but fibrotic progression of liver disease is slow and variable; many infected persons never develop cirrhosis. Case selection for antiviral therapy is crucial. The most effective therapy is a pegylated (long-acting) interferon with ribavirin. Sustained viral response (SVR) (absent viraemia 6 months after completing treatment) can be obtained in 40-60% of individuals infected with genotype 1 and in approximately 67% with genotype 4 after 12 months of treatment. Response rates are higher (75-85%) with genotypes 2 and 3 after only 6 months of treatment. Late relapse is negligible after SVR. This viral cure reverses hepatic fibrosis, reduces the risk of liver failure and of hepato-cellular carcinoma. Combination therapy requires a supportive setting to minimize the impact of side-effects and maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Overall management of HCV-infected persons must also embrace measures to improve quality of life by preventing or dealing with psychosocial issues and advocating lifestyle changes to counter comorbidity from alcohol, central obesity and insulin resistance. These latter factors favour fibrotic disease progression, complications of cirrhosis (such as hepatocellular carcinoma) and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as eroding the chances of SVR with antiviral therapy.

Role of ethnicity in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the United States, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is more common among Asians and African Americans than Caucasians, with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection accounting for up to half of the patients. Our study examined ethnicity as a potential risk factor for HCC among patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study of 464 patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis (207 cancer patients and 257 controls) using medical records and pathology records at 4 medical centers. We estimated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals by using conditional logistic regression on case-control sets, matched within study centers and study period on sex and age groups (< or =45, 46-55, 56-65, >65 yr). To control for potential confounding caused by severity of cirrhosis and residual confounding caused by age, we also included Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores and age (continuous variable) in all regression analyses.

RESULTS

Compared with Caucasians, the cancer risk was increased significantly among Asians (adjusted odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-9.0 for men, and 4.6; 1.2-18.5 for women) and somewhat increased among African-American men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-6.3).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that, among patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis, liver cancer risk is increased 4-fold in Asians and may be doubled in African-American men, compared with Caucasians. These results need confirmation in larger studies from racially diverse populations, but, if confirmed, these results point to high-risk populations that should be targeted for screening and preventive efforts.

Effects of interferon treatment response on liver complications of chronic hepatitis C: 9-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

Fibrotic severity, biochemical indices of poor liver function, and sporadic transmission are independent predictors of liver complications among people with chronic hepatitis C. After accounting for these factors, we tested whether interferon treatment or the treatment response reduces the rate of liver cancer, liver-related death or transplantation, and other liver complications during extended follow-up.

METHODS

Liver clinic cohort of 455 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C was followed prospectively for median 9 yr (IQ 6, 11 yr); 384 received interferon, 343 completed a treatment course. Liver complications were assessed in relation to treatment and treatment response in univariate and multivariate models, and survival to onset of liver-related complications was determined.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of total liver complications was 1.5% in treated and 2.9% in untreated patients and appeared quasilinear throughout 9-yr follow-up. Interferon treatment did not influence the rate of liver complications. However, the rate of complications increased exponentially with transition of the treatment response from sustained viral response (SVR), through response-relapse to nonresponse (or no treatment). By univariate analysis, response to interferon treatment was a significant predictor of complications. After adjustment for fibrosis score, serum albumin concentration and mode of transmission in a multivariate model, treatment response just failed to reach significance (p= 0.058) as a predictor of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to antiviral therapy, and particularly SVR, appears to reduce liver complications in chronic hepatitis C. However, in the absence of an antiviral treatment response, a course of interferon does not reduce risks of liver cancer or liver failure.

The impact of prior hepatitis B virus infection on liver histology and the response to interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C

Patients with chronic hepatitis C frequently have antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), indicative of prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In these patients, persistence of HBV may exacerbate liver injury and diminish the response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between previous HBV infection and liver histology and the sustained virologic response (SVR) to interferon (IFN)-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 132 HBsAg-negative, treatment-naive patients were evaluated. Using multiple logistic regression analysis, the impact of anti-HBc-positivity on the rate of SVR was determined. Progression to bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The median age of the patients was 47 years (IQR, 37-60), 57% were male, and 73% had genotypes 1, 4, 5, or 6. Fifty-one patients (39%) were anti-HBc-positive. The prevalence of moderate to severe necroinflammatory activity (P = 0.36) and progression to bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (log-rank P = 0.83) was similar between anti-HBc-positive and -negative patients. After a median of 48 weeks (IQR, 26-52) of therapy (IFN, n = 116; IFN and ribavirin, n = 16), 23 patients (17%) achieved a SVR; the rate of response was similar in anti-HBc-positive and -negative patients (18%vs 17%, P = 1.00). After controlling for age, gender, genotype, fibrosis, and treatment regimen, anti-HBc status did not independently affect the rate of SVR (anti-HBc-positive vs negative: odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 4.06; P = 0.58). In conclusion, previous HBV infection does not affect liver histology or the response to IFN-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Changes in serum albumin during treatment of chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine: effects of response and emergence of drug resistance

OBJECTIVES

In chronic hepatitis B patients treated with lamivudine, the incidence of drug resistance increases with the duration of therapy. The effect of drug resistance on hepatic synthetic function is not well defined. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of lamivudine therapy on hepatic synthetic function in patients with moderately severe chronic hepatitis B and, particularly, to determine the effect of drug resistance.

METHODS

Hepatic synthetic function was assessed using serial measurements of serum albumin in 38 patients (26 with cirrhosis) in an open-label treatment program.

RESULTS

An initial antiviral response (hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA undetectable by hybridization assay) occurred in all patients, and nine of 22 (41%) hepatitis B e antigen-positive cases underwent hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion. Among 29 patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA at the end of observation, the mean serum albumin concentration rose from 39.9 +/- 0.7 to 43.2 +/- 0.6 g/L, corresponding to a yearly increase of 1.85 g/L (p < 0.001). This was largely attributable to an increase among cirrhotic patients. Nine patients (24%) developed resistance to lamivudine, all after 12 months of treatment. Among them, the mean serum albumin concentration had increased from 39.6 +/- 1.2 to 42.9 +/- 0.8 g/L before resistance emerged, but then decreased to 39.3 +/- 1.7 g/L (p = 0.01) at the time of reappearance of HBV DNA.

CONCLUSION

Suppression of viral replication by lamivudine improves hepatic synthetic function in chronic hepatitis B patients, but emergence of drug resistance is associated with a rapid decline in serum albumin, at least to pretreatment levels.