Left main coronary artery dissection during coronary angioplasty or angiography treated by stent insertion without requirement for emergency bypass graft surgery

Clinical Outcomes and Angiographic Results of Bailout Stenting for Guide Catheter-Induced Iatrogenic Coronary Artery Dissection - Impact of Stent Type

BACKGROUND

Guide catheter-induced iatrogenic coronary artery dissection is a rare but feared complication. When it occurs, bailout stenting is widely performed; however, its prognosis and the impact of stent type remains unclear.Methods and Results:The study population consisted of 77,257 consecutive patients (coronary angiography, 55,864; percutaneous coronary intervention, 21,393) between 2000 and 2015. We investigated the incidence, clinical outcomes, and angiographic results after bailout stenting and compared by stent type: bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES). Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection occurred in 105 patients (incidence rate, 0.14%). All cases of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection that were recognized as requiring bailout procedure could be managed by stent implantation, and no patients died during bailout procedure. The 5-year cumulative incidences of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events were 11.3%, 10.3%, and 21.0%, respectively. The binary restenosis rate was 10.4%, and it was not significantly different between BMS and DES implantation. In lesions with preprocedural stenosis, however, it was significantly lower in the DES group than in the BMS group. On the other hand, coronary artery dissection recurred in 8 patients, which was observed only after DES implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The immediate and long-term outcomes of bailout stenting for iatrogenic coronary artery dissection were acceptable. Although DES may be favorable for stenotic lesions, coronary artery dissection can recur after DES implantation.

Iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection

We present a case of iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection, successfully treated by prompt bail-out stenting, and provide a brief discussion on its occurrence and treatment, as well as the immediate and long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention, including our own single-centre experience, for this potentially catastrophic complication.

Iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection: incidence, classification, management, and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Although rare, iatrogenic left main coronary artery (LM) dissection is a feared complication of coronary catheterization. Its incidence, optimal therapeutic management, and prognosis remain largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to estimate the incidence, characterize the population at risk, depict the initial management, and evaluate the long-term prognosis of iatrogenic LM dissection.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients who fulfilled the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute diagnostic criteria for iatrogenic LM dissection were retrieved from our database and followed up by telephone or physician visit. The primary end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5 years.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of iatrogenic LM dissection during the study period was 0.07% (38/51,452 patients) and almost twice as common with percutaneous coronary intervention than coronary angiography. From 38 patients, 1 (3%) patient died before any therapeutic attempt was performed, 6 (16%) patients were treated conservatively, and 31 (82%) patients underwent stent implantation and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In-hospital outcome was favorable irrespective of the therapeutic strategy. During the 5-year follow-up, among 31 patients who underwent revascularization treatment by stenting or CABG, one patient died in each group from a cardiac cause, and MACE were observed in 12 patients (39%). Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival estimates showed no significant difference between different revascularization treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic LM dissection is a rare complication of cardiac catheterization procedures with favorable early and long-term outcome when recognized timely and managed properly.

Catheter-Induced Left Main Coronary Artery Spiral Dissection: Stenting or Bypass? (Case Report and Literature Review)

Catheter-induced Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) dissection is a very uncommon but life-threatening complication of coronary intervention and requires urgent management. We report one such patient whose risk factors appear to be Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), smoking and a prior Myocardial Infarction (MI).

Percutaneous coronary intervention for iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection

BACKGROUND

Although catheter-induced left main coronary artery (LMCA) dissection is a rare complication of coronary catheterization, it is a common cause of periprocedural mortality. Emergent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the mainstay for managing this acute complication. However, hemodynamic deterioration may progress while patients await emergent CABG; consequently, a high postoperative mortality rate has been reported. Although the number of cases was small, prompt bail-out stenting for iatrogenic LMCA dissection had reportedly reversed this complication with favorable clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This study included 13 cases of attempted stenting for iatrogenic LMCA dissection classified as grades C-F based on the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification system. Angiographic success, in-hospital mortality and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of iatrogenic LM dissection was 0.071%. Most of the patients were initially asymptomatic. Angiographic success was achieved in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%). Including one patient who underwent emergent CABG after a failed wiring attempt, two mortalities occurred in this series. Mean follow-up duration of the ten patients discharged was 30.1+/-11.8 months, and no cardiac deaths occurred. Follow-up angiogram of eight patients with a mean interval of 5.2+/-2.3 months after initial event demonstrated restenosis in three patients occurring either at the ostiums of the left anterior descending artery or left circumflex artery. Revascularization was performed on two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful bail-out stenting resulted in good long-term survival and should be considered for initial management of iatrogenic LMCA dissection.

Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hip fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Hip protectors are padded undergarments designed to decrease the impact of a fall on the hip. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of hip protectors to determine if they reduce hip fractures in the elderly. Analyses were pooled according to participant residence--community or institutional (the latter, included nursing homes, residential group homes or seniors' hostels). We included individually randomized and statistically adjusted cluster randomized trials. Seven trials of 12- to 28-month duration were included. The Safehip brand of hip protector was used in most studies. Compliance rates in the treatment groups varied from 31 to 68%. In four trials including a total of 5,696 community-dwelling seniors, the hip fracture rates in control groups ranged from 1.1 to 7.4%, and the pooled risk difference with hip protector allocation was 0% [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1%, +1%), with a relative risk of 1.07 (0.81, 1.42). In three trials including 1,188 institutionalized elderly participants, hip fracture rates in the control groups varied from 8 to 19.4%, and the pooled risk difference for sustaining one or more hip fractures with hip protector allocation was -3.7% (95% CI, -7.4%, 0.1%), with a relative risk of 0.56 (0.31, 1.01) (with statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of two trials comprised of exclusively nursing home residents, the risk difference with hip protector allocation was -4.4% (-8.09, -0.76) with a relative risk of 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) (n=1,014). Thus, there is little evidence to support the use of hip protectors outside the nursing home setting. The potential benefit of hip protectors in reducing hip fractures in nursing home residents requires further confirmation.

Bail-out stenting for left main coronary artery dissection during catheter-based procedure: acute and long-term results

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) dissection during catheter-based procedure remains uncertain.

HYPOTHESIS

In cases with significant LMCA dissection occurring during catheter-based procedure, prompt stent implantation may be safe and associated with favorable clinical outcome.

METHODS

We evaluated the acute and long-term results of bail-out stenting for LMCA dissection occurring during a catheter-based procedure in 10 patients.

RESULTS

Initially, there was no significant stenosis of LMCA segments in these patients. Catheter-induced dissection occurred in eight patients (during diagnostic angiography in three patients and during guiding catheter manipulation in five patients). Two patients suffered dissection in the setting of stent deployment in other vessels. Therefore, bail-out stenting for LMCA dissection was performed in a total of 10 patients. In four patients, hypotension developed and an intra-aortic balloon pump was placed during the procedure. Stents were successfully deployed in all patients; there was no in-hospital mortality. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in eight patients. No angiographic restenosis (diameter stenosis > or = 50%) was observed in any patient at follow-up study. During a mean follow-up of 31 +/- 25 months after hospital discharge, there was no major adverse cardiac event (death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization).

CONCLUSIONS

Bail-out LMCA stenting is technically feasible and showed good acute and long-term results in a small series of patients.