Phase II study of prolonged ambulatory infusion carboplatin and oral etoposide for patients progressing through hormonal therapy for prostate cancer

Advancements in platinum chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights and perspectives

Despite improvements in survival, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a significant clinical challenge. While taxanes, new hormonal agents, radiopharmaceuticals, and PARP inhibitors offer valuable treatment options, this review explores the potential of platinum chemotherapies (carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin) as alternative choices. Existing research demonstrates promising preliminary results for platinum-based therapies in mCRPC showing PSA response rates (7.7-95 %) and improved overall survival (8-26.6 months). However, chemotherapy-related cytopenias are a frequent side effect. Further research is underway to evaluate the efficacy of platinum regimens against specific mCRPC histopathological variants, particularly aggressive subtypes where the carboplatin and cabazitaxel combination is already recommended. The unique DNA-targeting action of platinum therapy holds promise for patients with deficient DNA repair (dDDR), especially those with BRCA mutations. This potential is supported by both preclinical and ongoing clinical research. Given the limited success of immunotherapy in mCRPC, researchers are exploring the potential for platinum therapies to enhance its efficacy. Additionally, trials are investigating the synergy of combining platinum therapy with both immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors. Further exploration into the effectiveness of platinum therapies in specific mCRPC subpopulations, particularly those with dDDR, is crucial for optimizing their future use. In conclusion, this review highlights the promising potential of platinum-based chemotherapy as a valuable treatment option for mCRPC. While current evidence is encouraging, ongoing research is essential to further optimize its efficacy, identify optimal combinations with other therapies, and better understand its impact on specific mCRPC subpopulations.

Effectiveness of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Taxanes are the only cytotoxic drugs that have demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but there is some evidence that platinum compounds may also benefit such patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search on electronic databases. We sought prospective clinical studies testing platinum compounds for CRPC. Platinum compounds could be delivered alone or in combination with other drugs. Both randomized and nonrandomized studies were included for qualitative synthesis, only randomized studies were included for meta-analyses. Clinical overall response rate (cORR), prostate-specific antigen overall response rate (sORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

We identified 53 studies delivering platinum agents for patients with CRPC. cORR varied from 0 to 82%, while sORR varied from 2% to 100%. Response rates were higher in patients who received combination treatments rather than platinum compounds alone. Pooled data from randomized trials demonstrated a statistically significant increase in both cORR (odds ratio = 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.89-14.92) and sORR (odds ratio = 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.22) when adding platinum compounds to chemotherapy. PFS varied from 2.1 to 12 months and OS 4.2 to 28 months with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Nausea and myelosuppression were the most common adverse effects. Toxicity was manageable in most studies.

CONCLUSION

Platinum compounds are a safe and active treatment for CRPC. Response rates are higher when cytotoxic chemotherapy containing platinum agents are compared to nonplatinum chemotherapy. Data on OS and PFS are inconclusive. More research is needed to evaluate whether platinum-based chemotherapy results in a survival benefit for patients with CRPC, as well as to establish predictive biomarkers.

Anti-tumour activity of platinum compounds in advanced prostate cancer-a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

For men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), several treatment options are available, including androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide), taxanes (docetaxel, cabazitaxel) and the radionuclide (radium-223). However, cross-resistance is a clinically relevant problem. Platinum compounds have been tested in a number of clinical trials in molecularly unselected prostate cancer patients. Advances in CRPC molecular profiling have shown that a significant proportion of patients harbour DNA repair defects, which may serve as predictive markers for sensitivity to platinum agents.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify and analyse clinical trials that have evaluated platinum agents in advanced prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed was searched to identify published clinical trials of platinum agents in advanced prostate cancer. The PRIMSA statement was followed for the systematic review process. Identified trials are analysed for study design, statistical plan, assessments of anti-tumour activity and the potential value of predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

A total of 163 references were identified by the literature search and 72 publications that met the selection criteria were included in this review; of these 33 used carboplatin, 27 cisplatin, 6 satraplatin, 4 oxaliplatin and 2 other platinum compounds. Overall, anti-tumour activity varies in the range of 10%-40% for objective response and 20%-70% for PSA decline ≥50%. Response seemed highest for the combinations of carboplatin with taxanes or oxaliplatin with gemcitabine. The interpretation of the clinical data is limited by differences in response criteria used and patient populations studied.

CONCLUSION

Platinum compounds have moderate anti-tumour activity in molecularly unselected patients with advanced prostate cancer. Translational evidence of DNA repair deficiency should be leveraged in future studies to select prostate cancer patients most likely to benefit from platinum-based therapy.

Assessing outcomes in prostate cancer clinical trials: a twenty-first century tower of Babel

BACKGROUND

Because of the osseous distribution of prostate cancer metastases, progression is more readily identified than response in prostate cancer clinical trials. As a result, there is an increased focus on progression-free survival (PFS) as a phase 2 endpoint. PFS, however, is vulnerable to inter-study design variability. The authors sought to identify and quantify this variability and the resultant error in PFS across prostate cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

The authors reviewed phase 2 clinical trials of cytotoxic agents in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer over 5 years to evaluate the policies determining extent of disease and the definitions of disease progression. A simulation model was created to define the degree of error in estimating PFS in 3 hypothetical cohorts (median PFS of 12, 24, and 36 weeks) when the frequency of outcome assessments varies.

RESULTS

Imaging policies for trial entry were heterogeneous, as were the type, timing, and indications for outcome assessments. In the simulation, error in the reported PFS varied according to the interval between assessments. The difference between the detected and the true PFS could vary as much as 6.4 weeks per cycle, strictly resulting from the variability of assessment schedules tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome assessment policies are highly variable in phase 2 studies of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, despite published guidelines designed to standardize authentication of disease progression. The estimated error in PFS can exceed 6 weeks per cycle, exclusively because of variations in the assessment schedules. Comparisons of PFS times from different studies must be made with circumspection.