Randomized cross-over trial comparing inpatient and outpatient administration of high-dose cisplatin

Outpatient consolidation chemotherapy with intermediate dose cytarabine has similar survival and relapses rates in acute myeloid leukemia as compared to high dose cytarabine: A single center analysis

INTRODUCTION

The last decade has seen advances in delivering outpatient consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The standard of care involves high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, given twice daily for three alternating days. At the London Regional Cancer Program, we have transitioned the administration of outpatient cytarabine to a once-daily regimen over six consecutive days. The outcomes of a longer duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is currently unknown. This study aims to assess the feasibility of administering a continuous 6-day protocol of high-dose (HDAC-16) and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-16) consolidation therapy in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review to analyze AML patients treated with outpatient high-dose or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program from January 1, 2019, through November 1, 2022. The primary objective was to determine the outcomes of the 6-day outpatient administration of once daily high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients received 89 cycles of cytarabine as outpatients; males were 55.6% of the total population, with a median age of ~57 years. Our overall 2-year survival of HDAC-16 (57.1%) and IDAC-16 (83.3%) is consistent with the reported literature. There was no difference in delays, relapse rates, and nonrelapse mortality between both HDAC and IDAC groups. The 2-year relapse free survival was 57.1% for HDAC-16 and 66.7% for IDAC-16.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient administration of intermediate-dose cytarabine once daily over six consecutive days results in similar overall survival and relapse rates as compared to high dose cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy. Moving to a once daily administration schedule can alleviate logistical and/or accessibility hurdles for outpatient oncology clinics. Prospective randomized trials are needed in this setting to validate our results.

Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient High Dose Cytarabine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Brazilian Amazon

Background: The attempt to manage patients with acute myeloid leukemia as outpatients has become increasingly common due to high hospitalization costs, low availability for beds and patient preference. Publications on the subject are scarce, especially in low-income regions and the safety in this population remains to be determined. The present study aims to assess the safety of consolidation with high-dose cytarabine in the outpatient setting.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients who underwent consolidation with high-dose cytarabine, between 2009 and 2018, at Ophir Loyola Hospital, in Belém, Brazil. Patients treated after 2015 were given high-dose cytarabine as outpatients due to the decision of medical staff.

Results: Twenty-seven patients received 76 cycles of cytarabine as outpatients; males were 48.14% of the total population, with a median age of approximately 45 years. The occurrence of delay between cycles was significantly lower among outpatients (48.14% vs. 83.33%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in relapse rates, transfusion requirements and non-relapse mortality between both groups. Hospitalization was required in 40.74% of patients during outpatient cycles and 18.51% of blood cultures were positive for pathogens. Non-relapse mortality was significantly higher among patients above 50 years old and treated on an outpatient basis (44.4% vs. 5.60%, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: High-dose cytarabine administration on an outpatient basis appears to be safe and effective in a low-income population at the Brazilian Amazon region, but toxicity seems to be increased for patients older than 50 years.

Reducing Hospitalizations: Institution of Outpatient Infusional EPOCH-Based Chemotherapy at a Safety Net Hospital

PURPOSE:

EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) -based chemotherapy is traditionally administered inpatient because of its complex 96-hour protocol and number of involved medications. These routine admissions are costly, disruptive, and isolating to patients. Here, we describe our experience transitioning from inpatient to outpatient ambulatory EPOCH-based chemotherapy in a safety-net hospital, associated cost savings, and patient perceptions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS:

Guidelines for chemotherapy administration and educational materials were developed by a multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. Data were collected via chart review and costs via the finance department. Patient satisfaction with chemotherapy at home compared with hospitalization was measured on a Likert-type scale via direct-to-patient survey.

RESULTS:

From January 30, 2017, through January 30, 2018, 87 cycles of EPOCH-based chemotherapy were administered to 23 patients. Sixty-one ambulatory cycles (70%) were administered to 18 patients. Of 26 cycles administered in the hospital, 18 (69%) were the first cycle of treatment. Rates of inappropriate prophylactic antimicrobial prescription and laboratory testing were lower in the outpatient setting. Eight of nine patients surveyed preferred home chemotherapy to inpatient chemotherapy. Per-cycle drug costs were 57.6% lower in outpatients as a result of differences in the acquisition cost in the outpatient setting. In total, the transition to ambulatory EPOCH-based chemotherapy yielded 1-year savings of $502,030 and an estimated 336 days of avoided hospital confinement.

CONCLUSION:

Multiday ambulatory EPOCH-based regimens were successfully and safely administered in our safety-net hospital. Outpatient therapy was associated with significant savings through avoided hospitalizations and reductions in drug acquisition cost and improved patient satisfaction.

Making moves: Transitioning R-EPOCH to the ambulatory setting

Purpose

Ambulatory administration of chemotherapy provides benefit to patients and institutions alike. We hypothesized that transitioning rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (R-EPOCH) from an inpatient to ambulatory setting would reduce inpatient bed days and overall healthcare costs. The purpose of this effort was to create a guideline that would transition R-EPOCH to the ambulatory setting. To assess institutional benefit, we assessed inpatient bed days saved and financial impact.

Methods

A single center, retrospective analysis of inpatient R-EPOCH administration from January 2013 to December 2015 defined the need for medication use guidelines for ambulatory R-EPOCH administration. While this guideline targeted a reduction in inpatient bed days, it also created desired staff-and-patient education on R-EPOCH. Multidisciplinary collaboration enabled this comprehensive approach to outpatient chemotherapy administration.

Results

The 42 patients included received 147 cycles of R-EPOCH. Administration was primarily inpatient, amounting to 107 cycles and 799 inpatient days. Concurrently, 40 cycles of R-EPOCH were administered to 11 patients in the ambulatory setting. Only two patients received all cycles as outpatient; the other nine patients received chemotherapy in both settings. Financial analysis showed a 53% reduction in drug acquisition cost and 30% reduction in direct costs with ambulatory R-EPOCH administration. Based on our projection, after guideline implementation, 12 patients will be eligible for ambulatory R-EPOCH annually, resulting in a savings of 360 bed days and approximately $650,000 per year.

Conclusion

Transitioning R-EPOCH is a viable option to significantly decrease inpatient bed days and overall healthcare costs. Multidisciplinary collaboration is vital to successfully transitioning regimens to the ambulatory setting and to establishing consistent support for ambulatory administration.

Clinical use of biomarkers for toxicant-induced acute kidney injury

Toxicant-induced acute kidney injury (ToxAKI) causes substantial morbidity and retards drug development. ToxAKI is relatively underexplored compared with ischemia–reperfusion injury in clinical biomarker studies. We highlight the rationale for novel AKI biomarkers in management of ToxAKI, and review the contemporary evidence supporting their clinical use. Directly-acting nephrotoxins, such as cisplatin, aminoglycosides, vancomycin and radiocontrast, remain widely used and highlight how novel biomarkers can either improve the detection of changes in glomerular filtration rate or directly signal cellular injury and structural damage. Serum cystatin C has already improved clinical risk prediction and drug dosing although its clinical use for early diagnosis awaits validation. The use of novel functional and structural biomarkers to stage ToxAKI and aid prognosis requires robust validation and better understanding of the relationship between biomarkers, morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers that illustrate the probable mechanisms and phase of ToxAKI may guide mechanism-specific diagnosis and therapy.

A feasibility study of outpatient chemotherapy with S-1 + cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Regimens of standard-dose cisplatin have usually been administered as inpatient chemotherapy in Japan. This prospective study evaluated the feasibility of outpatient chemotherapy with standard-dose cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Advanced gastric cancer patients received an S-1 + cisplatin regimen (S-1: 80-120 mg days 1-21; cisplatin: 60 mg/m(2) day 8, every 4-5 weeks), either as outpatient chemotherapy with oral hydration on days 9-10, or as inpatient chemotherapy with intravenous hydration on days 9-10, based on the results of an oral hydration test during days 1-7 of the first cycle. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of two cycles in the outpatient group.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were enrolled: 32 were allocated to the outpatient group and 4 to the inpatient group. The completion rate of two cycles in the outpatient group was 78% [90% confidence interval (CI): 63-89]. The median of the total number of treatment cycles of S-1 + cisplatin and the median progression-free survival in the outpatient group were 5 (range 1-11) and 10.6 months (95% CI 4.2-16.9), respectively. Although seven patients in the outpatient group discontinued treatment, mainly owing to gastrointestinal toxicity, most of them could continue S-1 + cisplatin by switching to inpatient chemotherapy from the next cycle.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient chemotherapy with S-1 + cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer patients can be safely and effectively administered in Japan with appropriate patient selection and supportive treatment.

Outpatient consolidation treatment with clofarabine in a phase 2 study of older adult patients with previously untreated acute myelogenous leukemia

This report describes outpatient (OP) administration of clofarabine in older patients (≥60 years) with untreated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Overall, 112 patients underwent clofarabine induction. Clofarabine was administered to 35 OPs for a total of 72 OP cycles, with 81% of these cycles representing consolidation treatment. Median length of hospital stay was 0-6 days and 5-25 days across OP and inpatient (IP) cycles, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, edema, hypokalemia and pneumonia. The overall frequency of treatment-emergent grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs was generally not different with IP or OP administration of clofarabine. No deaths were reported within 30 days following OP or IP consolidation cycles. In the appropriately selected older patient, OP administration of clofarabine consolidation appears feasible, is as well tolerated as IP administration and has potential to contribute to the quality of life in elderly patients with AML.

Use of high-dose cisplatin with aprepitant in an outpatient setting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and nephrotoxicity are adverse events induced by cisplatin administration. These effects can be reduced by treatment regimens with low-dose cisplatin, but high-dose cisplatin is still used. In Japan, high-dose cisplatin is usually administered in an inpatient setting to permit management of CINV. However, with use of new-generation antiemetic agents such as aprepitant, CINV and nephrotoxicity are controllable in an outpatient setting. Here, we discuss issues related to the management of high-dose cisplatin administration in outpatients. Grade 2 or worse CINV induced by high-dose cisplatin occurs in more than 40% of patients without treatment with aprepitant, but is controllable by administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, steroids and aprepitant. Moreover, prevention of CINV using these drugs is cost-effective, since outpatient settings have advantages with regard to health economics and patient quality of life. These findings suggest that shifting high-dose cisplatin administration to the outpatient setting may be achieved with co-administration of aprepitant. Available facilities and the status of the patient should be considered when selecting whether an outpatient setting is suitable for administration of cisplatin, but the use of aprepitant and adequate oral hydration should allow use of cisplatin in this setting.