SPECT ventilation perfusion scanning with the addition of low-dose CT for the investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism

The Diagnostic Accuracy of SPECT Imaging in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis and systematic review assessed the diagnostic accuracy of lung SPECT compared with lung planar imaging in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified suitable articles published before October 2023. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT imaging modalities, including perfusion (Q) SPECT, ventilation (V)/Q SPECT, Q SPECT/CT, and V/Q SPECT/CT. Network meta-analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT and planar imaging in paired-design studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles (total n = 6576) were included in the analysis. For suspected acute PE, the respective sensitivity and specificity of SPECT imaging modalities were as follows: Q SPECT, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99; I2 = 49%) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.95; I2 = 94%); V/Q SPECT, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98; I2 = 51%) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98; I2 = 80%); Q SPECT/CT, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.98; I2 = 66%) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.96; I2 = 87%); and V/Q SPECT/CT, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00; I2 = 7%) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00; I2 = 31%). The relative sensitivity and specificity of SPECT compared with planar imaging were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06-1.30; P < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.00-1.29; P = 0.05), respectively. For suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT imaging were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00; I2 = 0%) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94; I2 = 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SPECT exhibited superior diagnostic performance for PE. V/Q SPECT/CT was the most accurate modality.

SPECT Ventilation/Perfusion Imaging for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of ventilation/perfusion-single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT) imaging modalities for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). These included, in addition to V/Q-SPECT, V/Q-SPECT with low-dose computed tomography (CT; V/Q-SPECT-CT), Q-SPECT with low-dose CT (Q-SPECT-CT), and Q-SPECT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched, and studies included if they studied ≥10 adult participants with acute PE and reported data on the imaging tests' diagnostic performance. Data were meta-analyzed using bivariate random effects regression model.

RESULTS

Data from participants totaling 4146 from 11 V/Q-SPECT studies, 785 from 7 V/Q-SPECT-CT studies, 1196 from 7 Q-SPECT-CT studies, and 728 from five Q-SPECT studies were separately meta-analyzed. The bivariate weighted mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.87-0.98) for V/Q-SPECT, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88-0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.92-1.00) for V/Q-SPECT-CT, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.79-0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96) for Q-SPECT-CT, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.67-0.95) for Q-SPECT studies. The positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LRs and -LRs) were 17.4 (6.9-44.0) and 0.06 (0.03-0.13), 76.7 (11.8-498.0) and 0.06 (0.02-0.13), 11.0 (5.3-22.9) and 0.09 (0.04-0.23), and 6.4 (2.6-15.8) and 0.13 (0.07-0.27) for V/Q-SPECT, V/Q-SPECT-CT, Q-SPECT-CT, and Q-SPECTs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the diagnosis of acute PE, this meta-analysis showed that V/Q-SPECT-CT had the highest specificity and +LR. Conversely, Q-SPECT showed the lowest specificity and an unfavorably high -LR.

Comparison of international guideline recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of death due to cardiovascular disease. Timely diagnosis is crucial, but challenging, as the clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism is unspecific and easily mistaken for other common medical emergencies. Clinical prediction rules and D-dimer measurement allow stratification of patients into groups of expected prevalence and are key elements in adequate selection of patients for diagnostic imaging; however, the strengths and weaknesses of the multiple proposed prediction rules, when to measure D-dimer, and which cutoff to apply might be elusive to a significant proportion of physicians. 13 international guidelines authored by medical societies or expert author groups provide recommendations on facets of the diagnostic investigations in suspected pulmonary embolism, some of which are hallmarked by pronounced heterogeneity. This Review summarises key recommendations of each guideline, considers the most recent evidence on the topic, compares guideline recommendations on each facet of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, and provides a synthesis on the most common recommendations.

Diagnostic Accuracy of V/Q and Q SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography has simplified the diagnostic approach to patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but alternative imaging tests are still advocated. We aimed to systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) and Q single-photon emission CT combined with low-dose CT (SPECT/CT) for PE diagnosis.

METHODS

 Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of acute PE were systematically searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to August 2022). The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment of the primary studies. A bivariate random-effects regression approach was used for summary estimates of both sensitivity and specificity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42021276538.

RESULTS

 Eight studies, for a total of 1,086 patients, were included. The risk of bias of all included studies was high. The weighted mean prevalence of PE was 27.1% at the random-effects model. The SPECT/CT bivariate weighted mean sensitivity was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93-98%), with a bivariate weighted mean specificity of 95% (95% CI: 90-97%). At subgroup analysis, for V/Q SPECT/CT bivariate weighted mean sensitivity and specificity were 96% (95% CI: 89-98%) and 96% (95% CI: 91-99%), while for Q SPECT/CT they were 96% (95% CI: 92-98%) and 84% (95% CI: 66-93%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

 V/Q SPECT/CT has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of acute PE, meanwhile Q SPECT/CT has high sensitivity but limited specificity for the diagnosis of PE. Management studies will conclusively ascertain the actual role of SPECT/CT in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected acute PE.

An audit of ventilation and perfusion SPECT reporting for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a tertiary cardiothoracic centre

The aim of the study was to identify reporting patterns of ventilation and perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/Q SPECT) scans done in our department over 3 months in 2016. Factors impacting on reporting and patient groups that would most benefit from the addition of low-dose computed tomography (CT) to V/Q SPECT were analysed. Among 178 patients, 173 (97.2%) had a definitive (positive/negative) report and 2.8% had an equivocal report. As the majority of the equivocal reports were seen in patients aged ≥70 years, we believe that addition of low-dose CT with V/Q SPECT to this patient group will reduce the non-diagnostic rate.

Ventilation/perfusion SPECT for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has largely replaced conventional planar V/Q scan in nuclear medicine departments for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis. However, the diagnostic performance of the test and its role in the diagnostic management of acute PE are still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to establish the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) of V/Q SPECT for PE diagnosis. The secondary aim was to review the clinical outcomes of patients investigated for PE suspicion with a standardized algorithm based on V/Q SPECT.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and management outcome studies involving patients evaluated with V/Q SPECT for suspected acute PE. We searched from inception to June 23, 2020, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for diagnostic accuracy studies, randomized controlled trials, and observational cohort studies. The methodological quality and risk of bias of eligible studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tools.

RESULTS

We identified 13 accuracy studies and one prospective outcome study. Eleven diagnostic accuracy studies were deemed at high risk of bias in at least two of the four domains of QUADAS-2 evaluation and a further two studies raised concerns regarding the applicability of results, precluding the meta-analysis for accuracy indices. The only prospective cohort study demonstrated critical risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Although V/Q SPECT has been widely implemented in daily clinical practice, the exact diagnostic performance of V/Q SPECT for PE is still unknown. This systematic review clearly identifies knowledge gaps and sets the agenda for future research.

Radionuclide lung scans for suspected acute pulmonary embolism: Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or hybrid SPECT/CT?

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with CT (SPECT/CT) may improve diagnostic accuracy in suspected acute pulmonary embolism, but further research is needed. We evaluated whether the use of attenuation correction and/or the depiction of lung pathology with hybrid SPECT/CT could significantly reduce potentially false-positive ventilation-perfusion (VQ) SPECT studies or obviate the need for a ventilation study.

METHODS

Two specialists (S1 and S2) reviewed prospectively acquired VQ SPECT/CT in 165 patients. Studies were reported using standard criteria and compared to VQ SPECT and Q SPECT/CT.

RESULTS

S1 and S2 recorded positive VQ SPECT in 54 (32.7%) and 42 (25.6%) cases, respectively. Hybrid SPECT/CT showed non-embolic pathology in 41 (S1) and 46 (S2) patients, but compared to VQ SPECT, neither hybrid SPECT/CT nor attenuation correction SPECT/CT had significantly fewer positive studies. Intra-observer agreement with VQ SPECT/CT was almost perfect (k = 0.91 for S1 and k = 0.95 for S2; P < 0.001), but not with Q SPECT/CT (k = 0.4 for S1 and k = 0.62 for S2; P < 0.001). Inter-observer agreement was moderate for VQ SPECT (k = 0.65) and VQ SPECT/CT (k = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

In our study, hybrid VQ SPECT/CT did not reduce the number of potentially false-positive VQ SPECT, nor did the CT obviate the need for a ventilation study. Thus, the routine use of hybrid SPECT/CT for suspected pulmonary embolism is not justified.

Two decades of SPECT/CT - the coming of age of a technology: An updated review of literature evidence

PURPOSE

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography (CT) was introduced as a hybrid SPECT/CT imaging modality two decades ago. The main advantage of SPECT/CT is the increased specificity achieved through a more precise localization and characterization of functional findings. The improved diagnostic accuracy is also associated with greater diagnostic confidence and better inter-specialty communication.

METHODS

This review presents a critical assessment of the relevant literature published so far on the role of SPECT/CT in a variety of clinical conditions. It also includes an update on the established evidence demonstrating both the advantages and limitations of this modality.

CONCLUSIONS

For the majority of applications, SPECT/CT should be a routine imaging technique, fully integrated into the clinical decision-making process, including oncology, endocrinology, orthopaedics, paediatrics, and cardiology. Large-scale prospective studies are lacking, however, on the use of SPECT/CT in certain clinical domains such as neurology and lung disorders. The review also presents data on the complementary role of SPECT/CT with other imaging modalities and a comparative analysis, where available.

A Brief History of Lung Ventilation and Perfusion Imaging Over the 50-Year Tenure of the Editors of Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

The ventilation/perfusion lung scan has been in continuous use for approximately half a century, the same lifetime as Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. Remarkably, the founding Editors-in-Chief have continued to guide the journal over this entire period. In this Feschrift issue celebrating their enormous contribution, we review the history of the lung scan, its highs and lows, the transition from planar to SPECT/CT V/Q scans, and the future that is in store in this age of multimodality functional imaging. We concur with the published view of one of the retiring editors (LMF) that V/Q scintigraphy is indeed alive and well and has a definite future in clinical medicine.

An aortic intra mural hematoma in ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT: A case report

RATIONALE

Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) has arisen as an alternative to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) suspicion. The addition of low dose CT (ldCT) to V/Q SPECT improves the specificity of the test, allowing for potential alternative diagnosis.

PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS

Here we presented a case of an aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) diagnosed on the ldCT portion of V/Q SPECT combined with CT. A 74-year-old man suffering from sudden-onset chest pain was referred to our nuclear medicine department for PE suspicion.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

A V/Q SPECT combined with nonenhanced ldCT ruled out PE diagnosis. Nevertheless, ldCT revealed high attenuation aortic wall thickening suggestive of aortic IMH. Chest CT angiography showed mild dilatation and circumferential thickening of aortic wall confirming Stanford type A IMH involving the entire ascending aorta.

LESSON

This case illustrates the potential usefulness of combining ldCT to V/Q SPECT in providing alternative diagnosis in suspected PE patients.

Dual-energy CT (DECT) lung perfusion in pulmonary hypertension: concordance rate with V/Q scintigraphy in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the concordance between DECT perfusion and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

METHODS

Eighty patients underwent V/Q scintigraphy and DECT perfusion on a 2nd- and 3rd-generation dual-source CT system. The imaging criteria for diagnosing CTEPH relied on at least one segmental triangular perfusion defect on DECT perfusion studies and V/Q mismatch on scintigraphy examinations.

RESULTS

Based on multidisciplinary expert decisions that did not include DECT perfusion, 36 patients were diagnosed with CTEPH and 44 patients with other aetiologies of PH. On DECT perfusion studies, there were 35 true positives, 6 false positives and 1 false negative (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 0.86, PPV 0.85, NPV 0.97). On V/Q scans, there were 35 true positives and 1 false negative (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 1, PPV 1, NPV 0.98). There was excellent agreement between CT perfusion and scintigraphy in diagnosing CTEPH (kappa value 0.80). Combined information from DECT perfusion and CT angiographic images enabled correct reclassification of the 6 false positives and the unique false negative case of DECT perfusion.

CONCLUSION

There is excellent agreement between DECT perfusion and V/Q scintigraphy in diagnosing CTEPH. The diagnostic accuracy of DECT perfusion is reinforced by the morpho-functional analysis of data sets.

KEY POINTS

• Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is potentially curable by surgery. • The triage of patients with pulmonary hypertension currently relies on scintigraphy. • Dual-energy CT (DECT) can provide standard diagnostic information and lung perfusion from a single acquisition. • There is excellent agreement between DECT perfusion and scintigraphy in separating CTEPH and non-CTEPH patients.

The Economic Value of Hybrid Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography With Computed Tomography Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

Objective

The objective was to quantify the potential economic value of single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with computed tomography (CT; SPECT/CT) versus CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), ventilation–perfusion (V/Q) planar scintigraphy, and V/Q SPECT imaging modalities for diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) patients in an emergency setting.

Methods

An Excel‐based simulation model was developed to compare SPECT/CT versus the alternate scanning technologies from a payer's perspective. Clinical endpoints (diagnosis, treatment, complications, and mortality) and their corresponding cost data (2016 USD) were obtained by performing a best evidence review of the published literature. Studies were pooled and parameters were weighted by sample size. Outcomes measured included differences in 1) excess costs, 2) total costs, and 3) lives lost per annum between SPECT/CT and the other imaging modalities. One‐way (±25%) sensitivity and three scenario analyses were performed to gauge the robustness of the results.

Results

For every 1,000 suspected PE patients undergoing imaging, expected annual economic burden by modality was found to be 3.2 million (SPECT/CT), 3.8 million (CTPA), 5.8 million (planar), and 3.6 million (SPECT) USD, with a switch to SPECT/CT technology yielding per‐patient‐per‐month cost savings of $51.80 (vs. CTPA), $213.80 (vs. planar), and $36.30 (vs. SPECT), respectively. The model calculated that the incremental number of lives saved with SPECT/CT was six (vs. CTPA) and three (vs. planar). Utilizing SPECT/CT as the initial imaging modality for workup of acute PE was also expected to save $994,777 (vs. CTPA), $2,852,014 (vs. planar), and $435,038 (vs. SPECT) in “potentially avoidable”’ excess costs per annum for a payer or health plan.

Conclusion

Compared to the currently available scanning technologies for diagnosing suspected PE, SPECT/CT appears to confer superior economic value, primarily via improved sensitivity and specificity and low nondiagnostic rates. In turn, the improved diagnostic accuracy accords this modality the lowest ratio of expenses attributable to potentially avoidable complications, misdiagnosis, and underdiagnosis.

New developments and future challenges of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging for pulmonary embolism

Although widely validated, current tests for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis, i.e. computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and V/Q planar scintigraphy, have some limitations. Drawbacks of CTPA include the radiation dose, some contra indications and a rising concern about a possible overdiagnosis/overtreatment of PE. On the other hand, V/Q planar scintigraphy has a high rate of non-diagnostic tests responsible for complex diagnostic algorithms. Since the PIOPED study, imaging equipment and radiopharmaceuticals have greatly evolved allowing the introduction of techniques that improve imaging of lung ventilation and perfusion. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/CT techniques are already largely used in daily practice and have been described to have greater diagnostic performance and much fewer non-diagnostic tests as compared with planar scintigraphy. However, they have not yet been firmly validated in large scale prospective outcome studies. More recently, it has also been proposed to image pulmonary perfusion and ventilation using positron emission tomography (PET), which has an inherent technical superiority as compared to conventional scintigraphy and may provide new insight for pulmonary embolism. Regardless of modality, these new thoracic imaging modalities have to be integrated into diagnostic strategies. The other major challenge for venous thromboembolism diagnosis may be the potential additional value of molecular imaging allowing specific targeting of thrombi in order, for example, to differentiate venous thromboembolism from tumor or septic thrombus, or acute from residual disease. In this article, the new imaging procedures of lung ventilation perfusion imaging with SPECT, SPECT/CT and PET/CT are discussed. We also review the current status and future challenge of molecular imaging for the in vivo characterization of venous thromboembolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism detection with ventilation/perfusion SPECT combined with full dose CT: What is the best option?

AIM

To compare diagnostic accuracy of Ventilation/Perfusion (V/P) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with simultaneous full-dose CT with a hybrid SPECT/CT scanner versus planar ventilation/perfusion (V/P) SPECT and CT angiography (CTA) in patients suspected with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, consecutive patients suspected of acute PE were referred for V/P SPECT/CT (reviewed board approved study). A contrast agent was administered to patients who had no contraindications. Non-contrast V/P SPECT/CT was performed on the remaining patients. All patients were followed-up for at least 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 314 patients were available during the study period, with the diagnosis of PE confirmed in 70 (22.29%) of them. The overall population sensitivity and specificity was 90.91% and 92.44%, respectively for V/P SPECT, 80% and 99.15%, respectively, for CTA, and 95.52% and 97.08% for V/P SPECT/CT. SPECT/CT performed better than V/P SPECT (AUC differences=0.0419, P=0.0043, 95% CI; 0.0131-0.0706) and CTA (AUC differences=0.0681, P=0.0208, 95% CI; 0.0103-0.1259)). Comparing imaging modalities when contrast agent could be administered, sensitivity and specificity increased and V/P SPECT/CT was significantly better than CTA (AUC differences=0.0681, P=0.0208, 95% CI; 0.0103-0.1259) and V/P SPECT (AUC differences=0.0659, P=0.0052, 95% CI; 0.0197-0.1121). In case of non-contrast enhancement, there was non-significant increase of specificity. Secondary findings on CT impacted patient management in 14.65% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that combined V/P SPECT/CT scanning has a higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting acute PE than V/P SPECT and CTA alone. When feasible, V/P SPECT/CT with contrast enhancement is the best option.

SPECT-CT/VQ versus CTPA for diagnosing pulmonary embolus and other lung pathology: Pre-existing lung disease should not be a contraindication

INTRODUCTION

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Ventilation-Perfusion (SPECT-VQ) with low-dose CT (SPECT-CT/VQ) has equivalent diagnostic accuracy to CTPA for diagnosing pulmonary embolus (PE) while using lower radiation doses, but is underutilized owing to perceived inaccuracy of scintigraphy in the setting of pre-existing lung disease. This study assesses the accuracy of SPECT-CT/VQ compared with CTPA for the diagnosis of PE, including in patients with pre-existing lung disease.

METHODS

Retrospective non-inferiority cohort study of all patients who underwent SPECT-CT/VQ scanning at St Vincent's Hospital, NSW, from June 2012 to November 2013, who also had a CTPA within the same admission and <72 h apart (n = 102).

RESULTS

SPECT-CT/VQ had 100% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity when compared with CTPA. Of the 102 patients, 14 were lung transplant patients, and 27 had other pre-existing lung disease (41/102, 40.2%), with SPECT-CT/VQ having a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97.2% in this patient group. Non-inferiority of SPECT-CT/VQ was demonstrated at a significance level of 0.005.

CONCLUSION

SPECT-CT/VQ has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PE compared with CTPA, even among patients with pre-existing lung disease, with lower radiation doses.

Suspected pulmonary embolism in patients with pulmonary fibrosis: Discordance between ventilation/perfusion SPECT and CT pulmonary angiography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common differential diagnosis in patients with pulmonary fibrosis presenting with a clinical deterioration. Both ventilation/perfusion (V/Q)-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) are routinely used to detect PE. However, the value of V/Q-SPECT and CTPA in this scenario has not been studied so far. We aimed to investigate the concordance of V/Q-SPECT and CTPA in patients with pulmonary fibrosis and suspicion of pulmonary embolism.

METHODS

A total of 22 consecutive patients with pulmonary fibrosis and clinical deterioration who underwent both V/Q-SPECT and CTPA were included in the study and analyzed for the presence of pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

Nine of 22 patients (41%) had evidence for pulmonary embolism in V/Q-SPECT, and two of these patients had matching evidence for pulmonary embolism in CTPA. In the other seven patients with positive findings in V/Q-SPECT, no evidence of pulmonary embolism was found in CTPA. None of the 13 patients with a negative V/Q-SPECT had evidence for pulmonary embolism in CTPA.

CONCLUSION

In patients with pulmonary fibrosis and suspected pulmonary embolism, pulmonary embolism is detected more frequently by V/Q-SPECT than by CTPA. Thromboembolic disease is identified on CTPA only in a minority of patients with positive findings on V/Q-SPECT. When making treatment decisions, clinicians should be aware of the high rate of discordant findings in V/Q-SPECT and CTPA in this specific patient population.

The Utility of Hybrid SPECT/CT Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is diagnosed either by ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy or pulmonary CT angiography. One of the imaging methods used in nuclear medicine is hybrid SPECT/CT scintigraphy.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of SPECT/CT(Q) scintigraphy in the diagnosis of PE and to compare SPECT/CT(Q) with planar(Q) and SPECT(Q) methods.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 109 consecutive patients suspected of having PE referred for performing lung scintigraphy. The inclusion criteria were: performance of perfusion planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT scans; availability of clinical data covering a 6-month follow-up period, and D-dimer level testing. The number of eligible patients was 84. PE was reported in patients with at least 1 segmental or 2 subsegmental perfusion defects without parenchymal abnormalities on CT scans. PE was excluded when there was a normal perfusion pattern or perfusion defects were caused by lung parenchymal abnormalities or were not arranged in accordance with the pulmonary vasculature.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (31%) had a final diagnosis of PE. The sensitivity and specificity values of each method were as follows: planar(Q) 73 and 43%, SPECT(Q) 88 and 47% and SPECT/CT(Q) 100 and 83%. SPECT/CT(Q) yielded a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than planar(Q) (p < 0.001) and SPECT(Q) (p < 0.001) scans.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that hybrid SPECT/CT(Q) imaging has a high diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of PE. Lung perfusion scintigraphy performed with a hybrid SPECT/CT device has a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than scanning performed with the planar or SPECT technique.

Pulmonary Scintigraphy for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Survey of Current Practices in Australia, Canada, and France

There are currently no data published regarding the proportion of nuclear medicine centers using SPECT or SPECT/CT rather than planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) imaging in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Furthermore, the reporting criteria used for interpretation of both planar and SPECT V/Q scans are variable and data are lacking regarding which criteria are commonly used in various centers. The aim of this study was to assess current practices regarding the performance and interpretation of lung scintigraphy across 3 different countries.

METHODS

A short online survey composed of simple multiple-choice questions was distributed to nuclear medicine departments in Australia, Canada, and France during the period April to December 2014. The survey covered image acquisition, interpretation criteria for SPECT and planar images, and use of pseudoplanar images and radiopharmaceuticals. Information was initially solicited by 2 sets of e-mails, which pointed to the survey internet link. Departments were subsequently contacted by telephone. A single response per department was consolidated.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-one responses were collected (Australia, 74; Canada, 48; and France, 209). Twenty-eight percent of centers indicated use of V/Q planar imaging alone whereas 72% of centers included some form of SPECT in their acquisition protocol for evaluation of PE, specifically V/Q SPECT in 36%, V/Q SPECT/CT in 29%, Q SPECT/CT in 2%, and both V/Q planar and SPECT in 5%, with a strong variability among countries. The most commonly used criteria for SPECT interpretation were the those of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (60%). Criteria used for planar interpretation were heterogeneous (European Association of Nuclear Medicine criteria, 35%; Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis study, 29%; no standardized criteria, 21%). Sixty-three percent of departments used pseudoplanar images in addition to SPECT images.

CONCLUSION

In the 3 countries surveyed, SPECT has largely replaced planar imaging for evaluation of PE, with almost half of the SPECT studies incorporating a CT acquisition. Criteria used for interpretation are inconsistent, especially for planar imaging.

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: conventional ventilation/perfusion SPECT is superior to the combination of perfusion SPECT and nonenhanced CT

BACKGROUND

Ventilation/perfusion single-emission photon CT (V/P-SPECT) is widely used to detect pulmonary embolism (PE). Any pathological deficit on P-SPECT with a corresponding unremarkable V-SPECT is considered an embolism. This means that a deficit on P-SPECT with a corresponding deficit on the ventilation scan correlates with other lung pathologies such as pneumonia, bullous emphysema or tumor. In principle, it is possible to identify any of these lung pathologies on nonenhanced chest CT and so this technique has the potential to replace V-SPECT in the diagnosis of PE. Today, SPECT/CT hybrid imaging systems are increasingly applied in clinical routines.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether embolism can be diagnosed using a combined P-SPECT/CT hybrid imaging approach without V-SPECT.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients with clinically suspected embolism were investigated with standard V/P-SPECT and a nonenhanced CT scan on a combined SPECT/CT system. A diagnosis of embolism was based on V/P-SPECT (gold standard). P-SPECT/CT datasets were blinded and analyzed without any knowledge of the V-SPECT data. The accuracy of P-SPECT/CT was compared to the gold standard.

RESULTS

Embolism was diagnosed in 24/93 patients using V/P-SPECT. In total, 57 lung lobes were affected. P-SPECT/CT significantly (p < 0.01) overdiagnosed embolism in nonaffected patients. In total, 36 cases with 88 affected lung lobes were shown. The sensitivity was 95.8%, the specificity 82.6%, the false-negative rate 4.2% and the false-positive rate 17.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that a nonenhanced CT scan in a novel hybrid imaging system cannot replace V-SPECT in the scintigraphy-based diagnosis of PE. V-SPECT increases specificity and reduces the number of false-positive results when compared to 'perfusion-only' SPECT/CT.

SPECT/CT and pulmonary embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is diagnosed either by ventilation/perfusion (V/P) scintigraphy or pulmonary CT angiography (CTPA). In recent years both techniques have improved. Many nuclear medicine centres have adopted the single photon emission CT (SPECT) technique as opposed to the planar technique for diagnosing PE. SPECT has been shown to have fewer indeterminate results and a higher diagnostic value. The latest improvement is the combination of a low-dose CT scan with a V/P SPECT scan in a hybrid tomograph. In a study comparing CTPA, planar scintigraphy and SPECT alone, SPECT/CT had the best diagnostic accuracy for PE. In addition, recent developments in the CTPA technique have made it possible to image the pulmonary arteries of the lungs in one breath-hold. This development is based on the change from a single-detector to multidetector CT technology with an increase in volume coverage per rotation and faster rotation. Furthermore, the dual energy CT technique is a promising modality that can provide functional imaging in combination with anatomical information. Newer high-end CT scanners and SPECT systems are able to visualize smaller subsegmental emboli. However, consensus is lacking regarding the clinical impact and treatment. In the present review, SPECT and SPECT in combination with low-dose CT, CTPA and dual energy CT are discussed in the context of diagnosing PE.