Mental health nurses working in primary care: Perceptions of general practitioners

Comparison of depression care provided in general practice in Norway and the Netherlands: registry-based cohort study (The Norwegian GP-DEP study)

BACKGROUND

Depression is highly prevalent in general practice, and organisation of primary health care probably affects the provision of depression care. General practitioners (GPs) in Norway and the Netherlands fulfil comparable roles. However, primary care teams with a mental health nurse (MHN) supplementing the GP have been established in the Netherlands, but not yet in Norway. In order to explore how the organisation of primary mental care affects care delivery, we aimed to examine the provision of GP depression care across the two countries.

METHODS

Registry-based cohort study comprising new depression episodes in patients aged ≥ 18 years, 2011-2015. The Norwegian sample was drawn from the entire population (national health registries); 297,409 episodes. A representative Dutch sample (Nivel Primary Care Database) was included; 27,362 episodes. Outcomes were follow-up consultation(s) with GP, with GP and/or MHN, and antidepressant prescriptions during 12 months from the start of the depression episode. Differences between countries were estimated using negative binomial and Cox regression models, adjusted for patient gender, age and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Patients in the Netherlands compared to Norway were less likely to receive GP follow-up consultations, IRR (incidence rate ratio) = 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.74). Differences were greatest among patients aged 18-39 years (adj IRR = 0.64, 0.63-0.66) and 40-59 years (adj IRR = 0.71, 0.69-0.73). When comparing follow-up consultations in GP practices, including MHN consultations in the Netherlands, no cross-national differences were found (IRR = 1.00, 0.98-1.01). But in age-stratified analyses, Dutch patients 60 years and older were more likely to be followed up than their Norwegian counterparts (adj IRR = 1.21, 1.16-1.26). Patients in the Netherlands compared to Norway were more likely to receive antidepressant drugs, adj HR (hazard ratio) = 1.32 (1.30-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed differences indicate that the organisation of primary mental health care affects the provision of follow-up consultations in Norway and the Netherlands. Clinical studies are needed to explore the impact of team-based care and GP-based care on the quality of depression care and patient outcomes.

Perceived quality of primary healthcare services and its association with institutional trust among caregivers of persons diagnosed with a severe mental illness in China

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT

Low utilization of the family-oriented community rehabilitation services is a threatening challenge facing low- and middle- income countries. Family caregiver's trust in community healthcare providers is the precondition of service utilization and is shaped by their perceived quality of primary healthcare services from previous experience. Most of the studies concerning the relationship between perceived quality and institutional trust were conducted in western countries, resulting in limited attention paid to conditions in non-western countries. Which aspect of quality predicts institutional trust in China has not been studied yet.

WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE

In China's context, institutional trust was generally associated with communication, worry relief and risk of privacy leak, but not with technical competence. Significant rural-urban disparity was observed: among rural respondents, institutional trust was associated with technical competence, communication and risk of privacy leak, but not with worry relief; institutional trust was only associated with worry relief in urban respondents.

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Mental health nurses training or working with community healthcare workers may improve their technical and communicative competence. Priorities may differ between rural and urban areas. Mental health nurses or community healthcare workers may provide more family-oriented psycho-education to rural families, and more emotional support to urban families. Wider public anti-stigma initiatives are needed to reduce the affiliated stigma of families of persons diagnosed with a severe mental illness.

ABSTRACT

Introduction Prior studies suggested that caregiver's trust in community healthcare providers is the precondition of the utilization of community-based rehabilitation services and is shaped by their perceived quality of primary healthcare services. Nevertheless, the research conducted in non-western countries is scarce, and which aspect of quality is associated with institutional trust in China has not been studied. Aim To explore the association between perceived quality of primary healthcare services and institutional trust in China's context. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted with 796 family caregivers from Eastern, Central and Western China between August 2018 and October 2019. Perceived quality of primary healthcare services was measured by technical competence, communication, worry relief and risk of privacy leak. Results Institutional trust was generally associated with communication, worry relief and risk of privacy leak, but not with technical competence. Among rural respondents, institutional trust was associated with technical competence, communication and risk of privacy leak, but not with worry relief. Contrary finding was observed in urban respondents. Discussion and implications for practice With rural-urban disparity considered, strategies such as improving the technical and communicative competence of community healthcare workers, providing family-oriented psycho-education and emotional support, and promoting public anti-stigma initiatives may be worth consideration.

Experiences of mental health nurses working in general practice: A qualitative study

Background: This paper reports on a qualitative study utilising in-depth interviews of sixteen Australian mental health nurses (MHNs) working in general practice. On 1st July 2015, the commonwealth government of Australia established 31 primary health networks (PHN) to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of medical services for people, particularly those at risk of poor health outcomes, and to improve coordination of care. Aim: This study explores the experiences of Australian MHNs working in general practice. Design: Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes emerged through the data analysis: (1) autonomy and flexibility, (2) opportunity for more clinically focused work, (3) health promotion and preventative health and (4) excited to work in general practice. Findings: Study Participants identified many clinical opportunities working in primary practice and noted that the autonomy and flexibility of their role was quite different from other areas they had previously worked. They reported having more time to spend with the patients and being able to engage in health promotion. Conclusions: In order to make mental health care more accessible it is important to have a well-qualified workforce within primary health care (PHC) settings such as general practice. The participants of this study have identified ways they have been best utilised in the Primary Care workforce. They embrace the autonomy of the role and the ability to engage with consumers by providing clinical interventions that can assess and intervene with people experiencing mental illness.

Coordinating Mental and Physical Health Care in Rural Australia: An Integrated Model for Primary Care Settings

Introduction:

The ‘GP Clinic’ provides primary health care to people using community mental health services in a small town in Australia. This article examines the factors that have driven successful integration in this rural location.

Methods:

A multiple methods case study approach was used comprising service record data for a 24 month period and semi-structured interviews with sixteen staff members associated with the integrated rural service model.

Results:

Processes and structures for establishing integrated care evolved locally from nurturing supportive professional and organisational relationships. A booking system that maximised attendance and minimised the work of the general practice ensured that issues to do with remuneration and the capacity for the general practitioner to provide care to those with complex needs were addressed. Strong collaborative relationships led to the upskilling of local staff in physical and mental health conditions and treatments, and ensured significant barriers for people with mental illness accessing primary care in rural Australia were overcome.

Conclusions:

Integrated physical and mental health service models that focus on building local service provider relationships and are responsive to community needs and outcomes may be more beneficial in rural settings than top down approaches that focus on policies, formal structures, and governance.

Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program

Objective The aim of the present study was to review and synthesise research on the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) to ascertain the benefits and limitations of this initiative for people with mental illness, general practitioners, mental health nurses and the wider community. Methods An electronic and manual search was made of the research literature for MHNIP in May 2017. Features of studies, including cohorts and findings, were tabulated and cross-study patterns in program processes and outcomes were closely compared. Results Seventeen reports of primary research data have been released. Triangulation of data from different cohorts, regions and design show that the program has been successful on the primary objectives of increased access to primary mental health care, and has received positive feedback from all major stakeholders. Although the program has been broadly beneficial to consumer health, there are inequities in access for people with mental illness. Conclusions The MHNIP greatly benefits the health of people with mental illness. Larger and more representative sampling of consumers is needed, as well as intensive case studies to provide a more comprehensive and effective understanding of the benefits and limitations of the program as it evolves with the establishment of primary health networks. What is known about the topic? The MHNIP is designed to increase access to mental health care in primary care settings such as general practice clinics. Studies have reported favourable views about the program. However, research is limited and further investigation is required to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of the program. What does this paper add? All studies reviewed reported that the MHNIP had positive implications for people with severe and persistent mental illness. Qualitative research has been most prevalent for mental health nurse views and research on Health of the Nation Outcome Scale scores for recipients of the program. There is more research on system dimensions than on person-centred care. Mental health consumers, carers and families have been neglected in the establishment, engagement and evaluation of the MHNIP. What are the implications for practitioners? A more systematic, national-level research program into the MHNIP is required that is centred more on the experiences of people with mental illness.

La pratique infirmière avancée : un choix qui s’impose pour la qualité des soins et services en santé mentale

La refonte des lois professionnelles et la réorganisation des services en santé mentale ont eu une influence significative sur la pratique infirmière en santé mentale au Québec. De nombreuses infirmières ont fait preuve de leadership clinique et ont su adapter leurs services aux besoins de la population selon les nouveaux milieux de soins de proximité. Cependant, plusieurs sont d’avis que le rôle des infirmières n’est pas suffisamment connu et mis à profit pour contribuer de façon optimale à l’offre de services en santé mentale. Ainsi, cet article porte un regard critique sur la pratique infirmière en santé mentale au Québec et les conditions essentielles à son évolution. Il vise à : 1) décrire les tendances actuelles qui caractérisent l’évolution des rôles et la modernisation de la pratique infirmière en santé mentale au Québec ; 2) offrir un aperçu de l’évolution de la pratique infirmière avancée en santé mentale (PIA-SM) et de ses retombées sur la qualité des services ; 3) clarifier le concept de PIA et situer son évolution au Québec ; et 4) proposer diverses stratégies visant à optimiser le rôle des infirmières et leur complémentarité avec les autres professionnels dans l’offre de services en santé mentale. Les progrès en cours sont illustrés par des exemples de pratiques innovantes développées par des infirmières québécoises dans le contexte de la restructuration des services de santé. Les données quant à l’évolution de la PIA-SM aux États-Unis et en Australie indiquent qu’il existe encore de nombreux défis liés à l’implantation réussie de ce nouveau rôle. Toutefois, il se dégage, de la majorité des études, un consensus de plus en plus important quant à la contribution de la PIA-SM pour améliorer la qualité et l’accessibilité des soins en santé mentale. La réforme des services de santé mentale au Québec s’avère donc être un moment propice pour développer et soutenir la PIA-SM et en retirer les bénéfices attendus.

Released potential: a qualitative study of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program in Australia

The Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) is a Commonwealth Government funded scheme that supports people living with a mental illness. Despite its significance, the program has received little attention from researchers nor critical discussion within the published work. This paper first critically examines the MHNIP from the contexts of identities, autonomy, and capabilities of mental health nurses (MHN) and then reports on findings from a qualitative study that explored the experiences of staff working in the MHNIP. Key findings from this qualitative study include four main themes indicating that both the program and the nurses working within it are addressing the unmet needs of people living with a mental illness. They achieve these ends by adopting holistic and consumer-centred approaches and by providing a wide range of therapeutic interventions. As well, the MHN in this study valued the freedom and autonomy of their practice outside public health services and the respect received from colleagues working in other disciplines. Findings suggest that MHN within the study were experienced as having autonomous identities and roles that may be in contrast to the restrictive understandings of MHN capability within the program's funding rules.

Mental health nurses in primary care: qualitative outcomes of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program

The Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) is a government-funded programme, which, since 2007, has enabled mental health nurses to work in primary care settings in Australia in collaboration with general practitioners (GPs) or private psychiatrists. To date, small-scale qualitative studies have explored outcomes of the programme from the point of view of nurses, consumers, and the perceptions of GPs. This study reports on an on-line survey of credentialed mental health nurses perceptions of outcomes of the MHNIP. Two hundred and twenty five nurses who worked in MHNIP provided detailed narrative responses that were examined using thematic content analysis. The most commonly-cited outcomes were reductions in symptoms or improved coping, improved relationships, and enhanced community participation. Other reported outcomes included reduced hospitalization or use of state-funded mental health services, better use of health services, the continuation or establishment of meaningful occupation, improved physical health and medication management, less use of coercive interventions, and greater independence.

Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program: facilitating physical health care for people with mental illness?

People with serious mental illness have increased rates of physical ill-health and reduced contact with primary care services. In Australia, the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) was developed to facilitate access to mental health services. However, as a primary care service, the contribution to physical health care is worthy of consideration. Thirty-eight nurses who were part of the MHNIP participated in a national survey of nurses working in mental health about physical health care. The survey invited nurses to report their views on the physical health of consumers and the regularity of physical health care they provide. Physical health-care provision in collaboration with general practitioners (GPs) and other health-care professionals was reported as common. The findings suggest that the MHNIP provides integrated care, where nurses and GPs work in collaboration, allowing enough time to discuss physical health or share physical health activities. Consumers of this service appeared to have good access to physical and mental health services, and nurses had access to primary care professionals to discuss consumers' physical health and develop their clinical skills in the physical domain. The MHNIP has an important role in addressing physical health concerns, in addition to the mental health issues of people accessing this service.