Uterine cervical cancer associated with eosinophilic infiltration

Impact of systemic inflammation biomarkers on the survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory biomarkers have recently attracted attention as valuable prognosticators and predictors of survival outcomes in many cancers. We describe a new pre-treatment biomarker, expressed as the eosinophil-lymphocytes ratio (ELR) and validate other biomarkers such as the level of circulating eosinophils, neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocytes ratio (PLR) and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) as prognostic factors in cervical cancer (CC) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 151 consecutive patients diagnosed with CC and treated according to the European guidelines with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy and/or surgery in our institution from 2009 to 2016 were evaluated. Patients were categorized into two different groups based on the optimal cut-off for each biomarker, according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Impact of blood biomarkers on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CCS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined.

RESULTS

Higher values of ELR, eosinophils and age ≥ 50 years were associated with better OS in univariate Cox analysis, while high NLR, PLR, SII, neutrophils ≥ 7.0, Bulky tumor and FIGO stage III-IV at diagnosis were prognosticators of worse survival outcomes. In multivariate analysis, the only factors independently impacting OS were ELR ≥ 0.07 (HR = 0.49, p = 0.048) and FIGO stage III-IV (HR = 2.5, p = 0.018). High PLR and SII were associated with shorter PFR.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased values of ELR and eosinophils portend better OS in CC. To our best knowledge, this is the first report describing eosinophils-related biomarker as an independent prognostic factor in CC.

Clonal eosinophilic disorders and the hypereosinophilic syndrome

An increase in the blood eosinophil count may occur in a number of disease states including allergies, parasitic infections, vascular disease and as a reaction to the presence of malignant tumours. This article defines those disorders that are not purely reactive, and describes in detail the diagnosis and features of clonal eosinophilic disorders and the hypereosinophilic syndrome. The clonal disorders that are associated with eosinophilia are discussed, in particular the acute and chronic eosinophilic leukaemias and clonal eosinophilias in association with acute myeloid leukaemia, myeloproliferative disorders and myelodysplastic syndromes. Whether eosinophilia is produced by a clonal or reactive disorder, the end result can often be the same, i.e. end organ damage produced by sustained hypereosinophilia in the presence of eosinophil activation. When no cause for the eosinophilia leading to the end organ damage is found, this disease is termed 'idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome'. Its pathogenesis, clinical features and management are discussed with particular reference to the possibility of it being a T-cell-associated disorder.