Does a vitrified blastocyst stage embryo transfer program need hormonal priming for endometrial preparation?

Prediction of risk factors for first trimester pregnancy loss in frozen-thawed good-quality embryo transfer cycles using machine learning algorithms

PURPOSE

Can the risk factors that cause first trimester pregnancy loss in good-quality frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles be predicted using machine learning algorithms?

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Sisli Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center, between January 2011 and May 2021. A total of 3805 good-quality FET cycles were included in the study. First trimester pregnancy loss rates were evaluated according to female age, paternal age, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis of infertility, endometrial preparation protocols (natural/artificial), embryo quality (top/good), presence of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), recurrent implantation failure (RIF), severe male infertility, adenomyosis and endometriosis.

RESULTS

The first trimester pregnancy loss rate was 18.2% (693/ 3805). The presence of RPL increased first trimester pregnancy loss (OR = 7.729, 95%CI = 5.908-10.142, P = 0.000). BMI, which is > 30, increased first trimester pregnancy loss compared to < 25 (OR = 1.418, 95%CI = 1.025-1.950, P = 0.033). Endometrial preparation with artificial cycle increased first trimester pregnancy loss compared to natural cycle (OR = 2.101, 95%CI = 1.630-2.723, P = 0.000). Female age, which is 35-37, increased first trimester pregnancy loss compared to < 30 (OR = 1.617, 95%CI = 1.120-2.316, P = 0.018), and female age, which is > 37, increased first trimester pregnancy loss compared to < 30 (OR = 2.286, 95%CI = 1.146-4,38, P = 0.016). The presence of PCOS increased first trimester pregnancy loss (OR = 1.693, 95%CI = 1.198-2.390, P = 0.002). The number of previous IVF cycles, which is > 3, increased first trimester pregnancy loss compared to < 3 (OR = 2.182, 95%CI = 1.708-2.790, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

History of RPL, RIF, advanced female age, presence of PCOS, and high BMI (> 30 kg/m2) were the factors that increased first trimester pregnancy loss.

Endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study comparing true natural cycle, modified natural cycle and artificial cycle

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of three endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET): Natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and programmed/artificial cycle (AC) protocols. Primary outcomes investigated were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR).

Methods

A retrospective study on 2080 FET cycles including patients ≤ 35 years with a BMI ≤ 30 who underwent FET with a single autologous blastocyst stage embryo at Aarhus University Hospital or Horsens Regional Hospital in the period 2013–2019. Only blastocysts frozen by vitrification were included. No luteal phase support (LPS) was used in natural cycles.

Results

In NC, mNC and AC, CPRs were 34.9%, 40.6% and 32.0%, while LBRs were 32.3%, 36.3% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in main outcomes when comparing AC with NC [LBR: OR = 0.9 (0.6; 1.2), p = 0.4]. Compared to NC, mNC-FET displayed significantly higher positive hCG, implantation rate, CPR and LBR [LBR: OR = 1.4 (1.0; 1.9), p = 0.03]. An analysis with mNC as reference group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in the mNC group compared to AC [LBR: OR 0.6 (0.5; 0.8), p =  < 0.01].

Conclusion

The present study overall demonstrated better outcomes including LBR with mNC protocol as compared to NC and AC protocol, while comparison of AC and NC showed both protocols to be equally effective. A programmed cycle may be necessary for women with anovulatory cycles; however, normo-ovulating women may be offered a natural cycle protocol.

Trial registration number

3-3013-3047/1 and 31-1522-44. Date of registration: June 24, 2019 and April 23, 2020.

Ovulatory-Based FET Cycles May Achieve Higher Pregnancy Rates in the General Population and among Anovulatory Women

This study evaluated which endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles provides the best results for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients and the general population. This retrospective study of 634 FET cycles was conducted 2016-2018. Cycles were divided into Group A: Artificial endometrial preparations for FET (aFET; n = 348), Group B: Ovulatory cycle (n = 286) to compare two methods of endometrial preparation for FET. Artificial endometrial preparation with exogenous estrogen and progesterone versus natural ovulation cycles, modified natural cycles using hCG for the final triggering and letrozole-induced ovulation with hCG. Anovulatory patients were analyzed separately. Anovulatory PCOS patients had significantly higher pregnancy rates with letrozole treatment compared with aFET cycles (44% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.044). For the entire cohort, ovulatory cycles and aFET were similar in terms of patient characteristics, demographics, infertility causes, treatment protocols and number of embryos transferred. Although the mean ESHRE score of the transferred embryos was higher in the aFET group, we found higher clinical pregnancy rate in the ovulatory cycle FET (41.3% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.0001). A better pregnancy rate was found after ovulatory cycle FET. In the ovulatory cycles, the outcome of letrozole-induced and non-induced cycles were comparable. PCOS patients, as well as the general population, may benefit from ovulation induced FET cycles, with significantly better outcomes in FET in ovulatory cycles.

Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in young women with regular menstrual cycles increases the live-birth rates compared with hormone replacement treatment: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal endometrial preparation protocols of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in young women with regular menstrual cycles.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Public fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Infertile women with regular menstrual cycles undergoing FET.

INTERVENTION(S)

Natural cycle (NC) treatment for patients with proven ovulation in previous cycles or who refused medication (n = 308), or hormone treatment (HT) for patients who could not be frequently monitored (n = 1,538).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live-birth rates.

RESULT(S)

The live-birth rates were 61.73% in the NC group and 55.11% in the HT group. The effect size of the endometrial preparation on live-birth rates was evaluated in prespecified and exploratory subgroups in each subgroup, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine which variables could be independently associated with the live-birth rate. The HT patients had a lower chance of live birth in all subgroups: endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone administration, triple-line endometrial pattern, female age at embryo transfer, fertilization type, and protocol in the fresh cycle. Multivariable analysis showed NC to be associated with an increased likelihood of live birth compared with HT.

CONCLUSION(S)

Natural cycle treatment has a higher chance of live birth than HT for endometrial preparation in young women with regular menstrual cycles.

Reproductive outcomes of vitrified blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle versus mild hormonally stimulated and artificial protocols: A randomized control trial

OBJECTIVE

This study set out to investigate the pregnancy outcome of natural cycle regimen versus other endometrial preparation protocols with vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer (VTBT) cycles.

METHODS

This control trial study was carried out on 123 women undergoing VTBT. The women were randomly divided into three groups of endometrial preparation before VTBT; 1. Modified natural ovulation cycle with using HCG (n=32) 2. Mild hormonally stimulated cycle by low dose Clomiphene Citrate (n=30) and 3. Artificial cycle induced with estradiol and progesterone supplementation (n=61). Following endometrial preparation, the thawed blastocyst was vitrified and transferred. Reproductive outcome and endometrium characteristic were evaluated in the three groups.

RESULTS

The three above-mentioned protocols resulted in clinical pregnancy rates of 21.43% vs. 13.79% vs. 15.25%, respectively; without statistical differences. The ongoing pregnancy rates did not show any significant differences among the three groups (21.43% vs. 13.79% vs. 13.56%), respectively. In addition, the miscarriage rates were compared in the three groups. The endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone or human chorionic gonadotropin administration were more frequently observed in the artificial and modified natural cycle versus hormonally stimulated groups (8.34±0.89 vs. 7.3±1.4, p<0.001; 8.13±0.95 vs. 7.3±1.4, p<0.001). There was no significant difference regarding triple-line endometrial patterns in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The natural cycle with HCG trigger could be considered as an alternative protocol to mild hormonally or artificial cycle regimens in vitrification thawed blastocyst transfers.