Bispectral index in pediatrics: fashion or a new tool?

Investigation of the Optimum Time for Intravenous Access After Anesthesia Induction with Sevoflurane in Pediatric Patients Without Premedication

Objective:

Anesthesia induction is usually achieved with sevoflurane for pediatric patients without vascular access. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimum intravenous access time and to evaluate the corresponding bispectral index (BIS) value in pediatric patients after sevoflurane induction.

Method:

This prospective study included 100 children enrolled between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018 at Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital. Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane and oxygen. Measurements included mask adaptation time, time to loss of the ciliary reflex, time to recovery of regular breathing, and optimal timing of intravenous access time with the corresponding BIS values, as well as the time elapsed for the BIS value to fall below 60.

Results:

The mean mask adaptation time was 27.8±28.4 s, time to loss of the ciliary reflex was 39.7±10.3 s, and time to reach regular respiration was 88.5±116.9 s, with mean BIS value of 80.4±16.9, 70.2±10.4, and 52.4±12.1, respectively. The mean time for BIS to fall below 60 was 72.54±24.41 s. The mean time required for the the iniation of optimal intravenous access was 104.92±36.45 s, with a mean BIS value of 30±10.1.

Conclusion

Following anesthesia induction with sevoflurane in children, the BIS value below 60 which is the upper limit for surgical anesthesia, was found to be insufficient for intravenous intervention. For pediatric patients undergoing sevoflurane induction it has been concluded that, the BIS value below 30 or an average waiting time of 104.9 s is ideal for initiation of optimal intravenous access.

The power of N-PASS, aEEG, and BIS in detecting different levels of sedation in neonates: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Sedatives are essential drugs in every intensive care unit in order to ensure the patient's optimal level of comfort. Avoiding conditions of over- and under-sedation is a challenge in a neonatal intensive care setting. Drug administration could be optimized by the concomitant use of objective methods to assess the level of sedation.

AIMS

We aimed to look at the ability of different methods (Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale, amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram, and Bispectral Index), and their combination, in detecting different level of sedation.

METHODS

Twenty-seven neonates among whom 17 were receiving sedatives with or without opiate analgesics were monitored using the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale, the amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram, and the Bispectral Index. According to the expert opinion of two trained neonatologists, patients were categorized into three groups: no, light, and deep sedation. Four hours of simultaneous assessment of the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale scores, Burdjalov scores (to summarize the amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram trace), and Bispectral Index values were considered for the comparative analysis across these groups.

RESULTS

All three methods could differentiate patients who were not sedated from those who were deeply sedated: median score 12 and 9, respectively, (95% CI of difference = 1.99-5.99, P = 0.001) for the amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram Burdjalov score; median 1 and -5, respectively, (95% CI of difference = 2.99-8.00, P = 0.001) for the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; and median 48 and 37, respectively, (CI of difference = 1.77-22.00, P = 0.043) for the Bispectral Index. However none of them, used alone, was able to differentiate light and deep sedation: median score 10 and 9, respectively, for the amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram Burdjalov score; median -2 and -5, respectively, for the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; and median 48 and 37, respectively, for the Bispectral Index. Only the amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram and the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale were able to differentiate between the conditions of no sedation and light sedation. Also, according to the area under the curves values, the combination of the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale with the Burdjalov score derived from the amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram showed the best accuracy in differentiating light and deep sedation.

CONCLUSION

While none of the three methods alone was able to precisely differentiate between different levels of sedation, we suggest that using a combination of amplitude-integrated Electroencephalogram and Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale can be useful to distinguish between light and deep sedation in neonatal patients.

Safety and efficacy of propofol anesthesia for pediatric target-controlled infusion in children below 3 years of age: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Although the requirement of propofol in children is increasing, propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia below 3 years old has not been approved in Korea. This study can provide a clinical evidence to increase the range of approval.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients below 3 years of age who underwent surgery between September 2013 and December 2016. Safety was evaluated on the basis of vital signs, and laboratory findings and efficacy were evaluated on the basis of the bispectral index (BIS). Adverse events were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients anesthetized with propofol (propofol group) were compared with 109 patients with volatile anesthetics (volatile group) after propensity score matching. There was a difference in the proportion of patients showing decreased systolic pressure (P < 0.001) and heart rate (P = 0.03), but there was no difference in diastolic pressure (P = 0.238), mean arterial pressure (P = 0.175) during surgery. After surgery, there was no difference in all vital signs and the proportion patients who experienced adverse events of two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol anesthesia by target-controlled infusion was effective and didn't show serious propofol-related perioperative adverse events.

Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Desflurane for Maintaining BIS Below 50 in Children and Effect of Caudal Analgesia on it

Context:

Neuraxial techniques have sedative properties secondary to decreased inputs from sensory and motor afferents. We hypothesized that caudal analgesia decreases the requirement of desflurane as measured by bispectral index (BIS).

Aims:

This study aims to determine the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane for maintaining BIS below 50 (MACBIS₅₀) in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and study the effect of caudal analgesia on the same.

Settings and Design:

This is prospective and observational study.

Subjects and Methods:

Thirty-nine American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II children in between 1 and 8 years of age undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery under general anesthesia were allocated randomly into two groups (Group C and Group D) after induction with sevoflurane and LMA insertion. In Group C, caudal block was performed with 0.75 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine and BIS values were recorded after 10 min for 1 min at 10 s intervals. In Group D, BIS was recorded for desflurane for 1 min at 10 s intervals followed by a caudal block with the same dose.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Dixon up-down method with a step size of 0.5%, and probit analysis were used for analysis.

Results:

A total of 39 patients were enrolled. MAC of desflurane for maintaining MACBIS₅₀ was 5.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.22–5.95) in Group D and 4.31 (95% CI 3.12–5.08) in Group C. The use of caudal anesthesia lowered the MAC of desflurane for maintaining MACBIS₅₀ in children by 22.36% (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The use of caudal analgesia significantly reduced MAC of desflurane for maintaining MACBIS₅₀ in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries using LMA.

An observational study exploring amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram and spectral edge frequency during paediatric anaesthesia

Processed electroencephalography is used in adults to guide anaesthesia, but the algorithms used may not apply to infants. Knowledge of infants' electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to anaesthetics is fragmentary. An earlier pilot study suggested amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) may be a useful measure of anaesthetic effect. The aim of this study was to determine how aEEG changes between awake and anaesthetised children of varying ages and to compare the response to that seen with Spectral Edge Frequency 90% (SEF90). A prospective observational study of children receiving a general anaesthetic was conducted. Anaesthetic regimen remained at the discretion of the treating anaesthetist. EEG data were collected using the BrainZ ReBrim(TM) monitor using forehead and biparietal montages. SEF90 and aEEG were compared across age groups, EEG montage and between awake and anaesthetised states. A total of 178 children (aged 24 days to 14 years) were recruited. All aEEGs were greater during anaesthesia compared to when awake and this difference varied with age. Only children older than two years showed lower SEF90 while anaesthetised compared to when awake. SEF90 from children younger than six months was higher during anaesthesia compared to when awake. Analysis of parietal and forehead EEG montages revealed age-related differences. These findings suggest that SEF90 and aEEG can discriminate between awake and anaesthetised states in older children. In younger children aEEG changes are less pronounced and SEF90 either cannot discriminate between states or responds paradoxically. The aEEG may be marginally better than other EEG parameters in measuring anaesthetic depth in children.

Anesthetic-specific electroencephalographic patterns during emergence from sevoflurane and isoflurane in infants and children

BACKGROUND

Devices that monitor the depth of anesthesia are increasingly used to titrate sedation and avoid awareness during anesthesia. Many of these monitors are based upon electroencephalography (EEG) collected from large adult reference populations and not pediatric populations (Anesthesiology, 86, 1997, 836; Journal of Anaesthesia, 92, 2004, 393; Anesthesiology, 99, 2003, 34). We hypothesized that EEG patterns in children would be different from those previously reported in adults and that they would show anesthetic-specific characteristics.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed written consent was obtained. Patients were randomized to receive maintenance anesthesia with isoflurane or sevoflurane. EEG data collection included at least 10 min at steady-state maintenance anesthesia. The EEG was recorded continuously through emergence until after extubation. A mixed model procedure was performed on global and regional power by pooled data analysis and by analyzing each anesthetic group separately. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven children completed the study (ages 22 days-3.6 years). Isoflurane and sevoflurane had different effects on global and regional EEG power during emergence from anesthesia, and frontal predominance patterns were significantly different between these two anesthetic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The principal finding of the present study was that there are anesthetic-specific and concentration-dependent EEG effects in children. Depth-of-anesthesia monitors that utilize algorithms based on the EEGs of adult reference populations therefore may not be appropriate for use in children.

Awareness during pediatric anesthesia: what is the position of European pediatric anesthesiologists?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of awareness in the pediatric population is reported as high as 1 : 125. An online survey was conducted about the current perception and practice of members of the British and French pediatric anesthesia societies regarding awareness during general anesthesia.

METHODS

Following the approval of the executive committees of the British and French pediatric anesthesia societies, members with a valid email contact address were invited to participate in a web-based survey. Perceived risk factors, use of awareness monitors, pre- and postoperative discussions of awareness as well as personal experience were enquired.

RESULTS

A total of 302 (51%) responded to the email survey. More than 60% indicated that awareness is a problem in pediatric anesthesia with the majority estimating an incidence of 1 : 1000. Almost half (49%) the respondents believe that awareness is age-dependent and 50% are not concerned below 1 month of age. More than 86% of respondents do not discuss the risk of awareness with the parents or actively look for awareness despite 27% reporting at least one episode in their practice. Intra-operative monitoring almost exclusively consists of clinical signs and endtidal anesthetic concentrations. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring is routinely used by approximately 10% of the surveyed members.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey demonstrates that European pediatric anesthesiologists perceive awareness as a major problem. However, none seems to address the issue openly or looks for its presence routinely. The vast majority of pediatric anesthesiologists rely almost exclusively on clinical monitoring and endtidal anesthetic concentrations for its detection.

Level of sedation evaluation with Cerebral State Index and A-Line Arx in children undergoing diagnostic procedures

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of anesthesia depth is difficult clinically, particularly in children. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation existing between CSI (Cerebral State Index), or AAI (A-line ARX) and a clinical sedation scale such as UMSS (University of Michigan Sedation Scale), during deep sedation with propofol in children undergoing diagnostic procedures.

METHODS

Twenty ASA I and II children, scheduled to undergo deep sedation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS), were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to receive depth of anesthesia monitoring with CSI or AAI. The anesthetist administered repeated doses of propofol every 10 s to a UMSS score of 3-4. An attending anesthetist, not involved in drug administration, recorded time and doses of sedation medications, vital signs, UMSS score and CSI or AAI score. All the evaluations were recorded at awake state (baseline), every 10 s until an UMSS score of 3-4 and every 3 min until the children were awake.

RESULTS

We enrolled 13 males and seven females ranging in age from 8 months to 7 years. After induction of anesthesia CSI and AAI scores decreased and from the end of the procedure to emergence the two scores increased. The CSI data showed a strong correlation with the UMSS scores (r = -0.861; P < 0.0001); we found a similar correlation between the AAI data and the UMSS scores (r = -0.823; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that CSI and AAI may be two, real-time and objective tools to assess induction and emergence during propofol sedation in children undergoing EGDS and MRI.

[Awareness: a problem in paediatric anaesthesia?]

Intraoperative awareness has been reported to occur in 0.8-5.0% of paediatric patients undergoing anaesthesia and, therefore, seems to be more common than in adults (incidence 0.1-0.2%). In adult patients, the consequences of intraoperative awareness are well known and can be severe, in children, however, they have not yet been adequately studied. The causes for intraoperative awareness can be divided into three broad categories: First, no or only a light anaesthetic is given on purpose, second, an insufficient dose of an anaesthetic is given inadvertently, third, there is equipment malfunction or the anaesthesiologist makes an error. Unfortunately, especially in young children, painful interventions are still performed without adequate analgesia, e.g. awake intubation or fracture manipulation under midazolam sedation alone. The key issue is, however, that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics change enormously from the 500 g preterm baby to the adolescent patient. Adequate dosing is much more difficult in paediatric patients compared to standard adult surgical patients. Solid knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of commonly used drugs in different paediatric age groups, as well as aiming for perfection in daily care will help to reduce the incidence of awareness. Methods for monitoring the depth of hypnosis, e.g. the bispectral index, will be used increasingly, at least in children above 1 year of age. In addition to clinical parameters, they will hopefully help to further reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness.

Comparative evaluation of Bispectral Index and Narcotrend Index in children below 5 years of age

BACKGROUND

The use of electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring devices for assessing the depth of hypnosis is most difficult in children under 5 years of age.

METHODS

Forty five children aged 0-60 months were included in a prospective observational study. A direct comparison of the processed EEG variables Bispectral Index (BIS, version 3.4) and Narcotrend Index (NI, version 2.0AF) was to be achieved by simultaneous recording. The ability of these parameters to differentiate between various clinical states was evaluated by using the prediction probability (P(k)). Age-related effects on the BIS and NI were analyzed by dividing the children into three age groups: 0-6, 7-18 and 19-60 months.

RESULTS

The preanesthesia, conscious children were differentiated from anesthetized patients by the BIS and NI with no overlap (P(k) = 1.0). In the awake period the BIS was superior to the NI (P(k) to differentiate 'end of anesthesia' from 'awakening' was 0.97 vs 0.73 respectively; P = 0.002). Patients aged 7-18 months showed higher BIS and NI values in the course of anesthesia than the younger and older children (P = 0.001). On awakening, children aged 0-6 months showed the lowest mean BIS (n.s.) and NI (P = 0.006) values.

CONCLUSIONS

The BIS currently seems to be superior to the NI, but age-related processing algorithms of the raw EEG must be implemented in both BIS and NI in order to be useful in children younger than 5 years of age.

Depth of Anesthesia Monitoring

Depth-of-anesthesia monitoring with EEG or EEG combined with mLAER is becoming widely used in anesthesia practice. Evidence shows that this monitoring improves outcome by reducing the incidence of intra-operative awareness while reducing the average amount of anesthesia that is administered, resulting in faster wake-up and recovery, and perhaps reduced nausea and vomiting. As with any monitoring device, there are limitations in the use of the monitors and the anesthesiologist must be able to interpret the data accordingly. The limitations include the following. The currently available monitoring algorithms do not account for all anesthetic drugs, including ketamine, nitrous oxide and halothane. EMG and other high-frequency electrical artifacts are common and interfere with EEG interpretation. Data processing time produces a lag in the computation of the depth-of-anesthesia monitoring index. Frequently the EEG effects of anesthetic drugs are not good predictors of movement in response to a surgical stimulus because the main site of action for anesthetic drugs to prevent movement is the spinal cord. The use of depth-of-anesthesia monitoring in children is not as well understood as in adults. Several monitoring devices are commercially available. The BIS monitor is the most thoroughly studied and most widely used, but the amount of information about other monitors is growing. In the future, depth-of-anesthesia monitoring will probably help in further refining and better understanding the process of administering anesthesia.

Intraoperative awareness in children: myth or reality?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will outline old and recent data about the prevalence, causes and potential consequences of intraoperative awareness in children and give details on its detection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have confirmed the higher incidence of intraoperative awareness in children than in adults while using modern anaesthetic techniques. To detect this complication in children, the Brice interview, commonly used in adults, has to be adapted to children's cognitive capacities, with an extended follow-up. Neither the old nor the recent studies clearly identify predictive risk factors. Children describe the same perceptions as adults during their awareness period (mainly auditory and tactile sensations), but with fewer negative thoughts. Moreover, they do not seem to be affected by this experience, as they do not have long-term psychological sequelae. The prevention of intraoperative awareness in children is the same as in adults, the major factor being awareness of this complication.

SUMMARY

Intraoperative awareness is a reality in school-aged children. A larger multicentre study and large-scale follow-up is required in order to confirm the higher incidence of awareness and identify the risk factors and long-term psychological sequelae of this complication in the paediatric population.

Reflex pupillary dilatation in response to skin incision and alfentanil in children anaesthetized with sevoflurane: a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables

BACKGROUND

Estimation of analgesia in anaesthetized children is often imprecise, and consequently, anaesthesiologists commonly evaluate children's response to surgical stimulation by movement or haemodynamic changes. In adults reflex pupillary dilatation has been demonstrated to be a very sensitive measure of noxious stimulation, correlated with opioid concentrations. The autonomic nervous control changes with age, raising the hypothesis that mechanisms involved in pupillary autonomic functions regarding both sympathetic and parasympathetic components may also differ between adults and children. In this pilot study, we tested the hypothesis that the pupillary reflex dilatation might allow assessment of noxious stimulation and analgesic effect of alfentanil in children under sevoflurane anaesthesia, as an alternative to haemodynamic and bispectral measures.

METHODS

After sevoflurane induction, 24 children were maintained in steady-state conditions at 1.5 MAC of sevoflurane in O(2)-N(2)O (50-50). An intense noxious stimulation was provided by standardized skin incision on the lower limb. A bolus of alfentanil (10 microg kg(-1)) was administered either 1 min (n=16) or 2 min (n=8) after skin incision. Haemodynamic values, bispectral index (BIS) and pupillary diameter (PD) were recorded just before stimulation and at 30-60 s intervals during 4 subsequent minutes.

RESULTS

In all children PD increased significantly after noxious stimulation [+200 (40)%, at 60 s]. In contrast, mean heart rate and blood pressure increased only 11 (7)% and 10 (8)% respectively, 60 s after stimulation. BIS did not change significantly. In all children, alfentanil injection induced a rapid decrease of PD and restored pre-incision values in 2 min.

CONCLUSION

PD is a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables of heart rate, arterial blood pressure and BIS in children anaesthetized with sevoflurane.

Inhalational anesthetics in pediatric anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss interesting recent developments concerning the use of halogenated agents. Now we are in a new stage of halogen use; we have become alerted to the secondary effects which although not life-threatening are potentially deleterious.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature highlighted some unexpected effects with the use of new halogens such as emergence agitation associated with rapid elimination of new anesthetics, or epileptogenic effect of sevoflurane. In addition, recent advances in monitoring of depth of anesthesia may contribute to a more-precise dosing of halogens and concomitant decrease of the deleterious side effects.

SUMMARY

Based on this new approach, the therapeutic range of the new halogenated agents may be revisited and possibly narrowed.

Measuring anesthesia in children using the EEG

Advances in electroencephalogram (EEG) processing have produced new interest in measuring anesthesia using the EEG. There are a number of EEG-based anesthesia 'depth' monitors now available and their use in pediatric anesthesia is increasing. Although these monitors have been extensively studied in adults, there are relatively few studies examining their validity or use in children. To some extent we must rely on adult data. However, extrapolation of data from adults to children requires an in depth understanding of the physiology behind the data. The first question is what is being measured. What is anesthesia? A model of anesthesia has several components with arousal as a core component. Arousal can be linked to clinical observations, and correlates with anatomical and physiological studies. The EEG has characteristics that fairly consistently change with arousal during anesthesia, but the relationship between arousal and the EEG is imprecise and drug dependent. This relationship is the basis for using the EEG to measure anesthesia and provides only an indirect measure of consciousness and memory formation. A good understanding of how the EEG is related to anesthesia is essential when interpreting the EEG during anesthesia, and especially when extending the use of the EEG to measure anesthesia in children. Physiological studies in adults and children indicate that EEG-derived anesthesia depth monitors can provide an imprecise and drug-dependent measure of arousal. Although the outputs from these monitors do not closely represent any true physiological entity, they can be used as guides for anesthesia and in so doing have improved outcomes in adults. In older children the physiology, anatomy and clinical observations indicate the performance of the monitors may be similar to that in adults, although the clinical relevance of outcomes may be different. In infants their use cannot yet be supported in theory or in practice.

[Which sedation scale should be used in the paediatric intensive care unit? A comparative prospective study]

OBJECTIVES

To compare pain and sedation assessments by nurses undertaken with the Objective Pain Scale (OPS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to the current reference scale for paediatric intensive care that is the COMFORT scale. To compare the unmodified COMFORT scale to a COMFORT "behaviour" scale which does not include physiologic items. To evaluate the ease of use of these scales.

METHODS

This prospective observational comparative study was carried out in children aged 1 year or older who were admitted in an intensive care unit. At 2 to 3 time points within 24 hours, a pain sedation assessment was carried out by the nurse in charge of the child with COMFORT scale, OPS and VAS. Correlation tests were used to compare the scores of each scale.

RESULTS

Nurses recorded 55 assessments in 20 children. Correlation studies showed a poor correlation between OPS, VAS and the COMFORT scale (Spearman's r=0.54 and 0.53 respectively) and a strong correlation between the COMFORT scale and the COMFORT "behaviour" scale (Spearman's r=0.96). The COMFORT behaviour scale was the most frequently fully completed scale.

CONCLUSION

Among the 3 scales compared to the COMFORT scale in this study, the COMFORT "behaviour" scale was the only one to show a strong correlation and it also seemed to be the easiest to use.