Effect of epidural clonidine on minimum local anesthetic concentration (ED50) of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children

Effect of caudal ketamine on minimum local anesthetic concentration of ropivacaine in children: a prospective randomized trial

Background

Caudal ketamine has been shown to provide an effective and prolonged post-operative analgesia with few adverse effects. However, the effect of caudal ketamine on the minimum local anesthetic concentration (MLAC) of ropivacaine for intra-operative analgesia is unclear.

Methods

One hundred and sixty-nine children were randomized to five groups: Group C (caudal ropivacaine only), Group K_0.25 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.25 mg/kg ketamine), Group K_0.5 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.5 mg/kg ketamine), Group K_0.75 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.75 mg/kg ketamine), and Group K_1.0 (caudal ropivacaine plus 1.0 mg/kg ketamine). The primary outcome was the MLAC values of ropivacaine with/without ketamine for caudal block.

Results

The MLAC values of ropivacaine were 0.128% (0.028%) in the control group, 0.112% (0.021%) in Group K_0.25, 0.112% (0.018%) in Group K_0.5, 0.110% (0.019%) in Group K_0.75, and 0.110% (0.020%) in Group K_1.0. There were no significant differences among the five groups for the MLAC values (p = 0.11). During the post-operative period the mean durations of analgesia were 270, 381, 430, 494, and 591 min in the control, K_0.25, K_{0. 5}, K_0.75, and K_1.0 groups respectively, which shown that control group is significantly different from all ketamine groups. Also there were significant differences between K_0.25 and K_0.75 groups, and between K_1.0 groups and the other ketamine groups.

Conclusions

Adding caudal ketamine to ropivacaine prolong the duration of post-operative analgesia; however, it does not decrease the MLAC of caudal ropivacaine for intra-operative analgesia in children.

Clinical trial registration

ChiCTR-TRC-13003492. Registered on 13 August 2013.

Sequential allocation trial design in anesthesia: an introduction to methods, modeling, and clinical applications

Estimation of the dose-response curve for new anesthetic protocols typically focuses on identifying minimum effective doses. The application of a sequential experimental method is appropriate, as it minimizes sample size requirements by updating dose assignments based on information accrued from successive subjects. One approach is the up-and-down method for estimating the median effective dose in a patient population (ED₅₀ ). Designs better suited for achieving greater than 50% effectiveness, include the biased coin approach, and continual reassessment method. In this review we introduce different sequential design methods, provide examples of their use, and show through simulation how the method employed influences sample size and the accuracy of the estimated dose. Simulation studies are presented to illustrate the effects of dose parameter and stopping rule choice for up-and-down method and biased coin approach. For continual reassessment method, the effects of assumed dose-response model, prior guess, and cohort size are simulated. A binary response regression curve was fit to the data in Saidman and Eger's endtidal halothane dose-finding study to provide a dose-response curve for generating simulations. A range of options exist when designing a study using sequential allocation with biased coin approach or continual reassessment method. Method choice influences the required sample size and confidence in estimated effect. In the halothane example, up-and-down method decreases the required sample size by 20-30% when the choice of design parameters is optimal. For both up-and-down method and biased coin approach designs, greater sample sizes, arising from adjusted stopping criteria, might be required to achieve reliable estimates. The continual reassessment method is only efficient if a limited range of doses can be chosen a priori. In conclusion the up-and-down method can be more efficient than nonsequential designs for the estimation of the median dose/intervention level for a given intervention (ED₅₀ ). The biased coin approach or continual reassessment method are preferred for the estimation of higher or lower tail quantiles such as ED₉₀ or ED₁₀ . Continual reassessment method may be superior if knowledge of the dose-response relationship is available for the drug of interest.

Comparison of lumbar epidural bupivacaine with fentanyl or clonidine for postoperative analgesia in children with cerebral palsy after single-event multilevel surgery

AIM

To compare diazepam use, muscle spasm, analgesia, and side effects when clonidine or fentanyl are added to epidural bupivacaine in children with cerebral palsy after multilevel orthopaedic surgery.

METHOD

Fifty children were prospectively randomized to receive clonidine (n=24, mean age 10y 10mo [SD 2y 11mo]) or fentanyl (n=26, mean age 10y 11mo [SD 2y 10mo]).

RESULTS

There was no difference in primary outcome measures: median diazepam use (fentanyl 0, interquartile range [IQR] 0-0; clonidine 0, IQR 0-0; p=0.46), any muscle spasm (no muscle spasms in: fentanyl, 36%; clonidine, 62%; p=0.11), painful muscle spasm (fentanyl 40%; clonidine 25%; p=0.46), or pain score ≥6 (none: fentanyl 44%; clonidine 42%; p=0.29). There were differences in secondary outcome measures: no vomiting (clonidine 63%; fentanyl 20%); vomiting occurred more frequently with fentanyl (32% vomited more than three times; clonidine none; p=0.001). Fentanyl resulted in more oxygen desaturation (at least two episodes: fentanyl 20%; clonidine 0; p<0.001). Clonidine resulted in lower mean (SD) area under the curve for systolic blood pressure (fentanyl 106.5 [11.0]; clonidine 95.7mmHg [7.9]) and heart rate (fentanyl 104.9 beats per minute [13.6]; clonidine 85.3 [11.5]; p<0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Clonidine and fentanyl provide adequate analgesia with low rates of muscle spasm, resulting in low diazepam use. The choice of epidural additive should be based upon the most tolerable side-effect profile.

Retrobulbar dexmedetomidine decreases the MLAC of ropivacaine in vitreoretinal surgery in children

PURPOSE

Dexmedetomidine can prolong the duration of local anesthetics, but the effect of retrobulbar dexmedetomidine on the potency of ropivacaine for retrobulbar block has not been investigated. Our study was designed to determine the effect of retrobulbar dexmedetomidine on ropivacaine for retrobulbar block in children.

METHODS

A group of 90 children aged 10-16 years scheduled for vitreoretinal surgery who received retrobulbar block were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: group L (retrobulbar ropivacaine), group LD1 (ropivacaine plus 0.5 µg.kg-1 dexmedetomidine), or group LD2 (ropivacaine plus 1 µg.kg-1 dexmedetomidine). The minimum local anesthetic concentration (MLAC) was determined according to a Dixon-Massey protocol. The primary endpoint of the study was MLAC. Secondary outcomes were duration of postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain scores, dexmedetomidine side effects, and time to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The MLAC values of retrobulbar ropivacaine were 0.314%, 0.259%, and 0.246% in groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively. The median (interquartile range) durations of analgesia in the postoperative period were 66 (54-117), 89 (40-157), and 168 (120-194) minutes in groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively (L vs LD1 or LD2, p&lt;0.05). Wake-up time was significantly increased in groups LD1 and LD2.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrobulbar dexmedetomidine reduces the MLAC values of ropivacaine and improves postoperative analgesia in children without any neurologic side effects.

Adjuvants in pediatric regional anesthesia

SUMMARY Local anesthetics have a limited duration of action. Adjuvants are used to prolong the duration of action and to augment analgesia allowing lower concentrations of local anesthetic to be used. Adjuvants have been used more extensively with neuraxial blocks, particularly caudal epidural blocks, but more recently to supplement peripheral nerve blocks. Intrathecal adjuvants are not covered in this review since spinal anesthesia is not widely used in children except in ex-premature infants. Morphine is the historical gold-standard with which other adjuvants are compared. Clonidine is most useful and is becoming increasingly popular, while the side-effect profile of other agents reduces their utility. Concerns with regard to the neurotoxicity of ketamine in animal models has led to its withdrawal in some countries.

The effectiveness of pudendal nerve block versus caudal block anesthesia for hypospadias in children

BACKGROUND

Caudal block (CB) has some disadvantages, one of which is its short duration of action after a single injection. For hypospadias repair, pudendal nerve block (PNB) might be a suitable alternative since it has been successfully used for analgesia for circumcision. We evaluated PNB compared with CB as measured by total analgesic consumption 24 hours postoperatively.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blinded study, patients were randomized into 2 groups, either receiving CB or nerve stimulator-guided PNB. In the PNB group, patients were injected with 0.3 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg clonidine. In the CB group, patients were injected with 1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg clonidine. Analgesic consumption was assessed during the first 24 hours postoperatively. The "objective pain scale" developed by Hannalah and Broadman was used to assess postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Eighty patients participated in the study, 40 in each group. The mean age in the PNB group was 3.1 (1.1) years and in the CB group was 3.2 (1.1) years. The mean weights in the PNB and CB groups were 15.3 (2.8) kg and 15.3 (2.2) kg, respectively. The percentage of patients who received analgesics during the first 24 hours were significantly higher in the CB (70%) compared with the PNB group (20%, P < 0.0001). The average amount of analgesics consumed per patient within 24 hours postoperatively was higher in the CB group (paracetamol P < 0.0001, Tramal P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received PNB had reduced analgesic consumption and pain within the first 24 hours postoperatively compared with CB.

Caudal dexmedetomidine decreases the required concentration of levobupivacaine for caudal block in pediatric patients: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dexmedetomidine (D) can prolong the duration of local anesthetics, but the effect of caudal dexmedetomidine on the potency of levobupivacaine (L) for caudal block has not been investigated. This study was designed to determine the effect of caudal dexmedetomidine on levobupivacaine for caudal block in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Eighty-nine children scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair or hydrocele were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: Group L (caudal levobupivacaine), Group LD1 (levobupivacaine plus 1 μg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine), or Group LD2 (levobupivacaine plus 2 μg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine). The primary endpoint was the minimum local anesthetic concentration (MLAC), which was determined using the Dixon up-and-down method. The secondary endpoints were the duration of analgesia and sedation.

RESULTS

The MLAC values (sd) of caudal levobupivacaine were 0.103 (0.01)%, 0.068 (0.02)%, and 0.055 (0.03)% in Groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively. The values of EC50 and EC95 (95% CI) of caudal levobupivacaine from logistic regression analysis were 0.094 (0.083-0.105)% and 0.129 (0.1-0.159)%, 0.058 (0.044-0.072)% and 0.106 (0.067-0.144)%, and 0.046 (0.033-0.059)% and 0.091 (0.055-0.127)% in Groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively. The mean durations of analgesia in the postoperative period were 141, 378, and 412 min in Groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively (L vs LD1 or LD2, P < 0.001). The mean durations of sedation in both Groups LD1 and LD2 also were significantly prolonged, compared with Group L (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal dexmedetomidine reduces the MLAC values of levobupivacaine and improves postoperative analgesia in children without any neurological side effects.

Neuraxial analgesia in neonates and infants: a review of clinical and preclinical strategies for the development of safety and efficacy data

Neuraxial drugs provide robust pain control, have the potential to improve outcomes, and are an important component of the perioperative care of children. Opioids or clonidine improves analgesia when added to perioperative epidural infusions; analgesia is significantly prolonged by the addition of clonidine, ketamine, neostigmine, or tramadol to single-shot caudal injections of local anesthetic; and neonatal intrathecal anesthesia/analgesia is increasing in some centers. However, it is difficult to determine the relative risk-benefit of different techniques and drugs without detailed and sensitive data related to analgesia requirements, side effects, and follow-up. Current data related to benefits and complications in neonates and infants are summarized, but variability in current neuraxial drug use reflects the relative lack of high-quality evidence. Recent preclinical reports of adverse effects of general anesthetics on the developing brain have increased awareness of the potential benefit of neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia to avoid or reduce general anesthetic dose requirements. However, the developing spinal cord is also vulnerable to drug-related toxicity, and although there are well-established preclinical models and criteria for assessing spinal cord toxicity in adult animals, until recently there had been no systematic evaluation during early life. Therefore, in the second half of this review, we present preclinical data evaluating age-dependent changes in the pharmacodynamic response to different spinal analgesics, and recent studies evaluating spinal toxicity in specific developmental models. Finally, we advocate use of neuraxial drugs with the widest demonstrable safety margin and suggest minimum standards for preclinical evaluation before adoption of new analgesics or preparations into routine clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of clonidine as additive for caudal regional anesthesia: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Clonidine is still the most popular additive for caudal regional anesthesia. Aim of the present quantitative systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combined use of clonidine and local anesthetics in comparison with caudal local anesthetics alone.

METHODS

The systematic search, data extraction, critical appraisal and pooled analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement. The systematic search included the Central register of controlled trials of the Cochrane Library (to present), MEDLINE (1966 to present), EMBASE (1980 to present) and CINAHL (1981 to present). Relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Revman(®) statistical software for dichotomous and continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials (published between 1994 and 2010) including 993 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a longer duration of postoperative analgesia in children receiving clonidine in addition to local anesthetic (MD: 3.98 h; 95% CI: 2.84-5.13; P < 0.00001). Furthermore, there was a lower number of patients requiring rescue analgesics in the clonidine group (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.90; P = 0.003). The incidence of complications (e.g., respiratory depression) remained very low and was not different to caudal local anesthetics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable evidence that caudally administered clonidine in addition to local anesthetics provides extended duration of analgesia with a decreased incidence for analgesic rescue requirement and little adverse effects compared to caudal local anesthetics alone.