Pre-operative assessment of extramural invasion and sphincteral involvement in rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging with phased-array coil

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lymph node staging remains a significant challenge in the treatment of rectal cancer. Pretreatment evaluation of lymph node metastasis guides the formulation of treatment plans. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI in lymph node staging using various morphological criteria.

Methods

A systematic search of the EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed. Original articles published between 2000 and January 2021 that used MRI for lymph node staging in rectal cancer were eligible. The included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Results

Thirty-seven studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of preoperative MRI for the lymph node stage were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.77), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68–0.80), and 7.85 (95% CI, 5.78–10.66), respectively. Criteria for positive mesorectal lymph node metastasis included (A) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm, (B) morphological standard, including an irregular border and mixed-signal intensity within the lymph node, (C) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm with the morphological standard, (D) a short-axis diameter of 8 mm with the morphological standard, and (E) a short-axis diameter of 10 mm with the morphological standard. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for these criteria were 75%/64%, 81%/67%, 74%/79%, 72%/66%, and 62%/91%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the criteria in sensitivity/specificity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values of the fitted summary ROC indicated a diagnostic accuracy rate of 0.75–0.81.

Conclusion

MRI scans have minimal accuracy as a reference index for pretreatment staging of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer. Multiple types of evidence should be used in clinical decision-making.

Selection of Patients With Rectal Cancer for Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Are T Category and Nodal Status All That Matters?

BACKGROUND

Although the accuracy of preoperative MRI staging has been established on follow-up histopathologic examination, the reproducibility of MRI staging has been evaluated in studies with expert radiologists reading a large sample of MRI images and therefore is not generalizable to the real-world setting.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of MRI for distance to the mesorectal fascia, T category, mesorectal lymph node status, and extramural depth of invasion for preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, cross-sectional survey.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included GI radiologists.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants read 5 preselected staging MRIs using a synoptic report and participated in an educational Webinar.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Distance to the mesorectal fascia, T category, extramural depth of invasion, and mesorectal lymph node status for each MRI were abstracted. Data were analyzed in aggregate using percentage of agreement, Fleiss κ, and interclass correlation coefficients to assess interrater reliability.

RESULTS

Reliability was highest for distance to the mesorectal fascia with an intraclass correlation of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.27-0.80). Kappa scores for T category, mesorectal lymph node status, and extramural depth of invasion were 0.38 (95% CI, 0.23-0.46), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32-0.49), and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.16-0.82). There was no difference when radiologists were stratified by experience or volume.

LIMITATIONS

Scores may have been affected by MRI selection, because they were chosen to demonstrate diagnostic challenges for the Webinar and did not reflect a representative sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Interrater reliability was highest for distance to mesorectal fascia, and therefore, it may be a more reliable criterion than T category, extramural depth of invasion, or mesorectal lymph node status. Combined with the fact that an uninvolved mesorectal fascia is more consistent with the overall goal of rectal cancer surgery, it should be considered as an important MRI criterion for preoperative treatment decision making in the real-world setting. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A763.

The role of imaging and biopsy in the management and staging of large non-pedunculated rectal polyps

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are often used for benign and Sm1 large non-pedunculated rectal polyps (LNPRPs), although other surgical techniques including transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) and transanal minimal invasive surgery remain available. This review covers the role of pre-excisional imaging and selective biopsy of LNPRPs. Areas covered: Polyps between 2 and 3 cm with favorable features (Paris 1, Kudo III/IV pit patterns, and non-lateral spreading type [LST]) may have a one-stage EMR without biopsy and imaging, provided adequate expertise is available with other technologies such as magnifying chromoendoscopy. Higher-risk polyps (moderate/severe dysplasia, 0-IIa+c morphology, nongranular LST, Kudo pit pattern V or submucosal carcinoma, or those >3 cm) should have pre-EMR/ESD imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) ± biopsies and photographs prior to multidisciplinary team discussion. Expert commentary: In some centers, EMR and ESD are considered the primary modality of treatment, with TEMS as a back-up, while elsewhere, TEMS is the main modality for excision of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer lesions. Likewise, the exact roles of ERUS and MRI will depend on availability of local expertise, although it is suggested that the techniques are complementary.

Endoscopic ultrasound in oncology: An update of clinical applications in the gastrointestinal tract

An accurate staging is necessary to select the best treatment and evaluate prognosis in oncology. Staging usually begins with noninvasive imaging such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. In the absence of distant metastases, endoscopic ultrasound plays an important role in the diagnosis and staging of gastrointestinal tumors, being the most accurate modality for local-regional staging. Its use for tumor and nodal involvement in pre-surgical evaluation has proven to reduce unnecessary surgeries. The aim of this article is to review the current role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer.

Defining the distal margin of rectal cancer for surgical planning

Accurate measurement of the distal rectal tumor margin is essential in selecting the appropriate surgical procedure. However, there is no standard measurement method. The National Cancer Institute consensus group recommends use of the anal verge (AV) as a landmark, and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology recommends use of the anorectal ring (ARR). In addition, whether measurements should be made on double contrast barium enema (BE) radiographs or magnetic resonance (MR) images remains controversial. We measured the distal tumor margin on both BE and MR images obtained preoperatively from 52 patients who underwent sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. The distances from the distal end of the tumor to the AV and the ARR were measured on both types of images, and the variability was investigated by Bland-Altman analysis. The mean distance from the tumor to the AV was 8.9 cm on the BE radiographs and 7.7 cm on the MR images (P=0.013). The mean distances to the ARR were 6.8 and 5.6 cm, respectively (P=0.070). Significant proportional bias was shown as the measured distances increased, the difference between the BE- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based measurements increased. Use of one or the other landmark did not affect selection of the appropriate surgical procedure. We conclude that an approximate 1-cm underestimation should be taken into account when MRI-based measurement of the distal rectal tumor margin is used to choose between sphincter-saving resection and abdominoperineal resection.

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of rectal cancer is directly related to the stage of the tumor at diagnosis. Accurate preoperative staging is essential for selecting patients to receive optimal treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI in tumor staging and circumferential resection margin involvement in rectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science database.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles from 2000 to 2016 on the diagnostic performance of MRI in the staging of rectal cancer and/or assessment of mesorectal fascia status were eligible.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pooled diagnostic statistics including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were calculated for invasion of muscularis propria, perirectal tissue, and adjacent organs and for circumferential resection margin involvement through bivariate random-effects modeling. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were fitted, and areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curves were counted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI for each outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Preoperative MRI revealed the highest sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) and specificity of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) for muscularis propria invasion and adjacent organ invasion. Areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curves indicated good diagnostic accuracy for each outcome, with the highest of 0.9515 for the assessment of adjacent organ invasion. Significant heterogeneity existed among studies. There was no notable publication bias for each outcome.

LIMITATIONS

This meta-analysis revealed relatively high diagnostic accuracy for preoperative MRI, although significant heterogeneity existed. Therefore, exploration should be focused on standardized interpretation criteria and optimal MRI protocols for future studies.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI showed relatively high diagnostic accuracy for preoperative T staging and circumferential resection margin assessment and should be reliable for clinical decision making.

The value of high-resolution MRI technique in patients with rectal carcinoma: pre-operative assessment of mesorectal fascia involvement, circumferential resection margin and local staging

Background

The purpose of the study was to identify the accuracy of high-resolution MRI in the pre-operative assessment of mesorectal fascia involvement, circumfrential resection margin (CRM) and local staging in patients with rectal carcinoma.

Material/Methods

The study included 56 patients: 32 male and 24 female. All patients underwent high-resolution MRI and had confirmed histopathological diagnosis of rectal cancer located within 15 cm from the anal verge, followed by surgery. MRI findings were compared with pathological and surgical results.

Results

The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI-based T-staging were 92.8, 88.8%, 96.5%, 96%, and 90.3%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI-based assessment of CRM were 94.6%, 84.6%, 97.6%, 91.4, and 94.6%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI-based N-staging were 82.1%, 75%, 67.3%, 60%, and 86.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

Preoperative high-resolution rectal MRI is accurate in predicting tumor stage and CRM involvement. MRI is a precise diagnostic tool to select patients who may benefit from neo-adjuvant therapy and to avoid overtreatment in those patients who can proceed directly to surgery.

Effectiveness of MRI for the assessment of mesorectal fascia involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Defining the most appropriate definition of mesorectal fascia involvement (MRF+) by reviewing literature and using new inclusion criteria to re-evaluate the effectiveness of MRI in the assessment of MRF+ for rectal cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched from 1999 to 2012. The bivariate random effects model was used to estimate the pooled outcomes of each subgroup. The definition of MRF+ in MRI and the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-ChRT) were especially discussed.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 1,600 patients were included. Different definitions of MRF+ (≤ 1, ≤ 2 and ≤ 5 mm) in MRI exhibited different pooled sensitivity (76, 79 and 92%), specificity (88, 66 and 48%) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (22.4, 6.6 and 16.0). The definition of MRF+ at ≤ 1 mm showed the highest DOR. The specificity (88 vs. 93%, p = 0.026) and DOR (15.5 vs. 39.0, p = 0.001) were lower in patients who underwent neo-ChRT than those who did not while using ≤ 1 mm as the definition of MRF+. However, the sensitivity showed no significant difference (67 vs. 74%, p = 0.129).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is valuable for the assessment of MRF. The most appropriate definition of MRF+ in MRI is ≤ 1 mm. The effectiveness is higher in patients who did not undergo neo-ChRT.

Accuracy of high-resolution MRI with lumen distention in rectal cancer staging and circumferential margin involvement prediction

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with lumen distention for rectal cancer staging and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement prediction.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-three patients with primary rectal cancer underwent high-resolution MRI with a phased-array coil performed using 60-80 mL room air rectal distention, 1-3 weeks before surgery. MRI results were compared to postoperative histopathological findings. The overall MRI T staging accuracy was calculated. CRM involvement prediction and the N staging, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed for each T stage. The agreement between MRI and histological results was assessed using weighted-kappa statistics.

Results

The overall MRI accuracy for T staging was 93.6% (k = 0.85). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for each T stage were as follows: 91.8%, 86.2%, 95.5%, 92.6% and 91.3% for the group ≤ T2; 90.4%, 94.6%, 86.1%, 87.5% and 94% for T3; 98,6%, 85.7%, 100%, 100% and 98.5% for T4, respectively. The predictive CRM accuracy was 94.5% (k = 0.86); the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 89.5%, 96.3%, 89.5%, and 96.3% respectively. The N staging accuracy was 68.49% (k = 0.4).

Conclusion

MRI performed with rectal lumen distention has proved to be an effective technique both for rectal cancer staging and involved CRM predicting.

Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features

BACKGROUND

Few studies that meticulously match individual lymph nodes seen on MRI with their precise histologic counterparts after total mesorectal excision have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether preoperative MRI could detect lymph node metastases accurately in the node-by-node analysis.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with rectal cancer were enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Specimens were assessed using MRI for clinical staging. After surgical resection of the tumor, the specimens were again imaged with ex vivo ultrasound scan to localize the perirectal node. The locations of each lymph node were precisely matched with its corresponding magnetic resonance image to enable a node-for-node comparison of magnetic resonance images and histologic findings.

RESULTS

Agreement between MRI and histologic assessment of T stage was 82.5%. Of the 341 nodes harvested, 120 were too small (<3 mm) to be depicted on magnetic resonance images, and 18 of these contained metastasis (15%). A correlation between the results of MRI and histopathology was feasible for 205 lymph nodes, and the overall success rate of matching between the 2 techniques was 91.1% (205 of 221). Preoperative MRI revealed a node-by-node sensitivity and positive predictive value of 58.0%, and 61.7%. There was no difference in the diagnostic accuracy between the primary surgery subgroup and preoperative radiation subgroups.

LIMITATIONS

The study is limited by its heterogeneity of cohorts including the subgroup with preoperative chemoradiation and the lack of preoperative ultrasound assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative MRI was moderately accurate for the prediction of mesorectal lymph node metastasis. Moreover, preoperative MRI was insufficient for detecting small lymph nodes (<3 mm) with metastasis.

Detection of rectal cancer and response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

INTRODUCTION

To diagnose rectal cancer and monitor treatment response after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in rectal cancer patients using proton-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 134 rectal cancer patients before treatment, of whom 34 underwent preoperative CCRT and follow-up MR spectroscopy before surgery. (1)H-MRS was performed using a six-channel phased-array coil at 3.0 T. We evaluated the presence of a choline peak at 3.2 ppm, and lipid peaks at 0.9 and 1.3 ppm, and glutamine and glutamate peaks at 2.1-2.3 and 2.7 ppm seen at two TEs (40 and 135 ms). We divided MR spectra patterns into two groups (A and B).

RESULTS

A choline peak at 3.2 ppm seen in both TEs was characteristic for rectal cancer before treatment. Of 103 patients, 55 (53%) showed an elevated choline peak before treatment (type A). Type A spectra were seen in 68% of patients (23/34) before preoperative CCRT. After CCRT, the choline peak disappeared, resulting in only the lipid peak at 1.3 ppm (type B) in 97% of patients (33/34).

DISCUSSION

We optimized a localized in vivo(1)H-MRS method for detection of rectal adenocarcinoma and monitoring treatment response after preoperative CCRT. The method appears to be a promising and feasible noninvasive modality.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for rectal cancer staging. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of phased array MRI for T category (T1-2 vs. T3-4), lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in primary rectal cancer.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations of keywords relating to rectal cancer and MRI. Reference lists of included articles were also searched by hand. Inclusion criteria were: (1) original article published January 2000-March 2011, (2) use of phased array coil MRI, (3) histopathology used as reference standard, and (4) raw data available to create 2×2 contingency tables. Patients who underwent preoperative long-course radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were estimated for each outcome using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics and bivariate random effects modeling.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis. There was notable heterogeneity among studies. MRI specificity was significantly higher for CRM involvement [94%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88-97] than for T category (75%, 95% CI 68-80) and lymph nodes (71%, 95% CI 59-81). There was no significant difference in sensitivity between the three elements as a result of wide overlapping CIs. Diagnostic odds ratio was significantly higher for CRM (56.1, 95% CI 15.3-205.8) than for lymph nodes (8.3, 95% CI 4.6-14.7) but did not differ significantly from T category (20.4, 95% CI 11.1-37.3).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has good accuracy for both CRM and T category and should be considered for preoperative rectal cancer staging. In contrast, lymph node assessment is poor on MRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has established itself as the primary method for local staging in patients with rectal cancer. This is due to several factors, most importantly because of the ability to assess the status of circumferential resection margin. There are several newer developments being introduced continuously, such as diffusion-weighted imaging and imaging with 3 T. Assessment of loco-regional lymph nodes has also been investigated extensively using different approaches, but more work needs to be done. Finally, evaluation of tumours during or after preoperative treatment is becoming an everyday reality. All these new aspects prompt a review of the most recent advances and opinions. In this review, a comprehensive overview of the current status of MRI in the loco-regional assessment and management of rectal cancer is presented. The findings on MRI and their accuracy are reviewed based on the most up-to-date evidence. Optimisation of MRI acquisition and relevant regional anatomy are also presented, based on published literature and our own experience.

Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

For rectal carcinoma treated according to the concept of total mesorectal excision (TME surgery), the independent influence of regional lymph node metastasis on the locoregional recurrence risk is still in discussion. A reliable assessment of this risk is important for an individualised selective indication for neoadjuvant radio-/radiochemotherapy.

METHODS

Analysis of literature, especially of the last 20 years, and consideration of pathological and oncological basic research. Multivariate analysis of data of the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Carcinoma.

RESULTS

The clinical assessment of the pretherapeutic regional lymph node status by the present available imaging methods is still unreliable. The analysis of the association between pretherapeutic regional lymph node status and locoregional recurrence risk has to be based on follow-up data of patients treated by primary surgery and has to be distinguished between patients treated by conventional and optimised quality-assured TME surgery, respectively. Data from Erlangen show an increase of the local recurrence risk for patients with at least four involved regional lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with at least four involved regional lymph nodes, a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy may be indicated. However, today, the pretherapeutic diagnosis is uncertain and results in overtherapy in 40%. Thus, in case of positive lymph node findings by imaging methods, the benefits and risk of neoadjuvant therapy in such situations should always be discussed with the patient in the sense of informed consent and shared decision.

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Preoperative staging is now an essential factor in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer because tumor stage is the strongest predictive factor for recurrence. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer can be divided into either local or distant staging. Local staging incorporates the assessment of mural wall invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement, as well as the nodal status for metastasis. Distant staging assesses for evidence of metastatic disease. The aim of this review is to consider the indications and limitations of the current preoperative imaging modalities for rectal cancer staging including clinical examination, endorectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography–computed tomography, with respect to local and distant disease.

Endosonographic staging of lower intestinal malignancy

The use of EUS in the assessment of rectal pathology is well established. The accurate staging of lower intestinal tumours predicts prognosis and guides the planning of individual patient treatment. Increased experience and the development of high resolution three-dimensional EUS has lead to the greater accuracy of rectal staging with EUS of rectal tumours now considered the gold standard showing T stage accuracy that ranges from 75% to 95%, with N stage accuracy ranging from 65% to 80%. The use of EUS in the staging of colonic pathology, however, is not so well established though advances in miniprobe EUS has improved the assessment of colonic tumours. EUS is also of benefit in the assessment of anal pathology though here, accurate correlation with histology has not been firmly established.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging in prediction of response after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To prospectively differentiate, at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, patients with locally advanced nonmucinous rectal cancer who will respond to long-course chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) from those who will not respond, with histopathologic results as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval for this study was obtained, and all patients provided written informed consent. High-spatial-resolution T2-weighted MR images were acquired before and 6-8 weeks after CRT in 53 patients (33 men, 20 women; mean age, 63 years; age range, 42-79 years). Patients were categorized as responders to CRT (patients with T3 cancer that converted to T2 or a lower stage, patients with T4 cancer that converted to T3 or a lower stage) or as nonresponders (patients with stable or progressive disease). At the posttreatment MR imaging examination, a decrease in signal intensity was considered to represent a morphologic response with fibrosis. Before CRT and surgery, tumor volume was calculated at MR imaging by multiplying cross-sectional area by section thickness. Tumor length was measured at MR imaging and in the histopathologic specimen. Nodal downstaging was evaluated. The relationship between pathologic response, morphologic MR imaging response, and percentage volume reduction was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon two-sample test.

RESULTS

Morphologic response assessment with MR imaging achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 84.2% (32 of 38) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 66.7% (10 of 15). Volume reduction extent (> or = 70%) was significantly different between patients in whom disease was downstaged and those in whom it was not downstaged (P = .000005) and showed additional diagnostic value, with an overall accuracy of 86.8% (46 of 53). Presurgical MR imaging and histopathologic tumor length did not show a significant difference. MR imaging accuracy for lymph node (N) stage was 86.8% (46 of 53) on the basis of morphologic criteria.

CONCLUSION

After CRT, morphologic and volumetric evaluation at MR imaging had a high PPV and a low NPV for response assessment. The detection of small clusters of residual tumor cells within fibrosis remains a problem.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/250/3/730/DC1.

Rectal villous tumours: MR features and correlation with TRUS in the preoperative evaluation

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of MR and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) imaging of rectal villous tumours to elucidate the correlation between imaging results and specific histopathological tumour features, such as tumour size (T) and lymph node involvement (N), in order to establish the better technique for the pre-surgical patient evaluation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

23 cases of villous tumours of the rectum were studied with phased-array MR and TRUS. All patients underwent either surgical or endoscopic treatment. Final diagnosis was based on histopathological results. In particular, the following features were characterized by the imaging techniques mentioned above: lesion site, distance between lesion and ano-rectal junction, size, morphology and contrast enhancement of lesions, fluid layer around the lesion, alterations of the deep layers of the rectal wall, sphincter infiltration, presence or absence of mesorectal, iliac and obturatory lymphnode involvement.

RESULTS

Histology established muscular involvement in 7 cases (T2), perirectal fat infiltration in 1 case (T3); in the remaining 15 cases, staging was Tis-T1. In 17/23 cases (73.9%) the lesions were correctly staged with both imaging techniques, whereas in 5/23 cases (21.7%) the lesions were overstaged. No cases were understaged. TRUS concorded with histological exams in 17/23 cases (73.9%). 5/23 cases (21.7%) were overstaged and 1/23 (4%) was understaged. MR and TRUS were in accordance in 20/23 cases (86.9%).

DISCUSSION

Considering the frequent degeneration of villous tumours, correct preoperative identification and precise evaluation of these lesions, such as the detection of rectal wall invasion, is essential in deciding optimal treatment strategy. MRI and TRUS allow the identification of specific features of villous tumours and of malignant degeneration, allowing for a correct local disease staging.

3-T MRI of rectal carcinoma: preoperative diagnosis, staging, and planning of sphincter-sparing surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of 3-T MRI in the preoperative diagnosis, staging, and planning of surgical management of rectal carcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women) with clinically suspected rectal carcinoma underwent 3-T MRI. Coronal, axial, and sagittal T2-weighted sequences with and without fat suppression; axial T1-weighted spin-echo sequences; axial T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences with and without fat suppression; oblique 2D MR hydrography; and 3D fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed. Image quality with these sequences was evaluated by three radiologists experienced in body MRI. The significance of difference in results with the sequences was tested. The manner in which MRI staging and feasibility of sphincter-sparing surgery agreed with operative and pathologic findings was evaluated with kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Rectal carcinoma was identified on MRI and confirmed histologically in all 38 patients. MRI findings were correctly predictive of T category in 35 cases (accuracy, 92.1%). In 31 (96.9%) of 32 resectable cases,sphincter-sparing surgical approaches were accurately chosen on the basis of MRI findings. Among the 11 sequences, 3D fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI best delineated tumor margins. Coronal and axial T2-weighted images also well depicted tumor margins with minimal artifact. T2-weighted images were superior to unenhanced T1-weighted images.

CONCLUSION

MRI of rectal cancer at 3 T is accurate for prediction of T category and the feasibility of sphincter-sparing surgery. The best images were obtained with coronal, sagittal, and axial T2-weighted sequences and 3D fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Imaging and management of rectal cancer

Local staging and management of rectal cancer has evolved during the past decade. Imaging modalities used for staging rectal cancer include CT, endoscopic ultrasound, pelvic phased-array coil MRI, endorectal MRI, and PET. Each modality has its strengths and limitations. Evidence supports the use of both endoscopic ultrasound and CT in staging rectal cancer. MRI is the only reliable tool for determining the status of the circumferential resection margin, which is important for the assessment of the risk of local recurrence.

Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils prospectively, and evaluate if endorectal coil provides any additional information to high resolution pelvic MR imaging in rectal carcinoma staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative MRI of 25 patients with rectal carcinoma was performed with pelvic phased-array coil alone, and with both phased-array coil and endorectal coil placed. Staging was made by evaluating images obtained by using both coils prospectively, and correlated with histopathologic staging. The images were then assessed separately, and compared to each other retrospectively.

RESULTS

Two and 3 of the 5 histopathologically proved T1 tumors were staged correctly on MRI with pelvic phased-array coil alone and after the endorectal coil placement, respectively. Histopathologically identified five T2 tumors were staged correctly as T2 in 4 of the cases, 1 was understaged and 10 of 14 patients who had T3 tumor were staged as T3, 4 of them were understaged as T2 on both techniques. Specificity, sensitivity and accuracy rates for staging of T3 tumors were found as 71%, 100% and 84%, respectively, for each technique. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of N staging were both 88% on both techniques.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic MR imaging after the placement of endorectal coil in addition to the phase-array coil was not superior to the imaging with phased-array coil alone in T staging of rectal carcinomas and the latter achieved better visualization of the lymph nodes by means of larger field of view.

Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Circumferential margin involvement (CMI) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with rectal cancer. This meta-analysis aims at evaluating the diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative evaluation of CMI in patients with rectal cancer.

METHOD

Quantitative meta-analysis was performed comparing MRI against histology after total mesorectal excision. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and subgroup analysis were undertaken. Study quality and heterogeneity were evaluated. Meta-regression meta-analysis was used to evaluate the significance of the difference in relative DORs.

RESULTS

Nine studies evaluating 529 patients were included. Pooled results showed an overall sensitivity and specificity for MRI detecting CMI preoperatively of 94% and 85% respectively. The SROC analysis demonstrated an overall weighted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (DOR 57.21, 95% CI 18.21-179.77), without significant heterogeneity between the studies (Q-value 14.66, P = 0.06). Good study quality further increased the sensitivity and specificity of MRI. The use of a 1.5 Tesla coil, a phased array coil and the inclusion of two interpreters also resulted in high preoperative diagnostic precision. Meta-regression meta-analysis showed a significant difference in the DOR for studies published in or since 2003 (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately predict CMI preoperatively for rectal cancer in single units and this is reproducible across different centres. This strategy has important implications for selection of patients for adjuvant therapy prior to surgery.

Preoperative loco-regional imaging in rectal cancer

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer can influence the choice of surgery and the use of neoadjuvant therapy. This review evaluates the use of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of rectal cancer. Staging for distant metastases is beyond the scope of this review. A MEDLINE search for published work in English between 1984-2004 was carried out by entering the key words of ERUS, MRI and preoperative imaging and rectal cancer. Initially, 867 articles were retrieved. Abstracts were reviewed and papers selected according to the inclusion criteria of a minimum of 50 patients and papers published in English. Papers focusing on preoperative chemoradiotherapy and distal metastases were excluded. Thirty-one papers were included in the systematic review. The examination techniques and images obtained are discussed and the respective accuracy is reviewed. ERUS and MRI have complementary roles in the assessment of tumour depth. Ultrasound has an overall accuracy of 82% (T1, 2, 40-100%; T3, 4, 25-100%) and is particularly useful for early localized rectal cancers. MRI has an accuracy of 76% (T1, 2, 29-80%; T3, 4, 0-100%) and is useful in more advanced disease by providing clearer definition of the mesorectum and mesorectal fascia. Both methods have similar accuracy in the assessment of nodal metastases. Ultrasound is more operator dependent and accuracies improve with experience, but it is more portable and accessible than MRI. Improvements in technology and increased operator experience have led to more accurate preoperative staging. ERUS and MRI are complementary and are most accurate for early localized cancers and more advanced cancers, respectively.

An update on imaging of colorectal cancer

Screening of asymptomatic average-risk patients for presence of colon cancer and early detection in precursor stages is of great interest to general population. Comprehensive evaluation of symptomatic or high-risk patients represents another important clinical focus. Available techniques for total colon imaging, rectal cancer staging and the role of positron emission tomography are discussed.

New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy

MRI is being increasingly used in oncology for staging, assessing tumour response and also for treatment planning in radiotherapy. Both conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy requires improved means of defining target volumes for treatment planning in order to achieve its intended benefits. MRI can add to the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) process by providing excellent and improved characterization of soft tissues compared with CT. Together with its multiplanar capability and increased imaging functionality, these advantages for target volume delineation outweigh its drawbacks of lacking electron density information and potential image distortion. Efficient MR distortion assessment and correction algorithms together with image co-registration and fusion programs can overcome these limitations and permit its use for RTP. MRI developments using new contrast media, such as ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for abnormal lymph node identification, techniques such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion MRI to better characterize tissue and tumour regions as well as ultrafast volumetric or cine MR sequences to define temporal patterns of target and organ at risk deformity and variations in spatial location have all increased the scope and utility of MRI for RTP. Information from these MR developments may permit treatment individualization, strategies of dose escalation and image-guided radiotherapy. These developments will be reviewed to assess their current and potential use for RTP and precision high dose radiotherapy.