A novel two-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography technique to assess anismus comparing with three-dimensional echodefecography

Role of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in assessing the anal sphincter morphology of female patients with chronic proctalgia

AIM

To assess the role of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) for morphological assessment of the anal sphincter of female patients with chronic proctalgia (CP).

METHODS

In this unmatched case control study, 30 consecutive female patients with CP and 25 normal women (control group) were enrolled. 3D-EAUS was performed in all subjects. Thickness and length of internal anal sphincter (IAS), thickness of puborectalis muscle (PR), length of the external anal sphincter (EAS) plus PR, and puborectalis angle were measured and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients with CP had significantly shorter IAS length and greater PR thickness, as compared to those in normal individuals (26.28 ± 3.59 mm vs 28.87 ± 4.84 mm, P < 0.05 and 9.67 ± 1.57 mm vs 8.85 ± 0.97 mm, P < 0.05, respectively). No significant between-group differences were observed with respect to IAS thickness and the EAS plus PR length (P > 0.05). Puborectalis angle in the CP group was significantly decreased, both in resting (88.23° ± 1.81° vs 89.94° ± 2.07° in control group, P < 0.05) and straining (88.47° ± 3.32° vs 90.72° ± 1.87° in control group, P < 0.05) phases, which suggest the presence of paradoxical contraction of PR in patients with CP. In the CP group, no significant difference in puborectalis angle was observed between the resting and straining phases (88.23° ± 1.81° vs 88.47° ± 3.32° respectively, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The association of greater PR thickness and paradoxical contraction of PR with CP suggest their potential value as markers of CP.

Is dynamic two-dimensional anal ultrasonography useful in the assessment of anismus? A comparison with manometry

CONTEXT

Anismus is a prevalent functional cause of outlet delay. It is characterized by symptoms of obstructed defecation associated with paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor muscles.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of two dimensional anal ultrasonography to identify anismus patients with paradoxical contraction or normal relaxation, comparing findings with manometric measurements.

METHODS

Forty-nine women presenting with outlet delay and a mean validated Wexner constipation score of 13.5 were included in a prospective study. Following screening with anal manometry, the patients were assigned to one of two groups: G-I -with normal relaxation and G-II -patients with anismus. Dynamic anorectal ultrasonography was used to quantifier the movement of the puborectalis muscle and to measure changes in the angle between two converging lines drawn from the 3 o'clock and the 9 o'clock positions of the endoprobe circumference to the internal border of the puborectalis muscle. The angle decreases during straining in patients with normal relaxation, but increases in patients with anismus. The agreement between the two techniques was verified with the Kappa index.

RESULTS

In manometry, during straining the anal canal pressure decreased by 41.3% in G-I and increased by 168.6% in G-II, indicating a diagnosis of anismus for the second group. In US, during straining, the angle produced by the movement of the puborectalis muscle decreased from 63 ± 1.31 to 58 ± 1.509 degrees (P = 0.0135) in 23 of the 30 patients in G-I, indicating normal relaxation, and increased from 66 ± 0.972 to 72 ± 0.897 degrees (P = 0.0001) in 16 of the 19 patients in G-II, indicating anismus. The index of agreement between manometry and two dimensional anal ultrasonography was moderate: 77% (23/30) for G-I and 84% (16/19) for G-II.

CONCLUSION

Two-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography showed similar results previously suggested by anal manometry at identifying patients with normal relaxation or paradoxical contraction.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal sonography in the assessment of patients presenting primarily with evacuatory difficulty: a short position paper

Patients presenting with primary evacuatory difficulty have a multiplicity of pelvic floor and perineal soft tissue anomalies. The radiological assessment of these patients requires modalities which monitor the dynamic interaction of pelvic organs during provocative manoeuvres such as straining and simulated defaecation. The advantages and disadvantages of these complementary modalities, (dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, dynamic transperineal sonography and dynamic 2- and 3-dimensional endoanal sonography) are provided in this position paper.