Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute haemorrhagic rectal ulcer, and endoscopic haemostatic treatment: a retrospective study of 95 patients

Rebleeding Risk of Acute Hemorrhagic Rectal Ulcer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objective Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU) is characterized by sudden, painless, and massive bleeding from rectal ulcers. To date, few studies have analyzed the risk factors for AHRU rebleeding. In this study, we clarified the risk factors of rebleeding after initial hemostasis of AHRU through a multicenter study. Methods A total of 149 patients diagnosed with AHRU between January 2015 and May 2020 at 3 medical centers were enrolled. We retrospectively investigated the following factors: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), performance status (PS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), comorbidities, medications, laboratory examinations, endoscopic findings, view of the entire rectum on endoscopy, hemostasis method, blood transfusion history, shock, instructions for posture change after initial hemostasis, and clinical course. Results Rebleeding was observed in 35 (23%) of 149 patients. A multivariate analysis showed that significant factors for rebleeding were PS 4 [odds ratio (OR), 5.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.97-13.9; p=0.001], a blood transfusion history (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.41-9.51; p=0.008), low an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; p=0.001), poor view of the whole rectum on endoscopy (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90; p=0.030), and use of monopolar hemostatic forceps (OR, 4.89; 95% CI, 1.37-17.4; p=0.014). Conclusion Factors associated with rebleeding of AHRU were a poor PS (PS 4), blood transfusion, a low eGFR, poor view of the whole rectum on endoscopy, and the use of monopolar hemostatic forceps.

High risk stigmata and treatment strategy for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide study in Japan

BACKGROUND

 The rebleeding risks and outcomes of endoscopic treatment for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) may differ depending on the bleeding location, type, and etiology of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) but have yet to be fully investigated. We aimed to identify high risk endoscopic SRH and to propose an optimal endoscopic treatment strategy.

METHODS

 We retrospectively analyzed 2699 ALGIB patients with SRH at 49 hospitals (CODE BLUE-J Study), of whom 88.6 % received endoscopic treatment.

RESULTS

 30-day rebleeding rates of untreated SRH significantly differed among locations (left colon 15.5 % vs. right colon 28.6 %) and etiologies (diverticular bleeding 27.5 % vs. others [e. g. ulcerative lesions or angioectasia] 8.9 %), but not among bleeding types. Endoscopic treatment reduced the overall rebleeding rate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.69; 95 %CI 0.49-0.98), and the treatment effect was significant in right-colon SRH (AOR 0.46; 95 %CI 0.29-0.72) but not in left-colon SRH. The effect was observed in both active and nonactive types, but was not statistically significant. Moreover, the effect was significant for diverticular bleeding (AOR 0.60; 95 %CI 0.41-0.88) but not for other diseases. When focusing on treatment type, the effectiveness was not significantly different between clipping and other modalities for most SRH, whereas ligation was significantly more effective than clipping in right-colon diverticular bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

 A population-level endoscopy dataset allowed us to identify high risk endoscopic SRH and propose a simple endoscopic treatment strategy for ALGIB. Unlike upper gastrointestinal bleeding, the rebleeding risks for ALGIB depend on colonic location, bleeding etiology, and treatment modality.

Factors that affect the development of acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer syndrome and rebleeding

Objectives

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer syndrome (AHRUS) causes massive bleeding and often recurrent rebleeding from rectal ulcers that form immediately above the dentate line. This study aimed to determine the clinical background and risk factors contributing to rebleeding in patients with AHRUS and the most appropriate method of hemostasis treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study included 93 patients diagnosed with AHRUS at Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Japan, between April 2009 and November 2018. Information on clinical background factors, endoscopic findings, and hemostasis was obtained from medical records. The relationship with episodes of rebleeding was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The median age was 79 years, and 84 patients (90%) had a performance status of grade 2 or higher. The patients had multiple background factors, with a median number of 5 per patient. The background factors could be classified into two major factors: those related to arteriosclerosis and those related to delayed wound healing.

In the multivariate analysis, significantly more rebleeding occurred in patients with active bleeding during the initial endoscopy (odds ratio 4.88, 95% confidence interval 1.80–14.46, p = 0.003); significantly less rebleeding occurred in patients for whom hemostasis was first performed by clipping (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.88, p = 0.035).

Conclusions

In bedridden older individuals with poor general health, multiple combinations of arteriosclerosis‐related factors and protracted wound healing factors can induce AHRUS. We strongly recommend performing hemostasis via the clipping method on suspected bleeding points, including active bleeding sites, in AHRUS.

Nature and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Hemorrhagic Rectal Ulcer

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU) is a relatively rare disease that can lead to massive hematochezia. Although AHRU is a potentially life-threatening disease, its characteristics and clinical course are not fully understood. In this study, the clinical features were compared between AHRU and lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) from other causes (non-AHRU). Then, risk factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with AHRU were identified. A total of 387 consecutive adult patients with LGIB who were managed at two tertiary academic hospitals in Akita prefecture in Japan were retrospectively enrolled. Subjects were divided into AHRU and non-AHRU groups according to the source of bleeding. Regression analyses were used to investigate significant associations, and the results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). AHRU was found as the bleeding source in 72 (18.6%) of the patients. In comparison to non-AHRU, having AHRU was significantly associated with in-hospital onset, age > 65 years, and systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg. The AHRU group had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate in comparison to the non-AHRU group (18.0% vs. 8.3, p = 0.02), and hypoalbuminemia (<2.5 g/dL) was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in the AHRU group (OR, 4.04; 95%CI, 1.11−14.9; p = 0.03). AHRU accounts for a substantial portion (18.6%) of LGIB in our area, where the aging rate is the highest in Japan. Since AHRU is a potentially life-threatening disease that requires urgent identification and management, further studies to identify robust risk factors associated with serious clinical outcomes are required.

Usefulness of the CHAMPS score for risk stratification in lower gastrointestinal bleeding

We have recently developed a simple prediction score, the CHAMPS score, to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In this study, the primary outcome of this study was the usefulness of the CHAMPS score for predicting in-hospital mortality with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). Consecutive adult patients who were hospitalized with LGIB at two tertiary academic medical centers from 2015 to 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The performance for predicting outcomes with CHAMPS score was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and compared with four existing scores. In 387 patients enrolled in this study, 39 (10.1%) of whom died during the hospitalization. The CHAMPS score showed good performance in predicting in-hospital mortality in LGIB patients with an AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.80 (0.73–0.87), which was significantly higher in comparison to the existing scores. The risk of in-hospital mortality as predicted by the CHAMPS score was shown: low risk (score ≤ 1), 1.8%; intermediate risk (score 2 or 3), 15.8%; and high risk (score ≥ 4), 37.1%. The CHAMPS score is useful for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with LGIB.

Digital compression for hemostasis in acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer: a report of 4 cases and review of the literature

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer is a relatively rare cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. It most commonly occurs in bedridden elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. While the diagnosis can be confirmed on colonoscopy, achieving hemostasis may be difficult due to the poor visual field resulting from severe bleeding and stool remaining in the rectum, the stiffness of ulcers which may preclude effective clipping, the poor tolerability of patients for the procedure, and high risk of recurrence. Here, we present 4 cases of acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer, where hemostasis could not be achieved through traditional methods. In each case, the assistant introduced his finger into the rectal lumen and digitally compressed the bleeding vessel under endoscopic guidance. Once hemostasis was achieved, the responsible vessel could be visualized and traditional hemostatic measures were taken. No recurrence was observed in any of the cases during follow-up. This simple maneuver can be applied safely and effectively even by assistants attempting the maneuver for the first time. The technique was effective with the endoscope in retroflexed position and could be combined with gel immersion endoscopy to first identify the location of hemorrhage. We also review the existing literature on acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcers.

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer: Experience in 11 patients at an urban acute care center in the USA: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU) is a rare entity which has most frequently been described in Japan and Taiwan literature. This study characterizes 11 AHRUs identified and managed at an urban acute care hospital in the United States of America (USA).

METHODS

A total of 2253 inpatients underwent colonoscopy. In 1172 patients (52%), colonoscopy was performed for evaluation of lower gastrointestinal (LGI) bleeding. Eleven (0.9%) of the 1172 patients with LGI bleeding had AHRU.

RESULTS

AHRU is characterized by a sudden onset of painless and massive lower rectal bleeding in elderly, bedridden patients (pts) with major underlying diseases. The endoscopic findings were classified into 4 types. All 11 ulcers were located in the distal rectum within 10 cm of the dentate line. All 11 patients required blood transfusion (mean = 3.7 units; range 2-9 units). Seven patients responded to blood, plasma, and platelet transfusions. The other 4 patients required endoscopic hemostasis.Three patients died within a month of colonoscopy from comorbidities. None had bleeding as a cause of death. Eight surviving patients did not have recurrent bleeding.

CONCLUSION

AHRU does exist in the USA and should be considered as an important cause of acute lower GI bleeding in elderly, critically ill, and bedridden patients. AHRU should be recognized and managed correctly.

Experience of Manual Compression Hemostasis Under Endoscopic Observation for Acute Hemorrhagic Rectal Ulcer

We experienced two cases in which manual compression hemostasis under endoscopic observation was used in patients with acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU). The patients experienced an episode of massive fresh hematochezia, requiring the blood transfusion. Emergent sigmoidoscopy revealed multiple ulcers with a large protuberant visible vessel or with gush-out hemorrhage on the lower rectum. Endoscopic hemostasis by hemoclips and hypertonic saline-epinephrine injection was attempted; however, mechanical mucosal injury induced by hemoclips and needles caused another gush-out hemorrhage. Thus, the site of bleeding was manually compressed by a forefinger under endoscopic observation. After 5 min, compression hemostasis was achieved, and the postoperative course was uneventful. Manual compression hemostasis under endoscopic observation is useful and worth attempting for AHRU.

Successful hemostasis of active lower GI bleeding using a hemostatic powder as monotherapy, combination therapy, or rescue therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute lower GI bleeding is a frequent cause of hospital admission. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of a hemostatic powder (TC-325/Hemospray) in the treatment of nonvariceal lower GI bleeding.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled into this prospective, multicenter, single-arm study at 4 tertiary care centers in Canada. Fifty patients with active lower GI bleeding of multiple different causes (52 bleeding sites) underwent topical endoscopic application of hemostatic powder. The primary endpoint was powder-related adverse events within 30 days of the index procedure. Secondary endpoints were initial hemostasis as well as recurrent bleeding and mortality within 30 days of the index procedure.

RESULTS

Most patients (96%) had a single bleeding site, and most bleeding (73%) was due to polypectomy. Overall, the powder was applied as monotherapy in 13 bleeding sites (25%), as combination therapy in 22 bleeding sites (42.3%), and as rescue therapy in 17 bleeding sites (32.7%). Hemostasis was achieved in 98% of patients. No patient experienced a powder-related adverse event. Five patients (10%) developed recurrent bleeding within 30 days. One patient (2%) died within 30 days of powder application, but the death was not directly related to hemostatic powder use.

CONCLUSIONS

The hemostatic powder is a safe and effective option for patients with lower GI bleeding of varying causes, and in particular, postpolypectomy hemorrhage. The hemostatic powder is effective as monotherapy, part of a combination approach, or as a rescue therapeutic option for the treatment of nonvariceal lower GI bleeding. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02099435.).

Risk factors for recurrent bleeding from acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer

OBJECTIVES

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU) occurs suddenly with painless massive bleeding from rectal ulcers, usually in patients who have severe underlying disorders. The rate of recurrent bleeding from AHRU is high, but there have been few studies on the risk factors for recurrent bleeding. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for recurrent bleeding from AHRU.

METHODS

Among 27,151 patients who underwent colonoscopy from 2006 November to 2017 March in our hospital, 120 patients with AHRU were retrospectively reviewed to identify risk factors for recurrent bleeding. Factors analyzed were: age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), comorbidities (congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, renal failure, respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus and malignancy), medications (antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants and steroids); endoscopic therapy and endoscopic features of AHRU.

RESULTS

Recurrent bleeding from AHRU occurred in 30% of patients (36/120). In multi-variate analysis, individual comorbidities, medications, endoscopic features and endoscopic hemostasis were not significant or independent risk factors for recurrent bleeding. However, a high CCI score (4 or more) was a risk factor (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-27.1). Endoscopic hemostasis was performed in 61% (73/120) of AHRU patients, and successful hemostasis was achieved in 99% of the treated patients (72/73).

CONCLUSIONS

High CCI score was a predictor of recurrent bleeding from AHRU, but individual comorbidities, medications, endoscopic features or endoscopic hemostasis were not. Endoscopic hemostasis for bleeding from AHRU was achieved in most patients, but the recurrent bleeding rate was high.

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer syndrome: Comparison with non-hemorrhagic rectal ulcer lower gastrointestinal bleeding

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU) and to elucidate its predictive factors.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with AHRU were retrospectively reviewed. Their baseline clinical characteristics were compared with those of patients with non-AHRU lower gastrointestinal bleeding to identify predictive factors for AHRU.

RESULTS

Among the 118 patients who underwent emergency endoscopy due to acute massive hematochezia from 2013 to 2015, 25 (21.2%) were diagnosed as having AHRU. Of them, 22 (88.0%) were successfully managed endoscopically and 3 (12.0%) underwent surgery. Six (24.0%) patients developed rebleeding within 1-9 days after the initial bleeding, which was controlled by a repeat endoscopy. Five (20.0%) died during follow-up. A multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that a lower serum albumin level, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and history of constipation were significant factors for predicting AHRU. Hypoalbuminemia (<30 g/L) had a sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 84.0%, 78.5%, 51.2% and 94.8% for predicting AHRU, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 20% of patients with massive hematochezia had AHRU. Most patients with AHRU can be managed endoscopically. Low serum albumin level, poor ECOG performance status and prior constipation could be used in distinguishing patients with and without AHRU, facilitating the selection of optimal bowel preparation method for massive hematochezia.

Cytomegalovirus Colitis in a Critically Ill Patient Following Severe Legionella Pneumonia with Multiple Organ Failure

A 68-year-old man visited an emergency department complaining of dyspnea. He was diagnosed to have Legionella pneumonia with multiple organ failure. Although his multiple organ failure improved, he suffered from persistent abdominal pain and diarrhea with continuous minor bleeding. Colonoscopy revealed a longitudinal ulcer of the rectum, below the peritoneal reflection. He was diagnosed with cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis. Antiviral therapy with ganciclovir was initiated. He finally underwent a colostomy after a bowel stricture caused an intestinal outlet obstruction, which made oral intake impossible. Based on the present case, we believe that CMV colitis must be considered as one of the differential diagnoses when critically ill patients develop continuous diarrhea and abdominal pain.

Cytomegalovirus colitis in intensive care unit patients: difficulties in clinical diagnosis

PURPOSE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurs increasingly in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). We reported CMV colitis which has rarely been recognized in the ICU patients.

METHODS

CMV DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for blood and/or stool samples. Definite diagnosis of CMV colitis required histopathology or CMV immunohistochemical staining of colorectal biopsies. We reviewed ICU patients characterized by positive blood or stool CMV-PCR with colorectal bleeding or water diarrhea.

RESULTS

We identified 18 patients (biopsy-proved, n=8; probable cases, n=10). The most common comorbidities were chronic renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. Stool CMV-PCR was positive in 7 of 10 patients (2 of 3 biopsy-proved and 5 of 7 probable cases). Colonoscopy was performed for 15 patients, revealing ulcerative or polypoid lesions. The endoscopists obtained colonic biopsies from 9 patients. Yet, the pathologists reported CMV colitis for 4 patients. Additional 4 patients were confirmed using immunohistochemical stain by the request of clinical physicians. Pseudomembranous colitis was found in 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of CMV colitis seems difficult in clinical practice and need persistent communication between clinicians. The positive stool CMV-PCR result was a useful hint for adding immunohistochemical stain in mucosal biopsies to make a definite diagnosis of CMV colitis.

Clinical course and rebleeding predictors of acute haemorrhagic rectal ulcer: 5-year experience and review of the literature

AIM

This study was carried out to clarify the clinical features of acute haemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU) and to determine the risks and predictors of AHRU rebleeding.

METHOD

Forty patients with AHRU were retrospectively analysed. Patient characteristics, endoscopic features and clinical course were investigated and predictors of AHRU rebleeding were analysed.

RESULTS

All patients were in a bedridden state as a result of various diseases, and many patients had atherosclerosis-related comorbidities such as hypertension (67.4%), diabetes mellitus (40.0%) and chronic kidney disease (42.5%). All patients had hypoalbuminaemia, 75% of patients were using antithrombotic drugs and 25% of patients were using systemic corticosteroids. Based on colonoscopy, all patients developed ulcers in the distal rectum just above the dentate line and 30% of patients developed whole circumferential ulcers. The median interval between the onset of the bedridden state and the first massive haematochezia was 16 days and 50% of all patients developed rebleeding regardless of the presence or absence of haemostatic therapy. The median time from initial haemostasis to rebleeding was 6 days. Univariate analysis and stepwise multivariate analysis revealed that whole circumferential ulcer (P = 0.036) was a significant independent predictor of AHRU rebleeding.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we elucidated the clinical features of AHRU in detail and reviewed previous reports of AHRU. Rebleeding of AHRU occurred at a high rate and whole circumferential ulcer was a significant independent predictor of AHRU rebleeding.