Jiang W, Lin Y, Deng Y, Sun Y, Ye D, Zhong J, Huang Y, Chi P. The impact of prophylactic oophorectomy on the survival for postmenopausal patients with pT4a colorectal cancer.
Asian J Surg 2023;
46:424-430. [PMID:
35667928 DOI:
10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.045]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic effect of prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) in postmenopausal patients with pT4 colorectal cancers (CRC) in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and peritoneal metastasis.
METHODS
The data of postmenopausal female patients with pT4 CRC undergoing surgical resection between 2000 and 2019 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival outcomes between patients treated with and without PO. Risk factors for DFS and peritoneal metastasis were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Totally, 176 (34.3%) patients received PO. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, rates of postoperative complications, and hospitalization between the PO and non-PO groups. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were similar in the two groups (47.9% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.278; 53.5% vs. 50.5%, p = 0.161, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of patients with peritoneal metastasis, the median survival was significantly longer for the PO group compared with the non-PO group (14 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Undertaking PO in pT4 CRC female patients did not confer a survival benefit. Indication of PO even for advanced CRC patients should require caution. It has potential survival benefit only when the patients developed metachronous peritoneal metastases.
Collapse