Postoperative pain after haemorrhoidectomy: role of impaired evacuation

A rare presentation of large bowel obstruction post haemorrhoidectomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease is a common anorectal pathology. Complications post hemorrhoidectomy are rare. Postoperative complications following hemorrhoidectomy include bleeding (2%), infection (0.4-8%), urinary retention (15%), and constipation (15-30%).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 40-year-old of Asian background female presented to a tertiary colorectal service with large bowel obstruction post hemorrhoidectomy. This is the first case in the surgical literature describing large bowel obstruction secondary to extrinsic compression from urinary retention following hemorrhoidectomy. The patient developed urinary retention and obstructed defecation in setting of inadequate analgesia post hemorrhoidectomy. The patient required indwelling catheter insertion and aggressive constipation management to resolve symptoms. Histopathology from the hemorrhoidectomy did not reveal a malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Anesthetic choice and postoperative analgesia are important factors to avoid the development of complications. A missed malignancy diagnosis must always be excluded with patients presenting post hemorroidectomy with bowel obstruction.

Efficacy of postoperative oral metronidazole for haemorrhoidectomy pain: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

AIM

The aim of this work was to examine the efficacy of oral metronidazole in reducing posthaemorrhoidectomy pain versus placebo.

METHOD

Forty patients were randomized to either metronidazole and standard care or placebo and standard care (21 metronidazole, 19 placebo) in a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The main outcome measure was posthaemorrhoidectomy pain scores over 21 days, measured on a 10-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups with regards to age, gender, smoking status, self-reported general health or quality of life, haemorrhoid-related pain, haemorrhoid-related impact on quality of life, reported satisfaction with surgery, experience of surgery, median overall pain score or likelihood of recommending surgery to others. For reported median worst pain scores and defaecation-related pain, a trend to significance was identified between groups on days 16 and 18-21, with the metronidazole group reporting less pain. However, these differences were not significant when prespecified Bonferroni correction criteria were used. Using multilevel mixed effects modelling, the impact of time on median worst pain score was identified to be highly significant (P < 0.0001) whereas treatment allocation (placebo versus metronidazole) did not significantly affect the improvement in patients' reported pain (P = 0.8837).

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support the hypothesis that postoperative metronidazole has a clinically meaningful effect on posthaemorrhoidectomy pain. This study adds to the previous literature, and implies that it should not be routinely used as an adjunct to analgesia.

Development and validation of a practical score to predict pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy

PURPOSE

Excisional hemorrhoidectomy (EH) can be complicated by high early (EP) and prolonged pain (PP). This study aimed to determine predictors of high postoperative pain and to develop a risk score suitable to identify patient candidates to a more active analgesic treatment.

METHODS

We collected data of patients undergoing EH between January 2005 and September 2012 (development group). Patient-, disease-, surgery-, and surgeon-related characteristics were gathered. Anxiety was evaluated by means of STAI-Y. EP was assessed at 1-day, while PP at 15-day follow-up by means of a 10-cm VAS (cutoff, EP ≥ 5; PP ≥ 3 cm). On the basis of the odds ratio from a logistic regression, independent risk factors were assigned a weighted integer. The sum comprised the risk score, which was validated on a prospective cohort of patients undergoing EH between September 2012 and January 2014.

RESULTS

Five hundred fourteen patients were included in development group. Incidence of EP was 18.3 %, with 40.4 % developing PP. Younger age, male gender, advanced education, constipation, external component, anxious state and trait, and high anal resting tone were independent predictors of EP. Previous pain exerted a protective effect. Incomplete postoperative evacuation, advanced education level, high anal resting tone, and anxious trait were predictors of PP. In the development group, the risk of EP ranged between 1 % (low risk) and 21 % (high risk). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis of validation group (n = 130) confirmed the discriminatory power of this model (area under the ROC = 0.69).

CONCLUSION

The score can stratify the risk of EP following EH, identifying high-risk patient candidates to active analgesic administration or alternative surgical procedures.

Predictors of early postoperative pain after stapled haemorrhoidopexy

AIM

Moderate to severe pain after stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) is not uncommon. This study was designed to identify the predictors of postoperative pain after SH in a single centre.

METHOD

Seventy-six patients with Grade II to IV haemorrhoids who underwent SH were selected from a prospectively compiled database. Preoperative data, including patient characteristics, manometry results and surgical data, were documented. Pain was evaluated during the first 24 h after the operation. Its intensity was classified into three grades according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) score: mild (VAS ≤ 3), moderate (VAS >3 to <5) and severe (VAS ≥ 5). Analgesics were not routinely given but were administered if the patient had moderate or severe pain. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the predictors of postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Moderate and severe pain was noted in 43 (58.9%) patients. No patient was readmitted due to persistent anal pain during the month following discharge. Postoperative pain was significantly associated with gender (P = 0.017), age (P = 0.014), first initial sensory volume (P = 0.023) and constipation (P = 0.005) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified male gender as an independent predictor of postoperative moderate to severe pain (P = 0.037, OR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.07-9.09). The initial sensory volume and preoperative coexisting constipation were negative predictors of postoperative moderate to severe pain after SH (P = 0.037, OR = 0.320, 95% CI 0.110-0.934, and P = 0.036, OR = 0.255, 95% CI 0.071-0.913, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Male gender and the initial sensory volume are predictors of postoperative pain after SH. Anal manometry is recommended before the SH procedure. An active analgesia protocol should be considered for male patients with a low initial sensory volume after SH.