Endorectal elastography in the evaluation of rectal tumours

Elastography of the Male Pelvic Region-Perspectives on Malignant Lesions

Ultrasound elastography is widely used to assess tissue stiffness for lesion characterization, including differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. This study focuses on the use of elastography in the male pelvis, including the prostate, testicles, and rectum, by comparing elastography types (shear wave and strain). This article provides a summary of the existing literature on the use of elastography in the male pelvic region and outlines the clinical perspective. Ultrasound elastography is a good technique for evaluating and monitoring lesions in the male pelvic region.

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Cancer Staging

The authors review the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of cancers throughout the gastrointestinal tract. EUS offers an advantage over cross-sectional imaging in locoregional tumor staging but is less sensitive in identifying distant metastasis. The addition of FNA increases diagnostic accuracy and provides a tissue diagnosis. EUS combined with cross-sectional imaging is important in accurately staging GI tumors and thereby reducing unnecessary procedures and health care costs.

Towards targeted colorectal cancer biopsy based on tissue morphology assessment by compression optical coherence elastography

Identifying the precise topography of cancer for targeted biopsy in colonoscopic examination is a challenge in current diagnostic practice. For the first time we demonstrate the use of compression optical coherence elastography (C-OCE) technology as a new functional OCT modality for differentiating between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues in colon and detecting their morphological features on the basis of measurement of tissue elastic properties. The method uses pre-determined stiffness values (Young’s modulus) to distinguish between different morphological structures of normal (mucosa and submucosa), benign tumor (adenoma) and malignant tumor tissue (including cancer cells, gland-like structures, cribriform gland-like structures, stromal fibers, extracellular mucin). After analyzing in excess of fifty tissue samples, a threshold stiffness value of 520 kPa was suggested above which areas of colorectal cancer were detected invariably. A high Pearson correlation (r =0.98; p <0.05), and a negligible bias (0.22) by good agreement of the segmentation results of C-OCE and histological (reference standard) images was demonstrated, indicating the efficiency of C-OCE to identify the precise localization of colorectal cancer and the possibility to perform targeted biopsy. Furthermore, we demonstrated the ability of C-OCE to differentiate morphological subtypes of colorectal cancer – low-grade and high-grade colorectal adenocarcinomas, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and cribriform patterns. The obtained ex vivo results highlight prospects of C-OCE for high-level colon malignancy detection. The future endoscopic use of C-OCE will allow targeted biopsy sampling and simultaneous rapid analysis of the heterogeneous morphology of colon tumors.

Reconstructing the Spatial Distribution of the Relative Shear Modulus in Quasi-static Ultrasound Elastography: Plane Stress Analysis

Quasi-static ultrasound elastography (QSUE) is an imaging technique that mainly provides axial strain maps of tissues when the latter are subjected to compression. In this article, a method for reconstructing the relative shear modulus distribution within a linear elastic and isotropic medium, in QSUE, is introduced. More specifically, the plane stress inverse problem is considered. The proposed method is based on the variational formulation of the equilibrium equations and on the choice of adapted discretization spaces, and only requires displacement fields in the analyzed media to be determined. Results from plane stress and 3-D numerical simulations, as well as from phantom experiments, showed that the method is able to reconstruct the different regions within a medium, with shear modulus contrasts that unambiguously reveal whether inclusions are stiffer or softer than the surrounding material. More specifically, for the plane stress simulations, inclusion-to-background modulus ratios were found to be very accurately estimated, with an error lower than 3%. For the 3-D simulations, for which the plane stress conditions are no longer satisfied, these ratios were, as expected, less accurate, with an error that remained lower than 10% for two of the three cases analyzed but was around 34% for the last case. Concerning the phantom experiments, a comparison with a shear wave elastography technique from a clinical ultrasound scanner was also made. Overall, the inclusion-to-background shear modulus ratios obtained with our approach were found to be closer to those given by the phantom manufacturer than the ratios provided by the clinical system.

The expanding role of endoscopic ultrasound elastography

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an invaluable tool for assessing various GI diseases. However, using just the conventional B-mode EUS imaging may not be sufficient to accurately delineate the lesion's character. Using the principle of stress-induced tissue strain, EUS elastography (EUS-E) can help in the real-time sonographic assessment of the level of tissue stiffness or hardness of any organ of interest during a routine EUS procedure. Thus, EUS-E can better characterize the lesion's nature and highlight the more suspicious areas within an individual lesion. The most commonly studied lesions with EUS-E are the pancreatic lesions, namely, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and lymph nodes. However, EUS-E is gradually expanding its use for lesion characterization of the liver, bile duct, adrenals, gastrointestinal tract, and even therapy response. Moreover, the use of EUS-E along with other image enhancement techniques such as harmonic EUS and contrast-enhanced EUS can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis. However, several technical aspects need to be standardized before EUS-E can be truly used as a tool for "virtual biopsy". This review focuses on the various technical aspects of the use of EUS-E, it is established and expanding indications and an extensive outline of the various studies on EUS-E. We also discuss the current pitfalls and future trends in EUS-E.

A model based on endorectal ultrasonography predicts lateral lymph node metastasis in low and middle rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastasis in low and middle rectal tumors, construct a predictive model and test the model's diagnostic efficacy.

METHODS

The clinical and pathological data of 172 patients with rectal cancer confirmed by surgery were retrospectively evaluated, among whom 61 patients were finally included in this study. Patients were divided into positive groups and negative groups based on LN metastasis, and risk factors that might affect LN metastasis were analyzed. Finally, a risk predictive model was constructed based on the weights of each risk factor.

RESULTS

Compared with pathology, the efficacy of diagnosing LN metastasis only according to conventional endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) features of LN was not high, with sensitivity 67%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value 76%, negative predictive value 80%, and accuracy 79%. Univariate analysis showed that circumferential angle of the tumor, ultrasonic T- stage (UT stage), conventional ultrasound features diagnosis of LN metastasis, strain ratio (SR) of tumor were risk factors for LN metastasis, while vascular resistance index of rectal tumor was protective factor. Multivariate analysis showed that UT stage (OR = 7.188, p = 0.049), conventional ultrasound features diagnosis of LN metastasis (OR = 8.010, p = 0.025) and SR (OR = 5.022, p = 0.031) were independent risk factors for LN metastasis. These risk factors were included in logistic regression analysis and the model was established, Y = -7.3 + 1.9 X10 + 2.1 X11 + 1.6 X13 (Y = Logit[P], P: LN metastasis rate, X10: UT stage, X11: conventional ultrasound features diagnosis of LN metastasis, X13: SR). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to test the model's predictive efficacy, the area under the curve was 0.95, sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 87%. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed X2 = 6.015, p = 0.65 (p > 0.05), indicating that the model had a high predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of perirectal LN metastasis only based on conventional ERUS features of LN was not effective enough. UT stage of tumor, conventional ultrasound features diagnosis of LN metastasis and SR were independent risk factors for LN metastasis. The predictive model had good assessment efficacy and had certain clinical application value.

Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Shear Wave Elastography in Rectal Cancer

Simple Summary

For a diagnostic tool to be important, there must be a high level of agreement between different observers. If not, the reliability of the measurement can not be considered valid. Previous studies have evaluated the reproducibility of tissue stiffness measurements of rectal tumors, but only on previously obtained images. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the issue in a clinical setting and found a high level of agreement between observers.

Abstract

Background: Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is an important tool when evaluating complex rectal adenomas and rectal cancer, and the accuracy is improved by adding elastography measurements. A high interobserver agreement is imperative in clinical practice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver agreement assessed on real-time images. Additionally, we investigated the intra- and interobserver agreement between experienced and inexperienced observers. Materials and methods: We prospectively included patients referred to an ERUS at the Department of Radiology with a complex rectal polyp or suspected rectal malignancy. Two operators independently scanned each patient in turn. Furthermore, four observers assessed previously obtained images using three different methods for placing the region of interest (ROI). Three months later, the four observers reassessed the images to assess intraobserver variability. Results: A total of 19 patients were included for live assessment. Agreement of tumor classification was substantial for T stage (kappa: 0.86) and fair for N stage (kappa: 0.73), with an absolute agreement for T and N stages of 84% and 89%, respectively. Agreement of SWE was good for Emean (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.86–0.98) and fair for Emax (ICC 0.85, 95% CI 0.66–0.94). Intra- and interobserver agreement between inexperienced and experienced observers showed good to excellent agreement with all ROI methods. Conclusion: Interobserver agreement is high in SWE when performed in a clinical setting. We found the best agreement using the mean value of several ROIs. Intra- and interobserver agreement was high regardless of operator experience.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography as a Novel Diagnostic Method for the Assessment of Hardness and Depth of Invasion in Colorectal Neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) with that of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the diagnosis of the depth of invasion in colorectal neoplasms. This is an important clinical issue as the depth of invasion is associated with the risk of metastasis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected superficial colorectal neoplasms, evaluated by MCE, EUS, and EUS-EG, for whom endoscopic submucosal dissection was considered, were enrolled in 2018 (derivation study) and in 2019-2020 (validation study). The primary clinical endpoint was the diagnostic yield differentiating intramucosal and shallow submucosal neoplasms from deep submucosal (dSM) and advanced colorectal cancers. In addition, inter- and intra-observer agreements of the elastic score of colorectal neoplasm (ES-CRN) were evaluated by 2 expert and 2 non-expert endoscopists.

RESULTS

Thirty-one (33 lesions) and 50 (55 lesions) patients were enrolled in the derivation and validation studies, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, and accuracy of assessment of the depth of submucosal or deeper invasion in the derivation and validation groups were as follows: EUS-EG, 100/88.2/86.7/100/93.3% and 77.8/86.1/73.7/88.6/83.3%; MCE, 66.7/94.4/90.9/77.3/81.8% and 84.2/91.4/84.2/91.4/88.9%; and EUS, 93.3/77.8/77.8/93.3/84.8% and 89.5/65.7/58.6/92.0/74.1%, respectively. For the 2 expert endoscopists, interobserver agreement for the ES-CRN (first and second assessments) in the derivation group was 0.84 and 0.78, respectively; these values were 0.73 and 0.49, respectively, for the 2 non-expert endoscopists.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

All 3 modalities presented similar diagnostic yield. Inter- and intra-observer agreements of the ES-CRN were substantial, even for non-expert endoscopists. Therefore, EUS-EG may be a useful modality in determining the depth of invasion in colorectal neoplasms.

Can Ultrasound Elastography Discriminate between Rectal Adenoma and Cancer? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer is a common malignancy. Since the introduction of bowel-screening programs, the number of patients with advanced adenomas and early rectal cancer has increased. Despite improved diagnostics, the discrimination between rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer (i.e., pT1-T2) remains challenging. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) elastography in discriminating rectal adenomas from cancer.

METHOD

Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Studies evaluating the primary staging of rectal adenomas and cancer using ERUS elastography were included.

RESULTS

Six studies were identified; three evaluated the discrimination between adenomas and cancer; two evaluated adenomas and early rectal cancer (i.e., pT1-T2); one evaluated performance on different T categories. All studies reported increased diagnostic accuracy of ERUS elastography compared to ERUS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy ranged 0.93-1.00, 0.83-1.00 and 0.91-1.00, respectively, when discriminating adenomas from cancer. In the differentiation between adenomas and early rectal cancer, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.82-1.00, 0.86-1.00 and 0.84-1.00, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Elastography increases the accuracy of ERUS and may provide valuable information on malignant transformation of rectal lesions.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in the Assessment of Rectal Tumors: How Well Does It Work in Clinical Practice?

Endorectal ultrasound applications in the evaluation of rectal tumors could be a useful tool in achieving proper staging of rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of rectal tumor staging by flexible endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with real-time elastography (RTE) using the gold standard post-surgery histological analysis of the resected tissue as the control. The second aim of our research was to establish cutoff values for the EUS-RTE strain ratio corresponding to stages by independently comparing the stiffness values obtained with histology and EUS-RTE staging in order to minimize observation bias. We evaluated the records of 130 patients with a rectal tumor confirmed by biopsy. EUS was used in 70 patients, EUS-RTE-in the other 60. We found no statistically significant differences in staging accuracy when comparing EUS to EUS-RTE. Through a correspondence method between staging assessment and the EUS-RTE stain ratio, we identified cutoff intervals for T2, T3, and T4 staging that were nonoverlapping and proved to be statistically significant in terms of EUS-RTE values (significantly different ascending values from one interval to the other). We found that EUS-RTE offers slightly better, although not statistically significant sensitivity and specificity for T and N stage predictions compared to 2D EUS. Our results showed that EUS-RTE offers slightly higher sensitivity and specificity compared to EUS. Reliable cutoff intervals were found for strain rate elastography, previously available only for shear wave elastography (SWE) which is currently unavailable on any EUS system. Thus, these commonly available EUS-RTE systems can serve as a complementary tool in the staging of rectal tumors.

Shear Wave Elastography in Rectal Cancer Staging, Compared with Endorectal Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The goal of the study described here was to investigate the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) in pre-operative staging of rectal cancer. Fifty-five patients with rectal cancer underwent pre-operative conventional endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), SWE and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. Pathologic results were used as the gold standard for cancer staging. The concordance rate with pathologic stage by ERUS and MRI and the stiffness values measured by SWE for tumors in different stages were compared. The concordance rates for cancer staging were 72.7% and 70.9% for conventional ERUS and enhanced MRI, respectively; the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). SWE indicated that the mean and maximum stiffness values of the tumors increased with advance in stage. The differences in stiffness values between T1 and T2, T1 and T3-4, as well as T2 and T3-4, were all statistically significant (p < 0.001). When the maximum stiffness values of 65.0 and 90.7 kPa are used for the diagnosis of T1, T2 and local advanced rectal cancer, the concordance rate of cancer staging was 85.5%, which was slightly higher than those of ERUS and MRI, although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). SWE is useful in judging the depth of invasion of rectal tumors. The value of tumor stiffness can provide a quantifiable indicator for pre-operative diagnosis of cancer staging and can be used as a supplement to conventional ERUS. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of early rectal cancers: how well does it work in practice?

BACKGROUND

Rectal tumor treatment strategies are individually tailored based on tumor stage, and yield different rates of posttreatment morbidity, mortality, and local recurrence. Therefore, the accuracy of pretreatment staging is highly important. Here we investigated the accuracy of staging by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in a clinical setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 500 patients were examined at the rectal cancer outpatient clinic at Haukeland University Hospital between October 2014 and January 2018. This study included only cases in which the resection specimen had a histopathological staging of adenoma or early rectal cancer (pT1-pT2). Patients with previous pelvic surgery or preoperative radiotherapy were excluded. The 145 analyzed patients were preoperatively examined via biopsy (n = 132), digital rectal examination (n = 77), rigid rectoscopy (n = 127), ERUS (n = 104), real-time elastography (n = 96), and MRI (n = 84).

RESULTS

ERUS distinguished between adenomas and early rectal cancer with 88% accuracy (95% CI: 0.68-0.96), while MRI achieved 75% accuracy (95% CI: 0.54-0.88). ERUS tended to overstage T1 tumors as T2-T3 (16/24). MRI overstaged most adenomas to T1-T2 tumors (18/22). Neither ERUS nor MRI distinguished between T1 and T2 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical setting, ERUS differentiated between benign and malignant tumors with high accuracy. The present findings support previous reports that ERUS and MRI have low accuracy for T-staging of early rectal cancer. We recommend that MRI be routinely combined with ERUS for the clinical examination of rectal tumors, since MRI consistently overstaged adenomas as cancer. In adenomas, MRI had no additional benefit for preoperative staging.

EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound

This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.

Strain Elastography - How To Do It?

Tissue stiffness assessed by palpation for diagnosing pathology has been used for thousands of years. Ultrasound elastography has been developed more recently to display similar information on tissue stiffness as an image. There are two main types of ultrasound elastography, strain and shear wave. Strain elastography is a qualitative technique and provides information on the relative stiffness between one tissue and another. Shear wave elastography is a quantitative method and provides an estimated value of the tissue stiffness that can be expressed in either the shear wave speed through the tissues in meters/second, or converted to the Young's modulus making some assumptions and expressed in kPa. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages and they are often complimentary to each other in clinical practice. This article reviews the principles, technique, and interpretation of strain elastography in various organs. It describes how to optimize technique, while pitfalls and artifacts are also discussed.

New Imaging Techniques: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Elastography

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a major imaging method in the management of several diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and surrounding structures. Elastography is a novel technique providing additional information to standard B-mode imaging on the tissue stiffness. Elastography can be performed under EUS guidance. This method has proven to be an accurate and additional tool in the evaluation of pancreatic diseases and lymph nodes analysis. Possible uses include the study of liver lesions, subepithelial masses, and many more. This article reviews current knowledge and future perspectives.

Endoscopic ultrasound in oncology: An update of clinical applications in the gastrointestinal tract

An accurate staging is necessary to select the best treatment and evaluate prognosis in oncology. Staging usually begins with noninvasive imaging such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. In the absence of distant metastases, endoscopic ultrasound plays an important role in the diagnosis and staging of gastrointestinal tumors, being the most accurate modality for local-regional staging. Its use for tumor and nodal involvement in pre-surgical evaluation has proven to reduce unnecessary surgeries. The aim of this article is to review the current role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer.

Advances in endoscopic ultrasound imaging of colorectal diseases

The development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has had a significant impact for patients with digestive diseases, enabling enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, with most of the available evidence focusing on upper gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatico-biliary diseases. For the lower GI tract the main application of EUS has been in staging rectal cancer, as a complementary technique to other cross-sectional imaging methods. EUS can provide highly accurate in-depth assessments of tumour infiltration, performing best in the diagnosis of early rectal tumours. In the light of recent developments other EUS applications for colorectal diseases have been also envisaged and are currently under investigation, including beyond-rectum tumour staging by means of the newly developed forward-viewing radial array echoendoscope. Due to its high resolution, EUS might be also regarded as an ideal method for the evaluation of subepithelial lesions. Their differential diagnosis is possible by imaging the originating wall layer and the associated echostructure, and cytological and histological confirmation can be obtained through EUS-guided fine needle aspiration or trucut biopsy. However, reports on the use of EUS in colorectal subepithelial lesions are currently limited. EUS allows detailed examination of perirectal and perianal complications in Crohn’s disease and, as a safe and less expensive investigation, can be used to monitor therapeutic response of fistulae, which seems to improve outcomes and reduce the need for additional surgery. Furthermore, EUS image enhancement techniques, such as the use of contrast agents or elastography, have recently been evaluated for colorectal indications as well. Possible applications of contrast enhancement include the assessment of tumour angiogenesis in colorectal cancer, the monitoring of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease based on quantification of bowel wall vascularization, and differentiating between benign and malignant subepithelial tumours. Recent reports suggest that EUS elastography enables highly accurate discrimination of colorectal adenocarcinomas from adenomas, while inflammatory bowel disease phenotypes can be distinguished based on the strain ratio calculation. Among EUS-guided therapies, the drainage of abdominal and pelvic collections has been regarded as a safe and effective procedure to be used as an alternative for the transcutaneous route, while the placing of fiducial markers under EUS guidance for targeted radiotherapy in rectal cancer or the use of contrast microbubbles as drug-delivery vehicles represent experimental therapeutic applications that could greatly impact the forthcoming management of patients with colorectal diseases, pending on further investigations.

Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery

Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) consists of a series of anorectal surgical procedures using different devices that are introduced into the anal canal. TES has been developed significantly since it was first used in the 1980s. The key point for the success of these techniques is how accurately patients are selected. The main indication was the resection of endoscopically unresectable adenomas. In recent years, these techniques have become more widespread which has allowed them to be applied in conservative rectal procedures for both benign diseases and selected cases of rectal cancer. For more advanced rectal cancers it should be considered palliative or, in some controlled trials, experimental. The role of newer endoscopic techniques available has not yet been defined. TES may allow for new strategies in the treatment of rectal pathology, like transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery or total mesorectal excision.

Ultrasonography in gastroenterology

Ultrasonography (US) is a safe and available real-time, high-resolution imaging method, which during the last decades has been increasingly integrated as a clinical tool in gastroenterology. New US applications have emerged with enforced data software and new technical solutions, including strain evaluation, three-dimensional imaging and use of ultrasound contrast agents. Specific gastroenterologic applications have been developed by combining US with other diagnostic or therapeutic methods, such as endoscopy, manometry, puncture needles, diathermy and stents. US provides detailed structural information about visceral organs without hazard to the patients and can play an important clinical role by reducing the need for invasive procedures. This paper presents different aspects of US in gastroenterology, with a special emphasis on the contribution from Nordic scientists in developing clinical applications.

New endoscopic ultrasound techniques for digestive tract diseases: A comprehensive review

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is one of the most important modalities for the diagnosis of digestive tract diseases. EUS has been evolving ever since it was introduced. New techniques such as elastography and contrast enhancement have emerged, increasing the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of EUS for the diagnosis of digestive tract diseases including pancreatic masses and lymphadenopathy. EUS-elastography evaluates tissue elasticity and therefore, can be used to differentiate various lesions. Contrast-enhanced EUS can distinguish benign from malignant pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy using the intravenous injection of contrast agents. This review discusses the principles and types of these new techniques, as well as their clinical applications and limitations.

A comparative study of strain and shear-wave elastography in an elasticity phantom

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of strain and shear-wave elastography for determining targets of varying stiffness in a phantom. The effect of target diameter on elastographic assessments and the effect of depth on shear-wave velocity were also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 20 targets of varying diameters (2.5-16.7 mm) and stiffnesses (8, 14, 45, and 80 kPa) with a 4-9-MHz linear-array transducer. Targets were evaluated 10 times with three different methods-shear-wave elastography, strain ratio, and strain histogram analysis-yielding 600 evaluations. AUCs were calculated for data divided between different stiffnesses. A 1.5-6-MHz curved-array transducer was used to assess the effect of depth (3.5 vs 6 cm) on shear-wave elastography in 80 scans. Mixed model analysis was performed to assess the effect of target diameter and depth. RESULTS. Strain ratio and strain histogram AUCs were higher than the shear-wave velocity AUC (p < 0.001) in data divided as 80 versus 45, 14, and 8 kPa. In data divided as 80 and 45 versus 14 and 8 kPa, the methods were equal (p = 0.959 and p = 1.000, respectively). Strain ratios were superior (p = 0.030), whereas strain histograms were not significantly better (p = 0.083) than shear-wave elastography in data divided as 80, 45, and 14 versus 8 kPa. Target diameter had an effect on all three methods (p = 0.001). Depth had an effect on shear-wave velocity (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION. The ability to discern different target stiffnesses varies between shear-wave and strain elastography. Target diameter affected all methods. Shear-wave elastography is affected by target depth.

Endorectal ultrasonography, strain elastography and MRI differentiation of rectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas

AIM

Strain elastography is a method for recording tissue hardness. Strain in different areas may be compared using strain ratio (SR). The aims of this study were to validate a previously proposed SR cut-off value of 1.25 for differentiating adenocarcinomas from adenomas and to compare the performance of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), strain elastography and MRI in the same patients.

METHOD

A prospective evaluation of 120 consecutive patients with rectal neoplasia, using a predetermined elastography strain ratio cut-off value, was performed to differentiate adenomas from adenocarcinomas. ERUS and MRI were performed according to standard routine at Haukeland University Hospital, defining T0 as adenomas and T1-T4 as adenocarcinomas. Subsequent histopathology was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Histopathological evaluation revealed 21 adenomas and 99 adenocarcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (with 95% CI) were as follows: ERUS: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.62 (0.40-0.80) and 0.90 (0.83-0.94); elastography SR: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.86 (0.66-0.96) and 0.94 (0.88-0.97); and MRI: 0.99 (0.94-1.00), 0.07 (0.00-0.31) and 0.87 (0.80-0.93).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the elastography SR assessment accurately differentiates sessile adenomas from adenocarcinomas. SR assessment has a superior ability to differentiate adenomas and adenocarcinomas when compared with ERUS and MRI. MRI examination seems unable to recognize adenomas and should be interpreted with care when early-stage rectal neoplasia is suspected.

Combined endorectal ultrasonography and strain elastography for the staging of early rectal cancer

AIM

Strain elastography is a novel approach to rectal tumour evaluation. The primary aim of this study was to correlate elastography to pT stages of rectal tumours and to assess the ability of the method to differentiate rectal adenomas (pT0) from early rectal cancer (pT1-2). Secondary aims were to compare elastography with endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) and to propose a combined strain elastography and ERUS staging algorithm.

METHOD

In all, 120 consecutive patients with a suspected rectal tumour were examined in this staging study. Patients receiving surgery without neoadjuvant radiotherapy were included (n = 59). All patients were examined with ERUS and elastography. Treatment decisions were made by multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment, without considering the strain elastography examination.

RESULTS

Histopathology identified 21 adenomas, 13 pT1, 9 pT2, 15 pT3 and one pT4. Mean elastography strain ratios were predictive of T stage (P = 0.01). Differentiation of adenomas from early rectal cancer (pT1-2) had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.82, 0.86 and 0.84 for elastography and 0.82, 0.62 and 0.72 for ERUS. A combined staging algorithm was developed to identify tumours eligible for local resection. Based on MDT evaluation 32% of tumours later identified as pT0 or pT1 were treated with total mesorectal excision, even though a local excision might have sufficed. Combined ERUS and elastography evaluation would have significantly reduced this number to 9% (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Elastography may improve the staging of adenomas and early rectal cancer compared with ERUS alone. Combined ERUS and elastography assessment is likely to further improve the selection of patients for local resection.

Diagnosis of one small bowel tumor: the role of conventional ultrasound and elastography

Neuroendocrine tumors are the most common primary tumors of the small bowel, but diagnosis is usually delayed as the lesions are small and symptoms are mild or nonspecific. Diagnosis of this disease is currently based on radiologic or endoscopic findings. Ultrasound (US) is used as a first-line examination in patients with abdominal symptoms, as this technique permits an overall view of the gastrointestinal tract providing diagnosis of inflammatory and/or neoplastic disorders in a large proportion of patients. The aim of this case report is to describe the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of elastography in the diagnosis of a tumor of the ileum. The patient underwent conventional gray-scale US and elastography before surgery and these examinations were repeated postoperatively on the surgical specimen confirming preoperative outcome.

Feasibility of real-time strain elastography in colonic diseases

Real-time strain elastography is not routinely performed in clinical practice for characterizing gastrointestinal tract diseases, and there are few studies in the literature on the subject. The recent EFSUMB guidelines suggest the use of this method in the diagnosis of neoplastic lesions and in the characterization of bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to evaluate the feasibility of strain elastography in some pathologies of the colon frequently encountered in daily clinical practice and to compare elastography images with corresponding endoscopic and radiographic images. In our opinion, strain elastography is useful for characterizing diseases of the colon as it can add valuable diagnostic information to grayscale ultrasound imaging. However, diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance of this information should be confirmed by further prospective research-targeted studies.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is a well established method of accurate resection of specimens from the rectum under binocular vision. This review examines its role in the treatment of benign conditions of the rectum and the evidence to support its use and compliment existing endoscopic treatments. The evolution of TEMS in early rectal cancer and the concepts and outcomes of how it has been utilised to treat patients so far are presented. The bespoke nature of early rectal cancer treatment is changing the standard algorithms of rectal cancer care. The future of TEMS in the organ preserving treatment of early rectal cancer is discussed and how as clinicians we are able to select the correct patients for neoadjuvant or radical treatments accurately. The role of radiotherapy and outcomes from combination treatment using TEMS are presented with suggestions for areas of future research.

Imaging assessment of early rectal cancer

Early rectal cancer (ERC) is defined as invasive adenocarcinoma spreading into, but not beyond, the submucosa or muscularis propria-that is a Dukes'A: T1N0 or T2N0 tumour in the tumour node metastasis (TNM) classification (Taylor et al. 2008). Among these tumours it is suggested that the most superficial T1 tumours least likely to metastasize to local lymph nodes than adenocarcinoma invading deeper where the rich lymphatic and venous plexuses within the submucosa provide a mechanism for tumour spread beyond the rectum. Currently, only about 10 % of patients presenting symptomatically with rectal cancer are diagnosed with early disease; however, up to 30 % of screen detected cancers are being identified as Dukes'A. Thus, the overall detection of early stage tumours is likely to increase following greater implementation in screening programs. The goal of this invited review is to provide recommendations based on the consensus discussion on the information from preoperative imaging that is of relevance for clinical decision-making for patients with early rectal cancer.

Elastography and strain rate imaging of the gastrointestinal tract

Ultrasound based elastography of the gastrointestinal tract may be a useful approach to improved tissue characterisation. Distinguishing malignant lesions from benign may be one useful application. Monitoring of inflammatory bowel lesions for degree of inflammation or fibrosis would be another clinically useful tool. The anatomy of the bowel, however, raises many challenges for strain or shear wave imaging due to thin structures, non-constant boundary conditions and intrinsic contractility. Pathological lesions tend to increase bowel wall thickness and may ease elastography imaging. Very few studies have addressed issues of bowel wall elastography so far, and both inflammatory and neoplastic lesions seem to increase tissue hardness in the bowel wall.

Real time elastography endoscopic ultrasound (RTE-EUS), a comprehensive review

Real-time elastography (RTE) performed during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a relatively new technique which allows the evaluation of tissue stiffness, with the intent of better characterising lesions during EUS examinations. The aim of this comprehensive review was to describe the technique of RTE-EUS, as well as the clinical applications, including the study of pancreatic lesions, but also hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal (GI) tract pathology (including anal canal), lymph nodes, adrenal glands, lung and mediastinum, as well as urogenital applications. One of the advantages of the RTE-EUS technique is especially the possibility to be used in various locations accessible from the GI tract. Future developments are also briefly discussed, as elastography is a tissue characterising technique that will certainly not replace biopsy, but will rather be an adjunct during EUS examinations, due to its ease of use and low cost.

Ultrasound elastography in patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation

OBJECTIVE

The current literature has described several predictive markers in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiation, but so far none of them have been validated for clinical use. The purpose of the present study was to compare quantitative elastography based on ultrasound measurements in the course of chemoradiation with tumor response based on T stage classification and the Mandard tumor regression grading (TRG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively examined 31 patients with rectal cancer planned for high dose radiochemotherapy. The tumor and the mesorectal fat elasticity were measured using the Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse to generate information on the mechanical properties of the tissue. The objective quantitative elastography shear wave velocity was compared to the T stage classification and TRG.

RESULTS

The baseline mean tumor elasticity was 3.13 m/s. Two and six weeks after the start of chemoradiation the velocities were 2.17 m/s and 2.11 m/s, respectively. The difference between baseline velocity and velocities during the treatment course was statistically significant, (p<0.0001). Patients with tumor confined to the rectal wall at histopathology (ypT1-2) had a mean elasticity measurement after two weeks of treatment of 1.95 m/s, whereas tumors invading the mesorectal fat (ypT3-4) had a velocity of 2.47 m/s, (p<0.05). The mean elasticity tended to be lower (1.99m/s) after two weeks in patients with TRG 1-2 responses in contrast to 2.24 m/s in those with TRG 3-4.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound elastography after two weeks of chemoradiation seems to hold early predictive information to the pathological T stage.

Does the incidence of unexpected malignancy in 'benign' rectal neoplasms undergoing trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery vary according to lesion morphology?

AIM

Mucosectomy by trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) allows safe and effective excision of benign rectal lesions. Preoperative endoscopic, clinical and ultrasonographic assessment aims to select benign lesions whilst avoiding inappropriate mucosectomy in lesions with malignancy. This study examines the relationship between lesion morphology and accurate benign preoperative classification of rectal lesions undergoing TEMS.

METHOD

Primary lesions preoperatively assessed as benign were identified from a prospective TEMS database. Operative specimen morphology was independently classified by two blinded investigators, using photographs, into flat-sessile, exophytic or mixed morphology. The accuracy of the preoperative assessment by rectal ultrasonography was compared with the results of histological examination of the excised specimen (χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests).

RESULTS

Of 167 lesions with adequate data, the morphological classification showed 60 flat-sessile, 56 mixed morphology and 51 exophytic tumours, of which 5, 7 and 9, respectively, contained unexpected malignancy (P=0.48). Accurate preoperative assessment of a lesion as benign occurred in 89% of flat-sessile and mixed morphology (n=55 and 49, respectively) and in 70% of exophytic lesions (n=36) (P=0.01). Only the exophytic group contained patients in whom preoperative endoscopic and ultrasonographic staging could not be confidently made (uTx). Histology demonstrated six of the seven uTx cases to be benign.

CONCLUSION

In this study exophytic polyps were less likely to be accurately classified as benign using preoperative ultrasonography/endoscopy when compared with flat-sessile or mixed morphology polyps.

A critical appraisal of endorectal ultrasound and transanal endoscopic microsurgery and decision-making in early rectal cancer

AIM

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for early rectal cancer (ERC) gives results similar to major surgery in selected cases. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is an important part of the preoperative selection process. This study reports its accuracy and impact for patients entered on the UK TEM database.

METHOD

The UK TEM database comprises prospectively collected data on 494 patients. This data set was used to determine the prevalence of ERUS in preoperative staging and its accuracy by comparing preoperative T-stage with definitive pathological staging following TEM.

RESULTS

ERUS was performed in 165 of 494 patients who underwent TEM for rectal cancer. It inaccurately staged rectal cancer in 44.8% of tumours: 32.7% were understaged and 12.1% were overstaged. There was no significant difference in the depth of TEM excision or R1 rate between the patients who underwent ERUS before TEM and those who did not (P = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

The data show that ERUS is employed in a minority of patients with rectal cancers undergoing TEM in the UK and its accuracy in this 'Real World' practice is disappointing.

Endoscopic ultrasound elastography

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a reference technique for diagnosing and staging several different diseases. EUS-guided biopsies and fine needle aspirations are used to improve diagnostic performance of cases where a definitive diagnosis cannot be obtained through conventional EUS. However, EUS-guided tissue sampling requires experience and is associated with a low but not negligible risk of complications. EUS elastography is a non-invasive method that can be used in combination with conventional EUS and has the potential for improving the diagnostic accuracy and reducing the need for EUS-guided tissue sampling in several situations. Elastography measures tissue stiffness by evaluating changes in the EUS image before and after the application of slight pressure to the target tissue by the ultrasonography probe. Pathologic processes such as cancerization and fibrosis alter tissue elasticity and therefore induce changes in elastographic appearance. Qualitative elastography depicts tissue stiffness using different colors, whereas quantitative elastography renders numerical results expressed as a strain ratio or hue histogram mean. EUS elastography has been proven to differentiate between benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses, as well as between benign and malignant lymph nodes with a high accuracy. Studies have also demonstrated that the early changes of chronic pancreatitis can be distinguished from normal pancreatic tissues under EUS elastography. In this article, we review the technical aspects and current clinical applications of qualitative and quantitative EUS elastography and emphasize the potential additional indications that need to be evaluated in future clinical studies.