Anorectal function evaluation and predictive factors for faecal incontinence in 600 patients

Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 2-Examination and Conservative Treatment for Fecal Incontinence- English Version

Examination for fecal incontinence is performed in order to evaluate the condition of each patient. As there is no single method that perfectly assesses this condition, there are several tests that need to be conducted. These are as follows: anal manometry, recto anal sensitivity test, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, electromyogram, anal endosonography, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and defecography. In addition, the mental and physical stress most patients experience during all these examinations needs to be taken into consideration. Although some of these examinations mostly apply for patients with constipation, we hereby describe these tests as tools for the assessment of fecal incontinence. Conservative therapies for fecal incontinence include diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modification, pharmacotherapy, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, trans anal irrigation, and so on. These interventions have been identified to improve the symptoms of fecal incontinence by determining the mechanisms resulting in firmer stool consistency; strengthening the pelvic floor muscles, including the external anal sphincter; normalizing the rectal sensation; or periodic emptying of the colon and rectum. Among these interventions, diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modifications and pharmacotherapy can be performed with some degree of knowledge and experience. These two therapies, therefore, can be conducted by all physicians, including general practitioners and other physicians not specializing in fecal incontinence. However, patients with fecal incontinence who did not improve following these initial therapies should be referred to specialized institutions. Contrary to the initial therapies, specialized therapies, including pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, and trans anal irrigation, should be conducted in specialized institutions as these require patient education and instructions based on expert knowledge and experience. In general, conservative therapies should be performed for fecal incontinence before surgery because its pathophysiologies are mostly attributed to benign conditions. All Japanese healthcare professionals who take care of patients with fecal incontinence are expected to understand the characteristics of each conservative therapy, so that appropriate therapies will be selected and performed. Therefore, in this chapter, the characteristics of each conservative therapy for fecal incontinence are described.

Anorectal Manometry Versus Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as a Predictor of Maximal Treatment for Fecal Incontinence

PURPOSE

This study aims to establish the ability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in predicting the need for surgery in patients with fecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2015, PROMs data, including the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Wexner Incontinence Score and ARM results, were prospectively collected from 276 patients presenting with FI. Spearman rank was used to assess correlations between specific PROMs questions and ARM assessments of sphincter motor function. Binomial regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of the need for surgery. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to establish the utility of individual ARM and PROMs variables in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with FI.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight patients (82.60%) were treated conservatively while 48 (17.39%) underwent surgery. On univariate analyses, all 4 domains of the BBUSQ, all 8 domains of the SF-36, and the Wexner Incontinence Score were significant predictors of surgery. Additionally, maximum resting pressure, 5-second squeeze endurance, threshold volume, and urge volume were significant. On ROC curve analyses, the only significant ARM measurement was the 5-second squeeze endurance. PROMs, such as the incontinence domain of the BBUSQ and five of the SF-36 domains, were identified as fair discriminators of the need for surgery.

CONCLUSION

PROMs are reliable predictors of maximal treatment in patients with FI and can be readily used in primary care to aid surgical referrals and can be applied in hospital settings as an aid to guide surgical treatment decisions.

Functional anal canal length measurement using high-resolution anorectal manometry to investigate anal sphincter dysfunction in patients with fecal incontinence or constipation

BACKGROUND

Using high-resolution anorectal manometry, we aimed to evaluate the: (a) optimal threshold to measure functional anal canal length (FACL) with intra- and inter-observer variability; (b) relationship between abnormal FACL and other phenotypic findings; and (c) utility of FACL measurement to discriminate between healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with fecal incontinence (FI) or chronic constipation (CC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for investigation of FI or CC in isolation were included. FACL was calculated at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 mm Hg above rectal pressure. 5th-95th percentile in HV defined limits of normality.

KEY RESULTS

FACL was analyzed in 192 patients with FI (154 females), 204 patients with CC (175 females), and 134 HV (101 females). The optimal threshold for measurement of FACL was 20 mm Hg. Using this threshold, observer reproducibility was very high (ICC 0.99, P < 0.0001). FACL was shorter in females with FI and longer in females with CC compared to HV (2.3 vs 2.9 cm; and 3.4 cm vs 2.9 cm; both P < 0.0001). Twenty percent of females and 13% males with FI had a short FACL, associated with older age, anal hypotonia or hypocontractility, and a atrophic internal anal sphincter. However, abnormal FACL in isolation was only found in 1/190 FI (0.5%) and 2/201 CC (1%) patients; all other patients had other abnormal manometric findings.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Considering overlap with other routinely evaluated manometric parameters, FACL measurement does not provide additional information in the diagnostic assessment of FI or CC.

The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters.

METHODS

Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30-82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.

3D high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with perianal fistulas: comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Perianal fistula surgery can damage the anal sphincters which may cause faecal incontinence. By measuring regional pressures, 3D-HRAM potentially provides better guidance for surgical strategy in patients with perianal fistulas. The aim was to measure regional anal pressures with 3D-HRAM and to compare these with 3D-EUS findings in patients with perianal fistulas.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with active perianal fistulas who underwent both 3D-EUS and 3D-HRAM at a clinic specialised in proctology were included. A group of 30 patients without fistulas served as controls. Data regarding demographics, complaints, previous perianal surgical procedures and obstetric history were collected. The mean and regional anal pressures were measured with 3D-HRAM. Fistula tract areas detected with 3D-EUS were analysed with 3D-HRAM by visual coding and the regional pressures of the corresponding and surrounding area of the fistula tract areas were measured. The study was granted by the VUmc Medical Ethical Committee.

RESULTS

Forty patients (21 males, mean age 47) were included. Four patients had a primary fistula, 19 were previously treated with a seton/abscess drainage and 17 had a recurrence after previously performed fistula surgery. On 3D-HRAM, 24 (60%) fistula tract areas were good and 8 (20%) moderately visible. All but 7 (18%) patients had normal mean resting pressures. The mean resting pressure of the fistula tract area was significantly lower compared to the surrounding area (47 vs. 76 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Only 2 (5%) patients had a regional mean resting pressure < 10 mmHg of the fistula tract area. Using a Δ mean resting pressure ≥ 30 mmHg difference between fistula tract area and non-fistula tract area as alternative cut-off, 21 (53%) patients were identified. In 6 patients 3D-HRAM was repeated after surgery: a local pressure drop was detected in one patient after fistulotomy with increased complaints of faecal incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Profound local anal pressure drops are found in the fistula tract areas in patients normal mean resting pressures. Fistulotomy may affect local sphincter pressure. This might influence surgical decision making in future.

Hypothesized summative anal physiology score correlates but poorly predicts incontinence severity

AIM

To explore the relationship between such a construct and an existing continence score.

METHODS

A retrospective study of incontinent patients who underwent anal physiology (AP) was performed. AP results and Cleveland Clinic Continence Scores (CCCS) were extracted. An anal physiology score (APS) was developed using maximum resting pressures (MRP), anal canal length (ACL), internal and external sphincter defects and pudendal terminal motor latency. Univariate associations between each variable, APS and CCCS were assessed. Multiple regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 508 (419 women) patients, 311 had both APS and CCCS measured. Average MRP was 51 mmHg (SD 23.2 mmHg) for men and 39 mmHg (19.2 mmHg) for women. Functional ACL was 1.7 cm for men and 0.7 cm for women. Univariate analyses demonstrated significant associations between CCCS and MRP (P = 0.0002), ACL (P = 0.0006) and pudendal neuropathy (P < 0.0001). The association between APS and CCCS was significant (P < 0.0001) but accounted for only 9.2% of the variability in CCCS. Multiple regression showed that the variables most useful in predicting CCCS were external sphincter defect, pudendal neuropathy and previous pelvic surgery, but only improving the scores predictive ability to 12.5%.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the ability of AP tests to predict continence scores improves when considered collectively, but that a constructed summation model before and after multiple regression is poor at predicting the variability in continence scores.

Validation of Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence has a great impact on daily life, and many patients are reluctant to report it.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of fecal incontinence in patients with Crohn's disease, validate risk factors, and relate outcome with quality of life.

DESIGN

The design was cross-sectional.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at an academic tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with Crohn's disease treated between 2003 and 2013 were included in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A questionnaire was sent out in October 2013 to evaluate perianal disease, current symptoms of fecal incontinence, and its impact on quality of life (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire). Risk factors were validated with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was responded by 325 (62%) of 528 patients. Median age was 42 years (range, 18-91 y), 215 (66%) were women, and a diagnosis of Crohn's disease was established for a median period of 12 years (interquartile range, 6-21 y). Fecal incontinence was reported by 65 patients (20%). Fecal incontinence was associated with liquid stools (p = 0.0001), previous IBD-related bowel resections (p = 0.001), stricturing behavior of disease (p = 0.02), and perianal disease (p = 0.03). Quality of life (lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment) was poor in patients with fecal incontinence, particularly in patients with more frequent episodes of incontinence.

LIMITATIONS

There was no correction for disease activity in the multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of fecal incontinence in a tertiary population with Crohn's disease is substantially higher than in the community-dwelling population. Considering the reduced quality of life in incontinent patients, active questioning to identify fecal incontinence is recommended in those with liquid stools, perianal disease, or previous (intestinal or perianal) surgery. See Video Abstract at http://journals.lww.com/dcrjournal/Pages/videogallery.aspx.

Anal incontinence and vesico-sphincter events in systemic sclerosis: An epidemiologic bicentric cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the frequency and severity of anal incontinence and vesico-sphincter events, associated factors, and impact on the quality of life of patients with systemic sclerosis.

METHODS

Questionnaires assessing anal incontinence (Miller score), vesico-sphincter events (Urogenital Distress Inventory) and quality of life [Short Form Health Survey 36v2 (SF-36), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale] were mailed to 139 patients with systemic sclerosis at the university hospitals of Besançon and Poitiers, France. Clinical data were collected from the medical records to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Among the 121 (87%) responders, severe vesico-sphincter events or severe anal incontinence occurred in 3.4% and 12.4% of cases, respectively. Frequent urination (66.3%) and anal incontinence to gas (50.4%) were the most frequent symptoms. Anal incontinence was associated positively with vesico-sphincter events, unrelated to obstetrical factors. No correlations were seen with age, sex, or systemic sclerosis characteristics. In multivariate analysis, moderate or severe vesico-sphincter events was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores and lower SF-36 scores; the same results were observed for anal incontinence, but did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

Vesico-sphincter events and anal incontinence are common in systemic sclerosis, and sometimes severe, with a potential negative impact in quality of life. These results will be confirmed by a case-control study with dynamic and manometric assessment, and could legitimate a systematic screening to ensure early therapy and multidisciplinary individual management.

Diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence: Consensus statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists

Faecal incontinence is a common and disturbing condition, which leads to impaired quality of life and huge social and economic costs. Although recent studies have identified novel diagnostic modalities and therapeutic options, the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach is not yet completely known and shared among experts in this field. The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists selected a pool of experts to constitute a joint committee on the basis of their experience in treating pelvic floor disorders. The aim was to develop a position paper on the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of faecal incontinence, to provide practical recommendations for a cost-effective diagnostic work-up and a tailored treatment strategy. The recommendations were defined and graded on the basis of levels of evidence in accordance with the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, and were based on currently published scientific evidence. Each statement was drafted through constant communication and evaluation conducted both online and during face-to-face working meetings. A brief recommendation at the end of each paragraph allows clinicians to find concise responses to each diagnostic and therapeutic issue.

Does preoperative anal physiology testing or ultrasonography predict clinical outcome with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To determine the value of preoperative anal physiology testing and transanal ultrasonography in predicting clinical response to sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

METHODS

We report a retrospective study of all patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence in a single practice between 2011 and 2014 was performed. Patient demographics included age, gender, comorbidities, presence of an ultrasound-defined external sphincter defect, and history of prior anal sphincter repair. Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) scores were used to assess the severity of fecal incontinence at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between preoperative physiology testing and ultrasonography and patient outcome.

RESULTS

Sacral neuromodulation was trialed in 60 patients, of whom 31 had anorectal physiology testing and 29 did not. Patients who were tested were younger (60.9 vs. 71.4 years, p = 0.013) and more likely to have had a prior overlapping sphincteroplasty (40.5% vs. 15%, p = 0.043). Among patients who progressed to complete system implantation, CCF scores at 3 and 12 months were similar whether they had physiology testing or not. Likewise, patient outcome did not correlate with the finding of an ultrasound-defined external sphincter defect. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the test results and the 3-month CCF scores. CCF scores 3 months after full system implantation did not correlate with the presence or size of an external sphincter defect, resting or squeeze pressure, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, rectoanal inhibitory reflex, or minimum detectable volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal physiology testing and ultrasonography were not predictive of clinical outcomes among patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

Anorectal complications and function in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease: a series of patients with long-term follow-up

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe the long-term course of anorectal complains and function in a single centre cohort patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with perianal lesions.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 56 IBD patients (43 Crohn's disease and 13 ulcerative colitis) with perianal complaints underwent anorectal function evaluation (AFE) (baseline). For follow-up, they were approached between 2010 and 2012 by sending questionnaires including Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (IBDQ), Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), faecal incontinence scale (Vaizey) and an invitation for AFE.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 46 patients (82 %) were available, 9 (16 %) were lost and 1 (2 %) had died. Thirty patients returned the questionnaires of which 17 also underwent AFE. The remaining 16 patients were interviewed by phone and were only willing to mention their anorectal complaints. Median follow-up was 14 year. In 25 of the 46 patients (54 %), perianal complaints persisted faecal incontinence (n = 7); soiling (n = 13) and active fistula (n = 5). Eighteen (39 %) patients had an active fistula at baseline and three persisted at follow-up. Two developed a new fistula. Mean IBDQ, Vaizey and PDAI were 178 (SD 29), 7 (SD 5) and 4.2 (SD 3.0), respectively. In 17 patients, who underwent AFE, anal endosonography showed healing in nine of the ten fistulas. Anal pressures as well as rectal capacity remained unaltered in the individual patient, but showed a large range within the group.

CONCLUSION

After 14 years, 54 % of the IBD patients with perianal lesions still have mild complaints. The quality of life remained moderate over a long period, which is concerning.

The role of anorectal investigations in predicting the outcome of biofeedback in the treatment of faecal incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The current literature does not provide unequivocal evidence on prognostic factors of patients' response to biofeedback for management of faecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of patient response to biofeedback.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Baseline demographic characteristics, symptomatology and anorectal investigation reports of 137 patients who completed biofeedback therapy were analysed retrospectively. Short-term response (<3 months) to biofeedback was assessed using subjective criteria (improvement/ no improvement). P Values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

At univariate analysis, age, duration of symptoms, severity of faecal incontinence, mean maximum squeeze and resting pressure differed significantly (p < 0.05) were associated with patients' response. However, after performing logistic regression analysis age, duration and severity of symptoms were the only variables associated with the outcome (p Values were 0.041, 0.022 and 0.025, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Three independent factors (younger age, shorter duration and lower severity of faecal incontinence) were associated with patient outcome after completing our unit's biofeedback protocol. Anorectal investigations are of questionable value in patient selection for biofeedback therapy.

Severity of fecal urgency and incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical, manometric and sonographic predictors

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence (FI) and urgency are prevalent symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It is unclear which factors determine their severity. We evaluated associations of clinical activity, anorectal motility, and endoanal sonography with FI severity in IBD.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive IBD patients and 14 healthy volunteers participated in a cross-sectional, tertiary-center study. Active disease was defined as Crohn's disease activity index ≥ 150 and as simple clinical colitis index > 2. We assessed anal pressures and fatigue rate index (FRI) of the external anal sphincter (EAS) by manometry, rectal compliance and sensitivity by balloon distension, and sphincter defects by endoanal ultrasound. Significant bivariate associations between these parameters and the fecal incontinence severity scale (FISS) were evaluated in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (47%) reported urgency, 13 of which (22%) reported FI. Defects of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and the EAS were diagnosed in 14 (24%) and 13 patients (22%), respectively. Patients had significantly lower rectal compliance and FRI compared with controls. FISS demonstrated significant bivariate associations with clinical disease activity (P = 0.0115), FRI (P = 0.0018), sonographic IAS and EAS defects (P < 0.0001 and 0.0059), rectal compliance (P = 0.0001), and volume at the threshold of a constant urge (Vurge, P = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, FISS was associated with clinical disease activity (P = 0.0325), FRI (P = 0.0367), Vurge (P = 0.0091), and sonographic IAS defect(s) (P = 0.0008). The derived model explained 62% of the variance in FISS (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical disease activity and manometric and sonographic anorectal parameters are associated with FI severity in IBD. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate their predictive value in continence outcomes.

Reducing rectal injury during external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Rectal bleeding and faecal incontinence are serious injuries that men with prostate cancer who receive radiotherapy can experience. Although technical advances--including the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy coupled with image-guided radiotherapy--have enabled the delivery of dose distributions that conform to the shape of the tumour target with steep dose gradients that reduce the dose given to surrounding tissues, radiotherapy-associated toxicity can not be avoided completely. Many large-scale prospective studies have analysed the correlations of patient-related and treatment-related parameters with acute and late toxicity to optimize patient selection and treatment planning. The careful application of dose-volume constraints and the tuning of these constraints to the individual patient's characteristics are now considered the most effective ways of reducing rectal morbidity. Additionally, the use of endorectal balloons (to reduce the margins between the clinical target volume and planning target volume) and the insertion of tissue spacers into the region between the prostate and anterior rectal wall have been investigated as means to further reduce late rectal injury. Finally, some drugs and other compounds are also being considered to help protect healthy tissue. Overall, a number of approaches exist that must be fully explored in large prospective trials to address the important issue of rectal toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Impact of late anorectal dysfunction on quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Anorectal dysfunction is common after pelvic radiotherapy. This study aims to explore the relationship of subjective and objective anorectal function with quality of life (QoL) and their relative impact in patients irradiated for prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients underwent anal manometry, rectal barostat measurement, and completed validated questionnaires, at least 1 year after prostate radiotherapy (range 1-7 years). QoL was measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale (FIQL) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Bowel domain (EPICB)-bother subscale. Severity of symptoms was rated by the EPICB function subscale.

RESULTS

Anorectal function was evaluated in 85 men. Sixty-three percent suffered from one or more anorectal symptoms. Correlations of individual symptoms ranged from r = 0.23 to r = 0.53 with FIQL domains and from r = 0.36 to r = 0.73 with EPICB bother scores. They were strongest for fecal incontinence and urgency. Correlations of anal sphincter pressures, rectal capacity, and sensory thresholds ranged from r = 0.00 to r = 0.42 with FIQL domains and from r = 0.15 to r = 0.31 with EPICB bother scores. Anal resting pressure correlated most strongly. Standardized regression coefficients for QoL outcomes were largest for incontinence, urgency, and anal resting pressure. Regression models with subjective parameters explained a larger amount (range 26-92 %) of variation in QoL outcome than objective parameters (range 10-22 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal incontinence and rectal urgency are the symptoms with the largest influence on QoL. Impaired anal resting pressure is the objective function parameter with the largest influence. Therefore, sparing the structures responsible for an adequate fecal continence is important in radiotherapy planning.

[Anorectal diagnostics for proctological diseases]

The majority of proctological diseases can be defined by a structured evaluation of the symptoms and a physical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anal endosonography can detect complex anal fistulas with a high accuracy but MRI should be preferred because of its objective visualization. Functional anorectal disorders are multifactorial and show morphological and functional irregularities in different compartments of the pelvic floor which is why MR defecography is now one of the most important methods in diagnostic algorithms. Interpreting the results of anal endosonography, anal manometry and neurophysiological testing is highly demanding because of large interindividual variability. Scores are used for objective measurement of symptom severity and quality of life. In clinical practice, well validated scores evaluated in large patient groups with predetermined circumstances are needed. Bringing together morphological results with scores based on subjective perception is required to optimize diagnostics and therapy evaluation in proctology.

Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence associated with an anal sphincter lesion: a systematic review

AIM

The long-term results of sphincteroplasty for faecal incontinence due to an anal sphincter lesion have been disappointing. Initially sacral nerve stimulation was used only in faecal incontinence of neurogenic origin but subsequently the indications have been extended to other conditions. The aim of this review was to evaluate sacral nerve stimulation for incontinence in the presence of a sphincter defect.

METHOD

The MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for the period between 1995 and 2011 were searched for studies in English, with no limitations concerning the study size or the length of follow-up. The major endpoints were clinical efficacy, changes in anorectal manometry and quality of life.

RESULTS

Ten reports (119 patients) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was low (nine were retrospective, one was prospective). All reported a lesion of the external anal and/or internal anal sphincter on endoanal ultrasound. A definitive implant was performed on 106 (89%) of the 119 patients who underwent a peripheral nerve evaluation test. The weighted average number of incontinent episodes per week decreased from 12.1 to 2.3, the weighted average Cleveland Clinic Score decreased from 16.5 to 3.8, and the ability to defer defaecation, when evaluated, increased significantly. The features at anorectal manometry did not change. The quality of life improved significantly in almost all studies.

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation could be a therapeutic option for faecal incontinence in patients with an anal sphincter lesion. However, the quality of the published studies is low. A randomized clinical trial comparing sacral nerve stimulation with other classical surgical procedures at long-term follow-up, although beset with difficulties, should be conducted.

Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation

Introduction and hypothesis

Many women with chronic constipation are referred for anorectal function tests (AFT) when they fail initial conservative treatment with lifestyle advice and laxatives. Our goal was to prospectively investigate the diagnostic potential of AFT in women with constipation in order to identify treatable conditions.

Methods

Between May 2003 and June 2011, all women with constipation referred to our tertiary referral center completed a questionnaire regarding their perianal complaints and underwent physical examination and were evaluated according to our AFT protocol, including anorectal manometry (ARM) and anal endosonography.

Results

One hundred and thirteen women were referred and classified as having idiopathic constipation (n = 100), neurological disorder (n = 8), or others (n = 5). Of the 100 women with idiopathic constipation, clinical examination identified 25 (25 %) with hypertonia of the pelvic floor (dyssynergic pelvic floor) and 15 (15 %) with a rectocele. In 37/100 women also complaining of impaired evacuation, the yield of rectocele was 15 (41 %) and of hypertonia 5 (14 %). Women with hypertonia were younger (40 vs. 51 years; P = 0.002) and had no rectoceles identified (P = 0.02), and fewer women could relax during straining on ARM (56 % vs. 92 %; P < 0.001) compared with women without pelvic hypertonia. Other ARM measurements showed no differences between women with evacuation disorders, rectoceles, or hypertonia. Anal endosonography showed no internal sphincter hypertrophia.

Conclusion

Potentially treatable conditions, such as rectocele and pelvic floor hypertonia, are found on clinical examination in 40 % of women with idiopathic constipation. Impaired evacuation is associated with the presence of a rectocele. AFT contributes little and should be reserved for selected cases.