The anal fistula claw: the OTSC clip for anal fistula closure

Perianal Fistula; from Etiology to Treatment - A Review

Anal fistula has been a challenging clinical issue for years due to its complex pathogenesis. The risk of frequent recurrence and incontinence complicates long-term treatment. Recent scientific literature has reviewed new techniques used for anal fistula treatment in recent years, assessing the advantages and disadvantages of each based on clinical outcomes. Although surgery is the main method used to treat anal fistula, there is no simple technique that can completely heal complex anal fistula. The surgical treatment should consider the healing outcome and the protection of anal function comprehensively. Several innovative techniques have emerged in recent years, such as combined techniques based on drainage seton and LIFT-plug, which appear to be relatively effective therapies. However, more multi-center prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to validate their effectiveness. In some situations, medical treatment may also be considered.

European Society of Coloproctology: Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula

AIM

The primary aim of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Guideline Development Group (GDG) was to produce high-quality, evidence-based guidelines for the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula with input from a multidisciplinary group and using transparent, reproducible methodology.

METHODS

Previously published methodology in guideline development by the ESCP has been replicated in this project. The guideline development process followed the requirements of the AGREE-S tool kit. Six phases can be identified in the methodology. Phase one sets the scope of the guideline, which addresses the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula in adult patients presenting to secondary care. The target population for this guideline are healthcare practitioners in secondary care and patients interested in understanding the clinical evidence available for various surgical interventions for anal fistula. Phase two involved formulation of the GDG. The GDG consisted of 21 coloproctologists, three research fellows, a radiologist and a methodologist. Stakeholders were chosen for their clinical and academic involvement in the management of anal fistula as well as being representative of the geographical variation among the ESCP membership. Five patients were recruited from patient groups to review the draft guideline. These patients attended two virtual meetings to discuss the evidence and suggest amendments. In phase three, patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes questions were formulated by the GDG. The GDG ratified 250 questions and chose 45 for inclusion in the guideline. In phase four, critical and important outcomes were confirmed for inclusion. Important outcomes were pain and wound healing. Critical outcomes were fistula healing, fistula recurrence and incontinence. These outcomes formed part of the inclusion criteria for the literature search. In phase five, a literature search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews by eight teams of the GDG. Data were extracted and submitted for review by the GDG in a draft guideline. The most recent systematic reviews were prioritized for inclusion. Studies published since the most recent systematic review were included in our analysis by conducting a new meta-analysis using Review manager. In phase six, recommendations were formulated, using grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations, in three virtual meetings of the GDG.

RESULTS

In seven sections covering the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula, there are 42 recommendations.

CONCLUSION

This is an up-to-date international guideline on the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula using methodology prescribed by the AGREE enterprise.

OTSC Proctology clip as appropriate treatment for complicated anorectal fistula

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the effectiveness and tolerability of the application of an OTSC (Ovesco Endoscopy AG Tuebingen, Germany) Proctology clip as an innovative strategy of anorectal fistulae closure when established treatment strategies had already failed or were not feasible.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study including consecutive patients treated between March 2014 and March 2016 with the OTSC Proctology system for anorectal fistula closure, including one rectovaginal and one rectourethral fistula. The primary outcome was the healing rate with a minimum follow up of 6 months. Healing was defined as closure of the internal fistula ostium and absence of secretion or local inflammation during follow up.

RESULTS

A total of 66 fistula closures by the OTSC Proctology clip were investigated, including cryptoglandular fistulas (45/66 patients, 68%), fistulas associated with CED (19/66 patients, 29%), and other non-cryptoglandular fistulas (2/66 patients, 4%). 47% (31/66 patients) had a failed previous therapy. In that selected collective, a successful fistula closure was achieved in 29/66 cases (44%) after a median follow up time of 40 months (6-61 months). Suprasphincteric and high transsphincteric fistulas showed healing in 63% and 42% in CD associated fistulas.

CONCLUSION

Fistula closure by the OTSC Proctology clip is an innovative, sphincter protecting treatment strategy in anorectal fistulas that can achieve long-term cure in complex anorecta.

Trends in Treatment for Hemorrhoids, Fistula, and Anal Fissure: Go Along the Current Trends

Recent trends in benign anal disease treatment are minimizing surgery to preserve normal anorectal anatomical unit and its functions. However, some surgeons still prefer and are confident with the use of conventional solid surgical methods. In this report, we will investigate the recent trends in the treatment for hemorrhoids, fistula, and anal fissure. The practice guidelines of advanced countries, including UK, Italy, France, USA, Japan, and ESCP, are referred to in this review. Opinions suggested in international meetings were also added. In the management of hemorrhoids, surgical treatments and office procedures were recommended according to a patient's status and preference. For the management of complex anal fistula, novel sphincter-preserving surgical techniques are more widely accepted than a sphincter-dividing procedure of immediate repair following fistulectomy. The treatment of anal fissures is well covered in the guidelines of the ASCRS.

Lessons learned from an audit of 1250 anal fistula patients operated at a single center: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND

A complex anal fistula is a challenging disease to manage.

AIM

To review the experience and insights gained in treating a large cohort of patients at an exclusive fistula center.

METHODS

Anal fistulas operated on by a single surgeon over 14 years were analyzed. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was done in all patients. Four procedures were performed: fistulotomy; two novel sphincter-saving procedures, proximal superficial cauterization of the internal opening and regular emptying and curettage of fistula tracts (PERFACT) and transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS), and anal fistula plug. PERFACT was initiated before TROPIS. As per the institutional GFRI algorithm, fistulotomy was done in simple fistulas, and TROPIS was done in complex fistulas. Fistulas with associated abscesses were treated by definitive surgery. Incontinence was evaluated objectively by Vaizey incontinence scores.

RESULTS

A total of 1351 anal fistula operations were performed in 1250 patients. The overall fistula healing rate was 19.4% in anal fistula plug (n = 56), 50.3% in PERFACT (n = 175), 86% in TROPIS (n = 408), and 98.6% in fistulotomy (n = 611) patients. Continence did not change significantly after surgery in any group. As per the new algorithm, 1019 patients were operated with either the fistulotomy or TROPIS procedure. The overall success rate was 93.5% in those patients. In a subgroup analysis, the overall healing rate in supralevator, horseshoe, and fistulas with an associated abscess was 82%, 85.8%, and 90.6%, respectively. The 90.6% healing rate in fistulas with an associated abscess was comparable to that of fistulas with no abscess (94.5%, P = 0.057, not significant).

CONCLUSION

Fistulotomy had a high 98.6% healing rate in simple fistulas without deterioration of continence if the patient selection was done judiciously. The sphincter-sparing procedure, TROPIS, was safe, with a satisfactory 86% healing rate for complex fistulas. This is the largest anal fistula series to date.

Advances in the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Mini-Review of Recent Five-Year Clinical Studies

Anal fistula, with its complicated pathogenesis, has been considered as a clinical challenge for centuries. The risk of frequent recurrence and incontinence constitutes a considerable threat in the long-term treatment of anal fistula. In this work, we narratively reviewed the scientific literature of new techniques that have been used for anal fistula treatment over the recent 5 years, objectively evaluated the pros and cons of each technique on the basis of clinical outcomes, and tried to disclose the effective strategies for anal fistula treatment. Up to date, surgery is the main method used for treating anal fistula, but there is no simple technique that can completely heal complex anal fistula. In the course of surgery treatment, the healing outcome, and the protection of anal function should be weighed comprehensively. Among the innovative techniques that have emerged in recent years, combined techniques based on drainage Seton and LIFT-plug seem to be the relatively effective therapies, but their effectiveness requires more multi-center prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample size and long-term follow-up to be validated.

Can Perianal Fistula Be Treated Non-surgically with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Sealant?

INTRODUCTION

In the last 20 years, various procedures have been suggested for the treatment of anal fistula whilst minimising anal sphincter injury and preserving optimal function. Since 2011, patients at our hospital have been treated for anal fistula by means of platelet-rich fibrin plugs. To do so, three different application techniques have been used, the most recent of which is a non-surgical approach. In this paper, we compare and contrast the results obtained by each of these three techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This study compares three procedures in which the anal fistula was sealed using platelet-rich fibrin: for the patients in group A, the plug was surgically inserted, under anaesthesia, and traditional methods were used to curette the fistula tract and close the internal orifice; for those in group B, the plug was surgically inserted, under anaesthesia, after curettage of the fistula tract using a graduated set of cylindrical curettes, and the internal orifice was closed as before; and for those in group C, the plug was inserted during outpatient consultation, without anaesthesia, without curettage and without closure of the internal orifice.

RESULTS

The patients in the three groups were homogeneous in terms of sex, age, ASA classification, location of the fistula and previous insertion of the seton. There were no significant differences in morbidity or postoperative continence. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the outcomes achieved, in favour of group B, while groups A and C obtained similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment of perianal fistula is totally innocuous. It is a very low cost procedure and the results obtained are highly acceptable (similar to those of the surgical insertion of a plug, with traditional curettage). Therefore, we believe this approach should be considered a valid initial treatment for perianal fistula, reserving surgical treatment (curettage and sealing using a cylindrical-curette kit) for cases in which this initial method is unsuccessful. This would avoid many complications and achieve considerable financial savings for the health system.

Anal Fistula Laser Closure: the length of fistula is the Achilles' heel

BACKGROUND

Laser closure is a novel sphincter-saving technique for the treatment of anal fistula. The aim of this study was to report middle term results of laser treatment without closure of the internal orifice and to identify prognostic factors to improve selection criteria and maximize healing.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients treated with laser for transphinteric anal fistula. A diode laser emitting laser energy of 12W at a wavelength of 1470 nm was used. The relationship between fistula healing and age, sex, previous fistula surgery, location of fistula, and length of fistula tract was investigated. A successful outcome was defined by the complete healing of the surgical wound and external opening for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (16 males, median age 52 years, range 26-72 years) underwent laser fistula closure between January 2015 and December 2016. Cure was achieved in 10 patients (33.3%). The mean follow-up was 11.30 months (range 6-24 months). Patients with persistent or recurrent fistula were offered repeat surgery. Eventually 4 underwent laser treatment once more. Two patients were cured leading to an overall healing rate of 40% (12 out of 30). Only 4 minor complications occurred (13.3%). No worsening of anal continence was registered. Only fistula length had a statistically significant correlation with successful treatment. Fistula tracts shorter than 30 mm were associated with a primary healing rate of 58.3% while tracts longer than 30 mm were cured in only 16.6% of cases (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Laser closure is a safe and effective treatment for transphinteric anal fistula. The fistula length is the only significant prognostic factor when closing anal fistulas exclusively with laser: shorter fistulas have a better outcome.

German S3 guidelines: anal abscess and fistula (second revised version)

BACKGROUND

The incidence of anal abscess and fistula is relatively high, and the condition is most common in young men.

METHODS

This is a revised version of the German S3 guidelines first published in 2011. It is based on a systematic review of pertinent literature.

RESULTS

Cryptoglandular abscesses and fistulas usually originate in the proctodeal glands of the intersphincteric space. Classification depends on their relation to the anal sphincter. Patient history and clinical examination are diagnostically sufficient in order to establish the indication for surgery. Further examinations (endosonography, MRI) should be considered in complex abscesses or fistulas. The goal of surgery for an abscess is thorough drainage of the focus of infection while preserving the sphincter muscles. The risk of abscess recurrence or secondary fistula formation is low overall. However, they may result from insufficient drainage. Primary fistulotomy should only be performed in case of superficial fistulas. Moreover, it should be done by experienced surgeons. In case of unclear findings or high fistulas, repair should take place in a second procedure. Anal fistulas can be treated only by surgical intervention with one of the following operations: laying open, seton drainage, plastic surgical reconstruction with suturing of the sphincter (flap, sphincter repair, LIFT), and occlusion with biomaterials. Only superficial fistulas should be laid open. The risk of postoperative incontinence is directly related to the thickness of the sphincter muscle that is divided. All high anal fistulas should be treated with a sphincter-saving procedure. The various plastic surgical reconstructive procedures all yield roughly the same results. Occlusion with biomaterial results in lower cure rate.

CONCLUSION

In this revision of the German S3 guidelines, instructions for diagnosis and treatment of anal abscess and fistula are described based on a review of current literature.

Long-term efficacy and safety of a nitinol closure clip system for anal fistula treatment

INTRODUCTION

Treatment failure of anal fistula results in high re-occurrence rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Efficacy and safety of a nitinol closure clip system (bear-claw clip) were evaluated for anal fistulae treatment in a 36-month long-term follow-up study.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included. No patient had been treated with a bear-claw clip system before. All patients were fully continent before treatment. Follow-up time was 36 months (range 19-48 months). We observed a re-occurrence rate of 41% (nine patients) with presence of an active fistula. Time to recurrence was on average 6.9 months (range 3-11 months). Thirteen patients (59%) showed a complete healing of the fistula. Placed clip was removed in all patients on average after almost 5.8 months (3-12 months), in three cases the clip was left in situ. We did not observe any incontinence; one patient reported recurrent burning after defecation once the clip system was removed.

DISCUSSIONS

Clip placement is a minimally invasive sphincter-preserving procedure with minimal complications and with an acceptable recurrence rate in the long term. However, bear-claw clip placement should probably be offered patients as a treatment option before more invasive procedures with higher perioperative morbidity are taken into consideration.

Therapeutic management of complex anal fistulas by installing a nitinol closure clip: study protocol of a multicentric randomised controlled trial--FISCLOSE

INTRODUCTION

Complex anal fistulas are responsible for pain, faecal incontinence and impaired quality of life. The rectal mucosa advancement flap (RMAF) procedure to cover the internal opening of the fistula remains a strategy of choice. However, a new procedure for closing anal fistulas is now available with the use of a nitinol closure clip (OTSC Proctology, OVESCO), which should ensure a better healing rate. This procedure is currently becoming more widespread, though without robust scientific validation, and it is therefore essential to carry out a prospective evaluation in order to determine the efficacy and safety of this new medical device for complex anal fistulas.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The FISCLOSE trial is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of a nitinol closure clip compared to the RMAF procedure for the management of complex anal fistulas. This trial is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, bicentre and interventional study. Patients (n=46 per group) will be randomly assigned for management with either a closure clip or RMAF. The main objectives are to improve the healing rate of the anal fistula, lessen the postoperative pain and faecal incontinency, enhance the quality of life, and lower the number of reinterventions and therapeutic management costs. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with a healed fistula at 3 months. The secondary outcomes are anal fistula healing (6 and 12 months), proctological pain (visual analogue scale), the faecal incontinence score (Jorge and Wexner questionnaire), digestive disorders and quality of life (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and Euroqol EQ5D-3 L) up to 1 year.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by an independent medical ethics committee 1 (IRB00008526, CPP Sud-Est 6, Clermont-Ferrand, France) and registered by the competent French authority (ANSM, Saint Denis, France). The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international congresses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02336867; pre-result.

Platelet-rich fibrin sealant as a treatment for complex perianal fistulas: a multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of perianal fistulas is high, and this condition has a profoundly negative impact on patients' quality of life. The problem is greater when the fistula tract is high because treatment is necessarily complex (limited surgery may lead to recurrence, while aggressive surgery is associated with higher rates of faecal incontinence). To achieve a balance between these two options, we suggest that complex fistulas should be treated by sealing the tract with platelet-rich fibrin. Our objective is to evaluate the medium- to long-term results obtained from the treatment of complex perianal fistulas by sealing with platelet-rich fibrin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective longitudinal multicentre study involves three colorectal surgeons working at three hospitals. The study period was October 2010 to June 2013, during which a total of 60 patients were treated for complex fistulas. In all cases, the intervention consisted of curetting the fistula tract, sealing it with platelet-rich fibrin and closing the internal orifice. We evaluated the clinical outcomes (clinical examination and pelvic magnetic resonance (MRI)) and the quality of life results, both general (SF-36) and gastrointestinal (GIQLI questionnaire) in periodic reviews during consultation.

RESULT

The median follow-up period was 24 months (11-43 months), during which in 40 patients (66.66 %) the fistulas remained closed, with a zero rate of faecal incontinence. The results of the quality of life questionnaires are comparable (indeed, they are better in some items for the cured patients) to those of the reference population.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, this procedure is safe and its results are promising in terms of clinical outcome and medium- to long-term quality of life.

International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video)

BACKGROUND

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) provides more durable and full-thickness closure as compared with standard clips. Only case reports and small case series have reported on outcomes of OTSC closure of GI defects.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a large, multicenter experience with OTSCs for the management of GI defects. Secondary goals were to determine success rate by type of defect and type of therapy and to determine predictors of treatment outcomes.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective study.

SETTING

Multiple, international, academic centers.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients who underwent attempted OTSC placement for GI defects, either as a primary or as a rescue therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

OTSC placement to attempt closure of GI defects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Long-term success of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients (108 fistulae, 48 perforations, 32 leaks) were included. Long-term success was achieved in 60.2% of patients during a median follow-up of 146 days. Rate of successful closure of perforations (90%) and leaks (73.3%) was significantly higher than that of fistulae (42.9%) (P < .05). Long-term success was significantly higher when OTSCs were applied as primary therapy (primary 69.1% vs rescue 46.9%; P = .004). On multivariate analysis, patients who had OTSC placement for perforations and leaks had significantly higher long-term success compared with those who had fistulae (OR 51.4 and 8.36, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and multiple operators with variable expertise with the OTSC device.

CONCLUSION

OTSC is safe and effective therapy for closure of GI defects. Clinical success is best achieved in patients undergoing closure of perforations or leaks when OTSC is used for primary or rescue therapy. Type of defect is the best predictor of successful long-term closure.

The OTSC® Proctology clip system for anal fistula closure: first prospective clinical data

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal fistulas represent a troublesome condition for both patient and surgeon. The OTSC® Proctology clip system is a new device for transanal anorectal fistula closure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The OTSC® Proctology system was evaluated in a prospective clinical study undertaken in two surgical proctological centers. Ten patients (three women, seven men; median age 55 years, range 25-73 years) with nine transsphincteric and one suprasphincteric fistulas were enrolled into the study.

RESULTS

The median operation time was 30 minutes (range 20-45 minutes). There were no intraoperative technical or surgical complications. Postoperatively, no patient reported intolerable discomfort, immoderate pain or foreign body sensation in the anal region. At follow-up examination six months after surgery, nine out of ten patients had no clinical signs or symptoms of their previous fistula and were considered as healed (success rate 90%). In one patient persistency of the fistula was noted due to spontaneous early clip detachment on the third postoperative day.

DISCUSSION

These first data demonstrate the efficacy of the OTSC® Proctology system in the treatment of anal fistulas. Currently, more patients were enrolled into this prospective study to allow further evaluation of this new device and to assess its future role in relation to established surgical strategies for anorectal fistulas.

Endoskopische Möglichkeiten der Behandlung von Nahtinsuffizienzen im Rektum

<b><i>Hintergrund: </i></b>Anastomoseninsuffizienzen stellen eine gefürchtete Komplikation der kolorektalen Chirurgie dar. Endoskopische Techniken haben sich in der Therapie der Leckagen zunehmend etabliert. In dieser Übersicht möchten wir einen Überblick der wichtigsten endoskopischen Verfahren geben. <b><i>Methode: </i></b>Systematische Recherche der vorhandenen Literatur. <b><i>Ergebnisse: </i></b>Die bedeutendsten endoskopischen Verfahren zur Behandlung der kolorektalen Anastomoseninsuffizienzen stellen die Fibrininjektion, die Vakuumschwammtherapie (Endo-Sponge), spezielle Clip-Systeme (OTSC) sowie die Stentimplantation dar. Der breiten klinischen Anwendung dieser Verfahren steht jedoch eine unzureichende Studienlage gegenüber. <b><i>Schlussfolgerung: </i></b>Die Einschätzung der Wertigkeit der einzelnen endoskopischen Verfahren untereinander und in speziellen therapeutischen Situationen hängt im Wesentlichen von der Erfahrung der Untersucher ab. Es bedarf der Durchführung randomisierter, prospektiver Studien, um diese Erfahrungen zu objektivieren.