Feinstruktur pigmentierter und unpigmentierter Photoreceptoren bei Proseriata (Plathelminthes)

Ultrastructure of the epidermal eyespots of an acoel platyhelminth

The epidermal eyespots of the acoel Otocelis rubropunctata would appear to consist of a single cell type provided with pigment granules and cilia. Very numerous dictyosomes characterize the cytoplasm of the cells. The cilia possess the 9X2 + 2 pattern of microtubules and the typical rootlets of acoels. Microvilli are interspersed among the cilia. The basal surface of the cells seems to present synatpic input and to generate an axonal process, which would confirm their photosensitive role. The structural similarities with other photoreceptors are outlined.

Structure and development of onychophoran eyes: what is the ancestral visual organ in arthropods?

Scarce and controversial information on visual organs and their innervation in Onychophora currently do not allow a thorough comparison with Euarthropoda. Therefore, this study sets out to provide additional data on the architecture and morphogenesis of the onychophoran visual system and to explore similarities and differences between the visual organs of onychophorans and other arthropods. Based on the new data for Epiperipatus biolleyi (Peripatidae) and Metaperipatus blainvillei (Peripatopsidae), it is suggested that the compound eyes represent an autapomorphy of Euarthropoda since similarities with the onychophoran eyes are weak or absent. Instead, the innervation from a central rather than lateral part of the brain, the presence of only one (paired or unpaired) visual center, and a similar ontogenetic origin from an ectodermal groove rather than a proliferation zone suggest homology between the onychophoran eyes and the median ocelli of euarthropods. In conclusion, I suggest that the last common ancestor of arthropods bore only one pair of ocellus-like visual organs that were modified in several arthropod lineages. This hypothesis is supported by recent paleontological data.

The interrelationships of proseriata (Platyhelminthes: seriata) tested with molecules and morphology

Proseriate flatworms are common members of the interstitial benthic fauna worldwide, predominantly occupying marine environments. As minute animals, having relatively few characters useful for cladistic analysis, they have been difficult to present in a phylogenetic framework using morphology alone. Here we present a new morphological matrix consisting of 16 putatively homologous characters and two molecular data sets to investigate further this major group of free-living members of the Platyhelminthes. Complete 18S rDNA (representing 277 parsimony-informative characters) from 17 ingroup taxa and partial 28S rDNA spanning variable expansion regions D1 to D3 and D1 to D6 (representing 219 and 361 parsimony-informative characters, respectively) from 27 and 14 ingroup taxa, respectively, were determined and aligned as complementary data sets. Morphological and molecular data sets were analyzed separately and together to determine underlying phylogenetic patterns and to resolve conflict between published scenarios based on morphology alone. The monophyly of the Proseriata cannot be confirmed categorically with any of these data sets. However, the constituent taxa are confirmed as basal members of the Neoophora, and a sister group relationship with Tricladida is rejected. Similarly, the monophyly of one of the two subtaxa of the Proseriata, the Lithophora, could not be confirmed with molecules. Concerning intragroup relationships, we could reject one of the two phylogenetic trees formerly proposed, as well as the clade Otoplanidae + Coelogynoporidae. However, a clade Otoplanidae + Archimonocelididae + Monocelididae (to which the Monotoplanidae belong) was supported, and the position of the genus Calviria shifted from the Archimonocelididae to the Coelogynoporidae.

Ultrastructure of the eyes of the larva of Neoheterocotyle rhinobatidis (Platyhelminthes, Monopisthocotylea), and phylogenetic implications

The oncomiracidium of Neoheterocotyle rhinobatidis (Monogenea, Monopisthocotylea, Monocotylidae) has two pairs of eyes, each eye with a lens and pigment cup. The anterior eyes have a single rhadomere; the posterior ones, two rhadomeres. Lenses are part of the pigment cup cells, as indicated by cytoplasmic connections between them and the pigment cups, and they are of mitochondrial origin because mitochondrial cristae are present in the periphery of the lenses. This is the first time that mitochondrial lenses have been shown to exist in a neodermatan. Such lenses may be a synapomorphy of a large taxon comprising the Neodermata and its turbellarian sister groups, or they may have evolved convergently in several not closely related groups as a result of strong selection pressure to find a suitable habitat or host.

Ultrastructural investigations of presumed photoreceptive organs in two Saccocirrus species (polychaeta, saccocirridae)

In addition to the pigmented ocelli, four different types of photoreceptor-like organs without shading pigment have been found in Saccocirrus papillocercus and S. krusadensis. The sensory cells of these presumed ocelli are either ciliary or rhabdomeric with ciliary rudiments. With the exception of the multicellular type-2 ocelli they are bicellular consisting of a sensory cell and a supportive cell. In each ocellus the supportive cell forms a thin cup-shaped envelope around the sensory elements. In the type-2 ocellus, 7 supportive cells form an ovoid cavity leaving openings through which dendritic processes of an equal number of sensory cells enter the cavity. The pigmented ocelli possess an ocellar cavity communicating with the exterior through a pore in the eyecup, ciliary rudiments in both sensory and supportive cell, and additional non-photoreceptive sensory cells in the opening of the eyecup. The sensory organs show characteristic differences between the two species, such as presence or absence of a particular type of ocellus (type 2 is absent in S. krusadensis, type 3 in S. papillocercus), number of cilia in type-4 ocelli, density of microvilli, number of non-photoreceptive sensory cells in the pore of the pigmented ocellus, etc. These differences provide important characters which can be used for discrimination either of species or of subgeneric taxa in Saccocirrus. The phylogenetic significance of the different photoreceptive organs is discussed.