Percutaneous pyelolysis: indications, complications and results

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A retrospective case series review

Introduction

Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty has been gold standard in the management of pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). It has evolved from open to laparoscopic and now robotic surgery. Open surgery has its drawback of long incision and scar mark, significant post-operative pain and long hospital stay. The main limitation of laparoscopic surgery had been the difficulty in endosuturing. Robotic surgery has incorporated the minimal access method of laparoscopy and endowrist movement of open surgery to overcome the challenge of intracorporeal suturing. Here, we present our initial experience of robotic pyeloplasty.

Patients and Methods

A total of 30 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) over 19 months. Diagnosis of PUJO was made by computed tomography urography, diuretic renogram and retrograde pyelogram in selected patients. All patients underwent RALP by colon reflecting approach. Post-operative evaluation was done by DTPA scan at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Data were analysed after a mean follow-up of 11 months.

Results

The mean operative time was 148 min and the mean hospital stay was 3.5 days. While 93% of the patients showed objective improvement in their drainage pattern on DTPA renogram, 90% of the patients were symptom-free at the end of 6 months.

Conclusions

Robotic pyeloplasty is a safe and easily conquerable technique with comparable outcomes in the hands of surgeons who are beginners in this technique.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic non-dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels: A matched-paired analysis and review of literature

OBJECTIVE

To compare laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty (LAHP) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic YV-pyeloplasty (LRYVP) in ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJ) in presence of a crossing vessels (CV).

METHODS

Our database showed 380 UPJO-cases,who underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery during the last 2 decades including 206 non-dismembered LRYVP, 157 dismembered pyeloplasties LAHP, and 17 cases of laparoscopic ureterolysis. Among them 198 cases were suitable for a matched-pair (2:1) analysis comparing laparoscopic retroperitoneal non-dismembered LRYVP (Group 1, n = 131) and dismembered LAHP (Group 2, n = 67) in presence of a crossing vessel. Patients were matched according to age, gender, kidney functions, and obstruction grade. Complications were graded according to modified Clavien-classification.

RESULTS

Comparative data were similar between both groups (LRYVP vs. LAHP) including mean operating time (112 min vs. 114 min), complication rates (4.2% vs. 7.3%) mainly Grade 1-2 according to Clavien classification, and success rates (90% vs. 89%). These results reflected in the reviewed literature indicate that LRYVP provides the advantage of minimal dissection in case of CV with similar outcome. However, redundant pelvis and anteriorly crossing vessels still require a dismembered pyeloplasty LAHP.

CONCLUSION

LRYVP has achieved similar results compared with the previous golden standard of open surgery, especially in case of crossing vessels apart from presence of a redundant pelvis or anteriorly crossing vessel. This can be further improved when using the small access retroperitoneoscopic technique respectively mini-laparoscopy.

Technology Based Treatment for UreteroPelvic Junction Obstruction

Surgical management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) has historically been performed with open pyeloplasty. With the advent of endourology, laparoscopy, and robotics, minimally-invasive techniques have been described and accepted as alternatives to open surgery. Each of these approaches has its own advantages and disadvantages, equipment needs, degree of invasiveness, and experience of the treating urologist. Advocates and critics have their own say as to their preferred technique. In this article, we review the chronological evolution of these techniques and discuss their current role in the management of UPJO.

Laparoscopic stepwise-cut double initial stay suture pyeloplasty: our novel surgical technique

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel surgical technique, laparoscopic stepwise-cut double initial stay suture (LASDISS) pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Additionally, we evaluated the safety and short-term results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a nonrandomized study with a series of 6 patients with UPJO, operated on between March 2012 and August 2013. Perioperative and short-term outcomes were evaluated. In brief, a "T shape cut" was performed from the dilated pelvis to the ureter. The initial stay suture was placed between the lower edge of the pelvis and the distal end of the spatulated anterolateral part of the ureter. The pelvis was closed with a continuous suture starting from the opened upper edge of the pelvis that was secured after leaving enough space for ureteral anastomosis. The second initial stay suture was placed after passing the ureter and pelvis two times. The dilated part of the renal pelvis and the stenotic segment were excised. A double-J stent was inserted. The remaining space between the two initial sutures was closed with these continuous sutures.

RESULTS

We performed the LASDISS pyeloplasty technique in all cases. Median operation time was 177 minutes (range, 100-290 minutes). Mean follow-up was 7.5 months (range, 3-18 months). The mean pre- and postoperative split renal function on diuretic renography was 33% (range, 25%-56%) and 42% (range, 30%-52%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LASDISS pyeloplasty surgical technique represents a safe and effective option in surgical treatment of UPJO.

Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction

Pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) of the kidney can lead to a number of different clinical manifestations, which often require surgical intervention. Although the success of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy are good, there are still a number of patients who fail primary treatment and develop secondary PUJO. These treatment failures can be a challenging cohort to manage. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview on the surgical options available to the urologist for managing secondary PUJO as well as providing some guidance on assessing factors that will influence management decisions.

Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction

Open pyeloplasty is the gold standard treatment for adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with published success rates consistently over 90%. In recent years, the management of UPJO has been revolutionized by the introduction of endoscopic procedures and laparoscopic techniques. We analyzed the long-term results of endoscopic and other minimal access approaches for the treatment of UPJO.

Early results for endopyelotomy were promising but long-term results were not encouraging. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique is well defined and duplicates the surgical principles of conventional open pyeloplasty. With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of UPJO available, the treatment choice for UPJO must be based on the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon’s experience, the cost of the treatment, and the patient’s choice. We feel that with the technological advances in instrumentation coupled with a decrease in cost and improved training of urological surgeons, laparoscopic pyeloplasty may evolve to be the new “gold” standard for the treatment of UPJO.

Ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction stenosis after pyeloplasty

INTRODUCTION

Pyeloplasty is a standard and highly successful treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, stenosis is a late complication causing symptom recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of holmium laser stenosis incision-"laser endopyelotomy"-to manage this.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen adult patients were referred for loin pain recurrence after pyeloplasty. Subsequent to ureteropelvic junction stenosis confirmation with intravenous urogram and dynamic isotope renogram investigations, the patients underwent ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy. Eleven patients had stents in situ before endopyelotomy. Ureteric stents (7F) were placed for 6 weeks postprocedure when ureteroscopy was repeated and stents removed. All patients had repeat intravenous urogram and renograms at 3 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

Patients presented at a median of 3.2 years (range, 9 months to 8 years) after pyeloplasty (nine open dismembered, three Culp, and three laparoscopic). Three patients (all nonstented) required a second incision. All patients were discharged from hospital within 23 hours with no complications. Symptomatic improvement was documented in all of the patients, and improved drainage was recorded in the 3-month nuclear scans.

CONCLUSION

Laser endopyelotomy is an appropriate minimally invasive procedure for postpyeloplasty stenosis. Results are better in patients with ureteric stents in situ before the procedure.

[Retrograde endopyelotomy using Holmium-Yag laser for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our results of retrograde laser endopyelotomy for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 27 consecutive retrograde laser endopyelotomies performed on 24 patients over a six years period (June 1999 to July 2005). Sixteen stenoses were primary. The level of obstruction was severe in 13 patients and moderate in 14 patients. A polar pedicle was diagnosed by pre-operative CT-angiography in seven cases. Balloon dilatation was performed in 17 procedures. A double J ureteral stent remained in place for six weeks mean. We evaluated results by a clinical examination and an excretory urography (at 1 and 6 months then annually). Mean follow-up was 35+/-22.7 months.

RESULTS

Mean operating time and mean length of hospital stay were 49.8+/-17.9min and four days (range: 2-10 days). Two cases of pyelonephritis were observed. The overall success was 70%. In the eight unresolved cases, the failure appeared at 2.7+/-1 month mean. Success criteria were moderate level of obstruction and primary junction. Here, patients so selected have 100% of success.

CONCLUSION

Study confirmed retrograde laser endopyelotomy was safety with a short length of hospital stay. This minimally invasive procedure should be reserved to primary moderate stenoses without polar pedicle.

Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparative study of hot-wire balloon and ureteroscopic laser

PURPOSE

This study compared the immediate and long-term results and complications of hot-wire balloon endopyelotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1994 and January 2002, 64 patients with a primary (N = 52) or secondary (N = 12) ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent retrograde endopyelotomy using either a fluoroscopically guided hot-wire balloon incision (N = 27) or a ureteroscopically guided, direct-vision holmium laser incision (N = 37). This study group included 46 women and 18 men aged 13 to 79 years (mean 38.9 years). The indications and contraindications to a retrograde approach were identical in each group and included documented functionally significant evidence of obstruction, no upper-tract stones, obstruction <2 cm, and no radiographic evidence of entanglement of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction. Immediate and long-term outcomes were obtained from a prospective registry, with success defined as resolution of symptoms and radiographic relief of obstruction as determined by follow-up with intravenous urography, diuretic renography, or both. Follow-up ranged from 39 to 133 months (mean 75.6 months).

RESULTS

Length of hospital stay, indwelling stent duration, and long-term success rates (77.8% v 74.2% in the hot-wire balloon and holmium-laser group, respectively) were equivalent. However, two patients in the hot-wire balloon group developed bleeding necessitating transfusion and selective embolization of lower-pole vessels. No patient in the ureteroscopic group suffered a major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

These two alternatives for retrograde endopyelotomy provide comparable success rates for similarly selected patients. However, because significant hemorrhagic complications developed with greater frequency in those treated with the hot-wire balloon, our preference is for a ureteroscopic approach, as it allows direct visual control of the incision and thus, a lower risk of significant bleeding.

Comparison of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for poorly functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty are established procedures for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and historically a high failure rate has been observed in poorly functioning units with UPJ obstruction. The aim of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with endopyelotomy in poorly functioning renal units, i.e., GFR under 25 ml/min.

Antegrade versus Retrograde Endopyelotomy for Pelvi-Ureteric Junction (PUJ) Obstruction

OBJECTIVES

To compare complication and success rates of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy performed over 10 years and to define possible risk factors associated with treatment failure.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2004, 61 patients underwent a total of 68 endoscopic treatments: 19 antegrade and 49 retrograde endopyelotomy procedures. Antegrade endopyelotomy was always performed using diathermy. In the first 18 procedures retrograde endopyelotomy was performed using diathermy. In the most recent 30 procedures the incision was made using holmium laser. Endoluminal ultrasound was used in 78% of retrograde endopyelotomy and in 5% of antegrade endopyelotomy.

RESULTS

The retrograde endopyelotomy patients demonstrated significantly lower complication rates (12.5% vs. 42%) and shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs. 7 days) than the antegrade endopyelotomy patients. The mean follow up of the patients who remained free from disease recurrence during the study period was 46 and 24 months for the antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy group, respectively. The overall success rate (mean time to failure) of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy was 56% (31 months) and 70% (17 months), respectively. There was no statistically significant increase in the overall success rate of retrograde endopyelotomy using endoluminal ultrasound per se. Stratifying retrograde endopyelotomy by the type of energy used for the incision, the overall success rate (mean time to failure) was 80% (10 months) and 53% (21 months) for Holmium laser and diathermy, respectively (p = 0.0626).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall success of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy in this series appears to be largely a factor of lead-time bias and is similar enough to recommend retrograde endopyelotomy with holmium laser on the basis of its relative safety and shorter hospital stay.

Computer-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: University of Miami Experience with the daVinci™ Surgical System

PURPOSE

We report our experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty using the daVinci surgical platform.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We routinely performed laparoscopic pyeloplasties prior to acquiring the daVinci system. We prospectively evaluated 26 computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasties (CLP) performed since acquiring the device in March 2003. There were 15 male and 11 female patients with a mean age of 34.5 years, who underwent right-sided procedures in 11 cases and left-sided procedures in 15 cases. Four patients (15%) had secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. All procedures were performed through a transperitoneal approach over stents placed preoperatively. The operative time excluded the time needed for stent insertion. Radiographic objective success was defined as adequate cortical drainage (t (1/2) < or =15 minutes) and preserved or improved renal function on MAG-3 diuretic renography.

RESULTS

A total of 23 dismembered pyeloplasties and 3 Y-V plasties were performed. In five patients, nephroscopy was performed for stone removal. The mean operative time and blood loss were 245 minutes and 69 mL, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications or open conversions. Three minor postoperative complications were noted. The mean length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-5 days). In 19 evaluable patients, at a median follow-up of 6 months (range 2-10 days), 15 (79%) had complete symptom resolution, while 3 (16%) had marked symptom improvement. The overall subjective improvement rate thus was 95%. The objective success rate based on our strict diuretic renography criteria was 100%. The overall clinical success rate was 95% (18/19).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative to laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty with excellent short-term subjective and objective success rates.

Detection of crossing vessels as the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the role of antegrade pyelography prior to endopyelotomy

PURPOSE

To review the utility of antegrade pyelography in detecting crossing vessels as the cause of uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction prior to planned endopyelotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records, surgical reports, and medical images was performed in 109 consecutive adult patients in our practice who underwent antegrade pyelography just prior to planned endopyelotomy for symptomatic UPJ obstruction between January 1996 and December 2002.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were identified in whom a specific antegrade pyelographic appearance was detected in the diagnosis UPJ obstruction caused by crossing vessels. Surgical plans were changed in all 14 patients from antegrade endopyelotomy to open surgical pyeloplasty, during which the anterior (ventral) crossing vessels causing obstruction were confirmed. An additional three patients in the reviewed endopyelotomy group clinically failed their initial endopyelotomy procedure and were shown at the time of subsequent open or laparoscopic reconstructive surgery to have UPJ obstruction caused by anterior crossing vessels, but that diagnosis was missed at the time of the initial antegrade pyelogram.

CONCLUSION

A specific antegrade pyelographic appearance was identified to diagnose UPJ obstruction caused by anterior crossing vessels with a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 100%. The direct obstructing effect of the vessels on the ureter is defined with pyelography as an acute posteriorly angulated ureteral deformity just below a patent UPJ. Recognition of this specific antegrade pyelographic appearance permits use of an appropriate surgical technique for UPJ obstruction repair.

Die Geschichte der operativen Behandlung der Harnleiterabgangsstenose (Pyeloplastik)

The first reconstructive procedure for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction was performed by Trendelenburg in 1886. The important milestones in the reconstruction of UPJ are discussed and all available historical papers and reports since 1886 are reviewed. Kuster published the first successful dismembered pyeloplasty 5 years later, but his technique was prone to strictures. In 1892, the application of the Heineke-Mickulicz principle by Fenger resulted in bulking and kinking with obstruction. Plication of the renal pelvis, first introduced by Israel in 1896, was modified by Kelly in 1906. After the principle of the Finney pyloroplasty, von Lichtenberg designed his pyeloplasty in 1921, best suited to cases of high implantation of the ureter. Foley modified flap techniques, first introduced by Schwyzer in 1923 after the application of the Durante pyloroplasty principle, successfully to Y-V pyeloplasty in 1937. Culp and de-Weerd introduced the spiral flap in 1951. Scardino and Prince reported about the vertical flap in 1953. Patel published the extra-long spiral flap technique in 1982. In order to decrease the likelihood of stricture, Nesbit, in 1949, modified Kuster's procedure by utilizing an elliptic anastomosis. In the same year, Anderson and Hynes, published their technique. With the advent of endourology, several minimally invasive procedures were applied: antegrade or retrograde endopyelotomy, balloon dilation, and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The concept of full-thickness incision of the narrow segment followed by prolonged stenting was first described in 1903 by Albarran and was popularized by Davis in 1943. Several basic principles must be applied in order to ensure successful repair: the resultant anastomosis should be widely patent, performed in a watertight fashion without tension. Endopyelotomy represents an alternative to open surgery.

Application of Strict Radiologic Criteria to Define Success in Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

To review our experience and utilize rigorous radiologic criteria to establish success in laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The hospital records of consecutive adult patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction during a 5-year period at our institution were reviewed. We identified 47 candidates for study inclusion. With one open conversion secondary to excessive fibrosis and one patient requiring repeat laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrence, 46 patients with 47 renal units were included for analysis. Thirteen renal units had prior surgery for UPJ obstruction. Preoperative and postoperative symptomatology were compared to determine subjective outcome. Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) nuclear renography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess differential renal function (DRF) and obstruction, defined as a T1/2 -20 minutes, and evaluate objective success. There were 34 dismembered and 13 Y-V pyeloplasties.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 341.6 minutes (range 200-717 minutes). The mean preoperative T1/2 was 48.4 minutes (range 14 minutes-xc), with a mean DRF of 39.8% (range 22%-60%). The mean postoperative T1/2 was 9.32 minutes (range 2-27 minutes), and the mean DRF was 39.5% (range 7%-57%). The average length of hospital stay was 2.25 days (range 1-3 days). At a mean follow-up of 19.93 months (range 2-55 months), the subjective success rate was 95.7%, and the objective success rate was 93.6%.

CONCLUSION

Even when using strict radiologic criteria to define success, laparoscopic pyeloplasty is found to be similar to open surgery in its efficacy for the correction of adult UPJ obstruction.

Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term efficacy of percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction performed at a single institution during a 10-year period. We provide alterations in investigation and management strategies on the basis of the results.

METHODS

From July 1990 to June 2001, 80 patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of UPJ obstruction underwent percutaneous endopyelotomy for the treatment of primary (n = 61) or secondary (n = 19) UPJ obstruction. The mean patient age was 35 years (range 4 to 76). Percutaneous endopyelotomy was performed in a standard fashion using either a hooked-knife (n = 77) or holmium laser (n = 3).

RESULTS

With a mean patient follow-up of 55 months (range 16 to 138), the overall success rate was 67% (53 of 79). The success rate for primary and secondary UPJ obstruction was 65% (39 of 60) and 74% (14 of 19), respectively. The mean time to failure was 15 months (range 1 to 79). Operative intervention for 24 of 26 patients with failure included open pyeloplasty (n = 18, 75%), indwelling ureteral stenting (n = 2, 8%), retrograde balloon dilation (n = 1, 4%), and nephrectomy (n = 3, 13%). Two asymptomatic patients with recurrent radiographic evidence of obstruction elected conservative follow-up. Significant crossing vessels were encountered at open pyeloplasty in 15 (83%) of 18 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our long-term results of percutaneous endopyelotomy demonstrated somewhat lower success rates than that reported in published studies. Long-term follow-up is critical in identifying late failures. The high prevalence of crossing vessels encountered at open pyeloplasty provided further evidence to support its role in endopyelotomy failure. Routine preoperative helical computed tomography to detect significant crossing vessels is recommended. Patients with crossing vessels are likely better served with operative techniques that specifically address this issue, namely open or laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Determining Durability of Endourological Intervention

PURPOSE

We evaluated the durability of endourological intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and established guidelines for postoperative surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 1989, 150 patients have undergone endourological intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, of whom 127 (53 men and 74 women) 13 to 79 years old (mean age 40.4) underwent postoperative evaluation at our center. These 127 patients are the study group reported. Endourological management consisted of hot wire balloon endopyelotomy in 25 patients, percutaneous endopyelotomy in 67 and ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy in 35. Success in this study was strictly defined as symptomatic relief plus radiographic resolution on excretory urogram and/or diuretic renogram. Statistical analysis was performed to assess mean time to failure and develop Kaplan-Meier re-stenosis-free survival estimates.

RESULTS

Followup was 1 to 128 months (mean 22). Time to failure was 0.9 to 32.4 months (mean +/- SD 10.3 +/- 9.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to re-stenosis (failure) were 6 months in 12% of patients, 12 in 22%, 18 in 24%, 24 in 27%, 30 in 32% and 36 in 37%. After 3 years no further failures were observed and Kaplan-Meier estimates remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term probability of success, which is estimated to be 63.3% in this series, is somewhat lower than that reported in the literature. It likely is a result of longer followup and a more strict definition of success that includes functional and symptomatic relief. Our data suggest that while most failures become evident within the first 12 months, failure can develop as late as 3 years after intervention. As such, patients should be followed at least that long to ensure a durable result.

Percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Percutaneous endopyelotomy was performed 13 times on 11 patients with primary and secondary UPJ obstruction between 1994 and 2002. Excretory urogram revealed improvement in ten of eleven patients. One of the ten successfully treated patients required repeated endopyelotomy. Endopyelotomy failed in one patient, who had secondary UPJ obstruction that had been stenosed by granuloma caused by a ureteral stone. As the patient had UPJ obstruction of high insertion type with thinned renal parenchyma, nephrectomy was performed after repeated endopyelotomy. Compared with open pyeloplasty, percutaneous endopyelotomy is less invasive and is cosmetically advantageous.

Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty offers the same good results as open pyeloplasty, but without the disadvantages of the loin incision (which is painful, prolongs hospitalization and prevents a return to normal activities for several weeks) in the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive consenting patients presenting with PUJ obstruction underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty carried out by one surgeon using an extraperitoneal approach.

RESULTS

Two (4%) procedures were converted to open surgery. The mean (range) operative duration was 164 (120-240) min. Fifteen (30%) of the patients had their ureter transposed anterior to a crossing lower-pole vessel; 22 (44%) patients had a separate renal pelvic suture line. The mean (range) postoperative parenteral analgesic requirement was 19.1 (0-111) mg of morphine sulphate. The mean (range) hospitalization was 2.6 (2-7) days. Two (4%) patients had complications. After a mean (range) follow-up of 18.8 (3-72) months all but one patient, who had failed endopyelotomy, had a normal renogram and were symptom-free.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a loin wound is not necessary for a successful outcome after dismembered pyeloplasty, and that in expert hands laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty should now be considered the standard of care.

Endopyelotomy in poorly functioning kidney: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

Endopyelotomy is a minimally invasive surgical alternative for primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. However, its success in poorly functioning kidneys is controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 34 endopyelotomies performed on poorly functioning kidneys between January 1993 and December 1997 were reviewed. Of these, 13 patients had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <15 mL/min (Group I) and 21 had a GFR of 15 to 25 mL/min (Group II). All the patients insisted on endopyelotomy to avoid open surgery. Antegrade endopyelotomy was performed by the twin guidewire rail technique with a cold knife. An indwelling stent was kept for 2 to 6 weeks. Patients were followed up with assessment of symptoms and diuretic renograms at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Endopyelotomy was considered successful in 8 of 13 patients (62%) in Group I. Success was achieved in 19 of 21 patients (90%) in Group II.

CONCLUSION

Endopyelotomy can be performed for improvement of symptoms. Stabilization or improvement in GFR is less pronounced in poorly functioning kidneys with primary UPJ obstruction.

An endourologic approach to complete ureteropelvic junction and ureteral strictures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Complete stricture of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), ureter, or both represents a secondary upper tract obstruction and is a challenge for surgical management. The endourologic repair of these complete strictures remains controversial because of the many unsatisfactory results in the literature. The aim of this study was to achieve recanalization of the ureter or the UPJ using endourologic techniques to prove durable success of this technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present data on the 21 patients with complete UPJ or ureteral strictures treated over 5-year period. The length of the obliterated portion of the ureter or UPJ ranged from 0.3 to 1.7 cm. The stricture was at the UPJ level in 12 patients (57%), in the upper ureter in 3, and in the lower ureter in 4. The technique was a combined approach, with antegrade introduction of the guidewire and retrograde cold-knife incision in the majority of the cases. In five cases, the incision was carried out in the reverse direction with a guidewire introduced retrograde up to the stricture level. An originally designed 6F to 7F polyethylene double-J stent with a movable 12F to 16F silicon sheath or percutaneous tube was placed at the completion of the procedure.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 48 months. Recanalization was achieved in 17 patients (81%), of whom 14 became symptom free. Other surgical outcomes necessitated open surgical intervention (pyeloplasty, nephrectomy) in two patients. One patient developed a clinically significant recurrent urinary tract infection and deterioration of kidney function. Thus, the overall success rate of the endourologic management of the complete UPJ and ureteral strictures was 67% in our series.

CONCLUSION

Endourologic management with retrograde or antegrade pyeloureterotomy can be successful in patients with short (up to 1.0-cm) obliterative strictures who are without extensive hydronephrosis and with preserved renal function.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Retrograde endopyelotomy

The modern day treatment of UPJO with retrograde endopyelotomy continues to evolve as experience and knowledge progress. Use of the straight lateral incision and selective use of spiral CT angiogram has refined treatment decisions with retrograde endopyelotomy further. The authors' decision-oriented approach offers guidelines for the practicing urologist. Ultimately, it is up to the urologist and the patient to select the best approach for each clinical scenario.

Percutaneous endopyelotomy

Percutaneous endopyelotomy, introduced over 15 years ago, is a well-established alternative to open operative pyeloplasty for management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. Although several variations of the technique have been described, the goal in all cases is to develop a full thickness incision though the obstructing proximal uretra that extends out to the peripyeloureteral fat and heals over an internal stent. Though a percutaneous endopyelotomy can be considered for almost any patient with primary or secondary UPJ obstruction, it is particularly valuable in the setting of upper tract stones that can then be managed simultaneously. This article reviews the indications, techniques, and outcomes of percutaneous endopyelotomy.

Endopyelotomy outcome as a function of high versus dependent ureteral insertion

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a high versus a dependent ureteral insertion significantly affects the outcome of endopyelotomy for management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.

METHODS

Sixty patients with UPJ obstruction were treated with an endopyelotomy by way of either an antegrade percutaneous approach (n = 36) or a retrograde hot-wire balloon incision (n = 24). In these 60 patients, the ureteral insertion was high on the renal pelvis in 19 (32%), dependent in 25 (42%), and indeterminate in 16 (26%). Intravenous urography was performed 4 to 6 weeks after stent removal (8 to 12 weeks after endopyelotomy) and then at 6 to 12-month intervals. Success of the procedure was defined as resolution of symptoms and decrease in hydronephrosis compared with pre-endopyelotomy studies.

RESULTS

With a follow-up range of 2 to 41 months (mean 10.3), the overall success rate was 80%. This rate was independent of whether the procedure was performed in an antegrade or retrograde fashion. A successful result was achieved in 15 (78.9%) of those with a high insertion, 19 (76%) of those with a dependent insertion, and 14 (87.5%) of those with an equivocal insertion; these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of ureteral insertion (ie, high versus dependent) had no significant impact on the outcome of endopyelotomy by way of either a percutaneous or retrograde approach. As such, these anatomic variations need not play a role in a decision-making algorithm for contemporary management of UPJ obstruction.

Optimum duration of splinting after endopyelotomy

OBJECTIVE

Endopyelotomy is a well-accepted modality of treatment for pelviureteral junction (PUJ) obstruction, but the time period of stenting is debatable. The present study was aimed at evaluating the optimum duration and effectiveness of splinting after endopyelotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive patients with primary PUJ obstruction were randomized to have an external splint (for economic reasons) for 2 weeks or 4 weeks. Thirteen patients in each group were available for evaluation. The groups were comparable in age, sex, symptoms, and preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR). All patients underwent antegrade endopyelotomy with placement of an 8F-12F polyethylene splint across the PUJ. A nephrostogram was performed after removal of splint at 2 or 4 weeks. Nondraining units were managed by putting in a 6F double-J stent for 6 weeks and considered failures. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months for symptomatic improvement, change in GFR, and drainage pattern on a diuretic renogram.

RESULTS

At 1 year, a nonobstructed curve pattern was seen in 70% and improvement in GFR in 54% of the patients in the 2-weeks group, whereas in the 4-weeks group, these values were 54% and 39%, respectively. All patients in the 4-weeks group and 90% of those in the 2-weeks group were symptom free at 1 year of follow-up. Morbidity in terms of tube-related complications was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Two weeks of splinting is as effective as 4 weeks in the successful outcome of endopyelotomy.

Laser endopyelotomy: minimally invasive therapy of ureteropelvic junction stenosis

Endoscopic pyelotomy is a minimally invasive procedure that is increasingly used for the management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. We report the results and advantages in the management of UPJ obstruction using a ureteroscopic retrograde laser-assisted approach (laser endopyelotomy; LEP). Thirty-four patients were treated between December 1994 and June 1997 by this new technique. Twenty-seven obstructions were primary. The mean time of follow-up is 18 months. An indwelling ureteral catheter was placed 3 weeks prior to treatment. Intraoperatively, after the removal of the stent, a guidewire was passed across the stenosis, and the ureter was entered with a semirigid ureteroscope. The LEP was then performed under visual control using a contact laser fiber until all obstructive fibers had been cut. Follow-up examinations included sonography, intravenous urography, and, in unclear cases, a radionuclide renal scan with furosemide application after 3 months. The success rate was 85%. The most important factor influencing the outcome was the grade of hydronephrosis. Postoperative side effects have been minimal, and minor complications occurred in only 5 patients (15%). Laser endopyelotomy is a minimally invasive procedure with less morbidity for the treatment of UPJ obstruction. Only patients with a severe extrinsic cause of obstruction should be excluded from this technique. These cases can be approached laparoscopically.

Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE

Endopyelotomy has increasingly become well accepted as the optimal management for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We report our experience with ureteroscopic endopyelotomy guided by endoluminal ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy was attempted in 27 patients with primary and 10 with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Retrograde pyelogram and endoluminal ultrasound were performed at the start of the procedure in all patients. Based on sonographic findings 5 patients were not considered candidates for the procedure. The remaining 13 men and 19 women were treated ureteroscopically with a rigid ureteroscope in 5 (15.6%), flexible in 20 (62.5%), and rigid and flexible in 7 (21.9%) patients. Stents were placed postoperatively for 6 to 10 weeks. The patients were followed for a mean duration of 10 months.

RESULTS

The procedure was completed in all patients. Average operating time was 95 minutes including the time for imaging. Sonographic localization guided the site of incision in all patients and changed therapy in 5. It identified crossing vessels in 10 patients (31%), septum denoting high insertion in 5 (15.5%) and both in 7 (22%). Preoperative stenting was not required in any patient. Morbidity was low with no patients requiring transfusion and no evidence of ureteral strictures. Success, defined as pain-free with resolution of obstruction on diuretic renal scan, was achieved in 28 of the 32 patients (87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy is a safe and effective treatment for most cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Endoluminal ultrasonography of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction has gained a major role in defining which patient to treat and in directing endoluminal incisions to minimize the risk of injury to adjacent vessels. There is a higher failure rate when vessels are present.

Retrograde balloon cautery incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Retrograde balloon endopyelotomy has produced durable success rates of approximately 80% for all patients with UPJ obstruction. Patients with poor renal function, high-grade hydronephrosis, or stricture lengths of more than 2 cm fair worse, and these factors should be considered prior to balloon endopyelotomy. The debate concerning the functional significance of crossing vessels continues. However they are probably more important in terms of the risk of postoperative bleeding than in regards to overall success rates. With the use of endoluminal ultrasound, angiography, or spiral CT, patients with significant size crossing vessels can be identified preoperatively. The retrograde approach to UPJ obstruction using a cutting balloon is a quick and relatively inexpensive (shorter operative time and hospital stay, and no percutaneous nephrostomy) method for accomplishing an endopyelotomy incision. With the development of the 5-F balloon catheter and the use of a 7-F post-endopyelotomy stent, the need to stent the ureter for 7 days prior to the procedure is overcome. In this regard, the entire retrograde endopyelotomy may be performed in a one-step outpatient procedure.

Antegrade endopyelotomy

Antegrade endopyelotomy has become the procedure of choice for patients with UPJ obstruction. Overall success rates of 85% can be expected when the procedure is used in a broad spectrum of patients. Contraindications include an uncorrected bleeding diathesis, untreated infection, and any anatomic abnormality precluding safe percutaneous access.

Endopyelotomy for high-insertion ureteropelvic junction obstruction

We assessed the results of endourologic treatment of patients with a primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) caused by high insertion of the ureter into the renal pelvis (HIUPJO). A total of 10 patients 15 to 76 years old with preoperatively diagnosed HIUPJO were treated. Acucise retrograde endopyelotomy was performed in eight patients and percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy in two. A stent was left in place for an average of 5.3 weeks. The subjective success rate, based on patient questionnaire and analog pain scales, was 80% at 27 months' average follow-up. The objective success rate, based on diuretic renal scanning or Whitaker test, was 70% at 26 months' mean follow-up. Overall, 60% of the patients had both an objectively and a subjectively successful outcome. The success rate for endopyelotomy in patients with UPJO caused by high insertion is similar to that reported for endopyelotomy in patients without high insertion. High insertion is not a contraindication to endopyelotomy.

Endopyelotomy: experience with 320 cases

We were the first to initiate endopyelotomy in Hungary (in 1986) and in Yemen and Pakistan (in 1993). Through the end of 1995, 320 cases of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stenosis have been operated upon. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia in adult patients and general anesthesia in children. The minimum age of the patient was 4 years, while the oldest patient was 80 years of age. The UPJ was incised longitudinally at the posterolateral aspect until the perinephric fat was seen, and a drain of 8F to 12F was inserted transrenally into the ureter through a nephroscope. Patients soon left the hospital and were able to start working in 5 days (average). The drain was removed after 6 weeks. During the follow-up period, ultrasonic examination was performed each 3 months. The success rate (mean of three centers) came out to be 87%. Open pyeloplasty was performed in cases where the symptoms of pyelectasia were persisting and caused complaints and stenosis was present even after 6 months. In our opinion, endopyelotomy should be the procedure of first choice for UPJ stenosis, because it is less troublesome for the patient than open pyeloplasty, and the results are real encouraging.

Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability

PURPOSE

We evaluated the long-term efficacy of Acucise endopyelotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 28 patients with 28 ureteropelvic junction obstructions was reevaluated 2 or more years after Acucise endopyelotomy (mean 32.5 months). Subjective analysis was done with analog pain scales and objective analysis was performed with diuretic renal scintigraphy.

RESULTS

Subjective followup was available for all 28 patients, and 17 (61%) had a favorable response with 36% totally free of pain and 25% markedly improved. Among 26 patients with objective followup (93%) 21 (81%) had a patient ureteropelvic junction based on a diuretic renal scan with a half-time of less than 10 minutes or a normal Whitaker test. Among all regularly followed patients failure occurred uniformly within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Acucise endopyelotomy is an effective and durable method for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Acucise endopyelotomy: evolution of a less-invasive technology

Since its introduction in 1993, the electrosurgical cutting balloon device (Acucise) has been utilized for endopyelotomies by a number of investigators. The fact that the procedure can be performed in a completely retrograde fashion under fluoroscopic guidance without percutaneous access has made Acucise endopyelotomy appealing to many urologists. To date, overall Acucise endopyelotomy success rates ranging from 66% to 84% have been reported. The average hospital stay has ranged from 1.7 to 3.7 days, and serious complications have been rare (transfusion 0-2%, bleeding necessitating embolization 0-3%). On the basis of its track record and its minimally invasive nature, a compelling argument can be made for use of the Acucise device whenever an endopyelotomy is indicated.

Ureteropelvic invagination procedure for endopyelotomy (Gelet technique): review of 51 consecutive cases

Between 1990 and 1995, we performed 51 endopyelotomies on 38 cases of primary and 13 of secondary obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) using the ureteropelvic invagination technique. Of the 51 patients in the series, 49 have been followed for a minimum of 3 months postoperatively (mean follow-up 16 months). Overall, success was achieved in 38 (77.5%). Endoscopic endopyelotomy was successful in 11 of 13 cases (84.5%) with secondary strictures. When the technique was used for the treatment of primary UPJ stricture, the success rate was only 75% (27 of 36). The presence of a crossing vessel was identified as the cause of failure in five cases of primary strictures; hence, we advocate the use of angiography to identify crossing vessels preoperatively. We recommend the use of the ureteropelvic invagination technique as the first-line therapy for primary hydronephrosis in adults in the absence of a crossing vessel.

Use of ureteral stents after endopyelotomy

Despite the widespread practice of endopyelotomy for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, the optimal conditions for ureteral healing after endoincision remain largely untested. Current recommendations for the use of large-caliber graduated endopyelotomy stents and a 6-week duration of stenting are being challenged by recent reports of successful outcomes with the use of standard, small-caliber ureteral stents and early stent removal. Moreover, improvements in stent design have led to the development of endopyelotomy stents with improved biocompatibility, enhanced case of insertion, and fewer adverse effects.

Long-term results of endourologic and percutaneous management of ureteral strictures in bilharzial patients

We have managed 164 bilharzial ureteral strictures endourologically. The site was at the pelviureteral junction in 4, at the pelvic inlet in 22, juxtavesical in 78, and intramural in 60. These lesions were categorized according to the line of management. Type I or simple stricture, present in 116 cases, was managed by retrograde bougie dilation to 16F. Dilation was preceded by transurethral ureterotomy in 54 cases. Type II or difficult strictures (24 cases) were managed by percutaneous antegrade dilation. Type III or complicated strictures (24 cases) were managed by antegrade placement of a guidewire down to the bladder followed by transureteral meatotomy and bougie dilation in one sitting under C-arm fluoroscopy. Three types of stenting procedures and diversion were used according to the length of the stricture and the quality of renal function. After 6 to 72 months, an overall successful clinical outcome with decompression of the upper urinary system and improved drainage pattern was achieved in 87.8% (144 cases) v only 50% in patients with strictures longer than 2 cm. Postoperative reflux was seen in 21 cases (18%) of Type I strictures compared with 4 (17%) of Type II and 13 (54%) of Type III strictures. We concluded that this scheme of combined endourologic management for ureteral strictures is safe, simple, and less traumatic and produces excellent results. It should be the approach of choice, although it needs special equipment and operator experience. Open surgery should be restricted to the lesions that prove undilatable on both retrograde and antegrade procedures.

Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction

OBJECTIVES

To compare open pyeloplasty with three minimally invasive modalities: antegrade endopyelotomy, Acucise endopyelotomy (Applied Medical, Laguna Hills, Calif), and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

METHODS

Forty-five adult patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction were managed by one of the above four techniques. Success rates, analgesic use, length of hospital stay, recovery time, and complications were compared between each of the four groups.

RESULTS

Successful relief of obstruction was achieved in 100% of patients undergoing open and laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty, 78% undergoing Acucise endopyelotomy, and 77% undergoing antegrade percutaneous endopyelotomy. Acucise endopyelotomy results in shorter convalescence (1 week) than antegrade endopyelotomy (4.7 weeks), laparoscopic pyeloplasty (2.3 weeks) or open pyeloplasty (10.3 weeks). Complication rates appear to be similar among all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our limited data imply that Acucise endopyelotomy offers low morbidity with success rates comparable to antegrade pyeloplasty, whereas laparoscopic pyeloplasty is as effective as open pyeloplasty with diminished morbidity.