Surveillance for stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis: the optimal protocol has not yet been defined

Outcomes of active surveillance of clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: sub-analysis of the multi-institutional nationwide case series of the Japanese Urological Association

Objective

To evaluate the survival rate and risk factors of distant metastasis in stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) cases without adjuvant treatments.

Methods

A national testicular cancer survey of cases newly diagnosed in 2005 and 2008 was conducted by the Japanese Urological Association in 2011. In 159 stage I NSGCT cases, 132 were followed by active surveillance after high orchiectomy. Their recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) was compared with 27 cases that received adjuvant treatments, and clinical and pathological parameters were explored to identify significant risk factors of recurrence.

Results

Within a median follow-up period of 30.3 months (range: 0.3-65.6 months), 16 (12.1%) of the 132 surveillance cases relapsed at 2.8-51.2 months after high orchiectomy (median: 8.35 months). The 2-year RFS rate was 90%. Eleven (68.8%) cases relapsed within 1 year, and five (31.3%) cases relapsed in 3 years or more. Half (50%) of the recurrences were detected by imaging studies alone, 37.5% by imaging combined with tumor markers, and 12.5% by tumor marker elevation alone. The only significant risk factor of recurrence was the existence of embryonal carcinoma elements in the primary testicular tumor (P = 0.0068). There was no significant difference in RFS between cases with active surveillance and adjuvant treatments.

Conclusions

The present report is the first large scale study of clinical stage I NSGCTs in Japan. Active surveillance appears to be an effective treatment option for patients with clinical stage I NSGCTs.

Management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

Therapeutic options for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor include active surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) determines risk of recurrence, as those without LVI have 15% risk of relapse on surveillance while those with LVI have a 50% risk. This stratifies patients into high risk(LVI+) and low risk(LVI-) groups which direct treatment recommendations. Surveillance is preferred for those with low risk disease, and is an option for those with high risk disease, as at least half are over-treated with other options. Adjuvant chemotherapy is an option for all patients as it can eradicate micrometastatic disease and reduce recurrence by at least 90%. RPLND benefits patients with low volume retroperitoneal disease with a cure rate of RPLND alone at approximately 70%. All three treatment modalities have similar survival rates approaching 100% but differing potential morbidities, which, along with patient preferences and compliance, should guide treatment decisions.

Current management of stage I testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

Testicular germ cell tumors represent the most common malignancies in young males between the ages of 15 and 35; 50% of those with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have clinical stage I at diagnosis. Predictors for relapse include lymphovascular invasion, percentage of embryonal-cell carcinoma component, absence of yolk-sack histology and MIB1 proliferation rate. Therapeutic options following orchidectomy in stage I NSGCT comprise nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), surveillance or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Using a risk adapted approach, in about 50% of patients with clinical stage I NSGCT surveillance is favored in patients with good compliance. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients at high risk for developing metastatic disease. Non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer is a curable neoplasia. All available treatment modalities produce excellent results, with a long-term survival of almost 100%. Consequently, therapy-induced toxicity is an important concern in the management of these patients. An individually tailored approach that takes into account the prognostic factor profile, as well as the patients' preferences and their ability to comply with treatment, is the key for the successful management of stage I testicular cancer.

A comprehensive systematic review of testicular germ cell tumor surveillance

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 15-34, and its incidence has been increasing over the past half-century. Survival for stage I testis cancer approaches 100% regardless of management strategy which is often dictated by other factors such as perceived morbidity. Advances in treatment have attempted to decrease morbidity and surveillance is thought to achieve this goal.

METHODS

An English language literature search of MEDLINE from 1966 to December 2005 and CINAHL from 1982 to December 2005 was conducted using a broad search strategy. Comparative and descriptive original articles on outcomes of seminoma or NSGCT surveillance would be deemed eligible and review articles containing no original data were omitted. One hundred and thirty-eight articles were selected for formal review, during which a database was compiled that documented the first author, publication year, tumor histologic type, study purpose or topic(s), methodology, sample size, median follow-up, and relevant results.

RESULTS

Most evidence for the efficacy of surveillance is from descriptive series or non-experimental comparative studies. Relapse occurs in approximately 28% and 17% of surveillance patients in NSGCT and seminoma, respectively, and cause-specific survival is approximately 98% and 100%, respectively. Compliance with surveillance ranges from poor to adequate, however there is no evidence that compliance impacts clinical outcome. Cost analyses have yielded inconsistent results when comparing treatment modalities. There is scant literature on quality of life and psychosocial issues and results are inconsistent. Active surveillance appears to be appropriate and perhaps optimal first line management of clinical stage I seminoma and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Further quantitative and qualitative research is warranted to deepen understanding of these issues that may impact treatment decision-making.

The management of stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors

Testicular germ cell tumors represent the most common malignancies in young males; 70% of patients with seminomas and 50% of those with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have clinical stage I at diagnosis. Lymphovascular invasion, embryonal-cell carcinoma component, absence of yolk sac histology and MIB1 proliferation rate represent predictors of micrometastatic diseasein stage I NSGCT. Therapeutic options following orchiectomy in patients with stage I NSGCT comprise nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, surveillance or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. All available treatment modalities produce excellent results, with a long-term survival of almost 100%. Consequently, therapy-induced toxicity is an important concern in the management of these patients. An individually tailored approach that takes into account the prognostic factor profile as well as the patient's preferences and their ability to comply with each one of the modalities is the key to the management of stage I testicular cancer.

Outcomes of Surveillance Protocol of Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors—Is Shift to Risk Adapted Policy Justified?

PURPOSE

We evaluated the potential risk factors for disease relapse in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors treated with surveillance and reevaluated our treatment of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 211 consecutive patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors treated with surveillance after orchiectomy between 1993 and 2005 were included in this retrospective study. Risk factors evaluated were presence of vascular invasion, proportion of embryonal carcinoma, age, tumor size, preoperatively increased serum alpha-fetoprotein and the absence of yolk sac component.

RESULTS

Of the 211 patients 66 (31.3%) had disease relapse. Recurrence ranged from 2 to 32 months after orchiectomy (median 6). A total of 52 (78.8%) cases of relapse were diagnosed in year 1 of followup, 11 (16.7%) during year 2 and only 3 cases were diagnosed thereafter. The first evidence of relapse was most commonly the increase in serum tumor markers alone (28.8%) or in combination with other modalities (66.7%, overall 95.5%). While 40.9% of patients with more than 50% embryonal carcinoma had disease relapse, the relapse rate was 20.8% in patients with less than 50% embryonal carcinoma (p = 0.002). Relapse rates in patients with and without vascular invasion were 75.5% and 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.000). The relapse rates were 6.1% and 75.7% in patients with no risk factors (no vascular invasion and less than 50% embryonal carcinoma) and 2 risk factors (vascular invasion and more than 50% embryonal carcinoma), respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that vascular invasion was the most powerful predictor of relapse (OR 16.350, 95% CI 5.582-47.893). Disease-free and disease specific survival rates were 97.6% at a median followup of 75 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of our results we suggest that all patients with vascular invasion should receive chemotherapy. However, patients with no risk factors and those with more than 50% embryonal carcinoma but without vascular invasion should be on surveillance after orchiectomy since the relapse rate is less than 30%. Although strict followup in the first year is justified, followup schemas may be reassessed for the frequency of radiological investigations.

Surveillance programs for stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis

Germ cell tumors of the testes constitute approximately 1-2% of all tumors in males 15-35 years of age. Half of those present as clinical stage I disease. The traditional approach was either a retroperitoneal node dissection or radiotherapy. A historical review of the literature suggested that 70% of these patients were cured and did not benefit from further therapy. This coupled with the advent of tumor markers, advanced diagnostic techniques, and cisplatin based chemotherapy led to the consideration for surveillance programs, thereby offering therapy only to those who required it. This article reviews the surveillance programs described in the literature to date with respect to both suitability and program design.

Risk-adapted treatment for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether two courses of chemotherapy after orchiectomy in patients with clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor at high risk of relapse will spare patients additional chemotherapy or surgery.

METHODS

High-risk patients had one or more of the following: preorchiectomy alpha-fetoprotein level of 80 ng/dL or greater, 80% embryonal cell carcinoma or greater, or vessel invasion in the primary tumor. Low-risk patients had none of these factors or had 50% teratoma or more without vessel invasion. High-risk patients were offered two 21-day courses of outpatient chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin. Low-risk patients and high-risk patients not receiving chemotherapy were observed.

RESULTS

Of 99 patients, we classified 76 as high risk and 23 as low risk of relapse. All but eight of the high-risk patients received chemotherapy. No patient who underwent chemotherapy developed relapse, although 1 patient with normal biomarkers and a late-appearing mass underwent retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for mature teratoma. Two of the 23 low-risk patients had disease relapse; both successfully underwent chemotherapy. The nonhematologic toxicity was mild in patients receiving chemotherapy, and no patient required hospitalization. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 9 to 69).

CONCLUSIONS

Two courses of postorchiectomy adjuvant chemotherapy were safe and well tolerated and markedly decreased the relapse rate in high-risk patients with clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor without additional surgery or more protracted chemotherapy. This approach may avoid potential problems with compliance and diminish the cost of scrupulous follow-up. Our results support that surveillance for carefully selected patients at a low risk of relapse is appropriate.

Surveillance in stage I testicular cancer

Treatment results on 695 stage I testicular cancer patients followed with surveillance are described. Seminoma (SGCT) was present in 394 patients and nonseminoma (NSGCT) in 301 patients. Relapses were detected in 155 patients (22%), in 69 patients with SGCT (17%) and 86 with NSGCT (29%). In patients with vascular invasion, relapse was detected in 54% of patients with NSGCT and 38% of patients with SGCT. Time to relapse was median 13 months (range 1 to 84 months) for SGCT and 5 months (range 1 to 171 months) for NSGCT. Forty-nine percent of relapses in SGCT patients were seen within the first year, 87% of the relapses were diagnosed within the first two years, and 98% of the relapses were detected within 5 years. The figures for NSGCT were 80%, 89% and 95%, respectively. Forty-five patients had carcinoma in situ in the contralateral testis, 62% had this together with a seminoma in the other testis. Ten patients died during the follow-up period. None of these deaths were caused by the germ cell tumour or the treatment. The overall survival for patients with stage I disease is 98.6%, and the cause specific survival 100%.

Surgery versus surveillance in stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer

Today, the standard treatment for patients with clinical Stage I non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors (NSTGCT) following orchidectomy is either primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or close surveillance with cisplatin-based polychemotherapy in case of a relapse. Both treatment modalities provide excellent overall survival rates up to 100%. Consequently, selection of the most appropriate management option is not primarily guided by survival considerations. The choice between the available options, each having its merits and its drawbacks, should be made based on a number of factors including treatment-related morbidity, views and expertise of the physician, patient preferences, the expected degree of patient compliance, and prognostic factor analysis. To date, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy as an alternative management option for patients with clinical Stage I NSTGCT at high risk of occult metastases is limited. This systemic treatment modality would be a realistic alternative if the reliability of prognostic factors to identify high-risk Stage I patients could be improved. This review addresses relevant issues in the management of patients with clinical Stage I NSTGCT to provide information that will allow a rational selection of the most appropriate management option.

Is surveillance for stage 1 germ cell tumours of the testis appropriate outside a specialist centre?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of treatment for stage 1 germ cell tumours of the testis, outside a specialist centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 1984 until March 1996, 123 patients with stage 1 disease were treated at our institution. Sixty patients with seminoma and 31 with teratoma were treated with orchidectomy only and surveillance; 32 patients with stage 1 seminoma elected for orchidectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean ages were 40, 31 and 35 years, and the median follow-up 52, 47 and 49 months, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no disease- or treatment-related deaths. However, 18 (30%) patients with seminoma treated by orchidectomy only relapsed (median time 8 months, range 3-19); 14 of these responded to radiotherapy, three to radiotherapy and chemotherapy for second relapses outside the irradiated fields, and one to chemotherapy initially, for large-volume relapse. Fifteen (48%) patients with teratoma relapsed (median time 3 months, range 1-12); all responded to 4-6 courses of bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin chemotherapy. One patient had a second relapse and is currently disease-free 3 years after surgical excision of a lung metastasis.

CONCLUSION

These results show that stage 1 testis tumours can be managed successfully in a district general hospital. However, we are concerned about the high relapse rates and are now attempting to identify patients at greater risk of recurrence, to consider adjuvant therapy in this group.

Surveillance study for clinical stage I testicular seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

Optimal therapy for stage I testicular tumors is still controversial. This study evaluated the efficacy of a surveillance policy for patients with testicular stage I seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT).

METHODS

From 1984 to 1996, 24 patients with stage I seminoma and 20 with stage INSGCT were followed after radical orchiectomy with tumor markers and imaging studies. All patients were followed for at least 2 years except for those who recurred within 2 years. Recurrent patients were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods for seminoma and NSGCT patients were 41 and 54 months, respectively. Recurrences were detected in 2 seminoma (8.3%) and 10 NSGCT (50%) patients. Eleven of the 12 recurrent patients (92%) were detected within 2 years after orchiectomy. The seminoma patients both recurred in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, while 70% of the NSGCT patients recurred in the lung and/or retroperitoneal lymph nodes. The recurrent seminoma patients were treated with chemotherapy and are alive without disease for 1 7 and 24 months afterorchiectomy. One NSGCT patient died of cancer, but the other 9 recurrent NSGCT patients are alive without disease at 25 to 113 months after orchiectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance alone is reliable for monitoring patients with stage I testicular seminoma and NSGCT. The majority of recurrences occurred within 2 years, necessitating intensive follow-up for 3 years. As the lung metastatic rates in NSGCT patients were high, a more accurate assessment for lung metastasis is desirable in these patients.

The management of stage I testis cancer

For clinical stage I seminoma, conventional management consists of adjuvant RT after orchiectomy. Only 5% of patients relapse. The majority can be salvaged by chemotherapy. The overall survival of 98% is excellent. Seminoma is radiosensitive. A lower dose of RT is required than for NSGCT. Standard therapy presently is 30 Gy in 3 weeks, as suggested by the MRC study. RT is generally well tolerated. There have been recent concerns about second malignancies after 10 to 15 years. Surveillance studies have shown that 18% of patients relapse, the majority in para-aortic lymph nodes. About 15% require salvage RT and 5% salvage chemotherapy. Second relapses are seen in patients treated with RT at first relapse, and occur outside of the radiation field. The main advantage of surveillance is that 80% of patients can be spared slightly toxic overtreatment. The main disadvantage is the need for long-term follow-up, which is expensive and stressful to the patient. Good patient compliance, mandatory to an observation policy, is often difficult on a long-term basis. Seminoma is clearly responsive to chemotherapy. Adjuvant carboplatin in clinical stage I has only been evaluated in two studies. Because reliable prognostic factors have not been established, a high-risk group cannot be identified, and chemotherapy must be given to all patients. Whether or not one cycle of chemotherapy is sufficient requires further confirmation, particularly in view of the results with carboplatin as compared with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSGCT. Results of the randomized MRC trial comparing RT with carboplatin are of interest.

A rational approach to managing stage I nonseminomatous germ cell cancer

Regardless of the treatment option selected for management of low-stage germ cell cancer, ultimate survival is nearly identical. Treatment-related morbidity is very low regardless of management modality and the individual patient can expect similar physical limitations owing to therapy. The overall difference in loss of productivity between treatment programs varies by little more than 1 week. The cost of treatment is similar for all methods, although there is a definite financial advantage to surveillance, less so for selective surveillance, when compared with other forms of management. Socioeconomic factors are of importance when managing limited resources for a large population, but are of less concern to an individual, especially when the mean differences in per patient costs vary by only $5000. Because of these close similarities in efficacy, morbidity, and costs treatment decisions should be individualized. A responsible and reliable patient can be managed safely by selective surveillance. Those individuals considered to be less self-motivated to pursue intensive care should be managed by primary therapy. Without more information regarding the long-term outcomes associated with primary adjuvant chemotherapy, primary adjuvant RPLND, where experienced surgical support is available, is the preferred management for low-stage germ cell cancer in patients selected for, or electing, active treatment rather than surveillance. Active investigations examining the role of medical management in this population should be continued. Our preferred choice of initial management is to offer selective surveillance to appropriate patients and modified RPLND to the remainder.

Testicular cancer

The following article provides a comprehensive review of male germ cell tumors; the pathology and the clinical manifestations of the tumors are discussed, as are the modern concepts of clinical staging. Patients with bulky stage II and stage III non-seminomatous germ cell tumors are treated with chemotherapy. The new international classification system has provided a very useful way to categorize these patients by prognosis. Patients with good- or intermediate-risk tumors may be treated with 3 courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) or 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP), and more than 90% of these patients will survive. Randomized trials have shown that, if only 3 courses of chemotherapy are to be given, the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin and the omission of bleomycin are deleterious to outcome. Patients who still have a significant residual mass and normal markers after treatment should undergo a surgical resection of the residual tumor. Patients who are classified by the international classification system as having poor-risk tumors have about a 50% likelihood of survival, and many of these patients will require surgical resection of a residual tumor after chemotherapy. No randomized trial has proved a regimen to be superior to that of 4 courses of BEP. Currently, an ongoing trial is evaluating the effect of the early use of high-dose therapy in combination with hematopoietic rescue in patients with these types of tumors. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are generally treated with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). About 25% of the patients selected for this procedure will actually have pathologically negative nodes. Those with positive nodes may elect to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (2 courses of BEP), which will almost always prevent relapse. An alternate approach for patients willing to comply with monthly follow-up is surveillance, with chemotherapy deferred until relapse is noted. About 50% of these patients will be cured with surgery (as many as 75% have microscopic disease only). With careful follow-up, those destined to relapse can be treated promptly and at a time when they have small-volume tumors and an excellent prognosis if they go on to receive chemotherapy. Patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors may also undergo RPLND, although an acceptable alternative for these patients is surveillance. The advantages and the disadvantages of each approach are discussed. The overall risk of recurrence is about 30%, but there have been patient groups defined that may vary in risk from 10% to 15% up to 50% or more. Patients with advanced seminoma are treated with chemotherapy. When this procedure is used, outcomes are favorable and all patients are either in good- or intermediate-risk groups, according to the international classification system. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are treated with radiotherapy. Radiation is also generally used for the treatment of clinical stage I patients, although surveillance is growing in prominence as a means to treat these patients. Late effects of treatment are also discussed in this article. Ejaculatory function can be preserved in most patients who have early stage tumors and who undergo RPLND and in some patients who undergo surgery after chemotherapy. The most troubling effect of chemotherapy is the development of etoposide-induced leukemia, a unique--and fortunately rare--clinical entity.

Active surveillance after orchiectomy for nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: late relapse may occur

OBJECTIVES

To review the outcome of men with Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors managed with a policy of active surveillance following orchiectomy.

METHODS

The clinical records of all men with Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors seen at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia between 1982 and 1995 were reviewed. Data were obtained concerning the histologic type of tumor, levels of serum tumor markers, relapse and subsequent treatment, and survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were entered into the active surveillance protocol between 1982 and 1995. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, 27 (35%) have relapsed, with a median time to relapse of 5 months. Two late relapses occurred at 37 and 57 months after diagnosis. Relapses occurred most commonly in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, with the lungs the second most common site. Following treatment with chemotherapy and surgery, all patients achieved complete remission, with 1 patient subsequently relapsing and ultimately dying of progressive tumor. One other patient died of acute myeloid leukemia, thought to be secondary to chemotherapy. Overall, 75 patients (97%) remain alive and free of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Active surveillance is a safe and effective approach to the management of Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Although most relapses occur within the first 2 years, late relapses may occur.

Importance of a new tumor marker TRA-1-60 in the follow-up of patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

TRA-1-60 is a new tumor marker for embryonal carcinoma-positive nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors (NSTGCT). Upper normal reference value (RV) and serum half-life (t1/2) were determined. The value was determined in the follow-up of 154 patients with stage I NSTGCT.

METHODS

TRA-1-60 was measured in normal controls (n = 100) to determine RV and in patients without recurrence for t1/2. In all patients, TRA-1-60 was determined at the time of orchidectomy. In 42 patients with recurrence, values were also evaluated 1 month before and at the time of computed tomography-confirmed recurrence. Predictive values and survival probability were examined and compared with values for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).

RESULTS

RV was 230 U/ml and t1/2 9.5 days. Elevated TRA-1-60 at the time of orchidectomy was not associated with recurrence. One month before recurrence, 21 of 42 patients had elevated TRA-1-60 levels (50%); 10 were negative for both AFP and hCG. At the time of recurrence, 24 patients had elevated TRA-1-60 levels (57.1%): 9 were negative for AFP/hCG. Patients with TRA-1-60 levels of > 500 U/ml had a poorer recurrence-free survival probability (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

TRA-1-60 is useful in the follow-up of stage 1 NSTGCT. The combination of AFP, hCG, and TRA-1-60 may improve the early detection of recurrence.

Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumour

We report our experience in laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in non-seminomatous stage I testicular neoplasia. This technique is an alternative to the formal retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Between 1993 and 1996 we carried out 8 retroperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomies in patients, aged 19–40 years, affected by non-seminomatous testicular neoplasia. We removed from 13 to 24 lymph nodes. Operating time ranged between 200 and 300 minutes. The mean stay in hospital was 5 days. Histological findings revealed micrometastatic lymph nodes in half the patients. No complications were reported except in one patient, who underwent TC-guided drain owing to voluminous lymphocele one week after the laparoscopic operation. Normal antegrade ejaculation was preserved in all cases and no retroperitoneal recurrence was noted at a mean 18 months follow-up.

Laparoscopic approach to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a new surgical procedure used to enhance staging in men with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis. The procedure has been performed in a limited number of patients at several centers with extensive laparoscopic experience. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is a technically demanding procedure which can be successfully completed in the majority of patients. However, the risk of complications is greater than in patients who undergo standard open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The primary advantage of a laparoscopic approach is shortened hospitalization and rapid return to normal activity. The role of laparoscopy in the management of patients with testis malignancy has not been defined. The use of this staging procedure may help minimize the need for surveillance studies following surgery and may be best utilized in men with a lower likelihood of nodal metastases. Ultimately, prospective study in large groups of patients will be necessary to determine the role of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with testis cancer.

Cost- and risk-benefit considerations in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumors

BACKGROUND

The high curability of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) and the availability of equally effective management options (retroperitoneal lymph node dissection [RPLND] and surveillance) allows for treatment decisions based on secondary end points, including sort- and long-term toxicity and cost relative to benefit. The purpose of this study was to perform cost-benefit and risk-benefit analyses of management options in clinical stage I NSGCT using data from the literature and Indiana University.

METHODS

The overall costs for 100 patients undergoing a primary RPLND were compared with the total costs of 100 patients managed by surveillance for clinical stage I disease. These two options were then analyzed in terms of survival, late relapse, acute and chronic toxicity (including fertility), and perioperative morbidity.

RESULTS

The overall costs of these two approaches were essentially identical. The two options were similar in terms of survival, although RPLND demonstrated superiority in terms of fertility, toxicity, and late relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of nerve-sparing RPLND or surveillance in clinical stage I NSGCT patient cannot be made on the basis of cost as a discriminator. Instead, the decision should be made based on patient desires, physician expertise, biological predictors, and short- and long-term toxicity.

Accuracy of clinical staging in non-seminomatous testicular cancer--a single centre experience of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

The management of low stage non-seminomatous testicular cancer remains a controversial issue. Programs of surveillance or primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) after orchiectomy show equally good survival rates. Current focus is therefore on reduction of toxicity or side effects of the treatment while maintaining maximal prognostic safety. The clinician's decision of therapy is based on clinical staging methods including computerized tomography, pulmonary x-rays and serum tumour marker levels. In this study, the accuracy of clinical staging was compared with histopathology in 64 patients with clinical stages (CS) I and IIa, operated upon with RPLND between 1980 and 1992. Lymph node metastases were histopathologically verified in 37% of CS I and in 47% of CS IIa tumours. Thus, the clinical staging was inaccurate in 37% in CS I and in 53% in CS IIa patients. No clear relationship was shown between the risk factors: vascular invasion and/or tumour marker levels and metastatic spread. The specificity of clinical staging in non seminomatous testicular cancer was low. RPLND, on the other hand, is a reliable method for assessment of metastatic spread and will minimise unnecessary use of chemotherapy. Modern techniques for lymphadenectomy have a very low rate of post-operative morbidity. Development of better non-invasive imaging techniques for detection of lymph node metastases is hoped for, in order to improve the information on tumour spread and make it possible to individualize therapy. Thus, unnecessary therapy and following side-effects can be avoided, improving the patient's quality of life during and after treatment.

Post-orchidectomy radiation therapy alone for patients with early stage non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis

The aim of this study was to review the patterns of disease relapse and survival outcomes for patients treated post-orchidectomy with radiotherapy for early stage (I and IIA) non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis (NSGCT). The clinical records were reviewed of 117 men consecutively treated at the Queensland Radium Institute from 1960-90 (inclusive) for stage I or IIA NSGCT. A total of 108 patients received radiotherapy to the para-aortic nodes and ipsilateral hemipelvis following orchidectomy; nine patients received radiotherapy to the para-aortic nodes and whole pelvis. Twenty-two of 99 (22.2%) stage I and eight of 18 (44.4%) stage IIA patients relapsed following definitive radiotherapy. The 5 year overall and recurrence-free survivals were 84 and 75%, respectively. Factors associated with a significantly worse outcome included: (i) patients with stage IIA disease; (ii) the presence of undifferentiated elements in the operative specimen; (iii) a primary tumor < 5 cm size; and (iv) treatment given prior to 1979. Given the unsatisfactory recurrence rate following radiation therapy alone and the availability of cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens, it is recommended that radiation therapy alone for patients with early stage NSGCT be abandoned in favour of other management strategies.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: multi-institutional analysis

Modified unilateral laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was attempted in 20 patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. The procedure was completed in 18 men at a median operative length of 6 hours. Median estimated blood loss was 250 cc and median number of lymph nodes removed was 14.5. Nodal disease spread was noted in 3 of 18 patients (17%). Most patients were hospitalized for 3 days or less and had returned to normal activity levels within 2 to 3 weeks. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in all 20 patients. Significant complications occurred in 6 of 20 patients (30%), with bleeding being the most common adverse event encountered. In 2 patients an abdominal incision and completion of the procedure by open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were required due to significant bleeding following injury to the gonadal vessels. With a median followup of 10 months (range 2 to 25), 2 men had pulmonary disease recurrence and none had abdominal recurrence. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection can be completed successfully in patients with stage I testicular cancer and may be most appropriate in those with limited risk of metastatic disease spread. The morbidity may be largely attributed to a steep learning curve. The efficacy of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection compared with standard techniques and determination of its role in patients with testicular cancer will require longer followup in larger groups of patients.

Stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testicular cancer--management options and risk-benefit considerations

The results obtained with primary retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) in 464 patients with clinical stage A nonseminomatous germ-cell (NSGC) testicular cancer over a period of 25 years (1965-1989) were reviewed. Results were analyzed in clinical terms and subdivided into early (1965-1978) and contemporary (1979-1989) findings so as to be comparable with series using radiotherapy or surveillance. Between 1965 and 1978 (86 clinical stage A patients), the overall relapse rate of 15% (n = 13) was similar to that obtained in radiotherapy series but the survival (98.8% after RPLND) was superior to that achieved with irradiation (87%). From 1979 to 1989, 378 clinical stage A cases had primary RPLND, of whom 29% (n = 111) had cancerous nodes. The relapse rate for pathological stage A patients (n = 267) was 11% and two patients died. The rate of relapse for pathological stage B patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy was 32%. No relapse was seen among 46 pathological stage B patients given postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The mortality of 0.7% observed among 378 clinical stage A RPLND cases was lower than the 2% value reported in surveillance series. Although not statistically significant, these consistent results reported for two eras (pre- and postplatinum) spanning a period of 25 years suggest a sound basis for the surgical approach. The anatomic and medical principles in oncology, which have supported this approach, remain cogent today. They are discussed herein. Now that nerve-sparing techniques have been developed, the one long-term morbidity of RPLND (i.e., anejaculation) can be avoided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Results of a policy of surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma

PURPOSE

To determine what proportion of patients with Stage I testicular seminoma will be cured with orchidectomy alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From August 1984 to December 1991 148 patients with Stage I testicular seminoma were entered on a prospective study of surveillance following orchidectomy. The eligibility criteria included a normal chest X ray, lymphogram, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, and normal post-orchidectomy tumor markers (AFP and BHCG). Patients were followed with a clinical assessment (markers, chest X ray and CT abdomen and pelvis) at 4 to 6 monthly intervals.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 47 months (range 7-87 months), the actuarial relapse-free rate was 81% at 5 years. Twenty-three patients have relapsed with a median time to relapse of 15 months (range 2-61 months). Four patients (17%) relapsed at 4 or more years from diagnosis. Twenty-one of the 23 relapses occurred in the paraaortic lymph nodes, one patient relapsed in the mediastinum and ipsilateral inguinal nodes and one patient had an isolated ipsilateral inguinal node relapse. Nineteen patients were treated for relapse with external beam radiation therapy of which three developed a second relapse and were salvaged with chemotherapy. Four patients were treated for first relapse with chemotherapy and one developed a second relapse and died of disease. Age at diagnosis was the only prognostic factor for relapse, with patients age < or = 34 having an actuarial relapse-free rate at 5 years of 70% in contrast to a 91% relapse-free rate in those > 34 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that surveillance in Stage I testicular seminoma should only be performed in a study setting until further data regarding the risk of late relapse and the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy is available.

Retroperitoneal lymph node staging of testicular tumours. TNM Study Group

A prospective multicentre study was carried out to determine the efficiency of various diagnostic methods in the assessment of the retroperitoneal space. The diagnostic findings were confirmed histologically after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND). The sensitivity was 71% for bipedal lymphography, 41% for computed tomography (CT), 31% for abdominal ultrasound and 37% for alpha-fetoprotein/human chorionic gonadotrophin (AFP/HCG). Specificity was 60, 94, 87 and 93% respectively. When all diagnostic methods were combined, sensitivity was 88% and specificity 48%. The value of all methods depends on the metastatic enlargement of the lymph nodes. The predictive value of a negative diagnosis was 73% for lymphography, 67% for CT, 61% for ultrasound and 65% for AFP/HCG; the predictive value of a positive diagnosis was 58, 85, 69 and 81% respectively. Despite these results, lymphography is indicated only when a surveillance strategy is planned, since it detected 58% of the lymph node metastases that were overlooked by CT and tumour markers. Despite this, 17% of patients with clinical stage I tumours had metastases. False positive rates are detrimental to primary chemotherapy: between 24% (at least 2 methods positive) and 46% (1 or more methods positive) of patients with clinical stage II A/B tumours had a pathological stage I and for these patients primary chemotherapy meant overtreatment.

The impact of histological review on clinical management of testicular cancer

Accurate histological diagnosis and staging are critically important in determining the optimal management of patients with testicular cancer. We have assessed the importance of histological review of "outside" pathology reports from 87 patients referred to the Urological Cancer Research Unit. In 28 patients (32%), the reviewed pathology report differed from the outside report. In 10 of these patients (11%), the pathology review resulted in a change of treatment or prognosis from that which would have obtained in the absence of such histological review. Pathology review at a major cancer centre with a subspecialist interest in tumour pathology and a large experience in the management of germ cell malignancy is an essential first step in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Review of the Indiana University experience 1965-1989

The results of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in 464 patients with clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell (NSGC) testis cancer treated over 25 years (1965-1989) were reviewed. The results were analysed in clinical terms and subdivided into early (1965-1978) and contemporary (1979-1989) groups in order to be comparable with series using radiotherapy or surveillance. Between 1965 and 1978 (86 clinical stage A patients) the overall relapse rate of 15% (n = 13) was similar to that of radiotherapy series but survival (97.7% after RPLND) was superior to that achieved with irradiation (87%). From 1979 to 1989, 378 clinical stage A patients had primary RPLND and 30% of them (n = 112) had cancerous nodes. The relapse rate for pathological stage A (n = 266) was 12% and 2 patients died. The relapse rate in pathological stage B patients without adjuvant chemotherapy was 34%. No relapse was seen among 48 pathological stage B patients who received post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy. The death rate was 0.8% among 378 clinical stage A RPLND patients. While not statistically significantly different from death rates reported in current surveillance series, these consistent results spanning 2 eras (before and after cisplatin) over 25 years suggest a sound basis for the surgical approach. The anatomical and medical principles in oncology, which have supported this approach, still remain cogent today. Now that nerve-sparing techniques have been developed, the only long-term morbidity of RPLND (anejaculation) has been avoided. It would seem appropriate to include nerve-sparing RPLND techniques in the management of clinical stage A disease.

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage A testis cancer (1965 to 1989): modifications of technique and impact on ejaculation

Results with primary retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in 464 patients with clinical stage A nonseminomatous germ cell testis cancer (1965 to 1989) were reviewed. The false-negative staging error by clinical methods remains at 30%. The relapse rate in pathological stage A cancer patients was 11% (37 of 323), with 2 deaths. For pathological stage B disease 64% of the patients were cured by retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy alone. With modern adjuvant chemotherapy no stage B tumor relapsed since 1979 and the survival rate was 100%. For all 25 years (464 patients) the relapse rate was 14% and the survival rate was 98.9% (3 cancer and 2 noncancer deaths). Because these results are based on preoperative clinical staging, they are directly comparable with series using radiotherapy or surveillance.

Results of the surveillance policy of stage I non-seminomatous germ cell testicular tumours

A series of 115 patients with clinical Stage I non-seminomatous germ cell testicular tumours were managed with orchiectomy and close surveillance (median follow-up 36 months, range 3-119); 34 (29.5%) relapsed, 21 within 6 months, 29 within a year and the latest at 28 months. At relapse all patients were treated with platinum or analogue-based drug combinations, supplemented in 7 by retroperitoneal node dissection; 30 patients achieved durable remissions and 2 have had further relapses successfully treated. Two died; both had malignant teratoma intermediate with primary stage T1 and vascular and/or lymphatic invasion of primary tumour. At a median follow-up time of 36 months, the survivors (98.3%) demonstrate no evidence of disease, these results matching the outcome of other methods of management. Vascular and/or lymphatic invasion was associated with an enhanced relapse rate but specific histology, T stage of the primary and pre-orchiectomy serum alpha-fetoprotein status did not appear to favour relapse. The first sign of relapse was tumour marker alone in 10 patients, radiological features alone in 12, or both in 10 patients. However, in 2 cases the relapse was first detected clinically. Furthermore, pre-orchiectomy and relapse marker status did not correlate well. These points emphasise the importance of all aspects of follow-up, none of which can be safely omitted.

Single institutional experience with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis: local perspectives on a curable cancer

We have reviewed 77 patients with Non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis (NSGCTT) treated at a single institution. A residual mass following definitive treatment occurred in 16 patients (35%), 13 of whom had a resection of the mass, yielding active tumour in only one patient. Nine patients (12%) relapsed including four of the 14 with Stage I disease who were treated by orchidectomy alone. Four relapses occurred at more than two and a half years after primary treatment. Relapse prior to the development of clinical symptoms or signs was evident in three of nine patients; in two patients by routine imaging and one with elevated routine serum markers. Three of the nine patients who relapsed had elevated serum markers. Two patients died from disease but there were four treatment-related deaths (7%). Overall, 64 patients (83%) remain disease free at the time of follow-up. A further seven (9%) have been lost to follow-up but were disease-free at a minimum of 26 months after diagnosis. This study confirms features of this disease including the excellent prognosis when adequately treated. However, it also reveals the problems of late or marker negative relapses, the implementation of an observation policy in Stage I disease and treatment related mortality in young men.