Alternatives to radiotherapy in the management of seminoma

Stage I Seminoma of the Testis: Long Term Results and Toxicity with Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Aims and background

Pure testicular seminoma has historically been treated with post-orchidectomy radiation therapy with excellent results. Recently, several aspects of the treatment of stage I seminoma have been questioned. We assessed long-term results and toxicity of patients with pure testicular seminoma treated at the Department of Radiation Oncology of S. Chiara Hospital, Trento.

Methods

From 1953 to 1987, 102 patients with stage I pure testicular seminoma were given megavoltage irradiation with curative intent. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 3 years (maximum 37 years, median 13 years). They received a mean para-aortic/pelvic dose of 33.07 Gy (range 23.70-45.20 Gy) with different doses and fields reflecting the change in techniques over a long period of time.

Results

The cause-specific actuarial survival at 30 years was 99% and crude survival 67%. One patient had an out-field relapse (inguinal) after a few months and was cured with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Another patient relapsed with widespared metastases and died after 1 year of progressive disease. Early toxycity was mild and the treatment was well tolerated. Late side effects were reported in 8/102 patients.

Conclusion

In our series adjuvant radiation therapy resulted in cure rates corresponding to those reported in the literature. The 30-year actuarial survival of 99% was extremely good and the toxicity of the treatment was mild. Post-orchidectomy radiation to the para-aortic and ipsilateral pelvic nodes is a safe and effective method of preventing recurrences and is currently to be considered the treatment of choice in stage I testicular seminoma.

Testicular seminoma clinical stage 1: treatment outcome on a routine care level

Purpose

Clinical stage 1 (CS1) testicular seminoma involves an almost 100 % disease-specific survival in controlled clinical trials. We aimed to find out whether these results can be matched in patients managed on the routine care level.

Patients, methods

In total, 725 patients with seminoma CS1 were prospectively enrolled from 130 institutions. Adjuvant management as decided by local physicians involved surveillance (n = 256), radiotherapy (41), 1× Carboplatin (362), and 2× Carboplatin (66). We registered type of management, age, duration of follow-up (F/U), relapse, rete testis invasion (RTI), and tumor size. Actuarial relapse-free survival curves were calculated for treatment modalities and stratified for tumor sizes and RTI. A Cox regression model was calculated to explore for factors influencing relapses.

Results

Disease-specific survival was 100 %. Crude relapse rates were 8.2, 2.4, 5.0, and 1.5 % for surveillance, radiotherapy, 1× Carboplatin, and 2× Carboplatin after a median F/U of 30 months. RTI and tumor size were not associated with progression in surveillance patients. One course Carboplatin caused relapses in 6.8 % in tumor sizes >4 cm and 9.3 % (actuarial 13 %) in sizes >5 cm. The Cox model revealed the association of tumor size with recurrence in the entire seminoma population (Hazard ratio 1.17; 95 % confidence intervals 1.03–1.33).

Conclusions

The overall outcome of CS1 seminoma managed on the routine care level mirrors that of controlled trials. Unexpectedly, the risk factors in surveillance patients were not confirmed, but tumor size proved to be a risk indicator in the entire group of seminoma. Importantly, one course Carboplatin involved low efficacy to control the disease in large tumors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00432-016-2162-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Carboplatin AUC 10 for IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic seminoma is a highly curable disease. Standard treatment comprises of combination chemotherapy. The short- and long-term toxicities of this treatment are increasingly recognised and the possibility of over treatment in such a curable disease should be considered. We have therefore assessed the use of single agent carboplatin at a dose of AUC 10 in patients with good prognosis metastatic seminoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with good prognosis metastatic seminoma treated with carboplatin (AUC 10) were identified at our institution and affiliated institutions. Treatment was three weekly for a total of three or four cycles. Outcome and toxicities were analysed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 36 months, 61 patients in total were treated with carboplatin AUC 10, all good prognosis by the IGCCCG criteria. Forty-eight percent had stage IIA/IIB disease and 52% had greater than stage IIB disease. Thirty-one patients (51%) had a complete response following treatment. Three-year survival was 96.3% with a three-year progression free survival of 93.2%. The main treatment toxicity was haematological with 46% having grade 3, 24% having grade 4 neutropenia and 54% experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were no treatment related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Single agent carboplatin at a dose of AUC 10 is an effective treatment for good prognosis metastatic seminoma. The outcome compares favourably to previously published outcomes of combination chemotherapy. Although haematological toxicity is a concern, single agent carboplatin treatment for good prognosis metastatic seminoma could be considered a treatment option and is associated with less toxicity than combination regimens currently used.

Late relapse of germ cell tumors

This article highlights relevant aspects of the rare late relapses of malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs), which by definition occur at least 2 years after successful treatment. In most reports, 1% to 6% of patients with MGCT experience a late relapse. Surgery is the most important part in the treatment of late relapses. Viable MGCT or teratoma with malignant transformation may require multimodal treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery. Salvage chemotherapy should be based on a representative biopsy. Referring patients with late relapse to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables multimodal treatment.

The treatment of stage A testicular seminoma by carboplatin monochemotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although radiotherapy is considered to be a standard treatment of stage A testicular seminoma, an increasing number of studies have reported encouraging results of the treatment by carboplatin monochemotherapy (CBDCA). The aim of this study was to analyse the treatment results of patients with clinical stage A seminoma treated by CBDCA on daily basis in the period June 1999 to September 2008.

METHODS

A total of 124 patients, mean age 36.63 years (20-62 years), with stage A testicular seminoma were treated, upon radical orchiectomy, by adjuvant CBDCA (400 mg/m2 on day 1 and 22).

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was well tolerated, except moderate nausea on the day of the drug administration and the following day. No patient had any serious disorders in blood cells count requiring substitutional treatment. During the mean follow-up period of 37.5 (range 6-111) months, three relapses were noted (2.41%) and none neoplasm of contralateral testicle or any other organ.

CONCLUSION

Simple and easy carboplatin administration with excellent treatment results, along with good tolerance and absence of comorbidity, poses itself as a new "gold standard" of treatment for stage A testicular seminoma.

Late relapse of germ cell tumors

OBJECTIVE

To assess the main characteristics of late relapsing malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs). These tumors are rare and occur by definition 2 years or later after successful treatment.

METHODS

We present relevant literature on relapsing MGCT in order to highlight the following issues: incidence, impact of initial treatment on the subsequent risk of late relapse, treatment, and survival.

RESULTS

A pooled analysis of 5,880 patients with MGCT revealed late relapses in 119 of 3,704 (3.2%) and in 31 of 2,176 (1.4%) patients with non-seminoma and seminoma, respectively. The retroperitoneal space is the predominant site of relapse in both histological types. The initial treatment is important for the risk and localization of late relapses. Patients with single site teratoma are usually cured by surgery alone, whereas viable MGCT or teratoma with malignant transformation may require multimodal treatment with chemo- and/or radiotherapy as well as surgery. Surgery is the most important part in the treatment of late relapses. Salvage chemotherapy should, if feasible, be based on a representative biopsy. Five-year cancer-specific survival is above 50% in the recent large series and reaches 100% in case of single site teratoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of late relapsing MGCT patients is challenging and should be performed in experienced centers only. Referral of late relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables multimodal treatment, and contributes to increased knowledge of tumor biology as well experience with the clinical course of these patients.

Stage I testicular seminoma: management and controversies

Seminomas constitute more than half of testicular germ-cell tumours and 70-80% of patients with seminoma present with clinical stage I disease. Post-orchiectomy, management options include irradiation, surveillance or chemotherapy. Adjuvant irradiation to the infradiaphragmatic lymph nodes is the standard of care with relapse rates of 3-4%. Long-term follow-up data have shown association with late complications (cardiotoxicity, second malignancy, fertility impairment). Surveillance is an attractive alternative but relapse rates are higher ranging between 15 and 20%. Single agent carboplatin chemotherapy has demonstrated survival data equivalent to radiotherapy but long-term relapse and toxicity data are yet to be confirmed. Routine follow-up after irradiation and the role of risk stratification also remain unclear. Highly curative rates can be attained by all three modalities. Standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and patients' preferences are considered when management decisions are made.

Late Relapses of Germ Cell Malignancies: Incidence, Management, and Prognosis

Late relapses of malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs) are rare and occur, by definition, 2 years or later after successful treatment. They represent a major challenge of today's treatment of MGCTs. Because of the rarity and heterogeneity of late relapses, many aspects of their main characteristics remain obscure. We present relevant literature on relapsing MGCTs to highlight the following issues: incidence, impact of initial treatment on the subsequent risk of late relapse, treatment, and survival. In a pooled analysis, the incidence is 1.4% and 3.2% in seminoma and nonseminoma patients, respectively. The predominant site of relapse is the retroperitoneal space in both histologic types. The initial treatment appears to be important for the risk and localization of late relapses. The treatment of late relapses should be based on a representative presalvage biopsy and includes radical surgery and salvage chemotherapy in most cases. Five-year cancer-specific survival is above 50% in the recent large series and reaches 100% in case of single-site teratoma. Diagnosis and treatment of late-relapsing MGCT patients is challenging and should be performed in experienced centers only. Referral of late-relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables increasing understanding of tumor biology and the clinical course of these patients.

Surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma

Treatment options in patients with stage I testicular seminoma include adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), surveillance, and adjuvant chemotherapy. RT was the treatment of choice for the past 50 years, but there has been increasing concern in the past decade regarding late complications. Surveillance, reserving treatment for patients who relapse, has been shown to be a safe and effective strategy. It allows >80% of patients to avoid any post-orchidectomy treatment and is the recommended approach for these patients. The possible role of adjuvant chemotherapy is currently being assessed in clinical trials and should not be used outside of a study setting.

Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy is effective treatment for stage I seminoma, but is associated with a risk of late non-germ-cell cancer and cardiovascular events. After good results in initial studies with one injection of carboplatin, we undertook a large randomised trial to compare the approaches of radiotherapy with chemotherapy in seminoma treatment.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2001, 1477 patients from 70 hospitals in 14 countries were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy (para-aortic strip or dog-leg field; n=904) or one injection of carboplatin (n=573; dose based on the formula 7x[glomerular filtration rate+25] mg), at two trial centres in the UK and Belgium. The primary outcome measure was the relapse-free rate, with the trial powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year rates of more than 3%. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN27163214.

FINDINGS

885 and 560 patients received radiotherapy and carboplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 3.0-4.9), relapse-free survival rates for radiotherapy and carboplatin were similar (96.7% [95% CI 95.3-97.7] vs 97.7% [96.0-98.6] at 2 years; 95.9% [94.4-97.1] vs 94.8% [92.5-96.4] at 3 years, respectively; hazard ratio 1.28 [90% CI 0.85-1.93], p=0.32). At 2 years' follow-up, the absolute differences in relapse-free rates (radiotherapy-chemotherapy) were -1.0% (90% CI -2.5 to 0.5) by direct comparison of proportions, and 0.9% (-0.5 to 3.0) by a hazard-ratio-based approach. Patients given carboplatin were less lethargic and less likely to take time off work than those given radiotherapy. New, second primary testicular germ-cell tumours were reported in ten patients allocated irradiation (all after para-aortic strip field) and two allocated carboplatin (5-year event rate 1.96% [95% CI 1.0-3.8] vs 0.54% [0.1-2.1], p=0.04). One seminoma-related death occurred after radiotherapy and none after carboplatin.

INTERPRETATION

This trial has shown the non-inferiority of carboplatin to radiotherapy in the treatment of stage I seminoma. Although the absence of disease-related deaths and preliminary data indicating fewer second primary testicular germ-cell tumours favour carboplatin use, these findings need to be confirmed beyond 4 years' follow-up.

Metastatic seminoma treated with either single agent carboplatin or cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials

To study the role of single agent carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic seminoma based on the data from two randomised trials. In subgroup analyses in patients with different disease characteristics, the outcome treated with either single agent carboplatin or cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy was compared. Individual patient data from two randomised European trials involving patients with metastatic seminoma were gathered. The primary endpoint for all analyses was progression-free survival. The source data of 361 patients, 184 treated with cisplatin-based combinations and 177 treated with carboplatin single agent therapy, were entered into the analysis. Patient characteristics were comparable among the cisplatin-based and the carboplatin single agent treated patient groups with lymph nodes and lungs being the most frequent metastatic sites in 92 and 8% of patients, respectively. Overall, patients treated with single agent carboplatin had an inferior 5-year overall (89 and 94%; P=0.09) and progression-free survival rate (72 and 92%; P< 0.0001) compared with patients receiving cisplatin-based combinations. For all investigated subgroups (based on age, prior radiation therapy, metastatic sites), carboplatin single agent therapy was found to be inferior to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. In conclusion, carboplatin single agent therapy cannot be recommended as standard treatment for any patient subgroup with advanced metastatic seminoma and cisplatin-based combination regimens remain the standard of care.

Management of recurrence and follow-up strategies for patients with seminoma and selected high-risk groups

Seminoma is characterized by high sensitivity to both radiation and chemotherapy. Localized recurrences in the retroperitoneum after surveillance for stage I can be treated with radiotherapy; however, multiple or large bulky retroperitoneal recurrences or systemic metastasis requires cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy for those who recur after initial CR to induction chemotherapy is based on ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing regimens. Incomplete response or failure after induction chemotherapy requires high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue. Patients with seminoma need long-term follow-up because of the possibility of late recurrence and the risk of a second primary tumor.

Testis conserving chemotherapy in germ cell cancer: its potential to increase understanding of the biology and treatment of carcinoma-in-situ

Prompted by recognition of the potential of chemotherapy to increase the success of testis conserving surgery in patients with germ cell cancer, background and outcome data are reviewed and their contribution to the ongoing debate about how germ cell cancer develops discussed. The review is based on three previous studies of: a) time trends in tumour size in 578 personal series of all stages of testis cancer treated since 1978; b) impact of chemotherapy on actuarial risk of tumours in contralateral testis examined on 1221 patients treated in trials through the Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Consortium; and c) testes conservation attempted using chemotherapy in 78 patients. Since 1978 tumour size has decreased from 4.8 to 3.0 cms while cure has gone from 77 to 97%. There was no overall long term reduction in second cancers beyond 10 years in stage 1 patients after orchidectomy alone compared to stage 1 or metastatic disease patients receiving chemotherapy though the incidence was non significantly lower up to 10 years particularly in those patients receiving etoposide based combination. Testis conservation was initially successful in 28 of 78 (36%). An additional 25 (32%) had no viable cancer in orchidectomy specimen. In the 28 primary tumours cured by chemotherapy there was a 26% late relapse rate between 5 and 10 years (all cured by orchidectomy) compared to less than 5% in those cured with established metastases. In conclusion, testis conservation with chemotherapy is safe and feasible, though relapse is too frequent for routine service use. Confirmation of the high frequency of late relapse by others has raised the question whether these recurrences are due to post pubertal events reinducing CIS in intrauterine oestrogen primed germ cells and highlights the potential of testes conservation studies to better understand germ cell cancer development.

The role of retroperitoneal surgery in testis cancer

Testis cancer is today a curable malignancy. But controversy remains about the appropriate management of patients presenting different stages. There is an increasing interest in surveillance rather than in primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Adjuvant chemotherapy has become an efficient treatment option for high risk non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer, however, biological and histologic risk factors of the primary tumor are not yet precisely defined. To determine the appropriate management of patients with testicular cancer, postoperative morbidity after RPLND and risk of chemotherapy-induced morbidity must be balanced. Whoever reviews the literature must take into consideration that the excellent postoperative results after RPLND depend on high volume and large experience with testis cancer. As treatment morbidity and its intensity have a major impact on testis cancer patient quality of life, the choice of management must be based on the patient's social situation, his personal needs, and the doctor's experience and resources.

Presurgical window of carboplatin and surgery and multidrug chemotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma: Pediatric Oncology Group Trial

PURPOSE

Relapse remains a significant problem in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma. The response to carboplatin of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma was assessed in an upfront phase II window, which was followed-up by surgery and intensive multiagent chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients, ages 3 to 23 years with histologically confirmed diagnoses of osteosarcoma, were treated between January 1992 and November 1994 with carboplatin 1,000 mg/m2 per dose administered as a 48-hour continuous infusion. Two courses were administered in 3-week intervals, depending on marrow recovery. After radiographic reevaluation, patients underwent surgical removal of tumor (if feasible) and then 40 weeks of chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.

RESULTS

One of the 37 evaluable patients demonstrated a partial response to carboplatin; there were no complete responses. Patients were additionally analyzed by the response of pulmonary metastases to therapy and the extent of tumor necrosis of the primary lesion. By these criteria, 8 of 37 (22%) of patients showed a response at one or more sites, whereas 20 of 37 (54%) had unequivocal disease progression. Severe myelosuppression was the major toxicity. The projected 3-year event-free and overall survival rates were 23.9% and 31.9%, respectively. Only 1 of 17 patients with unresectable disease or distant bone metastases remains alive, in contrast to 6 of 17 patients with the lung as their only metastatic site and two of three patients with resected regional bone metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous-infusion carboplatin demonstrated limited activity as an upfront agent in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis, even at doses that result in severe and prolonged myelosuppression. Patients with isolated pulmonary metastases or resectable bone metastases have a longer median survival time and greater chance of long-term survival than do patients with unresectable bone disease, for whom the prognosis remains dismal.

Twelve-year experience with two courses of adjuvant single-agent carboplatin therapy for clinical stage I seminoma

PURPOSE

During the past 30 years, radiation therapy with 28 to 30 Gy for para-aortic and ipsilateral iliac node areas was the standard adjuvant treatment for clinical stage I seminoma after orchiectomy. However, late effects of radiotherapy prompted a search for alternative adjuvant treatment approaches, including surveillance and application of carboplatin. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of two adjuvant single-agent carboplatin courses in 107 patients who were diagnosed with clinical stage I seminoma at our study centers between 1988 and 1999.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 107 patients (median age, 39 years; range, 24 to 63 years) received two postoperative adjuvant cycles of carboplatin (400 mg/m(2)). The pathologic tumor stage was pT1 in 84 patients, pT2 in 18 patients, and pT3 in five patients. Whole blood count and serum chemistry were evaluated weekly during treatment to assess hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Six patients died from tumor-unrelated causes. The remaining 101 patients are currently alive and free of disease after a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 5 to 145 months). A detailed analysis of hematologic toxicity showed only World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 leukocytopenia in 10.7% of all cycles and WHO grade 2 leukocytopenia in 2.1% of all cycles.

CONCLUSION

Regarding the absence of tumor recurrences in our retrospective analysis and the favorable toxicity profile with no episodes of long-term toxicity, we suggest that two adjuvant courses of single-agent carboplatin for clinical stage I seminoma patients might be equivalent to radiotherapy.

Adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I seminoma: is a single course of carboplatin sufficient?

OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant radiotherapy produces excellent disease-free rates in clinical Stage I seminoma. However, concern is growing about side effects and late hazards of this treatment. Carboplatin has been suggested to supplant radiotherapy. To date, there is little experience with this drug in the adjuvant treatment of seminoma. In particular, it is unclear whether one or two courses should be administered.

METHODS

In a nonrandomized study, 125 patients with pure clinical Stage I seminoma were given adjuvant carboplatin treatment (400 mg/m2). Ninety-three patients received one course and 32 two courses. The median follow-up time was 48 months. To assess gonadal toxicity, serial measurements of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were done. To assess myelotoxicity, platelet counts at 3 and 4 weeks after treatment were monitored.

RESULTS

There were no relapses after two courses of carboplatin. After one course of carboplatin, eight relapses occurred (8.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.79% to 16.2%). All the relapses were located in the para-aortic region, and all the patients were rescued with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The median time to recurrence was 16 months. The 5-year actuarial progression-free survival rate after one course was 91.1% (95% CI 85.25% to 97.01%). Younger patients (age groups: less than 30 years and 31 to 38 years) had relapses more frequently (P = 0.038) than those in the older age group (greater than 38 years). After 3 weeks, 32% of the patients had platelet counts below 150/nL. The median FSH level increased immediately after treatment, reaching a peak of 13.6 U/L. After 20 months, the median FSH level had returned to the normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

One adjuvant course of carboplatin was associated with low myelotoxicity and low gonadal toxicity; however, the recurrence rate was almost 9% and thus unsatisfactory. After two courses of carboplatin, no relapse was observed. Thus, the two-course regimen of carboplatin appears to be equivalent to radiotherapy, and because of its favorable toxicity profile, this regimen should be investigated in randomized trials.

Sixty percent salvage rate for germ-cell tumours using sequential m-BOP, surgery and ifosfamide-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In germ-cell tumours (GCT), there is continuing controversy over the relative merits of dose dense therapy (increased frequency over a given time) versus vertical intensification (increased dose per fraction). The value of using a cisplatin-based dose dense approach in the salvage setting has not been documented and in addition the role of methotrexate remains uncertain. This paper reviews results from our investigations of these issues.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1987 and 1996, 65 patients with relapsing or refractory germ-cell tumour received weekly m-BOP (methotrexate, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin) as salvage therapy. Residual masses were excised if possible and patients progressing after this received cisplatin and ifosfamide based chemotheraphy with or without high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) consolidation.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 33 months, 34% are progression free following m-BOP, 11% who had surgery for residual masses which showed viable cancers are progression free. A further 15% who progressed following m-BOP with or without surgery were rendered progression free by third-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of m-BOP as second line therapy with deferment of cisplatin and ifosfamide based treatment to third line therapy with consolidation of third line responses with HDCT, leads to an overall progression-free survival of 60%. It does not appear that M-BOP prejudiced the response to third line therapy suggesting a lack of cross resistance. The potentially lower risk of leukaemia and infertility from m-BOP requires further evaluation.

The management of residual masses after chemotherapy in metastatic seminoma

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience in management of residual masses after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised a review of 107 patients with metastatic seminoma, treated with initial chemotherapy from 1978 to 1996. Forty-three patients had residual masses detected by computed tomography after chemotherapy, while 64 achieved a complete response. Residual masses were classified radiologically as <3 cm or >/=3 cm and as well- or poorly defined. Of the patients with residual masses, 19 underwent surgery, while 24 were observed.

RESULTS

Viable cancer was present in six of 11 patients with well-defined residual masses of >/=3 cm (positive histology in three of six undergoing surgery and site relapses in three of five observed), one of 14 patients with poorly defined masses of >/=3 cm (negative histology in nine undergoing surgery and site relapse in one of five observed), and in none of 17 patients with residual masses of <3 cm (negative histology in four undergoing surgery and no site relapses in 13 observed; one additional patient in this group died from treatment complications).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a complete response after chemotherapy, a residual mass of <3 cm and a poorly defined residual mass of >/=3 cm can be observed, reserving intervention for recurrent or progressive disease. Well-defined residual masses of >/=3 cm should be resected because there is a 55% likelihood of persistent tumour.

Sperm analysis and serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels before and after adjuvant single-agent carboplatin therapy for clinical stage I seminoma

OBJECTIVES

During the past 25 years, radiotherapy has been considered the standard adjuvant treatment for clinical Stage I seminoma after orchiectomy. However, the late effects of this treatment have prompted a re-examination of the alternatives, including surveillance and adjuvant administration of carboplatin. To our knowledge, the present clinical study is the first to report the effects of two adjuvant courses of single-agent carboplatin on the pituitary-testicular axis and on sperm analysis.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with clinical Stage I seminoma participated in a prospective investigation of gonadal function before and after carboplatin therapy. After orchiectomy but before chemotherapy, blood samples for determination of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) serum levels were obtained from all 22 patients. Seventeen patients provided a semen sample at the same time, but 5 were unable to do so. At the end of chemotherapy, all 22 patients provided repeated semen samples starting 1 year after the termination of treatment and continuing at intervals of 12 months. FSH serum levels were determined at the same time. The study period was 48 months.

RESULTS

Before chemotherapy, 2 patients (12%) had azoospermia, 9 (53%) had oligospermia, and 6 (35%) had normospermia. During the study period, sperm counts continued to increase in all patients. After 4 years, 7 patients (32%) had oligospermia and 15 (68%) normospermia. The mean prechemotherapy FSH level (15.5 IU/L) was increased in accordance with subnormal spermatogenesis, but a constant trend toward normalization was observed thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show recovery of spermatogenesis after adjuvant single-agent carboplatin for clinical Stage I seminoma in a remarkably high percentage of patients.

Radiotherapy after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma--a diminishing role. MRC Testicular Tumour Working Party

In a retrospective study, data from 302 patients with metastatic testicular seminoma treated with chemotherapy between 1978 and 1990 in 10 European centres were analysed to evaluate the role, if any, of postchemotherapy treatment with irradiation. The primary endpoint of this study was the progression-free survival rate after chemotherapy with or without additional radiotherapy. This was related to the type of primary chemotherapy, sites and sizes of pre- and postchemotherapy masses, the extent of surgical resection after chemotherapy and the use of radiotherapy. 174 patients had residual disease at the end of chemotherapy. The most important prognostic factors for progression were the presence of any visceral metastases or raised LDH prechemotherapy, and the presence of residual disease at visceral sites after chemotherapy. Approximately half the patients with residual masses underwent postchemotherapy radiotherapy, with selection based predominantly on institutional practice. In patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, no significant difference was detected in progression-free survival whether or not radiotherapy was employed. Patients receiving BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) had a progression-free survival rate of 88% (95% CI, 80-96%) uninfluenced by postchemotherapy radiotherapy. In patients with residual masses confined to the abdomen after platinum-based chemotherapy, the absolute benefit to radiotherapy was estimated to be 2.3%. The potential benefit of postchemotherapy radiotherapy is minimal, and so it is concluded that the use of adjuvant radiotherapy to residual masses after platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma is unnecessary.

Residual mass following chemotherapy of seminoma

BACKGROUND

The residual mass so frequently found after chemotherapy of advanced seminoma may consist entirely of benign tissue or may contain residual disease amenable to adjuvant therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A detailed retrospective analysis was performed on 45 patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy for advanced seminoma between 1978 and 1994.

RESULTS

The probability of a residual mass after chemotherapy was higher if the pre-treatment mass diameter was > 5 cm (78% versus 15%, P = 0.0009). Of 33 patients with residual masses following cisplatin chemotherapy, 4 were explored surgically showing fibrosis only, 15 were treated by adjuvant radiotherapy and 14 were managed by observation alone. Recurrence occurred in 2 of 14 patients managed by observation and in 2 of 15 managed by radiotherapy. There was no evidence that risk of recurrence was related to diameter of residual mass.

CONCLUSION

Residual masses persisted following cisplatin based combination chemotherapy for seminoma in 73% of cases. In our study, recurrence was rare and there was no evidence that this was influenced by either the size of the residual mass or the use of adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant carboplatin treatment for seminoma clinical stage I

The traditional adjuvant therapy for seminoma stage I is abdominal radiotherapy. Although the relapse rate ranges below 5% this treatment is challenged because concerns about adverse late effects are accumulating. Carboplatin is effective in metastatic seminoma and two pilot studies have indicated effectivity in the adjuvant setting also. As this drug is almost non-toxic in moderate doses it could be an ideal adjuvant treatment for seminoma stage I. A group of 82 patients, mean age 37.5 years (range 22-73 years), with histologically pure seminoma stage I, were given carboplatin 400 mg/m2 after orchiectomy; 60 patients received only one course of carboplatin, and 22 patients received two courses. The median time of observation is 24 months, ranging from 2 to 48 months, and 66 patients have a minimum follow-up of 1 year. There is one relapse so far. Toxicity is rather mild with no severe nausea/emesis. Mean platelet counts were 164/nl after 3 weeks and 208/nl after 4 weeks; thus, myelotoxicity was negligible. Gonadal toxicity was measured by serial follicle-stimulating hormone levels. The mean level was 11.4 U/l before treatment, and 16.2 U/l after 5 weeks, 17.3 U/l after 4 months, 14.5 U/l after 8 months and 13.5 U/l after 12 months. Thus, gonadal toxicity also appeared to be mild. In summary, the efficacies of adjuvant carboplatin and of abdominal radiotherapy seem to be identical. As carboplatin, in the dosage used, involves no severe acute side-effects and probably few late adverse effects, this regimen constitutes a promising new treatment option in seminoma patients stage I that deserves to be studied in randomized trials.

Secondary tumours following etoposide containing therapy for germ cell cancer

BACKGROUND

Reports have implied etoposide as the cause of secondary leukaemia in patients treated for germ cell cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1979 and 1992, 679 male patients with germ cell cancer received etoposide containing chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Six of 679 patients developed acute myeloid leukaemia (relative risk 150; CI: 55-326). None of these patients had a primary mediastinal germ cell tumour and only 1 patient received previous radiotherapy. The median interval between the onset of cytotoxic treatment and the development of leukaemia was 27 months. The FAB M4 morphology was seen in 4 of 6 cases.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of etoposide containing protocols outweigh the risk of leukaemia in patients with intermediate or high risk disease, however in patients with good risk disease non-etoposide containing protocols should be explored.

Pilot studies of 2 and 1 course carboplatin as adjuvant for stage I seminoma: should it be tested in a randomized trial against radiotherapy?

PURPOSE

Underpinned by increased confidence in cure of metastatic seminoma by chemotherapy during the past 12 years, three management strategies for Stage I seminoma have been evaluated by six collaborating centers within the Anglian Germ Cell Tumor Group. This paper evaluates the efficacy of surveillance, prophylactic radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, and discusses these differing management approaches.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were recruited into the study between 1982 and 1992. There was no randomization between treatment groups. Seventy-nine patients received prophylactic radiotherapy (median follow-up = 51 months), 67 patients had surveillance alone (median follow-up = 61 months) and 78 patients were treated with adjuvant single agent platinum (median follow-up = 44 months). Fifty-three of these patients received two courses of platinum (median follow-up = 51 months) and 25 patients received one course (median follow-up = 29 months, range 22-72 months).

RESULTS

There were 18 (27%) recurrences on surveillance, five (6%) after radiotherapy, one (1%) after two courses of adjuvant single agent platinum and none after one course of carboplatin. There was one death from testis cancer after radiotherapy and none after adjuvant chemotherapy treatments. Two patients died with drug resistant disease after relapse on surveillance. There was one death from a myocardial infarction after prophylactic radiotherapy and one death from suicide in the surveillance group. A retrospective quality of life questionnaire reviewing the incidence of early and late toxicity revealed no major differences though they suggest that those treated with one course adjuvant carboplatin had somewhat less sickness and an earlier return to work.

CONCLUSION

Single agent carboplatin appears well tolerated and is an effective adjuvant treatment for Stage I seminoma. A multicenter randomized trial of the different treatment modalities is required to further evaluate its use.

Treatment of stage I testis seminoma by radiotherapy: long-term results--a 30-year experience

PURPOSE

From 1956 to 1986, we have retrospectively studied 184 patients with a Stage I testis seminoma treated by orchidectomy and radiotherapy at the Institut Gustave Roussy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 184 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy to the para-aortic and ipsilateral iliac nodes. Of the 184 patients, 133 received additional mediastinal and supraclavicular irradiation, 47 received supraclavicular without mediastinum irradiation, 98 patients received additional radiotherapy given to inguino-scrotal area. The mean dose of irradiation is 21 Gy which is the lowest dose published. The actuarial survival rate is, respectively, 96%, 93%, 83% and 77% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years.

RESULTS

Four patients relapsed, and four died of progressive disease. Four patients presented cardiovascular disease, all of them had mediastinal irradiation, two were heavy smokers. Seventeen second malignancies were observed, six tumors in the contralateral testis. The actuarial risk of developing a second malignancy is 10% at 10 years, 21% at 20 years. The cure rate and relapse rate in our patients is the same as that obtained by higher dosage of irradiation.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that low dose of prophylactic irradiation in lumbo aortic and ipsilateral iliac lymph nodes is active and safe in the treatment of Stage I testis seminoma.

Short duration radiotherapy in stage I seminoma of the testis: preliminary results of a prospective study

Ninety-four patients with Stage I seminoma of the testis, treated between November 1989 and December 1991, received short duration radiotherapy (2000 cGy in 8 fractions) to the para-aortic area only. The treatment was well tolerated and, after a median follow-up time of 34 months (minimum 15 months), no patient has relapsed in the abdomen. One patient developed an apparently solitary distant metastasis from a latent teratoma and is disease free after chemotherapy. This form of radiotherapy would appear to be well-tolerated with a low relapse rate. It offers the advantage of a simpler and shorter technique compared with conventional therapy and avoids the necessity of intensive surveillance to detect relapse.

Stage I seminoma of the testis: is post-orchidectomy surveillance a safe alternative to routine postoperative radiotherapy?

Experience with the management of 128 patients with Stage I testicular seminoma over a 10-year period, 1980-1989, is presented. Fifty-six patients were treated with post-orchidectomy radiation therapy and 72 patients were put on surveillance. Patients thought to be at higher risk of relapse were generally treated with radiotherapy. There have been no tumour related deaths in this series; 5.4% of the irradiated group and 18% of patients on surveillance have relapsed to date. All relapses have been salvaged with further therapy and are currently in complete remission. In this interim analysis, surveillance appears to be a safe alternative to adjuvant radiation therapy provided regular, prolonged follow-up can be ensured. Surveillance is, however, time consuming and resource demanding, and should be undertaken only as part of a formal clinical study. Adjuvant post-orchidectomy radiotherapy should be considered the treatment of choice until further long-term data are available.