Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for renal stones in over 1000 patients

Hemorrhagic complicationes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: The importance of an early endovascular management

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Hemorrhage due to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or pseudoaneurysm (PA) is a rare complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The objective of this study is to evaluate hemorrhagic complications (HC) after PCNL and the results of their endovascular treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2009 and December 2019, 1335 PCNL were performed in our center for kidney stone disease. We analyzed the incidence of early and late HC, their management, the need for subsequent embolization, as well as clinical and analytical data of these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 59 (4.4%) patients presented HC. Bleeding was managed with arteriography and selective embolization (ASE). Perirenal hematoma was seen in 38 patients (64%). Regarding angiographic findings, there were 32 (54%) PA, 8 (14%) AVF, 4 (7%) extravasations due to vascular laceration and 15 (25%) PA combined with AVF. In one case, 3 procedures were required to control the bleeding. In 30 patients (51%) blood transfusions were not necessary, while in 29 (49%), a mean of 1.3 units were transfused. Median follow-up was 24 ± 21 months. Mean time interval between PCNL and ASE was 7.3 ± 4.9 days. A total of 24 (41%) patients were readmitted after discharge due to late HC requiring ASE. Delay between readmission and ASE was 4.8 ± 4.6 h in average.

CONCLUSION

Early and late HC after PCNL can be severe. Rapid identification and treatment with ASE is an effective and minimally invasive and avoids multiple blood transfusions which in many cases constitute an insufficient treatment.

Hemorrhagic complicationes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: The importance of an early endovascular management

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Hemorrhage due to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or pseudoaneurysm (PA) is a rare complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The objective of this study is to evaluate hemorrhagic complications (HC) after PCNL and the results of their endovascular treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2009 and December 2019, 1335 PCNL were performed in our center for kidney stone disease. We analyzed the incidence of early and late HC, their management, the need for subsequent embolization, as well as clinical and analytical data of these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 59 (4.4%) patients presented HC. Bleeding was managed with arteriography and selective embolization (ASE). Perirenal hematoma was seen in 38 patients (64%). Regarding angiographic findings, there were 32 (54%) PA, 8 (14%) AVF, 4 (7%) extravasations due to vascular laceration and 15 (25%) PA combined with AVF. In one case, 3 procedures were required to control the bleeding. In 30 patients (51%) blood transfusions were not necessary, while in 29 (49%), a mean of 1.3 units were transfused. Median follow-up was 24±21 months. Mean time interval between PCNL and ASE was 7.3±4.9 days. A total of 24 (41%) patients were readmitted after discharge due to late HC requiring ASE. Delay between readmission and ASE was 4.8±4.6hours in average.

CONCLUSION

Early and late HC after PCNL can be severe. Rapid identification and treatment with ASE is an effective and minimally invasive and avoids multiple blood transfusions which in many cases constitute an insufficient treatment.

The Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Urolithiasis and its Urological Treatments: A Review

PURPOSE

Urolithiasis can impair kidney function. This literature review focuses on the risk of kidney impairment in stone formers, the specific conditions associated with this risk and the impact of urological surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed® and Embase® databases were searched for publications on urolithiasis, its treatment, and the risk of chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and nephrectomy in stone formers.

RESULTS

In general, renal stone formers have twice the risk of chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease, and for female and overweight stone formers the risk is even higher. Patients with frequent urinary tract infections, struvite stones, urinary malformations and diversions, malabsorptive bowel conditions and some monogenic disorders are at high risk for chronic kidney disease/end stage renal disease. Shock wave lithotripsy or minimally invasive urological interventions for stones do not adversely affect renal function. Declines in renal function generally occur in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease or a large stone burden requiring repeated and/or complex surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the effect size is modest, urolithiasis may cause chronic kidney disease and, thus, it is mandatory to assess patients with renal stones for the risk of chronic kidney disease/end stage renal disease. We suggest that all guidelines dealing with renal stone disease should include assessment of this risk.

A randomized controlled study comparing the standard, tubeless, and totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures for renal stones from a tertiary care hospital

Introduction:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective treatment for renal stones. Due to the significant pain and morbidity after standard PCNL because of nephrostomy tubes, various modifications of PCNL are being performed. We report a randomized trial comparing these modalities.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 75 patients were randomized into three groups of 25 each: standard PCNL with nephrostomy tubes (Group 1), tubeless PCNL with ureteric stent and no nephrostomy (Group 2), and totally tubeless PCNL without ureteric catheter or nephrostomy (Group 3). Randomization was done at the end of the procedure for those patients satisfying the inclusion criteria based on duration of surgery, single puncture tract, intraoperative bleeding, stone burden, intact pelvicalyceal system, and no residual stones at the end of procedure. The outcomes measured were hemoglobin (Hb) drop, hemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, pyrexia, urine leak, pain score, analgesic requirement, and duration of hospital stay.

Results:

There was no significant difference in hemorrhage, Hb drop, need for blood transfusion, and postoperative pyrexia among the groups. All patients except one in the standard group only had variable amount of urinary leak. The analgesic requirement and duration of hospital stay attained statistical significance in favor of tubeless and totally tubeless groups compared to the standard.

Conclusions:

Tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL are safe and effective method of renal stone management. Totally tubeless PCNL significantly reduced postoperative pain and morbidity compared to the tubeless method.

Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as a primary procedure of patients following previous open surgery or post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal calculi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 367 patients who underwent PCNL by a single surgeon from January 2008 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were divided into 3 Groups. Group-1 (n=232) included patients with no history of ipsilateral open stone surgery. Group 2 (n=86) patients had undergone one or more open stone surgeries before PCNL, patients with failed or recurrence following PCNL were placed in Group-3 (n=49). The demographic data, operation duration, stone free rate (SFR), number of attempts to access the collecting system and intra operative and postoperative complications between the three Groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), stone burden and laterality among the three Groups. Operation time was significantly less in first Group, while there was a statistically significant difference in operation duration between second and third Groups (p<0.05). The number of attempts to enter the collecting system was lower in the first Group in comparison to other two Groups (p<0.5). There was no significant differences among three groups in stone free rate. Intra operative and postoperative complications were slightly more frequent in Groups 2 and 3. Mortality occurred in 1 patient with colon perforation in Group-2.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that PCNL can be performed in patients even as secondary procedure without further complications.

Risk factors for hemorrhage requiring embolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the primary surgical intervention in kidney stone management. Even though it is performed quite often, the complication rates are also high. Arteriovenous fistulas following extended hemorrhages after PCNL are one of the most serious complications of this operation. Our main objective was to review the data of patients who required angiography and embolization.

METHODS

In total, we included 1405 patients who underwent PCNL between 2007 and 2014. All patient data were retrospectively reviewed. All patients went under PCNL using fluoroscopy. Following informed consent, all hemorrhagic patients underwent angiography in the interventional radiology department and embolization was performed in patients with a hemorrhage focus point.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients (10.4%) required transfusion for post-PCNL hemorrhages. Of them, 14 (0.99%) underwent angiography and embolization (9 [64.2%] were male and 5 [35.8%] were female, with a mean age of 39.4 ± 10.2). The remaining 133 patients were conservatively managed (81 [60.9%] males and 52 [39.1%] females, with a mean age of 42.3 ± 12.4). When the predicting factors for angiography and embolization were reviewed, renal abnormalities and the mean size of stones were significant in both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with extended and intermittent hematuria should be monitored closely for hemodynamics; if there is an ongoing necessity for transfusion, angiography should be considered.

Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 10 years of experience

OBJECTIVE

To provide a contemporary look at vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with access performed solely by a urologist using fluoroscopic guidance.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2792 patients who had 3338 PNLs at Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital and Mayo Clinic Rochester was performed. Patients who experienced significant bleeding requiring diagnostic renal angiography and superselective embolization (SSE) were reviewed and compared with the overall database.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients (16 renal units) requiring renal angiography and SSE (0.48%). Mean time from PNL to bleeding was 7 days (range, 1-15 days) and to SSE was 9.6 days (range, 2-18 days). Mean drop in hemoglobin was 5.3 g/dL (range, 2-9 g/dL). Transfusion was needed in 9 patients (60%). There were no differences between the vascular complications group and the uneventful PNL group in mean age (55.06 vs 52.2 years; P = .519), UTI history (40% vs 38%; P = .92), mean operative time (125.8 vs 102.47 minutes; P = .192), the need for multiple access (18.75% vs 18%; P = .939), and access location. The vascular complications group had a lower stone burden than the uneventful PNL group (stones > 2 cm; 43.7% vs 74.03%; P = .014).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of vascular complications in this contemporary series is one of the lowest reported to date. At our centers, vascular bleeding complications appear to be a random and rare event after PNL as we were unable to identify any specific risk factors. Early SSE avoided the need for blood transfusion in many patients.

Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An 18-year experience

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for large, extracorporeal lithotripsy failure stones and those in the inferior calyx. Despite the development of new techniques and the increasing experience in recent decades, complications may still occur. Colonic perforation is one of the most dangerous and rare complications of PCNL, which may lead to peritonitis and sepsis. We present our 18-year experience on the diagnosis and management of colonic perforation during PCNL.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 5260 PCNL procedures performed between May1995 and August 2013. Preoperative and operative factors, such as age, sex, history of previous ipsilateral stone intervention, stone side, stone location, site of skin puncture and punctured calyx, were reviewed in patients with colonic injury.

RESULTS

Colonic perforation was found in 11 patients (5 males and 6 females) and the mean age was 40.4 ± 22.2 years (range: 4 to 71). All injuries were retroperitoneal. The left side was affected in 5 patients and the right side was injured in 6 cases. Conservative management was the treatment planned for all patients. It included withdrawal of the nephrostomy tube outside the kidney to the colon as a percutaneous colostomy, insertion of a double-J ureteral stent, intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics, bowel rest and total parenteral nutrition. Under this conservative management, complete healing of the colon was achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and conservative management of colonic perforation can minimize patient morbidity and mortality and result in excellent healing of the fistulous tract without any serious complications.

Comparison of urologist- and radiologist-gained percutaneous renal access during PCNL: a review

Percutaneous renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be performed by either an interventional radiologist or urologist, depending on local expertise. We reviewed the current literature comparing the success and complications in gaining percutaneous access for both groups. An extensive literature search was carried out using Medline which included keywords “PCNL”, “PCNL access”, “percutaneous nephrolithotomy” and “percutaneous nephrostomy”. The search yielded six published articles that compared the success and complication rates between urologist- and radiologist-performed percutaneous access for PCNL. A systematic literature review was performed. Because of the considerable heterogeneity between studies, no pooling of data or statistical analysis was undertaken. In terms of success or complication rates, there was no significant difference between urologist- and radiologist-made percutaneous tracts. We observed, however, that there appears to be an argument that urologists are in a better position to make their own tracts, which requires only a single-stage procedure in theatre. There appears to be low uptake amongst urologists with the common beliefs that it is a radiological procedure, that radiologists have superior equipment, that it increases intraoperative time and that a steep learning curve is required for proficiency, suggesting that competence in percutaneous access would require at least 60 PCNL procedures. It is therefore unsurprising that many trainees may struggle to gain sufficient exposure to this technique, unless they are training in a centre with adequate patient numbers. Nonetheless, the papers reviewed illustrate that the urologists who are practicing this procedure are performing to an acceptably high standard. In conclusion there appears to be no difference in complication rates between the urologist- and the radiologist-made percutaneous tract. The steep learning curve required can be addressed by new teaching methods such as inanimate simulators, virtual-reality (VR) simulators, PCNL workshops and old-fashioned apprenticeships. A prospective study comparing urologist- and radiologist-placed nephrostomies would be beneficial.

Predictive factors for bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Purpose

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been accepted as a standard method for the management of large renal stones, the incidence of renal hemorrhage is relatively high. This study investigated the variables that affect bleeding during PCNL.

Materials and Methods

The medical records of 370 patients who underwent PCNL by a single surgeon from January 2005 to December 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups according to median blood loss (lesser bleeding group and higher bleeding group). Various clinical and perioperative factors including age, sex, stone size and position, degree of hydronephrosis, operative time, underlying disease, history of anticoagulant medication, presence of previous nephrostomy catheter, stone composition, and thickness of the renal cortex were assessed. For statistical assessment, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used.

Results

The mean patient age was 48.8 years (range, 22 to 75 years). Forty-three patients (11.6%) received a transfusion and 9 patients (2.4%) underwent angioembolization after surgery. The mean blood loss was 511.8±341.3 mL. Body mass index (BMI), stone size, stone position, operation time, and degree of preoperative hydronephrosis were predictive factors for severe bleeding during PCNL.

Conclusions

On the basis of the results achieved by a single surgeon, staghorn stones, high BMI, large stones, prolonged operation time, and absence of hydronephrosis were significantly associated with the risk of severe bleeding during PCNL.

Nephrostomy tube placement after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: critical evaluation through a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hemostatic and drainage functions of the nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy through a prospective randomized study. Additionally, the effect of nephrostomy tube placement on postoperative pain, hospital stay, and the success and complication rates was assessed.

METHODS

The present study was designed to include 100 patients with upper urinary tract calculi who were prospectively randomized to tubeless (group 1) and standard (group 2) PCNL using closed envelopes. The hemoglobin and hematocrit deficits, development of hematuria and hematoma, and blood transfusion rate were compared to assess the hemostatic effect. The drainage effect was evaluated by comparing the incidence of postoperative urinary leakage, urinoma, and/or hydrothorax development.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 100 fulfilled the study requirements. The hemoglobin and hematocrit deficits were comparable. Significant hematuria and/or hematoma were recorded in 5 and 4 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Blood transfusion was required in 5 and 6 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. One patient with chronic kidney disease in the tubeless group required abdominal exploration because of respiratory embarrassment and a large hematoma. Transient urinary leakage was recorded in 2 and 31 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .05). No urinoma developed. Hemothorax developed in 1 patient in the tubeless group with supracostal puncture. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the tubeless group. No statistically significant difference was found in the success rate, morbidity, or hospital stay between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The hemostatic and drainage functions of the nephrostomy tube were modest. However, the tubeless approach might be not suitable for the patients with chronic kidney disease or a supracostal approach.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: keeping the bridge for one night

This study was conducted to compare nephrostomy-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with early nephrostomy tube removal (after 1 day). A prospective study started from January 2008 through December 2009 and included patients who underwent non-complicated PCNL through a single tract without intra-operative residual stones. Nephrostomy-free technique was performed during 2008 (nephrostomy-free group). During 2009, a nephrostomy tube was placed for 1 day (1-day nephrostomy group). Both groups were compared for post-operative events, dose of analgesia, hemoglobin deficit and hospital stay. The study included 55 patients (27 in nephrostomy-free group and 28 in 1-day nephrostomy group). There were no statistically significant differences between patients, renal and stone characteristics of both groups. Post-operative events were significantly more in nephrostomy-free group (26 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.039). They include hematuria in three (11.1%) of nephrostomy-free patients and one (3.6%) of 1-day nephrostomy patient, severe renal colic in four patients of nephrostomy-free group (14.8%), and temporary urinary leakage via the nephrostomy site in three patients of 1-day nephrostomy group (10.7%). Mean dose of post-operative analgesia, mean hemoglobin deficit and hospital days were comparable for both groups (p = 0.946, 0.541, 0.807, respectively). A second look PCNL was performed through the already present tract to retrieve residual stones in two patients with nephrostomy. In conclusion, 1-day nephrostomy technique after PCNL showed significantly better post-operative course. It was comparable to nephrostomy-free technique in analgesic requirements and hospital stay. The nephrostomy tube provided a bridge for second look nephroscopy.

Ultrasound-guided X-ray free percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of simple stones in the flank position

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access in the flank position without the use of fluoroscopy in any stage of the procedure. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in flank position under the guidance of ultrasound (USG) without the use of fluoroscopy between December 2008 and January 2010 on 43 patients who had kidney stones bigger than 20 mm. Access to the kidney's proper calyx was achieved by dilatation through the guide wire placed after insertion of the needle through the needle director under the guidance of transrectal ultrasound probe placed on the patient's flank area. A convex USG probe was used for imaging during dilatation and lithotripsy instead of fluoroscopy. Access to the targeted calyx was achieved successfully in all patients (100%). The percentage stone free rate was 86.1% (37 patients). Residual stones were detected in six patients. Their dimensions ranged from 5 to 12 mm. The mean stone diameter was 29 (20-41) mm, duration of surgery was 87.1 ± 43.2 (55-210) min and duration of hospital stay was 3.1 (2-8) days. Blood transfusions were given to two patients; none of the patients had major intraoperative or postoperative complications. In comparison with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in flank position under ultrasonographic imaging instead of using fluoroscopy seems to be safe and effective. This procedure has to be limited to selected cases with one or maximum two big stones in the pelvis or in a single calyx in absence of complex intrarenal anatomy. Both surgical team and the patients were protected from the harmful effects of radiation. Regarding anesthesia, flank position is more comfortable for the patient than prone position.

Renal access by urologist or radiologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

We evaluated percutaneous access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) that was obtained by interventional radiologists or urologists at a single academic institution and compared access outcomes and complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 233 patients who underwent PCNL at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2000 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to percutaneous access by urologists (group 1) or a group of interventional radiologists (group 2) in 195 and 38 patients, respectively. Radiologist-acquired access was performed for collecting system decompression in 33.3% of patients in group 2. A predicted access difficulty score was calculated using demographic, stone, and operative variables. Percutaneous access complications and stone-free rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 53 ± 16 years (51% male, range 19-90 y) and 58 ± 17 years (62% male, range 25-95 y) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Use of multiple access tracts (4.3% vs 5.4%; P = 0.54), mean stone diameter (3.5 ± 1.8 cm vs 3.6 ± 1.9 cm; P = 0.97), and percentage of supracostal tracts (36% vs 35%; P = 0.63) were comparable between groups. Mean access difficulty parameters were comparable between groups. The percentage of staghorn calculi (39% vs 30%; P = 0.28) and number of obese (body mass index > 30) patients (30% vs 38%; P = 0.34) were also comparable between groups 1 and 2. The complication rate was the same in the two groups (14.3% vs 13.5%; P = 0.52). The overall stone-free rate was significantly greater in the urology access group (99% vs 92.1%; P = 0.033) on univariate analysis. Radiologist-obtained access could not be used in 36.8% of patients, necessitating additional access tract placement at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Urologist-obtained access is safe and effective for PCNL. Access obtained by radiologists for decompression of infected or obstructed systems often is not adequate for PCNL. Despite similar stone complexity and access difficulty, urologist-obtained access was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall stone-free rate.

X-ray-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position with ultrasound guidance

PURPOSE

Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has numerous benefits compared to the prone position, including lower anesthesia risk, shorter operating time, and better ergonomic position for the surgeon. It is also comparable to prone position regarding vascular and bowel injuries. This study was conducted to add some more benefits by omitting X-ray in PCNL in a supine position.

METHODS

Nineteen consecutive adult patients underwent ultrasound-guided PCNL in supine position. All patients were placed under ultrasound guidance in supine position. The tract was dilated over a guidewire in a single shot technique under ultrasound guidance from anterior abdominal wall. Once the procedure ended, residual stone was controlled using ultrasound with anterior abdominal wall window. Residual stones less than 5 mm were considered insignificant. No X-ray was used in any setting of the procedure.

RESULTS

The pelvicaliceal system could be successfully approached in all patients. The posterior calices were the most common sites of entry. Mean (range) of operation time was 111 (70-180) min. Mean + or - SD hemoglobin before PCNL was 14.0 + or - 2.2 mg/dl, and after the procedure it was 12.3 + or - 1.6 mg/dl. Only one patient required blood transfusion. Mean + or - SD creatinine before PCNL was 1.03 + or - 0.24 mg/dl, and after the procedure it was 1.11 + or - 0.22 mg/dl. None of the patients suffered visceral injury. The total stone-free rate was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in our first report with limited experience, it seems that the efficacy of PCNL with ultrasonography in supine position is comparable to PCNL in prone position with fluoroscopy with no more complications.

Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique

PURPOSE

PCNL (percutaneous nephrolithotripsy) is usually performed in the prone position. The supine position has potential advantages comparing with the prone position. Our objective is comparison between the outcome of PCNL in the complete supine position and the standard prone position.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 80 patients who underwent PCNL from February 2008 to June 2008 evaluated in a prospective manner, were randomly divided into two groups: 40 patients underwent prone PCNL and 40 patients underwent complete supine PCNL. We performed complete supine PCNL with no rolled towel under the flank and no change in leg position. Results in both positions were compared regarding technical aspects, operative time, stone free rate, complications and hospital stay, and were analyzed using t-test and chi-square. We considered P < 0.05 as significant.

RESULTS

Regardless the position, the pelvicaliceal system could be successfully approached in all patients. Mean operative time in supine group was 74.7 +/- 25.1 min and less than prone group (106.87 +/- 17.5) with a significant statistical difference (P < 0.0001). Stone free rate was 80% and 77.5% in prone and supine position respectively. Mean hospital stay was similar in both groups. Bleeding requiring transfusion in two groups had not significant statistical difference. We had not colon injury.

CONCLUSION

PCNL in supine position is safe, effective and suitable for the patients. It offers the potential advantages of better urethral access, less patient handling, needing drape only once, ability to perform simultaneous PCNL and ureteroscopic procedures, better control of the airway during procedures, thus reducing over-all operative time compared to traditional prone position and performing PCNL while the surgeon is sitting. It may be considered for most patients requiring PCNL.

Case report: conservative treatment of liver injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Liver injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is very rare and is usually overlooked. In this report, we present a case of inadvertent liver injury during right supracostal PCNL and describe diagnostic tools, conservative management measures, and outcome. A literature review of potential risk factors and suggested techniques to avoid injuring the liver during PCNL is also presented.

Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons?--with comprehensive technique

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has historically been performed with the patient in the prone position, which has inherent drawbacks. Supine PCNL has numerous benefits in terms of safety, efficacy, and versatility and is comparable with respect to vascular and bowel injury. This study was intended to prove that PCNL with the patient in the supine position is an alternative method of doing PCNL along with comprehensive technique.

METHODS

A total of 184 patients with 191 renal units underwent tubeless supine PCNL from 2005 to May 2007. Their mean age was 32 years and mean weight 62 kg. After insertion of a retrograde 5F ureteral catheter, the patient was placed in the supine position with a small towel roll under the ipsilateral flank, raising it by 20 degrees. Caliceal entry was achieved with an 18-gauge spinal needle, and the tract was dilated up to 27F with Alkans dilators over a 0.032-in. guidewire using fluoroscope only, with the patient under general anesthesia.

RESULTS

Primary stone clearance was achieved in 84% patients. Of the 184 patients, 94% had a single and 6% had a double tract; 72% of patients had a lower, 25% a middle, and 3% an upper caliceal puncture. The mean single stone size was 3.5 cm, and the mean multiple stone burden was 12 cm. No vascular or splanchnic injury or bowel transgression was observed. Tubeless PCNL was possible in 87% patients; 4% patients required transfusion, and 1 patient each had a perinephric collection and a plural effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Tubeless PCNL with the patient in the supine position is an independent method of treating renal stones without complementing PCNL in the prone position. It adds ease and comfort to the patient, anesthesiologist, and surgeon.

Renal access by urologist or radiologist for percutaneous nephrolithotomy--is it still an issue?

PURPOSE

Despite evidence that urologists can safely acquire percutaneous renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, many centers still rely on interventional radiologists to obtain renal access. In this study we evaluated percutaneous access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy obtained by interventional radiologists or urologists, and compared access outcomes and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The surgical records of 1,121 patients with 1,155 stone bearing kidneys treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy between 1999 and 2003 were reviewed. Patients were stratified according to percutaneous renal access into 509 patients with 661 access procedures performed by urologists and 612 patients with 612 access procedures performed by interventional radiologists.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable except there was a higher incidence of multiple stones in the urologist access group. Urologists had a significantly greater rate of using multiple and supracostal tracts compared to radiologists. The stone-free rates were 83.4% and 86.1% for urologist and radiologist access groups, respectively (p = 0.1). Major complications were seen in 74 patients (6.6%). Both groups had similar complication rates except for significant bleeding in the urology group (4.3%) compared with 2.1% in the radiology cohort (p = 0.02). Further multivariate analysis showed that bleeding was not related to the type of access whether performed by urologist or radiologist.

CONCLUSIONS

The urologist is able to safely and effectively obtain percutaneous renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a single stage procedure. Despite more complex stones and higher access difficulty in the urology access group, access related complications and stone-free rates were comparable. We recommend percutaneous access training in urology training programs.

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day

PURPOSE

We challenge the routine placement of nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) without taking into consideration the size, burden, and multiplicity of the stones; the degree of obstruction of the pelvicaliceal system, or any anatomic variations of the kidney in shape or position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2005 to March 2006, 110 patients underwent PCNL, 77% of whom had multiple stones. The mean size of the single stones was 4.3 cm (range 2.8-6.5 cm), and the mean single-stone burden was 7.2 cm2 (range 5.6-14.3 cm2). The mean burden of multiple stones was 11.4 cm2 (range 8-23 cm2). Among the patients, 18 had had previous renal surgery, 12 had renal insufficiency, and 7 had a solitary functioning kidney. One patient each had horseshoe kidney and malrotated kidney. In 106 patients, no nephrostomy drain was placed, only an externalized 5F ureteral catheter for 16 to 20 hours. Two patients had simultaneous bilateral tubeless PCNL. The outcome was evaluated prospectively. The frequency of complications, length of hospital stay, and stone-free status were assessed.

RESULTS

A stone-free rate of 80% was achieved using PCNL as monotherapy. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 16 to 20 hours. Three patients required placement of a nephrostomy tube because of significant bleeding and one because of purulent renal discharge. In four patients, a ureteral catheter was replaced by a stent because of significant residual stone burdens. The initial 18 patients underwent ultrasound examination on the first postoperative day, and none demonstrated any extrarenal collection, so routine ultrasound examination was omitted in succeeding patients. One patient required exploration because of a retroperitoneal hematoma.

CONCLUSION

Omission of a nephrostomy tube after PCNL while retaining an externalized ureteral catheter for 16 to 20 hours is sufficient and safe irrespective of the stone characteristics. Shape, position, and function of the kidneys are also irrelevant with regard to tubeless PCNL.

Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors

PURPOSE

We identified risk factors predicting severe bleeding due to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computerized data on 2,909 patients who underwent a total of 3,878 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures between January 1995 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patients who experienced severe bleeding requiring angiographic renal embolization were compared with those on other patients using univariate and multivariate analyses. We tested the characteristics of patients, kidneys and stones together with details of the operative procedure and surgeon experience.

RESULTS

Severe bleeding complicated a total of 39 procedures (1%) in 25 males and 14 females with a mean age of 50.7 +/- 12.6 years. Associated morbidity included shock in 6 patients and perirenal hematoma in 4. Renal angiography revealed pseudoaneurysm in 20 patients, arteriovenous fistula in 9, the 2 lesions in 8 and arterial laceration in 2. Bleeding could be controlled with superselective embolization in 36 patients (92.3%). Followup was available on 33 patients (mean 21 +/- 15 months). Renal function was stable in all patients except 3 who had a post-embolization increase in serum creatinine, of whom all had a solitary kidney and none required renal replacement therapy. Significant risk factors for severe bleeding were upper caliceal puncture, solitary kidney, staghorn stone, multiple punctures and inexperienced surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be performed by an experienced endourologist in patients at risk for severe bleeding, such as those with a solitary kidney or staghorn stones.

Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factors

OBJECTIVES

To identify the risk factors implicated in colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

METHODS

From 1985 to 2004, 5039 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were performed in our center. Colonic perforation complicated 15 procedures (0.3%). The patient files were retrospectively reviewed for detection of preoperative risk factors as shown by multivariate statistical analysis. The operative details and postoperative course were also studied to determine the time and mode of diagnosis of colonic injury and treatment strategies and outcome.

RESULTS

All injuries were retroperitoneal. The mean patient age was 57 +/- 8.4 years. Of the 15 patients, 11 were men and 4 were women. The left side was affected in 10 patients (66.6%). The right side was injured only in those with horseshoe kidneys or with recurrent disease. Colonic perforation complicated lower caliceal puncture in 12 procedures (80%) and complicated upper caliceal punctures in those with horseshoe kidneys or chronic colonic distension. Significant independent risk factors were advanced patient age and the presence of a horseshoe kidney. The diagnosis was established intraoperatively in 5 patients and postoperatively in 10, 5 of whom presented with colocutaneous fistula. The diagnosis was confirmed with abdominal computed tomography or opacification of the colon during antegrade or retrograde pyelography. Conservative treatment was successful in all but 2 patients who required colostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant independent risk factors for colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy were advanced patient age and the presence of a horseshoe kidney. Early diagnosis and proper treatment represent the key to minimizing patient morbidity and avoiding serious complications.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys

OBJECTIVES

To present our experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys.

METHODS

The study included 34 patients with 45 stone-bearing horseshoe kidneys treated by PCNL in one center. The indications for PCNL were large stone burden (greater than 2 cm) in 10 kidneys (22.2%), multiple complex stones in 22 (48.9%), staghorn stones in 3 (6.7%), and failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in 10 kidneys (22.2%). All PCNL procedures were performed in a standard one-session technique with fluoroscopic guidance. Procedures were evaluated for intraoperative and postoperative complications, use of auxiliary procedures (second-look PCNL, ureteroscopy, and ESWL), and length of hospital stay. Moreover, the stone-free rate was calculated at discharge from the hospital and 3 months later. In addition, we assessed the need for secondary intervention during a mean follow-up of 75 +/- 16 months (range 6 to 108).

RESULTS

The stone burden ranged from 264 to 2408 mm(2) (mean 664 +/- 153). Access to the horseshoe kidneys was supracostal in 10 (22.2%) and subcostal in 35 kidneys (77.8%). A single tract was used in 37 (82%), and two tracts were created in the remaining 8 kidneys (18%). Major complications were seen in six PCNL procedures (13.3%) and included significant hematuria requiring blood transfusion in three, septicemia in one, ureteral obstruction in one, and colonic injury in one. All complications were successfully treated. Auxiliary procedures were required in 12 patients (35.3%) and included ureteroscopy in 1, second-look PCNL in 3, and ESWL to fragment residual caliceal stones in 8 patients. The mean hospital stay was 4 +/- 1.9 days (range 3 to 12). The stone-free rate was 82% at discharge and 89% at 3 months. During the course of follow-up, 19 patients (56%) developed stone recurrence and were successfully treated with ESWL in 8 and PCNL in 11.

CONCLUSIONS

PCNL is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys.

The effects of irrigation fluid volume and irrigation time on fluid electrolyte balance and hemodynamics in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

OBJECTIVE

to determine fluid-electrolyte and hemodynamics changes and complications associated with irrigation fluid volume and time in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in that 0.9% NaCl was used as irrigant.

METHODS

Standard anaesthetic procedures were performed to 6 women and 16 men. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, Na+, K+, osmolality, haemoglobin, haematocrit were recorded before, during and after irrigation every 10 minutes. Creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were determined before and after irrigation. Moreover, the operation and irrigation times, irrigation fluid volume, total fluid output versus input, blood transfusions and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, Na+, K+, osmolality did not change significantly during and after irrigation and no relationship was observed between those with irrigation volume and time. Creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values during and after irrigation did not change significantly versus those before irrigation. Although no blood transfusion was needed for any case during the procedure, it was necessary for two cases after the procedure. One case with pneumothorax that developed during procedure was treated by inserting a thoracic tube.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant changes in fluid-electrolyte balance and hemodynamics related to both irrigation fluid volume and irrigation time when 0.9% NaCl was used in PNL.

Stone treatment and coagulopathy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate treatment protocols and results of upper tract stone treatment in patients with clotting disorders.

METHODS

In a 6-year period, 6,827 stone interventions (ESWL or endourologic procedures) were performed in 5,739 patients. Thirty-five (0.61%) patients suffered from a variety of systemic clotting disorders or were anti-coagulated. Clotting disorders were corrected by specific therapy prior to any intervention. A total of 76 interventions were performed consisting of ESWL, ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureteric stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy.

RESULTS

All patients became stone-free within 3 months or had clinically insignificant residual fragments. Severe complications were observed in 10/76 (13.1%) interventions. ESWL was successful in 88.9% (16/18) of patients, but associated with a 33.3% (6/18) complication rate; 27.8% (5/18) of patients required auxiliary procedures. URS and PNL were successful in all cases and complications occurred in 0% (0/7) and 33% (1/3) of patients, respectively. Time to complete stone clearance after ESWL was 32.0+/-49.3 days compared with a mean of 19.4+/-28.6 days in a non-coagulopathy control group; no difference was observed for endourologic procedures. Average costs of treatment in patients undergoing ureteroscopy was higher in patients with coagulopathy (4,611 versus 2,342); however, the difference was less pronounced compared with ESWL (6,070 versus 1,731).

CONCLUSION

Patients with coagulopathy have a higher rate of complications despite apparently normal clotting parameters during treatment and hospitalisation was prolonged. The efficacy of ESWL was lower in patients with coagulopathy and we currently favour endoscopic procedures for stone removal in this patient group.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique

OBJECTIVES

To compare the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine and prone positions.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal or upper ureteral stones were evaluated in a prospective and nonrandomized manner. The procedure was carried out in the supine or prone position in 53 and 77 patients, respectively. The results in both positions were compared regarding the technical aspects, success rate, and morbidity.

RESULTS

Regardless of the position, the pelvicaliceal system could be successfully approached in all patients, and the posterior calices were the most common site of entry. Punctures through the anterior calices were more frequently reported with the supine position. A higher incidence of anteromedial displacement of the kidney during tract dilation was reported with the supine approach. The overall success rate was 89% and 84% in the supine and prone positions, respectively. The complication rates were similar in both groups, and none of the patients experienced injury of adjacent organs.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach to the pelvicaliceal system is feasible in the supine position. The success and complication rates are comparable to the prone approach.

Haemorrhagic complications of percutaneous lithotripsy: original methods of treatment

698 patients treated for nephrolithiasis with the application of percutaneous lithotripsy were analysed. In 32 cases increased bleeding in the course of the procedure occurred. It was controlled without surgery with blood transfusion, constant renal saline flow maintenance, electrocoagulation, kidney parenchyma pressing with thick drain and approach canal tamponade. In one case the approach to the kidney was obtained surgically and the kidney parenchyma was stitched with haemostatic suture. One patient required selective embolization due to kidney haemorrhage after nephrostomy drain removal.