Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Review of the Indiana University experience 1965-1989

Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma: A Phase II Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Seminoma With Limited Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy

PURPOSE

The long-term toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy can represent a significant burden to testicular cancer survivors. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an established treatment for testicular germ cell tumors with minimal late morbidity although little data exist on its efficacy in early metastatic seminoma. Surgery in early metastatic seminoma is a prospective phase II single-arm, multi-institutional trial of RPLND as first-line treatment for testicular seminoma with clinically low-volume retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve sites in the United States and Canada prospectively enrolled adult patients with testicular seminoma and isolated retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (1-3 cm). Open RPLND was performed by certified surgeons with a primary end point of 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Complication rates, pathologic up/downstaging, recurrence patterns, adjuvant therapies, and treatment-free survival were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were enrolled, with a median (IQR) largest clinical lymph node size of 1.6 cm (1.3-1.9). RPLND pathology demonstrated a median (IQR) largest lymph node size of 2.3 cm (0.9-3.5); nine patients (16%) were pN0, 12 (22%) pN1, 31 (56%) pN2, and 3 (5%) pN3. One patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 33 months (12.0-61.6), 12 patients experienced recurrence, with a 2-year RFS of 81% and a recurrence rate of 22%. Of the patients who experienced recurrence, 10 were treated with chemotherapy and two underwent additional surgery. At last follow-up, all patients who experienced a recurrence were disease-free and the 2-year overall survival was 100%. Four patients (7%) experienced short-term complications, and four patients experienced long-term complications including incisional hernia (1) and anejaculation (3).

CONCLUSION

RPLND is a treatment option for testicular seminoma with clinically low-volume retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and is associated with low long-term morbidity.

Update on pediatric testicular germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

Testicular germ cell tumors are uncommon tumors that are encountered by pediatric surgeons and urologists and require a knowledge of appropriate contemporary evaluation and surgical and medical management.

METHOD

A review of the recommended diagnostic evaluation and current surgical and medical management of children and adolescents with testicular germ cell tumors based upon recently completed clinical trials was performed and summarized in this article.

RESULTS

In this summary of childhood and adolescent testicular germ cell tumors, we review the initial clinical evaluation, surgical and medical management, risk stratification, results from recent prospective cooperative group studies, and clinical outcomes. A summary of recently completed clinical trials by pediatric oncology cooperative groups is provided, and best surgical practices are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Testicular germ cell tumors in children are rare tumors. International collaborations, data-sharing, and enrollment of patients at all stages and risk classifications into active clinical trials will enhance our knowledge of these rare tumors and most importantly improve outcomes of patients with testicular germ cell tumors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a review article of previously published and referenced level 1 and 2 studies, but also includes expert opinion level 5, represented by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Cancer Committee.

Very Late Recurrence in Germ Cell Tumor of the Testis: Lessons and Implications

Background. Very late recurrence (LR), i.e., >5 years after initial presentation, occurs in about 1% of patients with germ cell tumors of the testis (TGCT) and is associated with poor prognosis. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center who developed LR > 5 years after their initial diagnosis of TGCT. Results. We identified 25 patients who developed LR between July 2007 and August 2020. The median age at the time of LR was 46 years (range, 29−61). Pathology of LR: somatic transformation to carcinoma or sarcoma—11, nonseminoma with yolk sac tumor or teratoma—11, nonseminoma without yolk sac tumor or teratoma—2, not available—1. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 68% of patients are alive 3 years after LR. Patients with prior post-chemotherapy consolidation surgery do not have statistically significant longer survival compared to patients who did not receive post-chemotherapy consolidation surgery, 83.3% vs. 60.8% at 3 years, respectively, p = 0.50. Conclusions. Patients with LR > 5 years tend to harbor nonseminoma (with yolk sac tumor and or teratoma). Among these patients, a majority who did not undergo surgery to remove residual disease after chemotherapy developed somatic transformation and succumbed to their LR.

Alternative approaches to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes based on surgical approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PT-RMS).

METHODS

Patients undergoing RPLND for PT-RMS over 10 years at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Length of stay (LOS), complications, oral morphine equivalents per kilogram (OME/Kg), lymph node yield, and time to chemotherapy were assessed. The surgical approaches compared were: open transabdominal, open extraperitoneal, laparoscopic, and retroperitoneoscopic. For cases with lymphatic mapping, indocyanine green (ICG) was injected into the spermatic cord.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included: five open transabdominal, six open extraperitoneal, three laparoscopic, and six retroperitoneoscopic operations. LOS was shorter in the retroperitoneoscopic group than laparoscopic (p = 0.029) and both open groups (p < 0.001). Mean OME/kg used was lowest in the retroperitoneoscopic (0.13 ± 0.15) group compared to laparoscopic (0.68 ± 0.53, p = 0.043), open transabdominal (14.90 ± 8.87, p = 0.003), and extraperitoneal (10.11 ± 2.44, p < 0.001). Time to chemotherapy was shorter for retroperitoneoscopic patients (0.13 days ± 0.15) compared to open transabdominal (15.6 days±6.5, p = 0.005). There was no difference in lymph node yield between groups. Spermatic cord ICG demonstrated iliac lymph node avidity on near-infrared spectroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive RPLND appears to offer a faster recovery without compromising lymph node yield for patients with PT-RMS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Primary Treatment for Men With Testicular Seminoma: Utilization and Survival Analysis Using the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2014

BACKGROUND

The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as first-line treatment for testicular seminoma is less well defined than for testicular nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors. We describe utilization of primary RPLND in the United States and report on overall survival (OS) after surgery for these men.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using 2004-2014 data from the National Cancer Data Base, we identified 62,727 men with primary testicular cancer, 31,068 of whom were diagnosed as having seminoma. After excluding men with benign, non-germ cell, and nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor histologies, those who did not undergo RPLND, those where clinical stage and survival data were unavailable, and those with testicular seminoma who underwent RPLND in the postchemotherapy setting (n = 47), 365 men comprised our final cohort. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and demographic factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS.

RESULTS

A total of 365 men with testicular seminoma underwent primary RPLND. At a median follow-up of 4.1 years, there were 16 deaths in the entire cohort. Five-year OS was 94.2%. Subset analysis of men with stage I and IIA/B disease who underwent primary RPLND revealed 5-year OS rates of 97.3% and 92.0%, respectively (P = .035). OS did not significantly differ in patients with stage IIA versus IIB disease (91.8% vs. 92.3%, respectively, P = .907).

CONCLUSION

Although RPLND is rarely used as primary therapy in testicular seminoma, OS rates appear to be comparable to rates reported in the literature for primary chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Ongoing prospective trials will clarify the role of RPLND in the management of testicular seminoma.

Management of Clinical Stage I Germ Cell Tumors

Experience demonstrates multiple paths to cure for patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer. Because all options should provide a long-term disease-free rate near 100%, overall survival is no longer relevant in decision making, allowing practitioners to factor in quality of life, toxicity, cost, and impact on compliance. Surveillance for clinical stage I seminoma and clinical stage I nonseminoma has become the preferred option. The contrarian view is that a risk-adapted approach should persist, with surveillance for low-risk individuals and active therapy high-risk individuals. However, results obtained in unselected patients provide a strong argument against the need for such an approach.

Indications, evolving technique, and early outcomes with robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Examine and discuss indications, technique, and outcomes for robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Open RPLND has been the longstanding standard of care for both primary and post chemotherapy RPLND. Recently, robotic RPLND has been an attractive option with the intent of reducing the morbidity associated with open surgery while providing identical oncologic efficacy. Naysayers of robotic RPLND suggest it is often inappropriately used as a staging procedure and consequently can compromise oncologic efficacy.

SUMMARY

Robotic RPLND is being evaluated as a therapeutic equivalent to open RPLND. On the basis of limited published data with modest follow-up from experienced centers, robotic RPLND appears to provide effective staging and therapeutic data mirroring that of open surgery.

Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an important component of the multimodal treatment which cures most patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. Considering the high cure rates achieved, research focus in recent years has been directed toward improving quality of life and decreasing long-term treatment related sequelae. Consequently, the role of RPLND has evolved over the past 3 decades in both low-stage and advanced testicular cancer. The use of RPLND in clinically stage I and low volume stage II disease may offer the advantages of treating retroperitoneal teratoma which is present in 15% to 20% of patients, avoiding chemotherapy and reducing the need for frequent imaging during follow-up. Similarly, ongoing studies are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of RPLND for the treatment of early stage seminoma to avoid the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RPLND is traditionally used for the treatment of residual masses >1 cm after completion of chemotherapy. Its role in subcentimeter residual masses remains somewhat controversial given the fact that 25% to 30% of these patients are found to harbor either teratoma or viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumors. The presence of teratoma increases the probability of teratoma in metastatic sites. Modified unilateral templates were developed based on early mapping studies with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation. Recent data suggests initial mapping studies underestimated the risk of contralateral retroperitoneal metastases which may reach 32%. Furthermore, antegrade ejaculation may be preserved in >95% of patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing primary RPLND and >80% undergoing nerve-sparing PC-RPLND, which, in our view is the more prudent oncologic approach. Recently, multiple series have demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of minimally invasive RPLND; however, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are required to validate the long-term oncologic efficacy of newer techniques.

[When is surgical resection of metastases in testicular germ cell tumors indicated and is there a scientific basis?]

Surgical resection of metastases represents an integral part of curative management in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCT). Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for low volume metastases in clinical stages I-IIB has to be differentiated from the more complex and more extensive postchemotherapeutic procedures. In Europe, primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for clinical stage I nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) plays a subordinate. In clinical stage IIA/B, nsRPLND is indicated for patients with marker-negative metastases in whom cure rates of about 65% can be achieved with surgery alone. For clinical stage IIA/B seminomas, nsRPLND represents an individual, still experimental procedure with high cure rates. Postchemotherapy residual tumor resection (pRTR) for advanced seminomas is only indicated in the context of a FDG-PET/CT-positive residual mass >3 cm in diameter. For NSGCT, pRTR is indicated in patients with residual masses >1 cm and negative or plateauing tumor markers to resect persisting teratoma or vital cancer. Complete resection of all masses including resection of adjacent vascular, visceral or skeletal metastases is mandatory to achieving the highest cure rate possible. Due to the complexity and the lower rate of significant morbidity and mortality, these procedures should be done at tertiary referral centers.

Current Concepts in Management of Stage I NSGCT

While about 50% of non- seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testes present as clinical stage I (CSI), further management of these patients continues to be mired in controversy. Active surveillance is a frontline option for low- risk CS I patients and according to some, even the high- risk ones with high embryonal carcinoma (ECA) component and vascular invasion (VI). However, it carries the disadvantage of long- term surveillance, the need for prolonged chemotherapy in case of recurrence and the possibility of secondary malignancies due to radiation exposure from frequent CT scans. One or two cycles of BEP chemotherapy is a popular alternative to active surveillance which carries a very low relapse rate, but valid concerns about overtreatment of a majority of patients, with the attendant chemotherapy- related toxicity exist. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been used as a means of avoiding chemotherapy, especially in high- risk patients, but carries the disadvantage of a high surgical morbidity and complications. As with any major surgical procedure, the best results are dependent on the experience and skill of the individual surgeon.

Safety and Early Oncologic Effectiveness of Primary Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer

BACKGROUND

Primary robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) has been studied as an alternative to open RPLND in single-institution series for patients with low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a multicenter series of primary R-RPLND for low-stage NSGCT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Between 2011 and 2015, 47 patients underwent primary R-RPLND at four centers for Clinical Stage (CS) I-IIA NSGCT.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

R-RPLND was performed using the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were collected regarding patient demographics, primary tumor characteristics, pathologic findings, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Forty-two patients (89%) were CS I and five (11%) were CS IIA. The median operative time was 235min (interquartile range [IQR]: 214-258min), estimated blood loss was 50ml (IQR: 50-100ml), node count was 26 (IQR: 18-32), and length of stay was 1 d. There were two intraoperative complications (4%), four early postoperative complications (9%), no late complications, and the rate of antegrade ejaculation was 100%. Of the eight patients (17%) with positive nodes (seven pN1and one pN2), five (62%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The one recurrence was out of template in the pelvis after adjuvant chemotherapy (resected teratoma). The median follow-up was 16 mo and the 2-yr recurrence-free survival rate was 97% (95% confidence interval: 82-100%). Limitations include retrospective design and limited follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multicenter experience supports R-RPLND as a potential option at experienced centers in select patients with low-stage NSGCT. Informal comparison to open and laparoscopic series suggests R-RPLND has an acceptably low morbidity profile, but oncologic efficacy evaluation requires further evaluation.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We examined outcomes after robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for patients with low-stage nonseminomatous testicular cancer with our data suggesting the robotic approach has acceptable morbidity and early oncologic outcomes.

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: Evolution of the Technique

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an accepted staging and treatment option for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Robotic surgery offers technical advantages and is being increasingly used in urologic procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for RPLND.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective review of robotic (R)-RPLND performed by a single surgeon from April 2008 to October 2014 using two approaches was performed. In total, 20 procedures in 19 patients were evaluated. Eleven men had clinical stage (CS) I disease, six had CS II, one of whom had prior chemotherapy, and two had CS III disease and had also undergone previous chemotherapy.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

A lateral robotic approach was initially used; however, a supine robotic approach was developed to allow for bilateral dissection in one setting without repositioning. Template dissection with nerve sparing was performed for CS I patients and full bilateral dissection for patients with CS II or higher disease and for those who had active disease according to intraoperative frozen section results.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Mean operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and lymph node count were retrospectively reviewed, as was the presence of recurrence or the need for adjuvant therapy over median follow-up of 49 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 37.4-70.5). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also reviewed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

R-RPLND was performed successfully in 20 procedures in 19 patients; 11 were performed from a lateral approach and nine from a supine approach. The median operating time (available for 19 of 20 cases) was 293min (IQR 257.5-317). Median estimated blood loss and length of stay were 50ml (IQR 50-100) and 1 d (IQR 1-2), respectively. Some 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged after one night. The median lymph node yield was 19.5 (IQR 13.8-27. 3). Eleven patients had pathologic stage I disease, and eight had residual disease on pathology. There was one ureteral transection that was repaired robotically at the time of surgery with no long-term sequelae. There were no open conversions or transfusions. Two patients had ejaculatory dysfunction following bilateral RPLND. There has been no evidence of retroperitoneal disease recurrence during the follow-up period. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the single surgeon experience.

CONCLUSIONS

R-RPLND can be successfully performed and provides improved visualization and dexterity over conventional laparoscopy. Patients experience significantly reduced morbidity and the nodal yield is comparable to open surgical techniques.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We studied our experience with robot-assisted removal of lymph nodes from the abdomen among men with testicular cancer. This method was found to be safe and effective with a very short hospital stay.

Fertility Preservation in Young Men Treated for Malignancies: Options for Precancer Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Fertility preservation (FP) is an essential component of treatment for young men with a new cancer diagnosis.

AIM

To discuss the barriers and recommendations for FP along with the impacts of cancer and cancer treatment on fertility, and to present the various options for FP in young men prior to cancer treatment.

METHODS

Literature Review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

To evaluate the options for FP in young men, including novel and experimental options for pre-pubertal boys.

RESULTS

With the advent of assisted reproductive technologies, fertility can be successfully preserved in the majority of post-pubertal patients with sperm cryopreservation, neurostimulatory methods of ejaculation, or surgical sperm retrieval procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

All men with a new diagnosis of cancer, including adolescents and children, should be offered FP prior to undergoing treatment. Sperm cryopreservation, the mainstay of FP, should be encouraged regardless of the treatment plan. Even without significant abnormalities on semen analysis, prompt referral to a male fertility specialist is recommended. Coward RM, Kovac JR, Smith RP, and Lipshultz LI. Fertility preservation in young mentreated for malignancies: Options for precancer treatment. Sex Med Rev 2013;1:123-134.

The Evolution and Technique of Nerve-Sparing Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy

The evolution of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection technique and associated template modifications for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors have resulted in significant improvement in the long-term morbidity. Through the preservation of sympathetic nerves via exclusion from or prospective identification within the boundaries of resection, maintenance and recovery of antegrade ejaculation are achieved. Nerve-sparing strategies in early-stage disease are feasible in most patients. Postchemotherapy, select patients can be considered for nerve preservation. This article describes the anatomic and physiologic basis for, indications and technical aspects of, and functional and oncologic outcomes reported after nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in testicular cancer.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as First-Line Treatment of Node-Positive Seminoma

INTRODUCTION

The long-term morbidity associated with treating advanced seminoma can be significant. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has established oncologic efficacy in treating germ cell tumors with minimal long-term toxicity. We describe our experience with RPLND as a front-line treatment of lymph node-positive seminoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our institutional review board-approved testicular cancer database to find the patients with pure seminoma and isolated retroperitoneal lymph node disease who had undergone primary RPLND. The clinical and pathologic variables were obtained. The follow-up data were used to determine recurrence and death.

RESULTS

Four patients with a mean age of 37 years were identified. All patients had normal tumor markers and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy measuring 1.1, 1.5, 1.8, and 5.5 cm before RPLND. Of the 4 patients, 3 had had seminoma diagnosed at orchiectomy and 1 (with a 5.5-cm retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and a burned out primary testicular mass) had had seminoma diagnosed at RPLND after 2 nondiagnostic retroperitoneal biopsies. All patients had undergone nerve-sparing, template, extraperitoneal RPLND and were discharged home after 3 days. An average of 3 positive lymph nodes were found. Of the 4 patients, 3 had pathologic stage IIA and 1 stage IIB disease, with no patient undergoing adjuvant therapy. At a mean follow-up period of 25 months, no patient had experienced disease recurrence, and none had died. All patients maintained antegrade ejaculation, and no long-term complications had developed.

CONCLUSION

Our small series has demonstrated encouraging oncologic efficacy for RPLND as a primary treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node-positive seminoma. A multi-institutional phase II trial of RPLND for stage IIA seminoma is being developed.

Management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

Therapeutic options for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor include active surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) determines risk of recurrence, as those without LVI have 15% risk of relapse on surveillance while those with LVI have a 50% risk. This stratifies patients into high risk(LVI+) and low risk(LVI-) groups which direct treatment recommendations. Surveillance is preferred for those with low risk disease, and is an option for those with high risk disease, as at least half are over-treated with other options. Adjuvant chemotherapy is an option for all patients as it can eradicate micrometastatic disease and reduce recurrence by at least 90%. RPLND benefits patients with low volume retroperitoneal disease with a cure rate of RPLND alone at approximately 70%. All three treatment modalities have similar survival rates approaching 100% but differing potential morbidities, which, along with patient preferences and compliance, should guide treatment decisions.

Fertility preservation in men with cancer

Due to recent advances in medical technologies, cancer has become more curable and chronic, and post-treatment quality of life, including male fertility, has become an important issue. Cancer itself can affect spermatogenesis through complex interactions, and cancer treatment such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, all have certain detrimental effects on spermatogenesis. Currently, sperm cryopreservation before cancer treatment is the mainstay of fertility preservation, and is recommended by numerous guidelines. Although fertility preservation should be discussed with all cancer patients before treatment, it still remains underused. Postpubertal patients who are unable to bank sperm may undergo testicular sperm extraction before treatment. For prepubertal boys, there is no clinically established guideline for fertility preservation. Investigations such as spermatogonial stem cell culture are ongoing, and may lead to clinical options for fertility preservation in the future.

Reoperative retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumors: analysis of local recurrence and predictors of survival

PURPOSE

While reoperative retroperitoneal lymph node dissection results in durable long-term survival, outcomes are comparatively worse than in patients who undergo initial adequate resection. We identified predictors of cancer specific survival and correlated technical aspects of initial resection to local recurrence in patients treated with repeat retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed subsequent data on 203 patients treated with reoperation for recurrent retroperitoneal germ cell tumor after initial retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with local relapse. We used multivariate Cox proportion hazard models for cancer specific survival and multivariate logistic regression for local recurrence.

RESULTS

The only 2 factors associated with local recurrence at lymph node dissection were incomplete lumbar vessel division at initial resection (p<0.01) and teratoma histology in the reoperative pathology specimen (p=0.01). Median followup was 73 months. Initial survival analysis including preoperative variables indicated that active cancer at initial operation (p=0.04), increased serum tumor markers (p=0.02), M1b stage (p<0.01) and salvage chemotherapy (p=0.01) were independent predictors of worse cancer specific survival. After introducing the final pathological data from reoperation into the final multivariate model only active cancer at reoperation (p<0.01), M1b stage (p=0.01) and salvage chemotherapy before reoperation (p=0.02) retained the association with worse oncologic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor biology and inadequate surgical technique (incomplete lumbar ligation) are associated with local recurrence after initial retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Decreased cancer specific survival is expected in this population, mostly driven by active cancer in the final pathology specimen.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for left clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: focus on port placement and surgical technique

The aim of our report was to describe the feasibility of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the contemporary era. We suggest the linear port location and 90° robotic docking as the main key to minimizing instrument clashing and improving the range of surgical accessibility.

Outcomes of the management of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection-associated anejaculation

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Modern surgical techniques have allowed preservation of fertility in most patients after post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND), but some patients still have infertility after surgery. We reviewed our experience treating infertility in 26 men after PC-RPLND. Using a structured clinical pathway we obtained sperm in 81% of men for use in assisted reproduction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical pathway on sperm retrieval outcomes in patients presenting with infertility after post-chemotherapy (PC) retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective review of patients with advanced testicular cancer, presenting with infertility after PC-RPLND in a large reproductive urology practice. We implemented a clinical pathway where pseudoephedrine was first administered. If this medication failed, electroejaculation (EEJ) and/or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) was carried out. The primary outcome was retrieval of sperm for use in assisted reproduction.

RESULTS

Four men had retrograde ejaculation, of whom two converted to antegrade ejaculation with medical therapy. In all, 22 patients had failure of emission (FOE) and, of these, no patient converted to antegrade ejaculation with medication. In patients with FOE, sperm was found in 15/20 of those experiencing a successful EEJ. Seven patients underwent TESE for azoospermia on EEJ or no ejaculate on EEJ, three of whom had sperm found on TESE. Sperm was found for assisted reproduction in 81% (21/26) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be no role for the use of pseudoephedrine therapy in patients with FOE after PC-RPLND. The use of a structured clinical pathway may optimize patient care.

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and resection for testicular cancer: an update on best practice

Clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) are highly curable. Following orchidectomy a risk-adapted approach using active surveillance (AS), nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) and primary chemotherapy is recommended by the current guidelines. Clinical stage I is defined as negative or declining tumour markers to their half-life following orchidectomy and negative imaging studies of the chest, abdomen and retroperitoneum. Active surveillance can be performed in low-risk and in high-risk NSGCTs with an anticipated relapse rate of about 15% and 50%. The majority of patients will relapse with good and intermediate prognosis tumours which have to be treated with three to four cycles chemotherapy. About 25-30% of these patients will have to undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for residual masses. Primary chemotherapy with one or two cycles of cisplatin (Platinol), etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) is a therapeutic option for high-risk clinical stage I NSGCT associated with a recurrence rate of only 2-3% and a minimal acute and long-term toxicity rate. nsRPLND, if performed properly, will cure about 85% of all high-risk patients with clinical stage I NSGCT without the need for chemotherapy. PC-RPLND forms an integral part of the multimodality treatment in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs). According to current guidelines and recommendations, PC-RPLND in advanced seminomas with residual tumours is only indicated if a positron emission tomography (PET) scan performed 6-8 weeks after chemotherapy is positive. In nonseminomatous TGCT, PC-RPLND is indicated for all residual radiographic lesions with negative or plateauing markers. Loss of antegrade ejaculation represents the most common long-term complication which can be prevented by a nerve-sparing or modified template resection. The relapse rate after PC-RPLND is around 12%, however it increases significantly to about 45% in cases with redo RPLND and late relapses. Patients with increasing markers should undergo salvage chemotherapy. Only select patients with elevated markers who are thought to be chemorefractory might undergo desperation PC-RPLND if all radiographically visible lesions are completely resectable. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres only.

Hospital surgical volume, utilization, costs and outcomes of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer

Objectives. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) outcomes for testis cancer originate mostly from single-center series. We characterized population-based utilization, costs, and outcomes and assessed whether higher volume affects outcomes. Methods and Materials. Using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001-2008, we identified 993 RPLND and used propensity score methods to assess utilization, costs, and inpatient outcomes based on hospital surgical volume. Results. 51.6% of RPLND were performed at hospitals where there were two or fewer cases per year. RPLND was more commonly performed at large urban teaching hospitals, where men were younger, more likely to be white and earning incomes exceeding the 50th percentile (all P ≤ .05). Higher hospital volumes were associated with fewer complications and more routine home discharges (all P ≤ .047). However, higher volume hospitals had more transfusions (P = .004) and incurred $1,435 more in median costs (P < .001). Limitations include inability to adjust for tumor characteristics and absence of outpatient outcomes. Conclusions. Sociodemographic differences exist between high versus low volume RPLND hospitals. Although higher volume hospitals had more transfusions and higher costs, perhaps due to more complex cases, they experienced fewer complications. However, most RPLND are performed at hospitals where there were two or fewer cases per year.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumours

INTRODUCTION

In the North Trent Cancer network (NTCN) patients requiring retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for metastatic testicular cancer have been treated by vascular service since 1990. This paper reviews our experience and considers the case for involvement of vascular surgeons in the management of these tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients referred by the NTCN to the vascular service for retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy between 1990 and 2009 were identified through a germ cell database. Data were supplemented by a review of case notes to record histology, intraoperative and postoperative details.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were referred to the vascular service for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, with a median age of 29 years (16-63 years) and a median follow-up of 4.9 years. Ten patients died: eight from tumour recurrence, one from septicaemia during chemotherapy and one by suicide. Of the 54 who survived, 7 were alive with residual masses and 47 patients were disease-free at the last follow-up. Sixteen patients required vascular procedures: four had aortic repair (fascia), three had aortic replacement (spiral graft), four had inferior vena cava resection, two had iliac artery replacement and two had iliac vein resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection often involves mobilisation and/or the resection/replacement of major vessels. We recommend that a vascular surgeon should be a part of testicular germ cell multidisciplinary team.

[Primary laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumor]

INTRODUCTION

this report is intended to retrospectively assess cancer control and morbidity of primary laparoscopic reproperitoneal lymphadenectomy (L-RPLND) in patients with clinical Stage I non seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

one hundred and sixty-four patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT underwent primary diagnostic LRPLND between 1993 and 2006. Patients were operated unilaterally limiting the dissection to templates. Kaplan Meier curves were generated estimating time to recurrence.

RESULTS

of the 164 patients, 82 (48%) had embryonal components and 35 (20%) lymphovascular invasion in the orchiectomy specimen. The median (IQR) age, operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss and number of lymph nodes retrieved was 28 years (24-33), 135 minutes. (120- 180), 48 hours (24-48), 50 cc (20-100) and 14 (10-18) nodes, respectively. All patients had negative serum markers preoperatively. Presence of lymph node metastasis was identified in 32 (19.5%) patients. Follow-up was available in 15 of these. Fourteen received adjuvant chemotherapy and 2 of them had recurrence at 3 and 64 months. Absence of lymph node metastasis was diagnosed in 132 (80.5%) patients. Follow-up was available in 80 of these. Among them 7 recurred (5 retroperitoneum, 2 lung), one of them 33 months after L-RPLND. Median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 14 months (IQR:4-35). The cumulative 3-year recurrence free rate was 82% (95%CI: 64-91). Seventeen (10%) of 164 patients had intra or perioperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

this is the largest series of L-RPLND performed in a single institution. Both morbidity and oncologic safety of this technique needs to be prospectively evaluated in randomized trials.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with therapeutic intent in men with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a primary means of therapy for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCTs) remains controversial. The object of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients with clinical stage I NSGCTs who underwent laparoscopic RPLND with therapeutic intent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the pathologic and clinical outcomes of 26 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic RPLND with therapeutic intent for clinical stage I NSGCT from July 2006 to March 2009. Patients underwent an extended template laparoscopic RPLND including dissection behind the great vessels. A full bilateral dissection was performed if metastatic disease was discovered intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients, 9 (35%) were discovered to have pathologic stage II disease. The mean number of nodes removed at the time of laparoscopic RPLND was 28 (range 6-82). Of six patients found to have pN₁ disease, four (67%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and are without evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 24 months. Two (12%) patients with pathologically confirmed stage I disease had recurrence after laparoscopic RPLND, both outside of the retroperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic RPLND with therapeutic intent can be performed with acceptable oncologic efficacy with the additional benefit of decreased morbidity and shorter convalescence times. Early data suggest that patients with pathologic N₁ disease can be safely observed after laparoscopic RPLND, although longer follow-up and additional patients are needed to validate these results.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with no adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumours: long-term outcome and analysis of risk factors of recurrence

BACKGROUND

The best management for patients with clinical stage I (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the long-term oncologic outcome of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with CS1 NSGCTs and reevaluated the traditional predictors of recurrence in a set of patients not undergoing adjuvant treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Between 1985 and 1995, 322 consecutive CS1 NSGCT patients underwent primary RPLND not followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a single referral centre. Patients were followed until relapse for a median time of 17 yr.

MEASUREMENTS

We estimated the crude cumulative incidence of any recurrence. Categories pN and pT, vascular invasion (VI), percentage of embryonal carcinoma, and presence of teratoma were evaluated as 2-yr recurrence predictors of event in a binary logistic model.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Fifty patients had a recurrence (46 in ≤ 2 yr and only 4 [1.2%] in > 2 yr). The 10-yr recurrence incidence was 15.2%. Significant predictors of recurrence at multivariable analysis were pN+, pT > 1, and the presence of VI. However, the discriminative ability of the model was modest (Harrell C = 0.74); only 9% and 3% of patients had a predicted recurrence probability > 30% and > 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RPLND alone could prevent recurrence in 85% of patients and minimise late relapses to 1.2%. Most patients could avoid the immediate and late toxicity of chemotherapy. Prognostic parameters combined into the multivariable model appeared of limited use in identifying a subset of patients at high risk of recurrence.

Late relapse of nonseminomatous germ cell tumours

Late relapses of nonseminomatous cell tumours (NSGCTs) are rare and occur by definition at > or =2 years after successful treatment. They represent a major challenge of current treatment and follow-up of the affected patients. We present relevant literature on late-relapsing NSGCTs to provide an overview over the effect of primary treatment, patient and tumour characteristics. Of all patients with NSGCT, 1-6% have a late relapse, with those having extragonadal GCTs being at greatest risk. The predominant site of relapse is the retroperitoneal space. Suboptimal primary treatment, especially insufficient retroperitoneal surgery, increases the risk of late relapses. Radical surgery is probably the most important treatment, with advances in salvage chemotherapy adding to the improved cure rates. Treatment at an experienced institution ensures a 5-year cancer-specific survival of >50%, and this approaches 100% in case of single-site mature teratoma. Diagnosis and proper treatment of patients with late-relapsing NSGCTs is challenging and should be restricted to experienced centres only. Referral of late-relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables increasing understanding of tumour biology and the clinical course of these patients.

[Results of the randomised phase III study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy versus one cycle BEP as adjuvant therapy for non-seminomatous testicular tumours in clinical stage I]

OBJECTIVE

As 30% of non-seminomas in clinical stage I will progress during active surveillance, alternative adjuvant strategies of 2 cycles of bleomycin, etoposid, cisplatin (BEP) or nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) can be offered. The risk of relapse is reduced to 2% and 10%, respectively. Without prognostic markers and with lowered toxicity it is postulated that only one cycle of BEP could significantly reduce the recurrence rate in comparison to RPLND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2005, 382 patients were randomly assigned to receive either RPLND (n=191) or 1 cycle of BEP (n=191). In accordance with the protocol, 174 patients were treated with 1 cycle of BEP and 173 underwent RPLND. The primary study end-point was a reduction of recurrence from 10% after RPLND to a maximum of 3% after 1 cycle of BEP.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, there were 2 and 13 recurrences in the according-to-protocol population with chemotherapy and surgery, respectively. The difference between chemotherapy (1.15%) and surgery (7.5%) was statistically significant (p=0.0033). The tumor-specific survival was 100%.

CONCLUSION

This largest randomized trial investigating treatment strategies in clinical stage I non-seminomas (AUO AH 01/94) showed the superiority of one cycle BEP over RPLND. The data obtained represent the basis for a reduced chemotherapy.

Late relapse of germ cell tumors

OBJECTIVE

To assess the main characteristics of late relapsing malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs). These tumors are rare and occur by definition 2 years or later after successful treatment.

METHODS

We present relevant literature on relapsing MGCT in order to highlight the following issues: incidence, impact of initial treatment on the subsequent risk of late relapse, treatment, and survival.

RESULTS

A pooled analysis of 5,880 patients with MGCT revealed late relapses in 119 of 3,704 (3.2%) and in 31 of 2,176 (1.4%) patients with non-seminoma and seminoma, respectively. The retroperitoneal space is the predominant site of relapse in both histological types. The initial treatment is important for the risk and localization of late relapses. Patients with single site teratoma are usually cured by surgery alone, whereas viable MGCT or teratoma with malignant transformation may require multimodal treatment with chemo- and/or radiotherapy as well as surgery. Surgery is the most important part in the treatment of late relapses. Salvage chemotherapy should, if feasible, be based on a representative biopsy. Five-year cancer-specific survival is above 50% in the recent large series and reaches 100% in case of single site teratoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of late relapsing MGCT patients is challenging and should be performed in experienced centers only. Referral of late relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables multimodal treatment, and contributes to increased knowledge of tumor biology as well experience with the clinical course of these patients.

Open versus laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: assessing adequacy of dissection in a porcine model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) is emerging as a viable alternative to traditional open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND). Despite numerous reports confirming clinical oncologic equivalency between the two approaches, however, concerns still remain over the adequacy of laparoscopic dissection. We therefore sought to compare the completeness of dissection between O-RPLND and L-RPLND in a porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen domestic swine were divided into two equivalent groups. Both groups underwent bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, approximating templates used in human dissection. In one group, the procedure was performed through an open midline incision, while the other group underwent completely laparoscopic dissection. Tissue was independently analyzed by a pathologist, who recorded lymph node yield based on microscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

All animals in the L-RPLND group underwent successful procedures, without the need for conversion. Two open procedures were aborted because of hemorrhage. Mean lymph node yield from O-RPLND was 32, while the mean yield for L-RPLND was 29. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

In the porcine model, L-RPLND is capable of providing a quality of dissection equivalent to that of O-RPLND, in terms of absolute lymph node yield on microscopic examination. The applicability of this data to human patients, however, may be limited by significant anatomic differences between the human and the pig. Further prospective comparison in human patients is critically needed.

Clinical outcome and predictors of survival in late relapse of germ cell tumor

PURPOSE

Late relapse (LR) of germ cell tumor (GCT) is a well recognized entity associated with poor survival. We report on our experience with LR and determine predictors of survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1990 to 2004, 75 patients were managed for LR of GCT at our institution. Clinical and pathologic parameters were reviewed. Estimates of cancer-specific survival were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess potential predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

The median time to LR was 6.9 years (range, 2.1 to 37.7 years). Overall, 56 patients (75%) had LR in the retroperitoneum, including 25 (93%) of 27 patients initially managed without retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 60% (95% CI, 46% to 71%). Patients who underwent complete surgical resection at time of LR (n = 45) had a 5-year CSS of 79% versus 36% for patients without complete resection (n = 30; P < .0001). The 5-year CSS for chemotherapy-naive patients was significantly greater than patients with a prior history of chemotherapy as part of their initial management (5-year CSS, 93% v 49%, respectively). In multivariable analysis of pretreatment parameters available at the time of LR, the presence of symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.9) and multifocal disease (HR = 3.0) were associated with an inferior CSS.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that meticulous control of the retroperitoneum is critical to prevent LR in the retroperitoneum. In multivariable analysis, patients with a symptomatic presentation and those with multifocal disease have a significantly decreased survival. Survival is greatly improved if complete surgical excision of disease is attained.

Risk-adapted management for patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis

Testis cancer is the most common cancer in young men and its incidence continues to rise. Even if prognosis is considered as good, a group with bad prognosis still remains. We aimed to evaluate whether two courses of chemotherapy after orchiectomy in patients with clinical stage I, non-seminomatous germ cell testicular tumour at high risk of relapse, will spare patients additional chemotherapy or surgery. High-risk patients had one or more of the following: preorchiectomy alpha-fetoprotein level of 80 ng/dl, 80% embryonal cell carcinoma or greater, vessel invasion in the primary tumour and tumour stage pT2 or greater. Low-risk patients had none of these factors or had 50% teratoma or more without vessel invasion. High-risk patients were offered two 21-day courses of outpatient chemotherapy consisting cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (BEP). Low-risk patients were observed. Of the 108 patients, we classified 71 as high risk and 37 as low risk of relapse. All of the high-risk patients received two courses of BEP chemotherapy. Low-risk patients were kept on close-up. The median follow-up was 26 months (range 10-60). Of the 71 patients in high-risk group, 3 relapsed with viable cancer and required additional chemotherapy and 1 patient with normal biomarkers and a late-appearing mass underwent retroperitoneal lympadenectomy for mature teratoma. All 4 relapsed patients were in high-risk group and presently they are free of disease. None of the 37 patients at low risk of recurrences developed relapse. We recommend two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy after postorchiectomy for high-risk patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis. Adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients results in a low relapse and morbidity, wich compares favourably with the results of surveillance or RPLND. This well-tolerated approach may spare patients additional surgery or protracted chemotherapy, reduce the cost and eliminate the compliance problems associated with intensive follow up of high-risk patients.

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced testicular cancer: radical or modified template resection

BACKGROUND

The anatomical extent of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) has been discussed controversially for many years.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the necessity of PC-RPLND with modified or radical template resection in patients with advanced nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT) and residual masses following systemic chemotherapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The charts of 152 consecutive patients who were treated at two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively reviewed.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent PC-RPLND, with 54 and 98 patients undergoing a radical template resection and 98 patients undergoing a modified template resection. Modified template resection was performed if the location of the residual mass corresponded to the primary landing zone of testis cancer and the residual mass measured < or = 5 cm in diameter. In all other cases a full bilateral PC-RPLND was chosen.

MEASUREMENTS

The following data were analyzed: location of the residual mass, extent of surgery, length of surgery, treatment-associated complications, nerve-sparing approach, adjunctive surgical procedures, postoperative morbidity, duration of hospital stay, early and late complications, relapse rates, cancer-specific survival rates, and overall survival rates.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 84 patients (55.2%) had necrosis/fibrosis, 45 (29.6%) had mature teratoma, and 23 (15.1%) had vital cancer in the surgical specimens. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 85% and 25% of patients undergoing modified and bilateral PC-RPLND (p=0.02), respectively. Eight recurrences (5.2%) were observed after a mean follow-up of 39 mo (range 6-105 mo): one patient had an in-field relapse following modified PC-RPLND, and seven patients had recurrences outside the boundaries of full bilateral PC-RPLNDs. The 2-yr disease-free survival rates were 78.6% and 92.8% for bilateral and modified PC-RPLND, respectively. The limitations of this study were a short follow-up, a limited number of patients, and the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Full bilateral PC-RPLND is the standard approach to extensive residual masses. In well-defined masses a modified template PC-RPLND does not interfere with oncologic outcome but decreases treatment-associated morbidity.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European perspective

CONTEXT

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) is not recommended as standard tool in European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To update the role of L-RPLND in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) compared to open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search from 1992 to 2008 was performed in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The largest series from each group was considered. Comparative analysis was based on raw data of series published in 2000 and later.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Results of >800 patients treated by L-RPLND reported in 34 articles were analyzed. Lymph node dissection (LND) was based on modified templates, removing an average of 16 (5-36) lymph nodes. At experienced centres, complication rates were 15.6% (9.4-25.7), including 2% (0-5) retrograde ejaculation and 1.7% (0-6) reintervention. Operating room times are longer compared to O-RPLND (204 vs 186min). Five publications with a follow-up of 63 (36-89) mo include 557 patients. One hundred twenty-six of 140 (90%) patients with positive nodes (25%, range: 17-38) received adjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in a local relapse rate of 1.4% (0.7-2.3) with no in-field recurrence; rate of distant relapses was 3.3% (1.8-4.6), including one port-site metastasis; and rate of biochemical failure was 0.9% (0.7-2.3). Two of 14 patients with positive nodes (pN1) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy relapsed, both 8 mo after surgery, and were salvaged by chemotherapy. Compared with O-RPLND, there was no difference in relapse rates, percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy (29% vs 31%), chemotherapy (CTx) cycles per cohort (0.6), rate of salvage surgery (1.2% vs 1.5%), and patients with no evidence of disease (NED; 100% vs 99.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

L-RPLND offers similar staging accuracy and long-term outcome to O-RPLND. In a late series of experienced L-RPLND centres, there was a trend towards fewer complications. L-RPLND represents a valuable tool for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Further studies must focus on the curative potential of the procedure in pathologic stage IIA.

Randomized phase III trial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I Nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: AUO trial AH 01/94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and adjuvant chemotherapy are two adjuvant treatment options for patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis (NSGCT). Aim of this trial was to prove the advantage of one cycle of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy compared with RPLND in terms of recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2005, 382 patients were randomly assigned to receive either RPLND (n = 191) or one course of BEP (n = 191) after orchidectomy. The primary study end point was the rate of recurrence. The trial was powered to detect a 7% reduction (from 10% to 3%) of recurrence with chemotherapy compared with surgery.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, two and 15 recurrences were observed in the intention-to-treat population with chemotherapy and surgery, respectively (P = .0011). The difference in the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate between chemotherapy (99.46%; 95% CI, 96.20% to 99.92%) and surgery (91.87%; 95% CI, 86.87% to 95.02%) was 7.59% (95% CI, 3.13% to 12.05%). The hazard ratio to experience a tumor recurrence with surgery as opposed to chemotherapy was 7.937 (95% CI, 1.808 to 34.48).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest randomized trial investigating adjuvant treatment strategies in clinical stage I NSGCT, which showed the superiority of one course BEP over RPLND performed according to community standards to prevent recurrence. Although not standard treatment, one course of BEP is active in an unselected group of patients with clinical stage I disease and merits further investigation.

[What about lombo-aortic curage in the treatment of testicle cancer?]

The indications and techniques of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in stage I non seminomatous germ cell tumours have markedly evolved over the past ten years. A literature review allows noticing that historical radical retroperitoneal dissection has been replaced by more limited techniques, known as nerve sparing and nerve preserving lymph node dissection. Stage I non seminomatous germ cell tumours are classified according to the risk of retroperitoneat lymph node involvement; they constitute three groups: low, intermediate and high risk tumours. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is considered for low risk patients in case of non compliance or difficult follow-up, and for intermediate risk patients (vascular invasion with presence of high percentage of teratomatous component).