Symptomatology of metastatic prostate cancer: prognostic significance

Association between symptom distress and survival in outpatients seen in a palliative care cancer center

Clinical observation and preliminary reports suggest that higher scores for symptoms such as pain may be associated with shorter survival. We undertook a survival analysis to determine whether symptom expression in outpatients with complex cancer is related to the duration of their survival. Participants were 225 outpatients with cancer evaluated in our comprehensive cancer center for pain management or palliative care over a 10-week period ending June 2000. In addition to age and other clinical and demographic information, the patients completed the Anderson Symptom Assessment System (ASAS), which assesses pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, shortness of breath (dyspnea), appetite, sleep, and feeling of well-being on a 0-10 scale. Univariate analyses showed that higher symptoms of dyspnea, drowsiness, problems with appetite, and nausea were significantly associated with shorter survival whereas pain, depression and other ASAS items were not. In multivariate analyses, only higher levels of dyspnea and drowsiness showed a significant association (P=0.01 and P=0.02, respectively) with shorter survival. Knowledge about these symptoms may be important in formulating adaptive randomization techniques for clinical trials and for research concerning estimates of survival.

Study of Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer: Hospital Care and Palliative Care Resource Use at a VA Medical Center

Palliative care plays a central role in the management of hormone refractory prostate cancer patients (HRPC), yet little is known about palliative care resource use. Computerized medical records of a retrospective cohort of 89 consecutive HRPC patients seen at a VA medical center from 1994 to 1999 were reviewed for hospital and palliative care resource use in the last 6 months of life. There were 51 Caucasian and 38 African American patients; 95% of patients were admitted to the hospital for symptom management (median of 2 admissions); 98% visited clinics (median 19 visits); 35% went to the emergency room (median of 1 visit); 60% died in the hospital (median length of last hospitalization of 22 days); 49% received palliative radiation; 52% used rehabilitation; 57% received blood transfusion (median 2 units). Thirty-five patients (40%) received hospice care (median stay 35 days). The most frequently prescribed medications included opioids (90%), laxatives (89%), H2-blockers (57%), antiemetics (55%), diuretics (49%), and corticosteroids (43%). The prevalence of patients receiving opioids, as well as the dose of opioids increased over time. There was no difference in categories of palliative care resource use or survival by race. The median survival for all patients was 13 months. The results begin to highlight the extent of care and resources needed by patients with end-stage HRPC. This information will be of importance in planning palliative care for patients with HRPC and in designing future prospective studies.

Predictors of pain and fatigue in the year following diagnosis among elderly cancer patients

Using data obtained from an inception cohort of 841 patients aged 65 or older newly diagnosed with breast, colon, lung, or prostate cancer, and observed at 6-8, 12-16, 24-30, and 52 weeks, three questions related to patients' experiences with pain and fatigue were posed. First, how do numbers of patients reporting neither pain nor fatigue, either symptom, or both change during the observation year? Second, did number of comorbid conditions, site and stage of cancer, treatment modalities, symptom management medication, and time affect the presence of these two symptoms? Third, do pain and fatigue predict the numbers of co-occurring other symptoms? Findings indicate that during the year patients improved with respect to their reports of pain and/or fatigue. Stage, more comorbidity, and lung cancer were related to both pain and fatigue. Chemotherapy was related to reports of fatigue, but did not have an extended effect on fatigue.

Prognostic indicators in hormone refractory prostate cancer

Prognostic factors in hormone refractory prostate cancer currently are of limited use to clinicians. Although studies have identified several factors that predict for poor survival in patients, most are either retrospective, or nonrandomized. Therefore, large prospective, randomized trials are needed to validate the significance of these factors. In addition, these indicators are largely descriptive of the patients' condition or the extent of disease. As more treatment options are developed for these patients, functionally relevant and prognostic molecular markers are needed to direct their care.

Quality of life and survival: the role of multidimensional symptom assessment

BACKGROUND

Recent data from clinical trials suggest that quality-of-life (QOL) measurements may independently predict survival. The relation between survival and QOL measurements was tested among 122 inpatients and 96 outpatients with malignancies at one of four sites (colon, breast, ovary, or prostate) who participated in a cross-sectional validation study of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), a measure of the frequency of, severity of, and distress caused by physical symptoms.

METHODS

The relation between MSAS summary scores and survival was evaluated in a multivariate analysis that adjusted concurrently for other important covariates, such as age, site and extent of disease, inpatient status, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and other QOL measurements.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, extent of disease (P < 0.0001), inpatient status (P=0.014), higher MSAS physical symptom subscale score (P=0.004), and lower KPS score (P=0.009) independently predicted decreased survival. Other QOL measurements did not contribute significantly to the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSAS physical symptom subscale score significantly predicts survival and adds to the prognostic information provided by KPS and extent of disease. Patients may be under-assessed regarding both the number and the severity of symptoms. Measurements of physical symptoms and related distress offer additional prognostic information concerning the survival of patients with cancer and may account for the predictive value of QOL scores.