Comparative efficacy of two alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists, doxazosin and alfuzosin, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic enlargement

Alfuzosin for the medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are a bothersome frequent symptom in adult males. This systematic review analyzed the available evidence on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of alfuzosin, and its clinical efficacy both as monotherapy and in combination with other drugs for the treatment of male LUTS/BPH.

METHODS

A systematic review of the last 10 years was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries in March 2020. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (Central Registration Depository: CRD42020136120) and is available in full on the University of York website.

RESULTS

Alfuzosin is a quinazoline derivative and, although a nonspecific α1-blocker, exhibits a selective concentration in the prostate compared with plasma in patients with BPH. Three registration trials assessed the safety and efficacy of alfuzosin. The 10 mg daily formulation has a three-layered matrix containing the active substance between two inactive coats allowing a drug release over 20 h. Alfuzosin showed high tolerability, few vasodilatory effects and a low rate of ejaculation disorders over older alpha-blocking compounds thanks to the high uroselectivity of alfuzosin and its preferential concentration at urinary level. Six randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessed efficacy and safety of alfuzosin versus other alpha-blockers ± placebo: three studies comparing with tamsulosin, one with doxazosin, and two with silodosin or tamsulosin. One RCT investigated the clinical outcomes of alfuzosin with finasteride, two with propiverine and two with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Alfuzosin is an effective drug for the treatment of LUTS/BPH, with a lower rate of sexual disorders compared with other alpha-blockers. Alfuzosin is also safe with low adverse events in case of concomitant antihypertensive therapy and in patients with cardiovascular morbidity. Safety and efficacy of alfuzosin has been reported also in case of combination therapy with antimuscarinic agents and PDE5i.

Effect of tadalafil on male lower urinary tract symptoms: an integrated analysis of storage and voiding international prostate symptom subscores from four randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) evaluates lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); the total score does not differentiate between storage and voiding and is unevenly weighted (four questions [57%] on voiding, three questions [43%] on storage).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relative contributions of storage and voiding IPSS subscores to total IPSS at baseline and in response to treatment with tadalafil.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Integrated analysis of data from four placebo-controlled, 12-wk studies of tadalafil (5mg once daily) in 1499 men with LUTS/BPH.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Relationships between total IPSS and the storage and voiding subscores were assessed using graphical exploration and linear regression modelling. Linear modelling was performed for the baseline and endpoint and for changes in subscores. The optimal storage subscore to total IPSS (S:T) ratio for IPSS improvement was identified using nonparametric regression and gradient-descent optimisation.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The contribution of storage and voiding subscores at baseline and endpoint was 38.8% and 61.2%, and 39.2% and 60.7%, respectively. This intuitive 40:60 storage-to-voiding ratio was similar at baseline and endpoint by treatment group and for changes in subscores, but spanned the entire range for individuals. Changes in total IPSS were greatest for a storage subscore percentage contribution to total IPSS of 42.7%. There was no statistical association between S:T ratio (≥ 40% vs < 40%) at baseline and response to tadalafil. The main limitation was the use of unvalidated storage and voiding IPSS subscores.

CONCLUSIONS

A constant S:T ratio of 4:10 was observed at baseline and endpoint. The greatest effect on total IPSS was noted for an S:T percentage contribution of 42.7%. Tadalafil efficacy was unaffected by the level of storage dysfunction at baseline.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This analysis shows that for men with BPH, improvements during treatment with tadalafil apply to both storage and voiding symptoms at a constant ratio. The extent of storage dysfunction before treatment did not affect the response to treatment.

Various treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A current update

In benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) there will be a sudden impact on overall quality of life of patient. This disease occurs normally at the age of 40 or above and also is associated with sexual dysfunction. Thus, there is a need of update on current medications of this disease. The presented review provides information on medications available for BPH. Phytotherapies with some improvements in BPH are also included. Relevant articles were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE, PUBMED, Sciencedirect and the proceedings of scientific meetings. The search terms were BPH, medications for BPH, drugs for BPH, combination therapies for BPH, Phytotherapies for BPH, Ayurveda and BPH, BPH treatments in Ayurveda. Medications including watchful waitings, Alpha one adrenoreceptor blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, combination therapies including tamsulosin-dutasteride, doxazosin-finasteride, terazosin-finasteride, tolterodine-tamsulosin and rofecoxib-finasteride were found. Herbal remedies such as Cernilton, Saxifraga stolonifera, Zi-Shen Pill (ZSP), Orbignya speciosa, Phellodendron amurense, Ganoderma lucidum, Serenoa Repens, pumpkin extract and Lepidium meyenii (Red Maca) have some improvements on BPH are included. Other than these discussions on Ayurvedic medications, TURP and minimally invasive therapies (MITs) are also included. Recent advancements in terms of newly synthesized molecules are also discussed. Specific alpha one adrenoreceptor blockers such as tamsulosin and alfuzosin will remain preferred choice of urologists for symptom relief. Medications with combination therapies are still needs more investigation to establish as preference in initial stage for fast symptom relief reduced prostate growth and obviously reduce need for BPH-related surgery. Due to lack of proper evidence Phytotherapies are not gaining much advantage. MITs and TURP are expensive and are rarely supported by healthcare systems.

Outcomes and quality of life issues in the pharmacological management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease of the aging male population. BPH treatment includes a variety of pharmacological and surgical interventions. The goal of this paper is to review the natural history of BPH, outcomes of pharmacological management, effects on quality of life (QoL), future pharmacotherapies, and associated patient-focused perspectives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline searches for the keywords benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH, alpha blockers, 5 alpha-reductase, and quality of life were performed. Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Alpha blockers, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors, and phytotherapy are the three categories of pharmaceutical interventions currently available for BPH. Various clinical trials have shown that alpha blockers and 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors are safe, efficacious, and improve QoL in patients with BPH. The evidence for phytotherapeutics is not as convincing. The current armamentarium of pharmaceutical interventions are encompassed in these three classes of medications. New pharmacotherapies based on novel mechanisms are on the horizon.

CONCLUSION

There are a variety of safe and efficacious medical therapies available for the management of BPH and it is important for the practicing physician to have an understanding of these pharmacotherapies and their potential impact on the patient. There is not enough evidence to make a recommendation regarding phytotherapy use. New classes of drugs for BPH will likely find their way into routine use.

Pharmacokinetics of Doxazosin Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System after Multiple Administration in Korean Healthy Volunteers

Doxazosin mesylate is a selective alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonist for the treatment of hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. A simple high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed and validated for the quantitative determination of doxazosin in plasma. A reversed phase C18 column was used for the separation of doxazosin and prazosin (internal standard) with a mobile phase composed of water, acetonitrile, triethylamine (68:32:0.2 v/v, pH 5.0) at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The fluorescence detector was operated at 246 (excitation) and 389 nm (emission). Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were acceptable for all quality control samples including the lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Recovery of doxazosin from human plasma was greater than 93.4%. Doxazosin was stable in human plasma under various storage conditions. This method was used successfully for a pharmacokinetic study in plasma after oral administration of multiple 4-mg dose of doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system formulation to 16 healthy volunteers. At steady state the mean area under the curve for a dosing interval and elimination half-life were calculated to be 367.0 +/- 63.5 ng x hr/mL and 29.2 +/- 4.5 hr, respectively. There was no difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between male and female.

Comparing the therapeutic outcome of different alpha-blocker treatments for BPH in the same individuals

OBJECTIVE

Alpha-blockers are the most widely used agents to treat lower urinary tract symptoms in males, and switching between alpha-blockers is a frequent management option when the desired effect could not be obtained. There is no data in the literature that reveal the outcome of treatments with different alpha-blockers within the same patient. We sought the answer to this question in a setting where the same individuals were treated with two different agents during different time frames.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty males with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) applying to the Department of Urology with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were enrolled in the study consecutively. Patients were evaluated with detailed medical history, IPSS forms, digital rectal examination (DRE), urinary ultrasound, PSA, and uroflowmetry. The subjects received terazosin 5 mg daily for 3 months, and controlled release form of alfuzosin 10 mg daily for another 3 months, leaving a 1-month clearance period in between. The above-mentioned detailed evaluations were carried out before and after each alpha-blocker regimen.

RESULTS

Mean age and PSA level was 63.3+/-1.6 years (45-80), and 2.1+/-0.4 ng/ml (0.16-6.3 ng/ml). IPSS and Qmax values before treatment with terazosin and alfuzosin were similar. Improvements in IPSS and Qmax values after treatments with both terazosin and alfuzosin were significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the drugs in terms of percent improvements in IPSS and Qmax with alpha-blocker treatment. No untoward effect except for transient dizziness in one case with terazosin treatment was encountered.

CONCLUSION

Different alpha-blockers, which are used during different time frames in the same individuals, provide similar efficiency outcome. When the desired effect in the treatment for BPH could not be obtained with one alpha-blocker, there may not be any benefit in switching to another one.

Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride compared to doxazosin in the treatment of Indonesian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

AIM

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride and doxazosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

The safety and efficacy of tamsulosin (0.2 mg) and doxazosin (2 mg) was determined after once daily administration for 6 weeks in an open-label, randomized, multicenter study of 101 men with BPH. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rates (Qmax), average urinary flow rates (Qave) and residual urine were determined at baseline and again at 6 weeks as efficacy parameters. The primary parameters used for safety evaluation were vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) and adverse events. The number of patients with a clinically significant response to treatment with tamsulosin or doxazosin was determined and defined as those with >20% improvement from the baseline Qmax or >20% decrease in total IPSS.

RESULTS

The total IPSS decreased significantly in both the tamsulosin and doxazosin groups compared to baseline. There was a significant difference in the decrease in total IPSS between two groups. Qmax, Qave and residual urine significantly improved only in the tamsulosin group. There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure or heart rate profile in the tamsulosin group; however, doxazosin resulted in a significant difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Tamsulosin was well tolerated; only three patients (6%) in the tamsulosin group reported an adverse event (dizziness) while 11 patients (22%) in the doxazosin group reported an adverse event (dizziness), one of whom withdrew from the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamsulosin was shown to be more effective than doxazosin in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH.

A randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release doxazosin and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Brazil

Brazilian patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomised in a 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy study to receive doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 4 mg q.i.d. (n = 82) or tamsulosin 0.4 q.i.d. (n = 83). Primary endpoints were the absolute and percentage change from baseline in symptoms measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary endpoints included IPSS, quality-of-life (QOL) question from the IPSS, and questions 6 and 7 of the Sexual Function Abbreviated Questionnaire (SFAQ) at weeks 4 and 12. Doxazosin GITS and tamsulosin improved IPSS with no significant differences between groups at week 12. During weeks 4-8, tamsulosin-treated patients demonstrated a slower improvement (p < 0.001) in IPSS than doxazosin GITS-treated patients. The proportion of satisfied patients was observed earlier with doxazosin GITS (p = 0.006) vs. tamsulosin. At week 12, the proportion of patients with little or no difficulty at ejaculation (Q6 of SFAQ) was higher in the doxazosin GITS group (p = 0.019). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Use of sympathetic alpha antagonists in the management of pediatric urologic disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the physician regarding the use of alpha-adrenergic antagonists in the management of various pediatric urologic problems.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of alpha-adrenergic antagonist for the treatment of pediatric urologic disorders has expanded greatly over the past decade. This review summarizes the current use of these medications in the treatment of pediatric voiding dysfunction, neurogenic bladder, chronic lower urinary tract symptomatology, idiopathic urethritis, and the passage of ureteral calculi.

SUMMARY

Currently alpha antagonist therapy although not useful in the primary treatment of voiding dysfunction is equivalent in potency to biofeedback therapy for the treatment of recalcitrant voiding dysfunction. In the management of neurogenic bladder and chronic lower urinary tract symptomatology, alpha antagonists working alone or in conjunction with anticholinergic medications will improve clinical symptoms, increase bladder compliance, and decrease detrusor instability. In addition, alpha antagonists may decrease the intensity and duration of symptoms in patients with idiopathic urethritis. Compared with placebo, alpha-adrenergic antagonists will also aid significantly in the spontaneous passage of distal ureteral calculi, thereby reducing the need for surgical intervention and analgesia. The findings noted above significantly expand the clinical usefulness of alpha antagonist therapy within the field of pediatric urology.

Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of alfuzosin in improving symptoms in, and quality of life of, patients with indwelling double-J ureteral stents.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients, 50 men and 50 women (mean age 54.2 years), with unilateral ureteral stone-related hydronephrosis, who had opted for conservative management with insertion of a double-J ureteral stent, were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group 1 included 50 patients who received 10 mg of alfuzosin, once daily for 4 weeks, and group 2 consisted of 50 patients who received placebo for the same period. All patients completed a validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) 4 weeks after stent placement.

RESULTS

The mean urinary symptom index score was 21.6 in group 1 and 28.1 in group 2 (P < 0.001). Stent-related pain was reported by 44% of patients in group 1 and 66% of patients in group 2 (P = 0.027). The mean pain index score was 14.6 in group 1 and 17.4 in group 2 (P = 0.047). The mean general health index score was statistically greater (P < 0.001) in group 1 compared with in group 2 (8 versus 11.4, respectively). Among sexually active patients, the mean sexual score was 2.3 in group 1 and 2.9 in group 2 (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent-related symptoms were present in 66% of the controls (group 2). Alfuzosin improved a subset of stent-related urinary symptoms and pain. Patients receiving alfuzosin had their sexual function and general health better preserved.

Doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy: an update

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of alpha 1--blocker doxazosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compatible with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolled 6261 men, average age 64 years, who had moderately severe LUTS and flow impairment. Compared with baseline measures and placebo effect, doxazosin resulted in a statistically significant improvement in both LUTS and flow. However, when compared with placebo, the average magnitude of symptom improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] improvement < 3 points) typically did not achieve a level detectable by patients. Combined doxazosin and finasteride therapy improved LUTS and reduced the risk of overall clinical progression of BPH compared to each drug separately in men followed over 4 years. Reported mean changes from baseline in the IPSS were -7.4, -6.6, -5.6, and -4.9 points for combination therapy, doxazosin, finasteride, and placebo, respectively. Combination therapy reduced the need for invasive treatment for BPH and the risk of long-term urinary retention. The absolute reductions compared with placebo were less than 4% and primarily seen in men with prostate gland volume > 40 mL or PSA levels > 4 ng/mL. Efficacy was comparable with other alpha 1--blockers. Withdrawals from treatment for any cause were comparable to placebo. Dizziness and fatigue occurred more frequently with doxazosin compared to placebo.

Effects of ??1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists on Male Sexual Function

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists such as alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin and terazosin are first-line agents for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but are only second-line agents (doxazosin and terazosin only) for the treatment of arterial hypertension. Sexual function is complex and includes multiple domains such as sexual desire (libido), erectile function and ejaculatory function. Erectile and ejaculatory functions are frequently reduced in patients with BPH and can impact on their quality of life. Therefore, the treatment of BPH should aim to maintain or even restore sexual function.alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists lack major effects on sexual desire in placebo-controlled studies. Reports on erectile function are inconsistent, with both beneficial and adverse effects being reported, but impotence can occur in some patients without clear differences between drugs. Ejaculatory dysfunction during treatment may represent (relative) an ejaculation. It occurs more frequently with tamsulosin than with other drugs of this class, but the differences are not big enough to be consistently detectable in directly comparative studies. We propose that such differences between drugs should be weighed against differences in cardiovascular tolerability when choosing the optimal treatment for each patient.

Alfuzosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of alfuzosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

The included studies were randomized controlled trials involving men with symptomatic BPH treated with alfuzosin versus placebo or active control for at least 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 11 trials involving 3901 men with a mean age of 64 years. Eight trials were placebo-controlled studies, two were alfuzosin versus alternative alpha-blockers, and one was alfuzosin versus finasteride and combination alfuzosin/finasteride therapy. The study durations were short term, 4 to 26 weeks. The mean baseline symptom scores and peak urinary flow rates were indicative of moderate BPH. Alfuzosin (7.5 or 10 mg) improved lower urinary tract symptoms assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score compared with placebo. The mean absolute change from baseline was -5.4 points for alfuzosin compared with -3.6 points for placebo, a weighted mean difference of 1.8 points (three studies). Alfuzosin increased the peak urinary flow more than did placebo, although the improvement varied across the eight studies. Symptom and flow improvements were generally comparable to that with combination therapy and with other alpha1-blockers. Alfuzosin had good short-term tolerability, and the numbers of study withdrawals were comparable to those with placebo and controls. Efficacy and short-term safety were similar across the various (immediate-release, sustained, and once-daily) formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from short-term studies have indicated that alfuzosin improves lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary flow more than does placebo and is generally well tolerated in men with symptomatic BPH. Long-term efficacy and safety studies in combination with a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor should be initiated.

Controlled-release doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of controlled-release doxazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

SCOPE

In this open-label, noncontrolled, observational surveillance study, 3684 men with BPH received 4-8 mg of controlled-release doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) for 6 months; 3283 (89.1%) patients completed the trial. Changes in urinary symptoms and quality of life were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Blood pressure and adverse events were assessed.

CONCLUSION

After 6 months' treatment with doxazosin GITS resulted in significant improvements in IPSS. BP was reduced only in hypertensive patients. Doxazosin, GITS was well tolerated.

The clinical efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin standard and gastrointestinal therapeutic system for benign prostatic hyperplasia

The therapeutic goal of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) through early detection and effective therapy is to relieve the symptoms, improve patients' quality of life, decrease postvoid residual urine volume, and prevent the associated morbidity when the condition remains untreated. Alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonists, e.g. doxazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin and alfuzosin, relax the bladder outlet to improve urinary flow, by reducing prostatic smooth muscle tone through the blockade of sympathetic adrenergic receptors. Doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) is a controlled-release formulation developed to enhance the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug while simultaneously minimizing possible adverse effects and reducing the need for dose titration. While both doxazosin standard and GITS are indicated for hypertension, they are also useful in the pharmacologically or naturally normotensive patient with BPH. In a cross-over trial comparing doxazosin GITS and tamsulosin, doxazosin gave a significantly greater improvement from baseline in symptoms. Results from recent trials (e.g. Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms, MTOPS) showed that doxazosin was significantly more effective than the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride in relieving lower urinary tract symptoms, irrespective of prostate volume. The MTOPS trial showed clearly that over the long term, the combination of doxazosin and finasteride was more effective than either agent alone in significantly improving symptoms and reducing the clinical progression of BPH. Both doxazosin standard and GITS are well-tolerated, long-term therapies that are equally effective in younger and older men, and not associated with causing sexual dysfunction.

After ALLHAT: doxazosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Doxazosin mesylate is an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist that was used to treat hypertension until a major study (ALLHAT; Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) showed that it increased the risk of progressing to heart failure. Doxazosin is now being used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Noradrenaline acts on alpha1-adrenoceptors to contract the smooth muscle in the prostate and bladder, and by opposing these actions, doxazosin is beneficial in BPH. Doxazosin also increases apoptosis in the prostate. Although the standard preparation is suitable for once-daily dosing in BPH, it has to be titrated through three steps to its final dose. The controlled-release gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of doxazosin is more convenient to use as it only has to be titrated through one step. In the treatment of BPH, standard doxazosin reduced both obstructive and irritative symptoms and increased peak urinary flow rate. The main side effects with doxazosin are those commonly associated with lowering blood pressure, although doxazosin lowers blood pressure to a lesser extent in normotensives than hypertensives. There is some evidence that in addition to being easier to use, doxazosin GITS may cause less adverse effects than the standard preparations. The benefits of doxazosin and the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, finasteride, may be additive in BPH especially in men with large prostates. Further trials are necessary in order to determine whether doxazosin GITS is superior to other alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in BPH.

Doxazosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of doxazosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compatible with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis if: the study duration was > or = 1 month; the study involved men with symptomatic BPO; and doxazosin was compared with placebo or active controls. Study and patient characteristics and outcome data were extracted in duplicate onto standardized forms using a prospectively developed protocol.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 6033 men with (mean age 64 years) met the inclusion criteria; 10 were placebo-controlled, including two with combined doxazosin/finasteride therapy and finasteride monotherapy arms. Three trials were a comparison with other alpha-blockers. The study duration was 1-54 months. The mean baseline symptom scores and peak urinary flow (PUF) rates were indicative of moderate BPO. Doxazosin gave significant improvements in LUTS, assessed by symptom scores, vs placebo and finasteride in the short- to long-term. Two long-term studies (1 and 4 years) reported mean changes from baseline for the International Prostate Symptom Score of - 8.3 and - 6.6 points (-49% and - 39%) for doxazosin and - 5.7 and - 4.9 points (-33% and - 29%) for placebo, respectively. Doxazosin significantly increased PUF rates vs placebo. In pooled results from three studies, the weighted mean difference in the mean change from baseline vs placebo was 1.6 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.1). Efficacy was comparable with other alpha1-blockers. In the long-term (>4 years) doxazosin was no better then finasteride in improving PUF. Combined doxazosin and finasteride significantly reduced the risk of overall clinical progression of BPO vs each drug separately in men followed for >4 years. Absolute risk reductions vs placebo were 11.3%, 6.9% and 6.4% for combined therapy, doxazosin and finasteride, respectively (P < 0.001). Improvements in symptom scores and PUF were also significantly greater with combined than monotherapy, and the former reduced the need for invasive treatment for BPO and the risk of long-term urinary retention, although the absolute reductions in risk vs placebo were small (<4%). Dizziness and fatigue were significantly more common with doxazosin than placebo (11% vs 7%, and 6% vs 3%, respectively). Adverse events reported for combined therapy were similar to those with each monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The evidence indicates that doxazosin is effective and generally well tolerated for improving LUTS and PUF in men with symptomatic BPO. Combined therapy was better than doxazosin alone in reducing the risk of clinical progression of BPO and other long-term complications related to BPO.