Initial incision of lateral pelvic fascia and early ligation of vascular pedicles during radical prostatectomy: potential to reduce positive margin rates

Delayed versus standard ligature of the dorsal venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To evaluate current views on comparing delayed ligature of the dorsal venous complex (D-DVC) with standard ligature of the dorsal venous complex (S-DVC) for safety, urinary control and oncological outcomes during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive searching of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and the Cochrane Library was made and then we performed a meta-analysis, including all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies, to evaluate the two different techniques.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and six retrospective studies containing 1822 cases (222 cases from RCTs and 1600 cases from retrospective studies) were identified. Although D-DVC was related to more blood loss (WMD: 7.30 mL; 95% CI, 2.43 to 12.16; p = 0.003), the blood transfusion rate between the two groups showed no significant difference (OR = 1.93; 95% CI, 0.55 to 6.73; p = 0.31), and patients in the D-DVC group could benefit from a shorter operative time (WMD: -30.83 min; 95% CI, -53.32 to -8.35; p = 0.007). Positive apical margin events were significantly less in the D-DVC group (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.71; p = 0.002). As for urinary control, there were no differences in continence rates after 3 months (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.73; p = 0.06) and 12 months (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57; p = 0.99) of follow-up. However, there was a significantly higher continence rate after 6 months of follow-up in the D-DVC group (OR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.11; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard and delayed approaches to DVC are equally safe and result in similar urinary control. The delayed approach could decrease the positive apical margin rate. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to investigate and compare the prognosis and long-term functional outcomes between the two approaches.

Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate

OBJECTIVES

Surgical technique, patient characteristics and method of pathological review may influence surgical margin (SM) status. Positive surgical margin (SM+) rates of 14% to 46% have been reported in different radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) series. We evaluated the effect of an anterograde versus retrograde approach to RRP and specifically focused on the incidence of SM+.

METHODS

From January 2003 to November 2007, we randomly assigned 200 patients with clinically localized prostate adenocarcinomas to undergo a retrograde (Group A) versus an anterograde (Group B) open RRP. All RRPs were performed at our institution by 2 surgeons. For all 200 patients, we evaluated a panel of clinical and pathological variables relating to their association with SM status.

RESULTS

In Group A, 22% of cases after RRP showed a pT3 tumour and 39% of cases with a Gleason score >/=7 (4+3); in Group B, 20% of cases showed a pT3 tumour and 37% of cases with a Gleason score >/=7 (4+3) (p > 0.10). The incidence of SM+ was 18% in Group A and 14% in Group B (p = 0.0320). In Group A, 22.2% of cases with SM+ had multiple positive margins, whereas no cases in Group B showed multiple SM+. Regarding the localization of SM+, no difference was found between the 2 groups. In the multivariate analysis, only prostate-specific antigen (p = 0.0090 and p = 0.0020, respectively in the 2 groups) and pathological stage (p < 0.0001 in both groups) were significant and independently associated with SM+ occurrence.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the anterograde approach to open RRP is associated with lower SM+ rates and no risk of multiple SM+ when compared with the retrograde approach.

Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base

BACKGROUND

The objective is to provide surgical and pathological guidelines for radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to achieve optimal benefit for patients, with minimal risk of harm.

METHODS

For surgical questions, a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database was performed. A literature search for the pathological questions was not conducted since the protocol for invasive carcinomas of the prostate gland developed by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) was endorsed. Urologists and pathologists were consulted for their assessment of the surgical and pathological recommendations.

RESULTS

Limited high-quality evidence from 95 primary studies was available and, therefore, the expert panel developed recommendations on the basis of a consensus of the expert opinion of the working group and through a consultation with urologists and pathologists. In addition to the CAP protocol, some technical recommendations related to the handling and processing of the specimen were made.

CONCLUSION

Radical prostatectomy is recommended for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer, depending on a patient's preoperative risk profile. The panel unanimously determined that the goals for RP are to attain a positive margin rate of <25% for pT2 disease, a mortality rate of <1%, rates of rectal injury of <1% and blood transfusion rates of <10% in non-anemic patients. Standard PLND should be mandatory in high-risk patients, should be recommended for intermediate-risk patients and should be optional for low-risk patients. The quality and effectiveness of this treatment and of subsequent patient care depend on good management, effective communication and reporting between surgeons and pathologists working together as part of a multidisciplinary team. The complete guideline document is posted on the Cancer Care Ontario website (www.cancercare.on.ca); search in their Toolbox, Quality Guidelines & Standards, Clinical Program category under "surgery."

Impact of capsular incision on biochemical recurrence after radical perineal prostatectomy

The prognostic implications of capsular incision (CI) remain to be defined. We evaluated the impact of CI on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and the potential risk factors of CI. Between June 1995 and July 2007, 266 patients with follow-up for at least 6 months, who had neither the seminal vesicle nor lymph node involvement on prostatectomy specimen, were included. Patients with insufficient biopsy data and those with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy were excluded. CI was defined as tumor extending into the inked margins, at sites except the apex of the prostate, without documented extraprostatic extension (EPE). There were 186 with organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins (pT2/SM–), 12 with organ-confined disease and an apex-only positive margin (pT2/AM+), 35 with CI, 19 with EPE and negative surgical margins (pT3a/SM–) and 13 with EPE and positive surgical margins (pT3a/SM+). We compared BCR-free probability among these five groups and the risk factors for CI were assessed. The 3-year BCR-free probability for each group was 92.7% for pT2/SM–, 75.8% for pT2/AM+, 70.7% with CI, 84% with pT3/SM– and 51% in pT3/SM+. That for CI was worse than pT2/SM– (P=0.007), not significantly different from pT2/AM+ and pT3/SM– (P=0.614, P=0.318, respectively), but better than pT3/SM+ (P=0.044), adjusting for the pre-operative prostate-specific antigen and pathological Gleason score. The risk for CI was significantly associated with more than 25% positive biopsy cores. CI seems to affect BCR and is more likely to occur in proportion to positive biopsy cores.

Long-term experience with an anatomical anterograde approach to radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of an anterograde approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in terms of positive surgical margins (SM+).

METHODS

323 untreated patients underwent anterograde RRP for clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Spearman coefficients, logistic univariate and multivariate analysis were used.

RESULTS

The incidence of SM+ was 14.9% and, in particular, this was 4.5% for apical, 9.0% for lateral, 0.9% for other sites, and 2.8% for multiple SM+. Upon univariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA; r = 0.2073, p = 0.0002), pathological stage (r = 0.3777, p < 0.0001), and seminal vesicle invasion (r = 0.1453, p = 0.0089) were found to be significantly associated with SM+. Upon multivariate analysis, only PSA (p = 0.0090) and pathological stage (p < 0.0001) were significantly and independently associated with SM+ occurrence.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the anterograde approach to RRP is associated with low SM+ rates.

Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

In the last few years there have been increasing claims that robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy decreases short-term morbidity in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer. However, there is surprisingly little objective evidence to support this point, which is often used to market the procedure to patients. To address this issue we prospectively evaluated patients undergoing open and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at baseline and weekly through the postoperative period using a validated questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 162 men undergoing radical prostatectomy, including open radical prostatectomy in 120 and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 42, for clinically localized prostate cancer completed the SF-12, version 2 Physical and Mental Health Survey Acute Form preoperatively and each week postoperatively for 6 weeks. Physical and Mental Component Scores were calculated from the questionnaires at each time point. Comparisons between the 2 surgical approaches were made at each time point.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen between the open and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy groups with regard to patient age, clinical stage or preoperative prostate specific antigen. Mean surgical blood loss was significantly higher in the open group compared to that in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group. Physical Component Scores in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group were significantly higher than those in the open cohort beginning postoperative week 1 and extending through week 6. On statistical extrapolation Physical Component Scores returned to baseline between weeks 5 and 6 postoperatively in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group and between weeks 6 and 7 in the open group. Mental Component Score scores were not statistically different between the groups except preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study helps prospectively define short-term health related quality of life in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy. Higher physical scores were seen in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group than the open group beginning postoperative week 1 and continuing weekly throughout the 6-week study period. Physical Component Score scores returned to baseline sooner in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group than in the open group.

Fascia: A Pragmatic Overview for Surgeons

The term “fascia” is a very frequently used notion, particularly in an anatomical, surgical, and radiological context. A closer look at the underlying concepts, however, reveals that the denomination is all but a consistent one. It is this use of one and the same term for very different entities that is one of the sources for controversial opinions on fascial structures and their applications in surgical practice. This article summarizes and illustrates examples of structures called fasciae. Considering the impossibility to give a simple, universal definition, we conclude that a precise description and iconographic documentation of the structure under consideration remain mandatory. They should replace the presumably unequivocal, but in fact often nebulous, notion “fascia” in surgical, radiological, and anatomical articles.

Anatomic Restoration Technique of Continence Mechanism and Preservation of Puboprostatic Collar: A Novel Modification to Achieve Early Urinary Continence in Men Undergoing Robotic Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The puboprostatic ligaments, puboperinealis muscle, and arcus tendineus are all recognized as important for continence in men and women. This complex of ligaments, muscles, and tendineus aponeurosis acts in unison to provide continence and can be disrupted during robotic prostatectomy. We propose that preservation of the puboprostatic collar during robotic surgery will help to restore early continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy.

METHODS

We performed cadaveric studies in 10 fresh cadavers to devise strategies to leave intact the puboprostatic ligaments, muscular collar, and arcus tendineus supporting the continence mechanism. We developed reconstructive strategies to reconnect the ligaments to the urethrovesical anastomosis, reapproximated the muscles, and fixed the distal bladder to the arcus tendineus. These modifications were then attempted in 50 consecutive patients who underwent robotic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The patient-reported outcomes were then used to assess the efficacy of this procedure.

RESULTS

The technique was reproducible, and the average additional time taken for the final reconstruction was only 2 to 5 minutes. The continence rate was 29% in the first week, 62% at 6 weeks, 88% at 12 weeks, and 95% in 16 weeks after catheter removal. No other differences were found in the operative, oncologic, or perioperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This modification helped in the early return of continence. It is unlikely that the long-term results will be any different, but shortening the recovery time will have psychological, financial, and health-related quality-of-life benefits for the patients.