Surgical treatment of stage pT3b renal cell carcinoma in solitary kidneys: a case series

Eligibility and Radiologic Assessment for Adjuvant Clinical Trials in Kidney Cancer

Purpose

To harmonize the eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment definitions in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Method

On November 28, 2017, US-based experts in RCC clinical trials, including medical oncologists, urologic oncologists, regulators, biostatisticians, radiologists, and patient advocates, convened at a public workshop to discuss eligibility for trial entry and radiologic criteria for assessing disease recurrence in adjuvant trials in RCC. Multiple virtual meetings were conducted to address the issues identified at the workshop.

Results

The key workshop conclusions for adjuvant RCC therapy clinical trials were as follows. First, patients with non-clear cell RCC could be routinely included, preferably in an independent cohort. Second, patients with T3-4, N+M0, and microscopic R1 RCC tumors may gain the greatest advantages from adjuvant therapy. Third, trials of agents not excreted by the kidney should not exclude patients with severe renal insufficiency. Fourth, therapy can begin 4 to 16 weeks after the surgical procedure. Fifth, patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy should be equally eligible. Sixth, patients with microscopically positive soft tissue or vascular margins without gross residual or radiologic disease may be included in trials. Seventh, all suspicious regional lymph nodes should be fully resected. Eighth, computed tomography should be performed within 4 weeks before trial enrollment; for patients with renal insufficiency who cannot undergo computed tomography with contrast, noncontrast chest computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis with gadolinium should be performed. Ninth, when feasible, biopsy should be undertaken to identify any malignant disease. Tenth, when biopsy is not feasible, a uniform approach should be used to evaluate indeterminate radiologic findings to identify what constitutes no evidence of disease at trial entry and what constitutes radiologic evidence of disease. Eleventh, a uniform approach for establishing the date of recurrence should be included in any trial design. Twelfth, patient perspectives on the use of placebo, conditions for unblinding, and research biopsies should be considered carefully during the conduct of an adjuvant trial.

Conclusions and Relevance

The discussions suggested that a uniform approach to eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment will lead to more consistently interpretable trial results in the adjuvant RCC therapy setting.

Is imperative partial nephrectomy feasible for kidney cancer with venous thrombus involvement? Outcomes of 42 cases and matched pair analysis with a large radical nephrectomy cohort

BACKGROUND

Radical nephrectomy (RN) with/without (±) thrombus excision (ThE) is the undisputed standard treatment for kidney cancer (KC) with renal or caval thrombus (Th). However, partial nephrectomy (PN) ± ThE may be considered in rare cases due to imperative (I) indications.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of IPN ± ThE and to compare it with RN ± ThE for KC with Th.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Records of 2,549 patients undergoing surgery for KC with Th at 24 institutions between 1971 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS), renal function variation after surgery and complications. Secondary outcomes were predictors of OS and CSS for IPN cases. To reduce bias IPN group was matched with RN using a propensity score with greedy algorithm on the basis of age, gender, tumor size, TNM, and histology.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Forty-two patients underwent IPN ± Th. All thrombi were ≥level I; 5 patients experienced Clavien ≥ 3 complications with 2 complications-related deaths. At 27.3 (interquartile range: 7.1-47.7) months OS and CSS were 54.8% and 78.6%, respectively whereas at 9.7 (interquartile range: 1.4-43.7) months eGFR change was -17.3 ± 27.0ml/min. On univariate analysis tumour size, preoperative eGFR, transfusions, hospital stay, high serum creatinine, operating time, complications, lymphadenectomy, and metastases related to an increased risk of death. After matching (n = 38 per arm) no significant differences were present except for tumor necrosis (IPN = 39.5%; 15.8%; P = 0.01), thrombus level (P = 0.02), so as for operating time (P = 0.27), perioperative transfusions (P = 0.74) and complications (P = 0.35). A 5-year OS and CSS for IPN were 57.9% and 73.7%, respectively with no significant differences with RN (OS = 63.2, P = 0.611; CSS = 68.4, P>0.99). After 14.9 months creatinine and eGFR changes were (+0.4 ± 0.6mg/dl and -23.2 ± 37.3ml/min; P = 0.2879).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cases due to imperative indications PN ± ThE is a complex procedure and may be an alternative to RN ± ThE for KC with Th yielding noninferior oncological outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications. Further studies are needed to determine the role of PN ± ThE for KC with Th.

Management of Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for approximately 3% of adult malignancies and over 90% of primary renal tumors. Recurrence rates for patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (LARCC) remain high.

Methods

The authors review literature regarding prognostic factors, potential biomarkers, surgical strategies, and adjuvant therapy trials for patients with LARCC.

Results

Molecular tumor markers may improve existing staging systems for predicting prognosis. Surgery is the best initial treatment for most patients with clinically localized renal tumors, although complete surgical resection can be challenging for patients with large tumors, bulky regional lymph node involvement, or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Significant recurrence rates for patients with LARCC undergoing nephrectomy indicate the presence of undetected micrometastases at the time of surgery. Adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy have been ineffective. Other trials of adjuvant therapy are ongoing.

Conclusions

Aggressive surgical resection alone for LARCC is not sufficient to prevent disease recurrence in a significant number of patients. Adjuvant therapies are needed to improve cancer-specific survival.

Complications of Renal Surgery

The incidence of the small renal mass continues to increase owing to the aging population and the ubiquity imaging. Most of these tumors are stage I tumors. Management strategies include surveillance, ablation, and extirpation. There is a wide body of literature favoring nephron-sparing approaches. Although nephron-sparing surgery may yield decreased long-term morbidity, it is not without its drawbacks, including a higher rate of complications. Urologists must be attuned to the complications of surgery and develop strategies to minimize risk. This article reviews expected complications of surgery on renal masses and risk stratification schema.

Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma

The diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma is accompanied by intravascular tumor thrombus in up to 10% of cases, of which nearly one-third of patients also have concurrent metastatic disease. Surgical resection in the form of radical nephrectomy and caval thrombectomy represents the only option to obtain local control of the disease and is associated with durable oncologic control in approximately half of these patients. The objective of this clinical review is to outline the preoperative evaluation for, and operative management of patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombi involving the inferior vena cava. Cornerstones of the management of these complex patients include obtaining high-quality imaging to characterize the renal mass and tumor thrombus preoperatively, with further intraoperative real-time evaluation using transesophageal echocardiography, careful surgical planning, and a multidisciplinary approach. Operative management of patients with high-level caval thrombi should be undertaken in high-volume centers by surgical teams with capacity for bypass and invasive intraoperative monitoring. In patients with metastatic disease at presentation, cytoreductive nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy may be safely performed with simultaneous metastasectomy if possible. In the absence of level one evidence, neoadjuvant targeted therapy should continue to be viewed as experimental and should be employed under the auspices of a clinical trial. However, in patients with significant risk factors for postoperative complications and mortality, and especially in those with metastatic disease, consultation with medical oncology and frontline targeted therapy may be considered.

Staging, surveillance, and evaluation of response to therapy in renal cell carcinoma: role of MDCT

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant renal tumor in the adults. Significant advances have been made in the management of localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma. Surgery is the standard of care and accurate pre-operative staging based on imaging is critical in guiding appropriate patient management. Besides staging, imaging plays a key role in the post-operative surveillance and evaluation of response to systemic therapies. Both CT and MR are useful in the staging and follow up of renal cell carcinoma, but CT is more commonly used due to its lower costs and wider availability. In this article, we discuss and illustrate the role of multi-detector CT in pre-operative staging, post-operative surveillance, and evaluation of response to systemic therapy in renal cell carcinoma.

Significance of Pathologic T3a Upstaging in Clinical T1 Renal Masses Undergoing Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the present study were to report the incidence of pathologic T3a upstaging in a contemporary cohort of patients with clinical stage T1 (cT1) renal tumors treated with partial or radical nephrectomy; investigate the clinical outcomes; and identify the predictors associated with pathologic upstaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a single-institution, institutional review board-approved renal tumor database of 945 patients, we identified 610 patients who had undergone surgery for a cT1 renal mass. Data for 494 patients were available for analysis. Of these, 66 lesions had been pathologically upstaged to T3a after surgery and 428 had not. The oncologic follow-up data and clinical and pathologic features were recorded, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for pT3a upstaging, controlling for age, gender, body mass index, and nephrectomy type.

RESULTS

The cT1 tumors of 66 patients (13.3%) were upstaged to pT3a after surgery. Of these 66 patients, 44 (66.7%) had undergone partial and 22 (33.3%) radical nephrectomy. The median follow-up period was 50 months. No patient with upstaging developed recurrence, and all were disease free at their last follow-up visit. On multivariable analysis, tumor size > 4 cm (odds ratio [OR], 3.766; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.417-10.011; P < .008), clear cell histologic features (OR, 4.461; 95% CI, 1.498-13.461; P < .007), and positive surgical margins (hazard ratio, 5.118; 95% CI, 2.088-12.547; P < .0001) were associated with upstaging.

CONCLUSION

Of the cT1 lesions in 66 patients, 13% were pathologically upstaged after surgery. The patients with larger tumors, clear cell histologic features, and positive surgical margins were at the greatest risk of upstaging. However, after an intermediate follow-up period, pathologic upstaging did not appear to result in worsened oncologic outcomes.

Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Masses Measuring Larger Than 7 cm on Preoperative Imaging: A Single Surgeon, Single Center Experience

Objectives. To document the feasibility of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for the surgical treatment of renal masses measuring larger than 7 cm (cT2) on preoperative imaging. Methods. A total of 139 patients have undergone NSS between 2001 and 2012 by a single surgeon in our clinic. Of these, we identified 17 patients whose tumors were measuring greater than 7 cm on preoperative imaging studies and were limited to the kidney. Their charts were retrospectively reviewed. Results. Mean age of the study population was 49.8 ± 11.3 years. Thirteen patients were managed by open NSS, while 4 patients have undergone robot-assisted NSS. Mean diameter and mean R.E.N.A.L. score of the tumors that were enucleoresected were 8.2 cm and 8.5, respectively. A total of 5 Clavien grade 2 and higher complications were recorded within 30 days of surgery. Histopathologic examination revealed benign histology in almost 1/4 of the cases. After a median followup of 33 months, all of our patients were alive. Only one patient (5.8%) experienced local recurrence. Conclusions. NSS is a feasible and safe option for large (>7 cm) renal masses. It may be considered not only for imperative conditions but also for highly selected cases with a normal contralateral kidney.

Single institutional experience with nephron-sparing surgery for pathologic stage T3bNxM0 renal cell carcinoma confined to the renal vein

OBJECTIVE

To assess our institution's experience with the management of pathologic stage T3bNxM0 renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus confined to the renal vein treated with nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

METHODS

Of the 492 patients who have undergone NSS at Columbia University from 1998 to 2009, 8 patients were found to have stage T3bNxM0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on final pathology. Records were reviewed for indication for NSS, imaging studies, perioperative management, surgical details, pathology, and both functional and disease-specific outcomes. Postoperative renal function was estimated by most recent glomerular filtration rate using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Recurrence of RCC was monitored using serial axial imaging.

RESULTS

The 8 patients were presumed to be clinical stage T1aN0M0 RCC before surgery; however, tumor thrombus was identified in the renal vein intraoperatively and on final pathology in 4, and 4 cases, respectively, corresponding to stage T3bNxM0 RCC by current American Joint Committee on Cancer-Tumor-Necrosis-Metastasis 2002 criteria. After a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the patients experienced a mean decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 27.1%. One patient developed new-onset renal failure, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Clean surgical margins were obtained in 7 patients. Carcinoma was identified at the parenchymal margin in 1 patient. No patients have evidence of recurrence of RCC by serial axial imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

NSS does not seem to have had a negative impact on a small series of patients with pathologic stage T3bNxM0 RCC limited to the renal vein and may be a feasible option when the clinical situation indicates a need for preservation of renal function.

Outcome of stage T2 or greater renal cell cancer treated with partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Partial nephrectomy for stage T1 renal cell carcinoma is oncologically efficacious and safe, and may have survival advantages. We describe our experience with partial nephrectomy for T2 or greater renal cell cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1970 and 2008 approximately 2,300 partial nephrectomies were done at our institution, including 69 for sporadic unilateral advanced stage tumors (pT2 in 32, pT3a in 28 and pT3b in 9). We reviewed outcomes in these patients compared to those in 207 treated with radical nephrectomy matched 3:1 for stage, tumor size, baseline renal function, age and gender.

RESULTS

The risk of cancer specific (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.43-1.50, p = 0.489) and overall (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.71, p = 0.642) death was similar for partial nephrectomy. At a median of 3.2 years of followup 15 patients (22%) with partial nephrectomy had metastatic disease vs 69 (33%) with radical nephrectomy (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42-1.29, p = 0.29). Four patients (6%) with partial nephrectomy had isolated local recurrence vs 7 (3%) with radical nephrectomy (HR 2.11, 95% CI 0.62-7.22, p = 0.234). In the partial nephrectomy group 12 (17%) and 2 cases (3%) were complicated by urine leak and retroperitoneal bleeding requiring intervention, respectively. The median serum creatinine increase was 9.5% (IQR 0-22) vs 33% (IQR 20-47) for partial vs radical nephrectomy (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy for T2 or greater renal cell carcinoma preserves renal function and appears to achieve oncological outcomes similar to those of radical nephrectomy. The role of partial nephrectomy in patients with T2-3 tumors and a normal contralateral kidney deserves further consideration and study.

Surgery insight: management of renal cell carcinoma with associated inferior vena cava thrombus

Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge; however, the surgical resection of these tumors can be facilitated by appropriate preoperative imaging and planning. First and foremost, we believe that this procedure should be considered an operation on the inferior vena cava rather than on the kidney. The level and extent of the tumor thrombus dictates the surgical approach used. Although the patient should be given an appropriate explanation of the procedure and its risks, the surgeon needs to be adequately prepared and have intraoperative versatility in order to maintain the safety of this operation. In this Review, we describe our approach to surgical resection in patients who have renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus, and outcomes for the management of patients with this disorder.

Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma

It has been 35 years since the radical nephrectomy was standardized by the work of Robson et al. (J Urol 101:297-301, 1969). Despite being based on a retrospective review of only 88 cases operated upon over a span of 15 years, this publication was an important milestone in the attempt to create uniformity in the staging of Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the measurement of surgical outcomes for RCC. Although this manuscript forms the basis for our contemporary measurement of the long-term results of RCC surgery and set the standard to which the entire subsequent literature was compared, contemporary research subsequently has questioned many of Robson's conclusions regarding RCC. In Robson's era, the majority of patients presented with large, symptomatic tumors, pre-operative staging was imprecise, and many patients had locally advanced disease at the time of surgery: of the 88 patients in Robson's series, 75% were managed through a thoracoabdominal incision. Since that time, advances in renal imaging and clinical staging have led to the increased detection of incidental, lower stage, organ-confined tumors more amendable to expanded surgical options. Surgical techniques have evolved and technological advances have made possible new methods of managing renal tumors in situ that have emphasized a transition from radical to less extirpative approaches. In addition, understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer has led to improved prognostication and the development of effective immunotherapies for advanced disease. The current concepts and long-term outcomes of the surgical management of RCC will be reviewed to help elucidate some of these changes, from the evolution of open to laparoscopic to percutaneous, from radical to partial to ablative approaches.

Open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Open partial nephrectomy, or nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), is now considered the standard of care for the treatment of small renal tumors. The oncologic efficacy and safety of NSS for the treatment of stage-T1a renal tumors has been repeatedly demonstrated to be equivalent to radical nephrectomy. NSS initially was reserved for patients with solitary kidneys, impaired renal function, hereditary tumor syndromes, bilateral renal tumors, and those with significant comorbidities predisposing to future renal failure. The indications have expanded recently to allow elective partial nephrectomy in the setting of a normal contralateral kidney. Furthermore, recent data demonstrate that partial nephrectomy for larger tumors (T1b), which have been historically treated with radical nephrectomy, is a viable option when surgical margins can safely be achieved. In the era of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic NSS is technically feasible, yet long-term studies are still needed to assess oncologic efficacy. New NSS ablative technologies, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, are on the horizon. In this article, we discuss the role of open NSS and surgical technique in the contemporary management of renal tumors.

Lessons learned in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma

Surgical excision, the mainstay of management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), has evolved significantly over the last 4 decades. Radiological imaging is crucial to the diagnosis and staging of RCC, and technological advances have facilitated more precise preoperative assessment. Additionally, wider use of cross-sectional imaging modalities has led to increasing incidental diagnosis of small, early-stage RCC. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), originally developed to treat RCC arising in a solitary functioning kidney, has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective alternative to radical nephrectomy. NSS is now also applicable to tumors of suitable size and anatomy in patients with a normal contralateral kidney, thus facilitating preservation of renal function and management of metachronous contralateral pathology. Laparoscopic and percutaneous approaches have developed over the last decade, thus providing minimally invasive modalities, with shortened convalescence and improved cosmesis. Advanced RCC, involving venous extension or nodal spread, is increasingly amenable to surgical management, although appropriate patient selection is crucial. Furthermore, surgical excision of the primary lesion appears to be an integral part of systemic therapy for metastatic RCC.