Carefully selected intratesticular lesions can be safely managed with serial ultrasonography

Diagnosis and management of indeterminate testicular lesions

The sophistication and accessibility of modern-day imaging result in frequent detection of small or equivocal lesions of the testes. Traditionally, diagnosis of a testicular lesion with any possibility of malignancy would usually prompt radical orchidectomy. However, awareness is growing that a substantial proportion of these lesions might be benign and that universal application of radical orchidectomy risks frequent overtreatment. Given the potentially profound effects of radical orchidectomy on fertility, endocrine function and psychosexual well-being, particularly in scenarios of an abnormal contralateral testis or bilateral lesions, organ-preserving strategies for equivocal lesions should be considered. Image-based active surveillance can be applied for indeterminate lesions measuring ≤15 mm with a low conversion rate to surgical treatment. However, these outcomes are early and from relatively small, selected cohorts, and concerns prevail regarding the metastatic potential of even small undiagnosed germ cell tumours. No consensus exists on optimal surveillance (short interval (<3 months) ultrasonography is generally adopted); histological sampling is a widespread alternative, involving inguinal delivery of the testis and excisional biopsy of the lesion, with preoperative marking or intraoperative ultrasonographic localization when necessary. Frozen section analysis in this context demonstrates excellent diagnostic accuracy. Histological results support that approximately two-thirds of marker-negative indeterminate solitary testicular lesions measuring ≤25 mm overall are benign. In summary, modern imaging detects many small indeterminate testicular lesions, of which the majority are benign. Awareness is growing of surveillance and organ-sparing diagnostic and treatment strategies with the aim of minimizing rates of overtreatment with radical orchidectomy.

Multiparametric Ultrasound for Diagnosing Testicular Lesions: Everything You Need to Know in Daily Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography (US) represents the gold standard imaging method for the assessment of testicular lesions (TL). The gray-scale (GSUS) and color-Doppler (CDUS) ultrasound examination allow sonographers to investigate the size, margins, echotexture, and vascular features of TLs with the aim to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Recently, the use of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and sonoelastography (SE) has led to further improvements in the differential diagnosis of TL. Although GSUS and CDUS are often sufficient to suggest the benign or malignant nature of the TL, CEUS can be decisive in the differential diagnosis of unclear findings, while SE can help to strengthen the diagnosis. The contemporary combination of GSUS, CDUS, CEUS, and SE has led to a new diagnostic paradigm named multiparametric US (mp-US), which is able to provide a more detailed characterization of TLs than single techniques alone. This narrative and pictorial review aimed to describe the mp-US appearance of several TLs.

METHODS

An extensive Medline search was performed to identify studies in the English language focusing on the mp-US evaluation of TLs.

RESULTS

A practical mp-US "identity card" and iconographic characterization of several benign and malignant TLs is provided herein.

CONCLUSIONS

The mp-US characterization of TL reported herein can be useful in daily clinical practice.

Small Testicular Masses: Contemporary Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies, Future Directions, and Knowledge Gaps

The incidental discovery of small masses in the testicles of young men is becoming an increasing clinical dilemma. We are learning that the malignancy rate in masses ≤ 2 cm is much lower than traditionally thought and could be as low as 13% to 21%. The challenge remains in identifying which of these patients harbor malignant tumors that need to be treated, and benign lesions that could be safely surveilled. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the current scientific evidence, diagnostic work-up, and treatment strategies for small testicular masses. We also discuss selection criteria, follow-up schedules and triggers for intervention for the surveillance of these small testis masses. Furthermore, we give a set of recommendations for assessing and treating these patients, based on the available literature and our experience at a dedicated testicular cancer clinic.

Is testis sparing surgery safe in patients with incidental small testicular lesions referring to a fertility center? A retrospective analysis reporting factors correlated to malignancy and long-term oncological outcomes

PURPOSE

To define predictors of malignancy after Testis sparing surgery (TSS) in patients referring to a fertility center with incidental small testicular lesions. Sub analyses were performed to assess predictors of Leydig cell hyperplasia and Leydig cell tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a single institutional database including patients treated with TSS between 2002 and 2020. All patients who underwent TSS as a first line surgical approach for incidentally detected lesions found during fertility evaluation were included.

RESULTS

Data of 64 patients were collected. The median follow up was 58 months and no recurrences were observed. At univariable logistic regression multifocal lesions, hypervascularization, microlithiasis, age and lesion size were significantly associated with malignancy. At multivariable logistic regression lesion dimension, hypervascularization and multifocal lesions were predictors of malignancy. Lesions smaller than 5 mm proved to be benign in 96.6% of the cases (32/33). Intraoperative color of the lesion and US pattern of vascularization were predictors at multivariable logistic regression for Leydig cell hyperplasia and Leydig cell tumor.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonographic characteristics and intraoperative appearance of the lesion can predict the malignant nature of small testicular lesions, guiding their surgical management in patients referring to a fertility center. Based on our experience, clinicians may safely perform TSS in carefully selected patients.

What Is the Malignant Potential of Small (<2 cm), Nonpalpable Testicular Incidentalomas in Adults? A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Unlike palpable lumps, a large number of nonpalpable testicular lesions found incidentally at ultrasound in asymptomatic postpuberal males are either benign tumours or non-neoplastic lesions. The prevalence of malignancy, however, is appraised based on small case series. Dedicated studies report a large number of patients, and systematic review articles are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review is aimed to assess, from the analysis of the pooled data of the available literature, the incidence of benign tumours, malignant tumours, and non-neoplastic lesions, and to identify predictive characteristics for malignancy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on January 6, 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were retrieved reporting on adult asymptomatic men, with single, incidentally identified small testicular lesions, either fertile or infertile, with negative tumour markers and without specific risk factors for malignancy. Lesions ≤20 mm were considered small. Seventy-four studies were selected for inclusion in this analysis. Twenty-six additional publications have been retrieved by the bibliography quoted in the selected articles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Pooled data of 1348 lesions in 1348 patients were collected. Of these lesions, 408 could be retrieved individually, 44.6% were benign, 27.2% were malignant, and 20.8% were non-neoplastic. Virtually all lesions <3 mm and 86.6% of lesions <5 mm were benign. Lesions >10 mm have a 38.14% probability of being benign. Hyperechoic lesions are likely benign. Fertility status does not affect the risk of malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Very small (<3 mm) and small (<5 mm) incidentally detected testicular lesions in asymptomatic postpuberal men with normal tumour markers could be frequently benign. More prospective studies are needed to better support this finding. Management strategies should be developed for these patients to reduce overtreatment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Small testicular lesions are incidentally founded at ultrasound. It is not easy to distinguish a benign lesion from a malignant one. Results of this study are reporting a higher incidence of benign lesions with a diameter of <5 mm. More studies are needed to better understand the biology and the management strategy for small testicular lesions.

Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses-A Systematic Review

Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, their benign or malignant histology and their management. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies reporting small or incidental testicular masses and their management by radical orchiectomy, testis sparing surgery (TSS) or ultrasound (US) surveillance. We initially screened 2126 abstracts and from these, 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. Testicular masses were detected in 1.74% of patients undergoing US examination. Regarding STMs removed by surgery, 41.12% were benign. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) is a reliable tool to discriminate between benign and malignant testicular masses (average 93.05% accuracy), supporting TSS. Benign lesions were associated with smaller diameter (<1 cm 68.78% benign), were often hypoechoic and exhibited regular margins on US. Conclusions: Small testicular masses are often benign. Clinical and US patterns are not accurate enough for including patients in surveillance protocols and TSS paired with FSE is pivotal for precluding the removal of testicles bearing benign lesions. Future research might unveil new imaging tools or biomarkers to support clinical management.

Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Burned-Out Testicular Tumours: The Diagnostic Keys Based on 48 Cases

The spontaneous regression of testicular germ-cell tumours is a rare event whose mechanisms have yet to be elucidated. In the majority of published cases, tumour regression is concomitant with the metastatic development of the disease. Residual lesions, often referred to as burned-out testicular tumours (BOTTs), are difficult to diagnose due to the paucity of published data, especially in the field of imaging. The aim of this article is to describe the radiological signs of BOTTs on multimodal ultrasound and multiparametric MRI from a series of 48 patients whose diagnosis was confirmed histologically. The demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients are studied, as well as the data of the imaging examinations, including conventional scrotal ultrasound, shear-wave elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI. A total of 27 out of 48 patients were referred for investigation of primary testicular lesion following the discovery of retroperitoneal metastases, 18/48 patients were referred because of lesions suspected on an ultrasound that was performed for an infertility work-up, and 3/48 were referred because of scrotal clinical signs. Of these last 21 patients (infertility work-up/scrotal clinical sign), 6 were found to be metastatic on the extension work-up. Of the 48 orchiectomy specimens, tumour involution was complete in 41 cases, and a small active contingent remained in 7 cases, with 6 suspected upon advanced US and MRI. Typically, BOTTs appear on a conventional ultrasound as ill-delineated, hypoechoic and hypovascular nodular areas. Clustered microliths (60.4%) and macrocalcifications (35.4%) were frequent. Shear-wave elastography showed areas of focal induration (13.5 ± 8.4 vs. 2.7 ± 1.2 kPa for normal parenchyma, p < 0.01) in 92.5% of the patients for whom it was performed, and contrast ultrasonography demonstrated hypoperfusion of these lesions. Of the 42 MRIs performed, BOTTs corresponded to nodules on T2-weighted sequences (hyposignal) with significantly increased ADC values compared with healthy parenchyma (2 ± 0.3 versus 1.3 ± 0.3 × 10−3 mm2/s, p < 0.01) and an enhancement defect after injection. This enhancement defect overlapped the lesions visible on T2-weighted sequences in most cases. In the case of predominant partial regression, an enhanced portion after contrast injection was visible on MRI in all seven patients of our series, and in six of them a focal diffusion restriction zone was also present. Spontaneously involuted testicular germ-cell tumours have specific radiological signs, and all of the mentioned examinations contribute to this difficult diagnosis, even histologically, because there is no tumour cell left. These signs are similar whether the patient is initially symptomatic metastatic or whether the discovery is fortuitous on the occasion of an infertility work-up, and whatever the seminomatous or non-seminomatous nature of the germ-cell tumour, when this can be determined. The appearance of regressed germ-cell tumours is often trivialized, which can lead to the wrong diagnosis of an extra gonadal germ-cell tumour (in metastatic patients) or of scarring from an acute event such as trauma or infection, which is not recognized or forgotten. In our series, two patients had an unrecognized diagnosis in their history, with local and/or distant recurrence. An improvement in diagnosing burned-out tumours, combining advanced US and MRI, is necessary in order to optimize patient management, with special attention paid to asymptomatic patients, to prompt extension screening and orchiectomy with analysis of the whole testis. This may reveal a persistent viable tumour or lesions of germinal neoplasia in situ, which are precursors of testicular germ-cell tumours.

Incidental Findings and How to Manage Them: Testis- A WFUMB Position Paper

Testicular incidentalomas are non-palpable, asymptomatic lesions, most frequently detected on ultrasound examinations. Each incidentaloma should undergo a standardized diagnostic workup to exclude malignancy and recognize other potentially significant non-malignant conditions that may first present with an incidental finding on scrotal ultrasound. This position statement of the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) summarizes the available evidence on management of testicular incidentalomas and describes efficient management strategies with particular reference to the role of ultrasound techniques.

The role of radiological surveillance in the conservative management of incidental small testicular masses: A systematic review

Objective: The increasing use of scrotal ultrasonography (US) for non-cancerous indications has led to greater detection of incidental, small testicular masses. Operative intervention is currently the mainstay of treatment for all testicular tumours; however, despite the low malignant potential of small, incidental masses, little is known about conservative management using radiological surveillance.

Methods: A systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed for patient outcomes.

Results: A total of 293 patients across six studies underwent radiological surveillance for an incidental small testicular mass. Infertility was the main indication for investigation and all studies used US as the surveillance modality. A total of 37 patients (12.6%) underwent surgical exploration during follow-up, with only 10 (3.4%) found to have malignant disease at histology.

Conclusions: Radiological surveillance of incidental small testicular masses is safe when used for select patient groups due to the high probability of benign disease, although optimal patient selection criteria and a well-defined protocol are lacking. This approach could be considered in patients with incidental, impalpable testicular masses of ≤5 mm in diameter displaying no significant size increase or internal vascularity on US and with negative tumour markers, as the probability of malignancy in these patients is low.

Feasibility of active surveillance in small testicular mass: a mini review

Introduction

Widespread use of scrotal ultrasonography has led to the detection of incidental, non-palpable small testicular masses (STMs). Historically, all intratesticular masses were treated radically, however more conservative strategies are now being applied with growing evidence that up to 80% of STMs are benign lesions. Testis-sparing surgery is deemed a gold standard in STMs. However, the high probability of the benign nature of STMs and the excellent cure rate of localized testicular cancer has led to emerging attempts to use an active surveillance (AS) strategy for selected groups of patients.

Material and methods

We conducted a non-systematic review of the literature in the PubMed and Embase databases for articles associated with AS strategy in STMs.

Results

The main inclusion criteria for AS in patients with STMs were lack of risk factors of testicular cancer, no features of disseminated disease, negative tumor markers, non-palpable lesion that did not exceed 10 mm. Mean follow-up time of AS across the studies ranged from 9.6 to 29.6 months. Surveillance protocols were based on regular physical examination, scrotal ultrasonography and measurement of tumor markers. The change rate to active treatment ranged from 0% to 8% without reported deterioration of oncological outcomes. Patients have proceeded to surgical treatment based on their preference, lesion growth, change in echogenicity, tumor marker growth and the need for testicular exploration for other reasons.

Conclusions

Active surveillance is a reasonable conservative strategy in the management of STMs in selected groups of patients with minimal risk of deteriorating impact on oncological outcomes.

Should We Use Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Characterization of Nonpalpable Testicular Lesions? An Analysis from a Cost-Effectiveness Perspective

PURPOSE

 Accurate characterization of testicular lesions is crucial to allow for correct treatment of malignant tumors and to avoid unnecessary procedures in benign ones. In recent years, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) proved to be superior in specifying the dignity of small, nonpalpable testicular lesions (< 1.5 cm) compared to native B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound which were previously regarded as the primary imaging method. However, the cost-effectiveness of CEUS has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of CEUS as compared to unenhanced ultrasound for the characterization of nonpalpable testicular lesions.

METHODS

 A decision model based on Markov simulations estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with unenhanced ultrasound and CEUS. Model input parameters were obtained from recent literature. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and costs was performed. Also, probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo Modelling was applied. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to $100 000/QALY.

RESULTS

 In the base-case scenario, unenhanced ultrasound resulted in total costs of $5113.14 and an expected effectiveness of 8.29 QALYs, whereas CEUS resulted in total costs of $4397.77 with 8.35 QALYs. Therefore, the unenhanced ultrasound strategy was dominated by CEUS in the base-case scenario. Sensitivity analysis showed CEUS to be the cost-effective alternative along a broad range of costs.

CONCLUSION

 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a cost-effective imaging method for the characterization of nonpalpable testicular lesions.

Rare presentation of a testicular glomus tumour

Glomus tumours are atypical in extracutaneous locations and very rarely located in reproductive organs. We present an unusual case of an incidentally discovered glomus tumour arising from the testis of a 47-year-old man. The testicular occurrence of this tumour type is not only exceptionally rare but also serves to highlight the debate regarding the optimal management of incidentally discovered small testicular lesions.

[Testicular tumors: A diagnostic challenge of imaging]

OBJECTIVES

Reviewing the characterization and the follow-up imaging of testicular tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature review (PubMed, Medline) of urological and radiological studies dealing with testicular tumors using keywords: Testicular tumors; Color Doppler ultrasound; US elastography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Contrast enhanced sonography.

RESULTS

Ultrasound remains the basic exam for the tumor characterization. Among the other techniques, MRI, elastography, contrast enhanced ultrasound, although still in evaluation, will be increasingly used in the future. The frequency of benign Leydig cell tumors justifies a testicular preservation approach, through improvement of characterization, monitoring or tumorectomy. The follow-up of testicular lesions must be indicated on precise indications: follow-up of the contralateral testicle in the case of germi cell tumor, follow-up by of a supposed benign lesion, such as a small Leydig cell tumor in an infertile patient, follow-up when ultra-sound findings are not sufficiently worrying to require immediate diagnosis but which include pejorative criteria. The tumor markers and the extension screening remain systematic.

CONCLUSION

The era of total orchiectomy for any uncertain testicular lesion is over. We try the challenge of characterization, and define management's algorithms based on clinical biological data and suspected nature of the tumor at imaging.

[Non-palpable testicular tumors in adults: A management based on imaging? Issue from the French Urologic Association Genital Cancer committee's edit]

BACKGROUND

Help in management of non-palpable testicular tumors. French Urologic Association Genital cancer committee's Edit.

OBJECTIVES

To review their characterization at imaging findings of non-palpable testicular tumors.

DOCUMENTARY SOURCES

Literature review (PubMed, Medline) of urological and radiological studies dealing with testicular tumors using keywords: non-palpable/incidental testicular tumors; color Doppler ultrasound; US elastography; magnetic resonance imaging; contrast enhanced sonography; partial surgery.

RESULTS

Color Doppler is the basic exam. The size, the presence of microlithts/microlithiasis/macrocalcifications, the vascular architecture are major semiological findings to suggest the benign or the malignant nature of the lesion. Other techniques like multiparametric MRI, contrast-enhanced sonography, sonographic elastography are still in evaluation. The frequency of benign tumors such as Leydig cell tumors lead to preservation management, through improved characterization, monitoring or tumorectomy.

LIMITS

Non-randomized study - a very few prospective studies.

CONCLUSION

The era of total orchiectomy for any uncertain testicular lesion is over. We try the challenge of characterization, and define management's algorithms based on the suspected nature of the tumors.

Causes of Avascular Hypoechoic Testicular Lesions Detected at Scrotal Ultrasound: Can They Be Considered Benign?

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to determine the cause of avascular hypoechoic lesions detected at scrotal ultrasound and to assess usefulness of sonographic and clinical features in differentiating benign from malignant etiologic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 58 patients with avascular hypoechoic lesions detected at testicular ultrasound. The sonographic features recorded were lesion size and margins and presence of peripheral vascularity and focal calcifications. Also recorded were patient age, symptoms, risk factors, lesion palpability, and levels of serum tumor markers. The reference standard was pathologic results or at least 2-year stability documented with serial follow-up ultrasound studies. Features associated with malignant, including burnt-out, lesions and benign lesions were examined by Fisher exact test, Wilcox-on rank sum test, and the generalized estimating equations method for multivariable models.

RESULTS

Sixty-three lesions were identified in 58 patients; 40 of the 63 (63.5%) were benign. Patients with malignant lesions had elevated serum tumor marker levels more often than patients who had benign lesions (26.1% versus 5.7%, p = 0.043). The clinical palpability of lesions and history of testicular cancer were not statistically significantly different between patients with malignant and those with benign lesions. Poorly defined margins of a lesion and focal calcification within the lesion were more often found in malignant lesions. Maximal size of a lesion and peripheral vascularity were not associated with either the benign or the malignant nature of a lesion.

CONCLUSION

Although most avascular hypoechoic testicular lesions are benign, a substantial proportion are malignant. The ultrasound characteristics of a lesion, the patient's clinical presentation, and serum tumor marker status may be useful in differentiating malignant from benign lesions.

Burned-Out Testis Tumors in Asymptomatic Infertile Men: Multiparametric Sonography and MRI Findings

Multiparametric testicular ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were analyzed in a series of 10 infertile asymptomatic men presenting with pathologically confirmed burned-out testicular tumors. Color/power Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), shear wave elastography (SWE), contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), and MRI were performed on 10, 5, 6, and 7 patients, respectively. All lesions appeared as a hypoechoic and hypovascular nodular area at CDUS, SWE, CEUS CDUS, and CEUS (if performed). Shear wave elastography showed a stiffer nodular area compared with the surrounding/contralateral tissues (13 versus 2 kPa); MRI revealed a well-delineated nodular area in hypointense signal on T2, a high apparent diffusion coefficient value, and a lack of enhancement.

Evaluation of the decision-making process in the conservative approach to small testicular masses

INTRODUCTION

We evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with conservative approach for small testicular masses (STMs). We analyzed the steps who brought to the selection of the therapeutic approach: starting from clinical presentation, through imaging and lab studies.

METHODS

We considered 18 patients who underwent an organ-sparing approach for STMs from 2005 until 2014. The selection criteria were dimension of the mass and absence of clinical, laboratory and/or radiological malignancy suspicion. Preoperative scrotal ultrasound (US) was carried out in all the patients by the same radiologist. The postoperative fertility profile was evaluated in patients younger than 40 years.

RESULTS

We performed 13 enucleations, one partial orchiectomy (PO) and four active surveillances. During surgery, a frozen section examination (FSE) was always requested and no discrepancies were noted between its results and the definitive histology. Only one seminomatous tumor was identified, while the remaining masses were four necrosis, four epidermoid cysts, three Leydig tumors, one Sertoli tumor and one chronic orchitis. After a mean follow-up of 41.6 ± 24.7 months, all the patients resulted free of disease and hypogonadism and five of them reached the fatherhood after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and instrumental evaluation consented an accurate selection of patients eligible for the organ-preserving approach. We believe that testis-sparing surgery leads good functional and aesthetic results in patients with benign lesions; it is a safe option for STMs with a reliable pathologist performing FSE and is an important goal in young patients with fatherhood desire.

Testicular biopsy: clinical practice and interpretation

Testicular biopsy was considered the cornerstone of male infertility diagnosis for many years in men with unexplained infertility and azoospermia. Recent guidelines for male infertility have limited the indications for a diagnostic testicular biopsy to the confirmation of obstructive azoospermia in men with normal size testes and normal reproductive hormones. Nowadays, testicular biopsies are mainly performed for sperm harvesting in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, to be used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Testicular biopsy is also performed in men with risk factors for testicular malignancy. In a subgroup of infertile men, there is an increased risk for carcinoma in situ of the testis, especially in men with a history of cryptorchidism and testicular malignancy and in men with testicular atrophy. Ultrasonographic abnormalities, such as testicular microlithiasis, inhomogeneous parenchyma and lesions of the testes, further increase the risk of carcinoma in situ (CIS) in these men. For an accurate histological classification, proper tissue handling, fixation, preparation of the specimen and evaluation are needed. A standardized approach to testicular biopsy is recommended. In addition, approaches to the detection of CIS of the testis testicular immunohistochemistry are mandatory. In this mini-review, we describe the current indications for testicular biopsies in the diagnosis and management of male infertility.

Targeted testicular excision biopsy: when and how should we try to avoid radical orchidectomy?

Small, incidental testicular lesions are often benign, but in the past have usually been treated by orchidectomy. An alternative is an operative excision biopsy, with localization by ultrasound if necessary, and characterization of the lesion by frozen section analysis. The present review summarizes the indications for the procedure, lists the likely diagnoses, and describes the technique. Frozen section is accurate for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, testicular function is usually preserved, and there is no evidence that oncological safety is impaired. Such testis-preserving surgery is a rewarding ground for collaboration between urologists, radiologists, and pathologists.

Diagnostic performance of three-dimensional ultrasound extended imaging at scrotal mass lesions

OBJECTIVES

High resolution two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) difficulty in evaluation of some scrotal mass lesions is not frequent. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional ultrasound extended imaging (3D XI) in characterization of those lesions.

METHODS

The study protocol had the approval of the University's review board all participants' informed consents were obtained. The study included 28 selected patients (12 testicular and 16 para-testicular mass lesions) examined by 2D US and 3D XI applications including computed multi-slice view (MSV) and multi-resolution enhanced images (XI MR). Results were correlated with histopathological findings.

RESULTS

Two-dimensional ultrasound did not adequately characterize 28 patients out of 329 (8.5%). 3D XI interrogation was an easy procedure and distinctive of the pathological findings in 27 patients out of 28 (96.4%). The performance of XI MR with respect to characterization provided additional diagnostic information over MSV.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of 3D XI with respect to testicular mass characterization proved better than static 2D US. Subsequently, the results of this study suggest that the routine use of 2D US in diagnosis of scrotal mass lesions should preferably be upgraded to 3D XI methods.