Assessing the body mass index of patients might help to predict blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy in Korean men

Prostatic Bleeding after Prostatic Biopsy Effects Oncological Outcomes with Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

We vigorously reviewed patients' operation record who had adhesion of the Denonvilliers' fascia and found out most of these patients had prostatic bleeding after prostatic gland biopsies. We examined the magnitude of prostatic bleeding and frequency after biopsies and the relationship with oncological outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 285 patients were selected for the final analyses. Inclusion criteria were as follows: receiving MRI three weeks after biopsiesand laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within 300 days after biopsy. We divided the patients into two groups with (group A) or without (group B) prostatic bleeding. We examined the magnitude of prostatic bleeding after biopsies and the relationship with operation time (OT), positive surgical margin (PSM), biochemical recurrence (BCR) and other factors. Furthermore, we created a logistic-regression model to derive a propensity score for prostatic bleeding after biopsies, which included all patient and hospital characteristics as well as selected interaction terms, and we examined the relationship with PSM and BCR.

RESULTS

In all patients, the OT in the group B was shorter than the group A (p < 0.001). Prostatic bleeding was associated with PSM (p=0.000) and BCR (p=0.036). In this propensity-matched cohort, 11 of 116 patients in the group B had PSM as compared with 36 of 116 patients from group A (match-adjusted odds ratio, 4.30; 95%CI confidence interval, 2.06 to 8.96; P=0.000). In addition, eight of 116 patients in group B encountered BCR, as compared with 18 of 116 patients in group A (match-adjusted odds ratio, 2.48; 95%CI, 1.03 to 5.96; P=0.042). Kaplan-Meier analysis in the propensity matching cohort showed a significant biochemical recurrence-free survival advantage for being free of prostate bleeding after biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings in the present cohort should help equip surgeons to pay attention to careful excision especially for those who experienced deferred prostatic bleeding.

Advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients: comparison with the open procedure

Purpose

Obesity has been suggested as a risk factor for worse perioperative outcomes, especially in radical prostatectomy, in several studies. However, the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes has not yet been well elucidated for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We evaluated whether obesity had an adverse effect on outcomes following RALP compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).

Materials and Methods

From April 2008 to May 2011, 181 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RALP, 111; RRP, 70). These patients were subdivided into two groups according to body mass index (BMI): the nonobese group (BMI, 25 kg/m² or less) and the obese group (BMI, greater than 25 kg/m²). Perioperative outcomes in RALP and RRP were retrospectively compared between the two groups.

Results

In RRP, patients in the obese group (n=20) showed greater blood loss and a higher complication rate than did those in the nonobese group (n=50). However, in RALP, no statistically significant differences in perioperative outcomes were observed between the obese (n=37) and the nonobese (n=74) groups. RALP showed less blood loss and a lower complication rate in both the obese and nonobese groups than did RRP.

Conclusions

RALP is thought to be a more effective and safer procedure in obese patients compared with traditional open radical prostatectomy. In the management of obese patients with localized prostate cancer, RALP should be considered as a primary choice for treatment.

Virtual modeling of robot-assisted manipulations in abdominal surgery

AIM: To determine the effectiveness of using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data in preoperative planning of robot-assisted surgery.

METHODS: Fourteen patients indicated for surgery underwent MDCT using 64 and 256-slice MDCT. Before the examination, a specially constructed navigation net was placed on the patient’s anterior abdominal wall. Processing of MDCT data was performed on a Brilliance Workspace 4 (Philips). Virtual vectors that imitate robotic and assistant ports were placed on the anterior abdominal wall of the 3D model of the patient, considering the individual anatomy of the patient and the technical capabilities of robotic arms. Sites for location of the ports were directed by projection on the roentgen-positive tags of the navigation net.

RESULTS: There were no complications observed during surgery or in the post-operative period. We were able to reduce robotic arm interference during surgery. The surgical area was optimal for robotic and assistant manipulators without any need for reinstallation of the trocars.

CONCLUSION: This method allows modeling of the main steps in robot-assisted intervention, optimizing operation of the manipulator and lowering the risk of injuries to internal organs.

Radical prostatectomy in obese patients: Improved surgical outcomes in recent years

OBJECTIVES

Obesity has been proposed as a risk factor for reduced disease-specific survival, increased positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between obesity and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing RP.

METHODS

Medical records of 491 patients who underwent RP from 2004 to 2007 were retrieved from our institutional database. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): <25, 25-30 (overweight) and >30 kg/m (obese). Outcomes after RP were compared between the groups in terms of length of stay, perioperative complications, BCR, PSM and Gleason scores.

RESULTS

Age, stage and preoperative prostate-specific antigen were similar between BMI categories. Operating time was prolonged in obese patients (146 vs 135 min, P = 0.01) and blood loss was greater (mean estimated blood loss 640 vs 504 mL, P = 0.02), but did not translate into higher transfusion rates. Early complication rates, PSM rates and Gleason scores were not statistically different between the groups. Significant differences in late outcomes, such as the need for adjunct procedures or BCR (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.18-1.09), were not shown.

CONCLUSION

As surgical experience with high BMI patients has developed, RP appears to be a well tolerated procedure in contemporary series, irrespective of BMI. In particular, early outcome parameters, such as PSM and BCR rates, are similar.

Perioperative blood loss in open retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is it safe to get operated at an educational hospital?

Introduction

Blood loss during radical prostatectomy has been a long term issue. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the training level of the first assistant regarding blood loss in open retropubic radical prostatectomy at an educational hospital.

Material and methods

364 patients underwent radical prostatectomy from 11/2006 to 10/2007 at one institution operated by one surgeon. In 319 patients all predefined parameters were obtained. Training level was determined by year of residency (1-5 yrs) or consultant status. Perioperative blood loss was calculated using three parameters: Hemoglobin level before and after surgery, postoperative sucker volume and weight of compresses. Furthermore the influence of prostatic size and BMI was analyzed.

Results

The Hb-decrease 24 h postoperatively was 2.4 g/dl median (-0.4-7.6 g/dl); sucker volume was 250 ml median (10-1500 ml); weight of compresses and swabs was 412 g median (0-972 g). One patient needed a transfusion with two erythrocyte concentrates one day after the surgery. There was no significant correlation regarding Hb-decrease (p = 0.86) or sucker volume plus weight of compresses (p = 0.59) in regard to the years of residency of the assisting physician. Also the number of assisted operations (n = < or > 20) had no significant influence on calculated blood loss (p = 0.38).

Conclusions

For an experienced surgeon the impact of the assistant regarding blood loss seems negligible. The training level of the assistant was not significantly correlated to a rise or decrease of perioperative blood loss. In our data radical prostatectomy could be safely performed at an educational hospital independent of the training level of the first assistant.

Effect of BMI on primary treatment of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Obese patients with prostate cancer have more aggressive tumors and, in some studies, more prostate cancer-specific deaths. This study was designed to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and treatment patterns of prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

We identified 5041 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (T1-3a, N0M0) who received their first treatment between 1995 and 2006. We derived the odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of receiving each type of therapy compared with radical prostatectomy by BMI categories using multinomial logistic regression. In our analysis we controlled for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, education level, clinical risk category, and number of co-morbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 28.1% of patients were classified as normal BMI, 50.5% were overweight, 16.5% were obese, and 4.8% were very obese. The adjusted OR of receiving nonsurgical therapies (brachytherapy, external radiation, primary androgen deprivation, and active surveillance) increased relative to radical prostatectomy for increasing obesity (P = 0.003). Compared with the patients with normal BMI, very obese patients were more likely to receive brachytherapy (OR 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 2.52), external radiation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.26), primary androgen therapy only (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.81), and active surveillance (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.17) compared with radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of American prostate cancer patients, a significant trend toward nonsurgical treatment modalities was apparent with increasing BMI.

Influence of prostate weight, obesity and height on surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Korean men

The purpose of this study was to determine if different body habitus, including prostate weight, body mass index (BMI) and height, are associated with surgical outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). Between July 2005 and June 2007, 135 patients underwent RLRP by a single surgeon. Information was collected retrospectively on prostate weight, BMI and height. Surgical outcome was assessed by total operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and surgical margin as parameters of technical difficulty. When statistically analyzed, prostate size was significantly related to total operative time (P = 0.001) and EBL (P = 0.033). But prostate size was not significantly related to the surgical margin. Patient BMI and height did not appear to affect surgical outcomes. Despite a shift in body frames towards the western standard, most Asians still have shorter stature, lower BMI and smaller prostates. We have found from our experience that different body habitus is not significantly related to surgical outcomes of RLRP, and therefore, it seems promising to operate successfully on Asian patients. However, it is important to obtain long-term outcomes on a larger cohort of patients in order to confirm our findings.