Dynamic dose-feedback prostate brachytherapy in patients with large prostates and/or planned transurethral surgery before implantation

Modified transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for men with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before brachytherapy is safe and feasible

OBJECTIVE

To report the urinary toxicity outcomes for patients at greater risk of voiding symptoms and retention who received a modified limited transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) before low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Data were analysed from patients receiving the above procedures between 2006 to present, taken from the prospective brachytherapy database of 2000 patients at the St. Luke's Cancer Centre. The limited TURP (TURP(BXT) ) was performed at a median (range) of 64 (25-205) days before seed implantation with a median resection weight of 1.15 g. Selection criteria were based on patients with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms, poor flow or post-void residual urine volume (PVR), or a prominent middle lobe or high bladder neck on transrectal ultrasonography. Baseline prostate cancer characteristics, uroflowmetry, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality-of-life QoL scores were collected and compared with follow-up IPSS and QoL scores.

RESULTS

Data for 112 patients was gathered from the database. The TURP(BXT) resulted in statistically significant improvements before LDR brachytherapy in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) and PVR, IPSS and QoL scores (the mean Qmax before vs after the TURP(BXT) was 11.3 vs 16.7 mL/s). The IPSS and QoL scores at 6 months after seed implantation were increased compared with baseline values before the TURP(BXT) (mean IPSS at 6 months 11.7 vs 9.2 before TURP(BXT) ), but no difference at 1 year (mean IPSS 9), and improved scores at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years follow-up (mean IPSS of 7.9, 5.6, 5.3 and 7.4, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests patients at increased risk of deteriorating voiding symptoms, including urinary retention, are no longer contraindicated against LDR brachytherapy if they receive a modified TURP before seed implantation. This procedure does not appear to carry the risk of urinary incontinence thought to be associated with a conventional TURP before LDR brachytherapy.

Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases

OBJECTIVE

To describe a protocol for transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate and present the clinical experience of this technique in a UK population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a single-centre experience of TPSB approach was undertaken that preferentially, but not exclusively, targeted the peripheral zone of the prostate with 24-38 cores using a 'sector plan'. Procedures were carried out under general anaesthetic in most patients. Between January 2007 and August 2011, 634 consecutive patients underwent TPSB for the following indications: prior negative transrectal biopsy (TRB; 174 men); primary biopsy in men at risk of sepsis (153); further evaluation after low-risk disease diagnosed based on a 12-core TRB (307).

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was found in 36% of men after a negative TRB; 17% of these had disease solely in anterior sectors. As a primary diagnostic strategy, prostate cancer was diagnosed in 54% of men (median PSA level was 7.4 ng/mL). Of men with Gleason 3+3 disease on TRB, 29% were upgraded and went on to have radical treatment. Postoperative urinary retention occurred in 11 (1.7%) men, two secondary to clots. Per-urethral bleeding requiring hospital stay occurred in two men. There were no cases of urosepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

TPSB of the prostate has a role in defining disease previously missed or under-diagnosed by TRB. The procedure has low morbidity.

Does the outcome of prostate cancer patients with large prostates differ from small prostate size in permanent seed, low dose-rate brachytherapy?

OBJECTIVE

Brachytherapy has good results in the treatment of early prostate cancer (PC). The procedure is challenging in large prostates, and the optimal prostate volume for brachytherapy was previously defined as ≤40 ml. This study analysed the outcome of PC patients with small (group A) and large (group B) prostate volume in prospective data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The material consisted of 535 consecutive patients treated with brachytherapy in Kuopio University Hospital. The mean follow-up time was nearly 6 years. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was defined as PSA rising ≥2.0 μg/l above nadir. A PSA bounce was defined as a rise in PSA of ≥0.2 μg/l. The causes of death were recorded.

RESULTS

A bounce was recorded more frequently in group A (30%) than in group B (18%) (p = 0.006). A bounce correlated with young age predicted a favourable outcome in both groups. PSA failure rate was similar in both groups: 13% and 12% in groups A and B, respectively. Post-treatment PSA ≤0.5 μg/l was the only independent prognostic factor associated with PSA failure in both groups (p < 0.0001, both groups). PC survival was 98.4% in both groups. Overall survival was 91% and 94% in groups A and B, respectively (p = not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences between the PC patients with small and large prostate volumes treated with brachytherapy with respect to PSA failure rate, PC survival or overall survival. All patients, independent of prostate size, are potential candidates for brachytherapy.