Colon pouch (Mainz III) for continent urinary diversion

Management of Medium and Long Term Complications Following Prostate Cancer Treatment Resulting in Urinary Diversion - A Narrative Review

The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss and highlight recently published studies regarding the surgical management of patients suffering from prostate cancer treatment complications. Focus will be put on the recalcitrant and more complex cases which might lead to urinary diversion as a definite, last resort treatment. It is in the nature of every treatment, that complications will occur and be bothersome for both patients and physicians. A small percentage of patients following prostate cancer treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or other focal therapies) will suffer side effects and thus, will experience a loss of quality of life. These side effects can persist for months and even years. Often, conservative management strategies fail resulting in recalcitrant recurrences. Prostate cancer patients with "end-stage bladder," "devastated outlet," or a history of multiple failed interventions, are fortunately rare, but can be highly challenging for both patients and Urologists. In a state of multiple previous surgical procedures and an immense psychological strain for the patient, urinary diversion can offer a definite, last resort surgical solution for this small group of patients. Ideally, they should be transferred to centers with experience in this field and a careful patient selection is needed. As these cases are highly complex, a multidisciplinary approach is often necessary in order to guarantee an improvement of quality of life.

[Urinary diversion after uro-oncologic interventions in women: the right procedure for the right patient]

Bladder carcinoma is a relatively rare tumour in women. The even rarer constellation of an invasive carcinoma or a high-risk situation when cystectomy is indicated requires adequate urinary diversion.The individual underlying circumstances of tumour and patient and the experience and preferences of the surgeon determine the choice of urinary diversion.A variety of alternatives are available for bladder replacement. The first decision to be made is between incontinent or continent urinary diversion. There is no general solution that fits all patients, but an individual solution must be found based on adequate information. Options include incontinent drainage with an ostomy, e. g. ureterocutaneostomy or ileum conduit, and the much more complex techniques of the continent variants of orthotopic or heterotopic replacement.Experience with continent diversion is significantly limited in women compared with men. In particular, the orthotopic connection to the urethra reveals gender-specific differences.All in all, clear inclusion or exclusion criteria for the different techniques have to be respected. Especially in cases when quality of life or body image play a crucial role, it is difficult to decide which type of urinary diversion is appropriate. This requires extensive experience on the part of the surgeon regarding the various options of surgical methods as well as knowledge and control of consecutive complications.

Urinary diversions: a primer of the surgical techniques and imaging findings

OBJECTIVE

The article attempts to describe the indications, classification, and surgical anatomy of the commonly performed urinary diversion procedures, followed by the imaging protocol and radiological appearances of the normal postoperative anatomy and complications related to these procedures.

CONTENTS

Diversion procedures are used to reroute urine after cystectomy and in patients with refractory neurogenic or outlet obstruction of the urinary bladder. Broadly, these can be classified as continent and incontinent diversions. Patients with urinary diversions frequently undergo radiological investigations for the detection of complications. Commonly, a loopogram or pouchogram is performed few weeks after the surgery to look for leak, whereas CT or MRI is used for long-term follow-up. Postoperative complications can be early (within 30 days of the surgery) or delayed and include leaks, collections, strictures, calculi, parastomal hernia, small bowel obstruction, and oncologic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A variety of urinary diversion procedures are commonly performed and interpretation of the postsurgical anatomy can be overwhelming for the general radiologist. This article provides a basic understanding of the normal anatomy as well as a thorough discussion on the imaging protocol and radiological appearances of the potential complications associated with these procedures.

W-pouch With Modified Non-isolated Extra Limb for Continence in Cutaneous Diversion After Radical Cystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To report the functional results of continent cutaneous ileal urinary diversion using modified W-pouch with non-isolated extra limb for continence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2013 to January 2016, 21 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with median (interquartile range) of 59 (56.5-62.5) years old underwent radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy; they then had an ileal continent cutaneous pouch constructed from W-pouch with non-isolated extra limb for continence. The technique entails the creation of a detubularized ileal W-pouch with extra limb fashioned from 59 cm of the terminal ileum. This extra limb is not isolated from the pouch. The proximal part of this limb is tailored and fixed in a subserous extramural tunnel for continence, whereas the distal part is left continuous with the pouch. The median (interquartile range) of follow up was 12 (8-17) months. Evaluation of the technique included operative time, continence efficiency, overall complications, and quality of life questionnaire for the patients.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) of operative time of the operation was 4.7 (3.9-5.4) hours. The median (interquartile range) of operative time of the cutaneous pouch creation was 39 (33-43) minutes. No perioperative mortality had occurred. The incidence of continence was 95.2%. The overall complications were 42.8%, and most of them were grade 1 or 2 on Clavien-Dindo classification system.

CONCLUSION

Modification of W-pouch with non-isolated extra limb as continent cutaneous pouch can simplify the technique and shorten the operative time with efficient continence, less side effects, and good quality of life.

[Continent urinary diversion following anterior exenteration]

BACKGROUND

Quality of life after anterior or total exenteration is determined, among other factors, by the type of urinary diversion. There are two different types of urinary diversion: incontinent diversion (ureterocutaneostomy, ileal conduit, and colonic conduit) and continent diversions (continent cutaneous pouch, orthotopic neobladder, and rectal reservoir).

RESULTS

Invasive bladder cancer and advanced or recurrent gynecological tumors are the main indications for continent urinary diversion in women. In patients with non-irradiated bladder cancer, an orthotopic neobladder (except those with tumor invasion of the bladder neck or urethra) or a rectal reservoir is an option. In patients who had received preoperative radiotherapy, non-irradiated bowel segments should be used for urinary diversion (e.g., the transverse colon). In patients with planned postoperative radiation, the urinary diversion should be outside the radiation field.

CONCLUSION

Advantages and disadvantages of all types of urinary diversion should be objectively discussed with the patient. Especially exenteration for advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers should be performed in centers with a multidisciplinary team (gynecologist, urologist, radiotherapist, and in cases with complete exenteration the gastrointestinal surgeon).

Continent urinary diversion

We present a review on the current options for continent urinary diversion and their different indications on the basis of patient selection. In current clinical practice continent urinary diversion is being used world-wide in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and in severe cases of benign bladder pathologies. We also discuss the specific complications of continent urinary diversion and highlight the need to rigorously monitor these patients in the long- term specifically in terms of their renal function and cancer recurrence.

Current developments for pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review aims to update new techniques of pelvic exenteration including minimal invasive surgery, and discuss other aspects of this radical surgery, including worldwide differences.

RECENT FINDINGS

Major advances are made since the first description of pelvic exenteration and the operation is still under evolution. Explorative laparoscopy prior to exenteration is a valuable alternative to laparotomy to elect candidates for pelvic exenteration. There are considerable differences with respect to indications, contraindications, preoperative staging and adjuvant therapy after exenteration in different countries. Advances in laparoscopic instruments also led to the laparoscopic exenteration. The main limiting step of the operation is urinary diversion. New techniques of laparoscopic-assisted and robotic-assisted techniques of urinary diversion have been reported that decrease the operation time. Vascularized muscle flaps are preferred by many surgeons to fill the empty pelvis and provide an acceptable vaginal reconstruction. J-pouch seems to be a safer technique than end-to-end coloanal anastomosis for bowel reconstruction. Developments in the bioengineering tissue for pelvic reconstruction are required.

SUMMARY

Laparoscopy has the advantages of decreased blood loss, improved convalescence, lower incidence of wound infection and incisional hernia, short recovery periods, rapid return of bowel function, better pain control and improved cosmetics compared with laparotomy for pelvic exenteration. Magnification and improved visualization permits en-bloc dissection of tumor and good anastomosis technique. New techniques of urinary diversion, orthotopic neobladder and coloanal are promising.