Urinary fibronectin as a predictor of a residual tumour load after transurethral resection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma

Urinary Protein Markers for the Detection and Prognostication of Urothelial Carcinoma

Bladder cancer diagnosis and surveillance is mainly based on cystoscopy and urine cytology. However, both methods have significant limitations; urine cytology has a low sensitivity for low-grade tumors, while cystoscopy is uncomfortable for the patients. Therefore, in the last decade urine analysis was the subject of intensive research resulting in the identification of many potential biomarkers for the detection, surveillance, or prognostic stratification of bladder cancer. Current trends move toward the development of multiparametric models to improve the diagnostic accuracy compared with single molecular markers. Recent technical advances for high-throughput and more sensitive measurements have led to the development of multiplex assays showing potential for more efficient tools toward future clinical application. In this review, we focus on the findings of urinary protein research in the context of detection and prognostication of bladder cancer. Furthermore, we provide an up-to-date overview on the recommendations for the quality evaluation of published studies as well as for the conduction of future urinary biomarker studies.

Effectiveness of urine fibronectin as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Previous researches pointed out that the measurement of urine fibronectin (Fn) could be a potential diagnostic test for bladder cancer (BCa). We conducted this meta-analysis to fully assess the diagnostic value of urine Fn for BCa detection.

Methods

A systematic literature search in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and CBM was carried out to identify eligible studies evaluating the urine Fn in diagnosing BCa. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were established. We applied the STATA 13.0, Meta-Disc 1.4, and RevMan 5.3 software to the meta-analysis.

Results

Eight separate studies with 744 bladder cancer patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.80 (95%CI = 0.77–0.83), 0.79 (95%CI = 0.73–0.84), and 15.18 (95%CI = 10.07–22.87), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) of SROC was 0.83 (95%CI = 0.79–0.86). The diagnostic power of a combined method (urine Fn combined with urine cytology) was also evaluated, and its sensitivity and AUC were significantly higher (0.86 (95%CI = 0.82–0.90) and 0.89 (95%CI = 0.86–0.92), respectively). Meta-regression along with subgroup analysis based on various covariates revealed the potential sources of the heterogeneity and the detailed diagnostic value of each subgroup. Sensitivity analysis supported that the result was robust. No threshold effect and publication bias were found in this meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Urine Fn may become a promising non-invasive biomarker for bladder cancer with a relatively satisfactory diagnostic power. And the combination of urine Fn with cytology could be an alternative option for detecting BCa in clinical practice. The potential value of urine Fn still needs to be validated in large, multi-center, and prospective studies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-018-1358-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Meta-analysis of a 10-plex urine-based biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer

A 10-plex urine-based bladder cancer (BCa) diagnostic signature has the potential to non-invasively predict the presence of BCa in at-risk patients, as reported in various case-control studies. The present meta-analysis was performed to re-evaluate and demonstrate the robustness and consistency of the diagnostic utility of the 10-plex urine-based diagnostic assay. We re-analyzed primary data collected in five previously published case-control studies on the 10-plex diagnostic assay. Studies reported the sensitivity and specificity of ten urinary protein biomarkers for the detection of BCa, including interleukin 8, matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 10, angiogenin, apolipoprotein E, syndecan 1, alpha-1 antitrypsin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, carbonic anhydrase 9, and vascular endothelial growth factor A. Data were extracted and reviewed independently by two investigators. Log odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine how strongly the 10-plex biomarker panel and individual biomarkers are associated with the presence of BCa. Data pooled from 1,173 patients were analyzed. The log OR for each biomarker was improved by 1.5 or greater with smaller 95% CI in our meta-analysis of the overall cohort compared with each analysis of an individual cohort. The combination of the ten biomarkers showed a higher log OR (log OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.60–4.31) than did any single biomarker irrespective of histological grade or disease stage of tumors. We concluded that the 10-plex BCa-associated diagnostic signature demonstrated a higher potential to identify BCa when compared to any single biomarker. Our results justify further advancement of the 10-plex protein-based diagnostic signature toward clinical application.

A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer

For over 80 years, cystoscopy has remained the gold-standard for detecting tumours of the urinary bladder. Since bladder tumours have a tendency to recur and progress, many patients are subjected to repeated cystoscopies during long-term surveillance, with the procedure being both unpleasant for the patient and expensive for healthcare providers. The identification and validation of bladder tumour specific molecular markers in urine could enable tumour detection and reduce reliance on cystoscopy, and numerous classes of biomarkers have been studied. Proteins represent the most intensively studied class of biomolecule in this setting. As an aid to researchers searching for better urinary biomarkers, we report a comprehensive systematic review of the literature and a searchable database of proteins that have been investigated to date. Our objective was to classify these proteins as: 1) those with robustly characterised sensitivity and specificity for bladder cancer detection; 2) those that show potential but further investigation is required; 3) those unlikely to warrant further investigation; and 4) those investigated as prognostic markers. This work should help to prioritise certain biomarkers for rigorous validation, whilst preventing wasted effort on proteins that have shown no association whatsoever with the disease, or only modest biomarker performance despite large-scale efforts at validation.

Prospective validation of DACH2 as a novel biomarker for prediction of metastasis and prognosis in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Metastasis is the main cause of death from muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), and the metastatic potential of tumors is often unpredictable. The role of Dachshund homolog 2 gene (DACH2) in tumorigenesis remains unexplored. We aimed to investigate whether DACH2 can be used as a biomarker to predict metastasis and prognosis of muscle-invasive UCB in a sequential training and validation fashion. For the training set (n = 40), compared with UCB patients without lymph node (LN) metastasis, both DACH2 protein and mRNA expression were greatly increased in case-matched patients with LN metastasis. For the independent validation set (n = 243), patients with primary UCB that did not express DACH2 had a longer metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) than did those with tumors expressing DACH2 (5-year MFS: 88% [95% CI 80-96] versus 19% [95% CI 7-31], p < 0.001; 5-year OS: 93% [95% CI 87-99] versus 37% [95% CI 23-51], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of DACH2 status showed hazard ratios of 7.34 (95% CI 3.15-11.87, p < 0.001) for MFS and 3.96 (95% CI 2.04-7.16, p < 0.001) for OS which were much higher than hazard ratios associated with other independent risk factors. Collectively, DACH2 is an independent prognostic marker that can be used at initial diagnosis of UCB to identify patients who have a high potential to develop metastasis.

Clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for prediction of residual tumor after transurethral resection of bladder urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of a multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for predicting the residual tumor load after transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC).

METHODS

Voided urine specimens were collected from 125 consecutive patients with suspected UC who had been admitted for TUR. Of the 125 patients, 89 with UC diagnosed underwent a second procedure (repeated TUR or cystectomy) 4-6 weeks after the initial TUR and were included in the present study. Using the pathologic findings from the second procedure, the patients were divided into those with (n = 38) and those without (n = 51) residual tumor. Urine samples were taken both before and after the initial TUR. The multiprobe FISH assay was performed to detect aneuploidy of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and the loss of the 9p21 locus.

RESULTS

Before the first TUR, no significant difference was found in the FISH-positive percentage between those with and without residual tumor. After the first TUR, the FISH-positive percentage in those with residual tumor was significantly greater than in those without residual tumor (42.2% vs 17.6%, P = .003). Moreover, before and after the initial TUR, the percentage of conversion from FISH positive to FISH negative in those with residual tumor was significantly lower than in those without residual tumor (28.9% vs 58.9%, P < .001). No patients were observed with a FISH result of conversion from negative to positive in those with and without residual tumor after the initial TUR.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH appears to be useful for the prediction of the presence of the residual tumor load after TUR of bladder UC.

Urinary protein biomarkers of cancer

BACKGROUND

Although several cancer biomarkers are now in use, few have the necessary sensitivity and specificity to eliminate the need for invasive diagnostic procedures. With the expansion of proteomics, new technologies have been used to study various cancers, resulting in the discovery of several potential urine biomarkers. Urine is an ideal medium for the detection of biomarkers because of the non-invasive means of collecting samples and demonstrated shedding of cells, proteins, enzymes, nucleic acids and metabolic products into urine during various pathological processes.

OBJECTIVE

To review the contemporary literature regarding urinary protein markers of cancer.

METHODS

A PubMed search for 'urinary protein biomarkers of cancer' revealed 4679 scientific publications. The search was limited to studies published over the last 5 years and reviewed pertinent findings regarding biomarker evaluation and discovery.

RESULTS

Several urinary protein biomarkers have been described for urologic, gynecologic, gastrointestinal and neurologic tumors. Some have been selected for use in clinical practice, whereas others have been abandoned owing to inconclusive follow-up studies.

CONCLUSION

Several potential urinary protein markers for cancer exist, yet multi-institutional, prospective trials are needed to validate results before implementation in clinical scenarios.