Renal tumour surgery in elderly patients

Survival benefit of nephron-sparing surgery for patients with pT1b renal cell carcinoma: A population-based study

The use of partial nephrectomy (PN) to treat patients with large renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial, particularly among elderly patients. The present study compared the improvement in cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with pT1b RCC who underwent either PN or radical nephrectomy (RN) and investigated the effects of age and sex on CSS. A total of 20,343 patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to compare the CSS of patients who received PN vs. those who received RN. In total, 5,375 (26.42%) and 14,968 (73.58%) patients with pT1b RCC received PN and RN, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis indicated that PN resulted in an improved CSS compared with RN (P<0.001). In addition, PN was observed to be beneficial in male (P<0.001) and female patients <75 years of age. However, it was not beneficial for female patients of ≥75 years of age (P=0.197). These preliminary results warrant further investigation in clinical trials.

Surgical treatment of renal-cell carcinoma in elderly people

OBJECTIVE

To describe the oncological characteristics and evolution of patients 65 years or older who underwent surgery for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of patients with RCC treated surgically. Those ≥ 65 years old were selected. We analyzed clinical and pathological characteristics as well as oncological and functional outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of OS.

RESULTS

A total of 156 elderly patients with mean age 72.0±5.5 years (range 65-92) and median follow-up of 33 months were included. Surgical approach was open radical nephrectomy in 114 (73.5%), laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 13 (8.4%), open partial nephrectomy in 23 (14.2%) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 6 (3.9%). Pathological stage was: Stage I, 71 (45.5%); Stage II, 27 (17.3%); Stage III, 48 (30.8%); and Stage IV, 10 (6.4%). Lastly, 51 (32.6%) patients died, 22 (43.1%) from cancer. The 5-year OS according to pathological stage was 77.6%, 71.9%, 45.1% and 11.7% for stage I, II, III and IV, respectively (P<.001). On multivariate analysis, pathological stage independently predicted OS (HR 1.96, 95% CI [1.36-2.84], P=.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical management of RCC appears to be safe in properly selected patients 65 years or older. Pathological stage predicts survival in this population.

Optimal management of renal cell carcinoma in the elderly: a review

Both the aging population and the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are growing, making the question of tumor management in the elderly a real challenge. Doctors should be aware of the importance of assessing this specific subpopulation. An aggressive therapeutic approach may be balanced by the benefit of the treatment - care or cure - and the life expectancy and willingness of the patient. The treatment for local disease can be surgery (radical or partial nephrectomy) or ablative therapies (radiofrequency, cryotherapy). Even if in most cases surgery is safe, complications such as alteration of renal function may occur, especially in the elderly, with physiological renal impairment at baseline. More recently, another option has been developed as an alternative: active surveillance. In the past decade, new drugs have been approved in the metastatic setting. All the phase 3 trials have included patients without a limit on age. Nevertheless, data concerning the elderly are still poor and concern only a very selective subpopulation. The toxicity profile of targeted agents may interfere with pre-existent comorbidities. Furthermore, the metabolism of several agents via cytochrome P450 can cause drug interaction. The importance of quality of life is a major factor with regard to management of therapy. Finally, to date, there is no recommendation of systematic a priori dose reduction in the elderly. In this review we describe the various possibilities of treatment for localized RCC or metastatic RCC in an aging population.

[Renal function in the elderly after radical tumor nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy]

Due to rising life-expectancy and increasing use of tomography more elderly patients with incidental renal tumors are being diagnosed. The current article gives an overview of kidney function after renal surgery in the elderly and the aim is to give assistance in clinical practice for deciding how to adequately treat these patients.

[Coping with small renal tumors in the elderly]

With the continually increasing number of elderly patients and the widely distributed use of radiological imaging techniques, the number of elderly patients with incidentally discovered asymptomatic small renal tumors will increase further. Treatment options range from active surveillance, minimally invasive (ablative) techniques, to open or laparoscopic surgery including radical nephrectomy. Many studies have been published on the operative treatment of small renal tumors in the elderly; however, all are limited by the retrospective nature and the small number of cases. Chronological age per se should not be a deciding factor or even an exclusion criterion for treatment of small renal tumors. The decision for therapy should be based on the physical state (comorbidities), mental and emotional state of the patient as well as the individual psychosocial environment. The decision for surgery should be based on organ preservation, depending on the tumor size of ˂7 cm and location, whenever possible.

The effect of age on the morbidity of kidney surgery

PURPOSE

Previous reports of the morbidity of renal surgery have been primarily from academic tertiary referral centers and, thus, they may not reflect general clinical practice. We determined the effect of age and comorbidity on in-hospital surgical morbidity for radical and partial nephrectomy on a population level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were obtained from a Canadian national discharge abstract database. From April 1998 to March 2008 information was available on 20,286 radical and 4,292 partial nephrectomies. Complications were identified using specific ICD-9 and 10 diagnosis and procedure codes. Complication rates were estimated by procedure type and by various explanatory variables, including patient age and Charlson comorbidity score. Multivariate logistic regressions were constructed for radical and partial nephrectomy to determine associations between explanatory variables and complications.

RESULTS

Overall complications developed in 34.1% of radical and 34.3% of partial nephrectomy cases. Patients were more likely to have cardiac, respiratory, vascular and surgical complications after radical nephrectomy while they were more likely to experience genitourinary and nephrectomy specific complications after partial nephrectomy. On multivariate logistic regression after radical and partial nephrectomy complications increased with age and Charlson score. After adjusting for other covariates patients with a Charlson score of greater than 2 were approximately 6 times more likely to experience a complication than patients with a Charlson score of 0 for radical and partial nephrectomy (OR 6.22, 95% CI 5.18-7.48 and OR 5.68, 95% CI 3.72-8.66, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population based study radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy were associated with higher morbidity than previously reported, particularly in the elderly population and in patients with comorbidity.