The ‘buoy’ stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model

Novel Antireflux "RELIEF" Stent to Prevent Vesicoureteral Reflux

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy, comfort, and symptoms of a novel ureteral stent (RELIEF) substituting the distal semirigid coil of a traditional double-J for a floating, monofilament tether allowing coaptation of the ureteral orifice. Ureteral instrumentation notoriously cause discomfort, urgency, frequency, dysuria, and hematuria; prolonged morbidity is likely related to stent-associated vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We hypothesized this design would eliminate VUR, be safe and provide comfort following intervention.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients within a single institution were enrolled. Passive cystography was performed pre- and post-stent placement assessing VUR. Patients completed Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaires (USSQ) before placement (baseline), postop day 1, and day of removal.

RESULTS

Twenty RELIEF stents were placed (11 female and 9 male). 95% demonstrated no VUR following placement. No unexpected adverse complications occurred; 1 patient opted for early stent removal for significant discomfort. Average total USSQ scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement between first and third surveys (P < .001). Statistically significant improvement in body pain, general health, and work performance scores were noted as well (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The RELIEF stent eliminates VUR with similar stent-related morbidity and overall well-tolerance. RELIEF-associated USSQ scores were below published mean symptom scores for standard double-J stents and appear safe in this preliminary clinical trial.

Computational simulation of the flow dynamic field in a porous ureteric stent

Ureteric stents are employed clinically to manage urinary obstructions or other pathological conditions. Stents made of porous and biodegradable materials have gained increasing interest, because of their excellent biocompatibility and the potential for overcoming the so-called ‘forgotten stent syndrome’. However, there is very limited characterisation of their flow dynamic performance. In this study, a CFD model of the occluded and unoccluded urinary tract was developed to investigate the urinary flow dynamics in the presence of a porous ureteric stent. With increasing the permeability of the porous material (i.e., from 10⁻¹⁸ to 10⁻¹⁰ m²) both the total mass flow rate through the ureter and the average fluid velocity within the stent increased. In the unoccluded ureter, the total mass flow rate increased of 7.7% when a porous stent with permeability of 10⁻¹⁰ m² was employed instead of an unporous stent. Drainage performance further improved in the presence of a ureteral occlusion, with the porous stent resulting in 10.2% greater mass flow rate compared to the unporous stent. Findings from this study provide fundamental insights into the flow performance of porous ureteric stents, with potential utility in the development pipeline of these medical devices.

Ureteric stents: Overview of current clinical applications and economic implications

Ureteric stents are one of the most crucial tools used for various clinical conditions in the urological field. Placement of a ureteric stent, for short- or long-term use, remains one of the commonest urological interventional procedures. In the past few decades, ureteral stents have undergone notable technological advancements. However, an ideal stent without significant side-effects is yet to be engineered. Indwelling ureteric stents are often accompanied by physical distress to the patient and clinical complications, such as bacterial adhesion, encrustation, malpositioning, stent fracture and forgotten stent syndrome, that influence patients' health-related quality of life. In the market, different stent types are available, designed to reduce infections, and improve patient symptoms and tolerance. In this review, we have emphasized the recent developments that have taken place in stent design, size, materials and coating. This overview looks at current practices and problems related to stents, along with clinical and economic considerations. Few trial studies have been enumerated in the context of utilization of a ureteral stent symptom questionnaire and various stent models to compare their effects in patients.

The use of internal stents in chronic ureteral obstruction

PURPOSE

Despite the lack of a well delineated definition, chronic ureteral obstruction imposes significant quality of life loss, increased pathological morbidity and risk of mortality as well as substantial economic burden. Ureteral stenting serves as an important therapeutic option to alleviate obstruction. Thus, we assessed the recently published literature on chronic ureteral obstruction; treatment options; types, benefits and shortcomings of current ureteral stents; as well as outcomes and complications of chronic ureteral stenting, with the goal of providing concise management guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systemic literature review was performed on Embase™, PubMed®, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Google Scholar™ on ureteral obstruction and internal ureteral stents. Relevant reviews, original research articles and their cited references were examined, and a synopsis of original data was generated on a clinically oriented basis.

RESULTS

Chronic ureteral obstruction can be classified into compression that is either intrinsic or extrinsic to the ureteral wall, or obstruction that is of a benign or malignant origin. Patients with malignant ureteral obstruction generally have a poor prognosis and are often difficult to treat. The aim of stenting is to adequately drain the upper urinary tracts while minimizing hospitalization and the negative impact on quality of life. Facing the challenge of chronic ureteral obstruction, novel stents with new compositions, materials, coatings and designs have been developed. Metallic stents are emerging as efficacious and financially viable alternatives. Early stent related complications include iatrogenic injury, stent migration or patient discomfort, while late complications include infection, difficulties with stent exchange, hardware malfunction, infection and stent encrustation.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting in chronic ureteral obstruction is a complex and challenging problem. Much work is being done in this area and many options are being explored.