Inguinal orchidectomy for testicular cancer

Radical inguinal orchidectomy: the gold standard for initial management of testicular cancer

Radical inguinal orchidectomy with division of the spermatic cord at the internal inguinal ring is the gold standard for diagnosis and local treatment of testicular malignancies. The technique is well established and described in detail in this paper, collating methods from various surgical textbooks and articles. We also discuss pre-operative considerations including fertility counselling and potential testicular prosthesis at time of orchidectomy, and the importance of contemplating differential diagnoses such as para-testicular sarcoma and primary testicular lymphoma (PTL) prior to performing radical orchidectomy (RO). The evidence and indications for new surgical techniques to treat local testicular malignancies are also described, including testis sparing surgery (TSS) and spermatic cord sparing orchidectomy.

Management of Primary Testicular Tumor

In any man with a solid testicular mass, cancer should be considered until proven otherwise. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the treatment of choice in patients with testis mass. Placement of a testicular prosthesis is safe with a very low complication rate and should be offered to all patients undergoing radical orchiectomy. In patients with widespread or life-threatening advanced disease, delayed orchiectomy following chemotherapy is recommended. Testis-sparing surgery can be performed in highly selected patients with solitary testicle mass, bilateral testicular tumors, or strong suspicion of a benign lesion.

Significance of spermatic cord invasion in radical inguinal orchidectomy: Will a modified subinguinal orchidectomy suffice?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Radical inguinal orchidectomy with ligation and division of the spermatic cord at the deep inguinal ring is the treatment of choice for testicular mass suspicious of cancer. In the era of organ preserving and minimally invasive surgery, it may be possible to propose a less radical sub-inguinal orchidectomy that may avoid the morbidity associated with opening the inguinal canal. The effect of this approach on oncological margins is not known. The aim of this article was to investigate the presence of spermatic cord involvement after a radical inguinal orchidectomy with a view to test feasibility of a modified sub-inguinal approach for testicular tumour excision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study on all orchidectomies performed for suspected testicular cancer was performed at a single hospital from over an 8-year period from January 2005 to December 2013. Non-cancerous lesions were excluded after histopathological review. All testicular malignancies were included and detailed histopathological review was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 121 orchidectomies were performed over the 8-year period. Three patients had spermatic cord involvement. Spermatic cord involvement did not adversely affect the outcome in these patients after a median follow-up of 5 years irrespective of tumour histology. The proximal spermatic cord was not involved in any testicular germ cell tumours on further cord sectioning, the only patient with proximal cord involvement had a B-cell lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

We postulate that a sub-inguinal modified orchidectomy may be a less invasive alternative to radical inguinal orchidectomy, with comparable oncological outcomes based on low risk of spermatic cord involvement, which in itself is not a prognostic factor. We require further long-term follow-up studies on patients who have undergone this approach to validate the oncological outcomes and report the possible advantage of lower post-operative complications with this technique.

Evaluation of Intratesticular Lesions With Strain Elastography Using Strain Ratio and Color Map Visual Grading: Differentiation of Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of strain elastography using calculated strain ratio and visual elastography score in differentiating nonneoplastic, benign, and malignant neoplastic intratesticular lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the hospital review board as a retrospective review of 86 patients examined with gray scale, color Doppler ultrasonography and strain elastography (visual elastography score and strain ratio). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio of color Doppler and stain elastography were documented. Receiver operator characteristic curves assessed the diagnostic accuracy of strain elastography to discriminate nonneoplastic, benign, and malignant neoplasms. Histology or follow-up ultrasonography determined lesion character.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 86 (36.0%) intratesticular malignant neoplasms, 17 of 86 (19.8%) benign neoplasms, and 38 of 86 (44.2%) nonneoplastic lesions were confirmed with histology (n = 52) or follow-up sonography (n = 34); 89.5% of intratesticular lesions were heterogeneous or hypoechoic on gray scale, with no difference between benign and malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio for nonneoplasm versus neoplasm were documented: color Doppler: 68.8%, 97.4%, 26.5, 0.32; visual elastography score: 81.3%, 57.9%, 1.93, 0.32; strain ratio: 68.8%, 81.6%, 3.73, 0.38. Neoplastic lesions showed a higher strain ratio than nonneoplastic lesions (P < .001), with strong correlation between median strain ratio and visual elastography score (Spearman's coefficient, 0.693; P < .001). Strain ratio is a significantly better assessment than visual elastography score for malignant lesions (P = .025). Logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between size (P = .001), hypervascularity (P < .001), and malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Higher strain ratio and visual elastography score are associated with neoplastic lesions and offer an alternative to assess tissue characteristics but do not improve the diagnostic accuracy when compared with the color Doppler pattern.

[Is it necessary to place a surgical clamp early in the spermatic cord during testicular examination via inguinal approach?]

OBJECTIVE

The presence of tumor cells in the spermatic cord was evaluated in patients undergoing inguinal testis study in order to assure if the placement of a clamp in it was necessary to avoid tumor dissemination.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Inguinal testis studies were performed over a two year period in 38 patients diagnosed of testicular mass. The presence of tumor cells in blood vessels or lymph nodes of the cord was evaluated in all of the patients.

RESULTS

Testicular tumors were found in 28 patients (20 seminoma, 5 mixed tumor and 3 embryonal) with an average age of 42 (range 21-82) years. There were T1N0M0 21; T1N1M0 3; T2N0M0 2 and T2N1M0 2 cases, respectively. Independently of the stage and tumor lineage, tumor cells in the cord vessels were not observed in any of the cases through the pathology study.

CONCLUSION

In our causistics, it seems that the surgical act consisting in the placement of a clamp early in the cord lacks a scientific foundation. However, this study does not make it possible to state that not performing this maneuver during the surgical procedure is oncologically safe. Thus, a precedent is established to perform studies with a larger number of patients that will make it possible to corroborate this observation. This would result in less traumatic and safer surgical techniques that would allow conserving the testis and its functionality.