The growth rate of large renal masses opposes active surveillance

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Single Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Oncological Outcomes

Introduction High-dose local stereotactic robotic radiosurgery (RRS) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery in renal masses and selected patients. We have, so far, limited its use to the elderly and patients at high risk from surgery. In this study, we matched patients with renal tumors who were treated with single fraction RRS to patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Methods Between January 2009 and December 2017, we included 571 consecutive patients undergoing OPN and 99 patients who underwent RRS in this retrospective analysis. Patients had to have a follow-up of at least six months and we were able to match 35 with a propensity score. Matching criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, age, clinical tumor, nodes, and metastases (TNM), and tumor diameter. Tumor response, renal function, survival, and adverse events were evaluated every three months until progression or death. Results Median age was 65 years for RRS (range 58-75) and 71 (range 56-76) for OPN (p=0.131). Median diameter of renal tumors was 2.8 cm (range 2.4-3.9) for RRS and 3.5 cm (2.8-4.5) for OPN, p=0.104. Median follow-up was 28.1 months (range 6.0-78.3 months). Local tumor control nine months after RRS and OPN was 98% (95% CI: 89-99%). Renal function remained stable with a median creatinine clearance (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)) at baseline of 76.8mlmin/1.73m2 (range 25.3-126.3) and 70.3ml/min/1.73m2 (range 18.6-127.3) at follow-up (p=0.89). Median overall survival was not reached. No difference in overall survival (OS) was seen in RRS compared to OPN (p=0.459). Conclusions Single fraction RRS is an alternative to OPN in patients unfit for surgery. Oncological and functional results are comparable to those of OPN. Further studies are needed to determine long-term results and limits of RRS in this setting and in younger patients.

Natural history of Von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated and sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study

PURPOSE

To compare the tumor growth kinetics between sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and Von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (VHL-associated RCC). To analyze predictive markers for the growth rate of these two types of RCC.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with renal tumors who received active surveillance were collected retrospectively. Immunohistochemical staining was utilized to analyze the expression levels of VHL, PBRM1, H3K36me3, and BAP1 in the postoperative specimens.

RESULTS

The age of the VHL group was significantly younger than that of the sporadic group (P < 0.0001). The mean linear growth rate (LGR) was significantly faster in the sporadic group (P = 0.0004). The tumors of those in the sporadic group tended to have a higher histologic grade (P = 0.0011). In the sporadic group, tumor histologic grade was an independent predictor for rapid mean LGR (P = 0.0022). In the VHL group, initial maximal tumor diameter (MTD) was the only independent predictor for rapid mean LGR (P < 0.0001). Tumors with low VHL expression and negative PBRM1 expression showed a faster growth rate in the sporadic group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). The expression levels of the four biomarkers showed no impact on the tumor growth rate in the VHL group.

CONCLUSION

Sporadic ccRCC grew faster than VHL-associated RCC. High histologic grade, low VHL expression and negative PBRM1 expression were predictors of faster growth in sporadic ccRCC. A large initial MTD was a predictor of faster growth for VHL-associated RCC.

Translating new data to the daily practice in second line treatment of renal cell carcinoma: The role of tumor growth rate

The therapeutic options for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have completely changed during the last ten years. With the sequential use of targeted therapies, median overall survival has increased in daily practice and now it is not uncommon to see patients surviving kidney cancer for more than four to five years. Once treatment fails with the first line targeted therapy, head to head comparisons have shown that cabozantinib, nivolumab and the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus are more effective than everolimus alone and that axitinib is more active than sorafenib. Unfortunately, it is very unlikely that we will ever have prospective data comparing the activity of axitinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib or nivolumab. It is frustrating to observe the lack of biomarkers that we have in this field, thus there is no firm recommendation about the optimal sequence of treatment in the second line. In the absence of reliable biomarkers, there are several clinical endpoints that can help physicians to make decisions for an individual patient, such as the tumor burden, the expected response rate and the time to achieve the response to each agent, the prior response to the agent administered, the toxicity profile of the different compounds and patient preference. Here, we propose the introduction of the tumor-growth rate (TGR) during first-line treatment as a new tool to be used to select the second line strategy in mRCC. The rapidness of TGR before the onset of the treatment reflects the variability between patients in terms of tumor growth kinetics and it could be a surrogate marker of tumor aggressiveness that may guide treatment decisions.

Optimizing clinical benefit with targeted treatment in mRCC: "Tumor growth rate" as an alternative clinical endpoint

Tumor growth rate (TGR), usually defined as the ratio between the slope of tumor growth before the initiation of treatment and the slope of tumor growth during treatment, between the nadir and disease progression, is a measure of the rate at which tumor volume increases over time. In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), TGR has emerged as a reliable alternative parameter to allow a quantitative and dynamic evaluation of tumor response. This review presents evidence on the correlation between TGR and treatment outcomes and discusses the potential role of this tool within the treatment scenario of mRCC. Current evidence, albeit of retrospective nature, suggests that TGR might represent a useful tool to assess whether treatment is altering the course of the disease, and has shown to be significantly associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Therefore, TGR may represent a valuable endpoint for clinical trials evaluating new molecularly targeted therapies. Most importantly, incorporation of TGR in the assessment of individual patients undergoing targeted therapies may help clinicians decide if a given agent is no longer able to control disease growth and whether continuing therapy beyond RECIST progression may still produce clinical benefit.

Natural history of small renal masses

Objective:

To review the natural history and growth kinetics of small renal masses (SRMs).

Data Sources:

The literature concerning natural history and growth kinetics of SRMs was collected from PubMed published from 1990 to 2014.

Study Selection:

We included all the relevant articles on the active surveillance (AS) or delayed treatment for SRMs in English, with no limitation of study design.

Results:

SRMs under AS have a slow growth potential in general. The mean linear growth rate is 0.33 cm/year, the mean volumetric growth rate is 9.48 cm³/year. The rate of metastasis during AS is below 2%. Some factors are associated with the growth rate of SRMs, including tumor grade, histological subtype, initial tumor size, age, radiographic characteristics, and molecular markers. No definite predictor of growth rate of SRMs is defined at present. SRMs with high tumor grade and the subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma may have aggressive growth potential.

Conclusions:

AS is a reasonable choice for elderly patients with SRMs, who are at high risk from surgery. Progression during observation is the biggest concern while performing AS. There is no definite predictor of progression for SRMs under AS. Percutaneous renal biopsy providing immunohistological and genic biomarkers may improve the understanding of natural history of SRMs.

The effect of delaying nephrectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients with renal tumors greater than 4cm

OBJECTIVES

Delaying nephrectomy<3 months does not adversely affect treatment outcome of renal tumors. Whether surgical waiting time (SWT; time from diagnosis to surgery)>3 months affects treatment outcome for large renal masses has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate if SWT is associated with treatment outcome of renal masses >4cm and identify patients who are more likely to experience prolonged SWT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 1,484 patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy at a single institution for a nonmetastatic renal mass>4cm between 1995 and 2013 were reviewed. Patients with benign tumors and incomplete preoperative data were excluded. The association between SWT and disease upstaging at the time of surgery and recurrence at 2 and 5 years was assessed using logistic regression. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were assessed with landmark survival analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All analyses were adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the final cohort of 1,278 patients, 267 (21%) had SWT>3 months. Patients with larger, symptomatic tumors had shorter SWT. Median follow-up for survivors was 3.8 years (interquartile range: 1.5-7.4). On multivariable analysis, SWT was not associated with disease upstaging, recurrence, or CSS. Longer SWT was associated with decreased overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.08-1.27; P = 0.0002). Sex and tumor size, histology, and presentation were associated with disease upstaging, recurrence, and CSS. The most common cause for surgical delay>3 months was evaluation and treatment of comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Patient and tumor characteristics, rather than SWT, were associated with disease upstaging, recurrence, and CSS, and should guide the decision to delay surgery when treating nonmetastatic renal tumors>4cm.

The growth rate of "clinically significant" renal cancer

Surveillance studies of enhancing renal masses report on a mean tumor growth rate of about 0.3 cm/year. In most of these studies however, only small tumors in elderly patients were followed. In the current report, we attempt to evaluate the growth rate of “clinically significant” renal carcinomas defined as tumors that were treated immediately upon diagnosis. 46 patients (mean age 64 years SD 11 years) were treated for renal carcinoma. All had a cross-sectional imaging studies performed 6–60 months prior to diagnosis of kidney cancer demonstrating no tumor. Tumor growth rate was calculated by dividing tumor’s largest diameter by the time interval between the normal kidney imaging and diagnosis of renal cancer. Mean tumor diameter was 4.5 cm (SD 2.4 cm). Mean time period from the normal imaging to diagnosis of renal cancer was 33.6 months (SD 18 months). According to the proposed model, the average growth rate of “clinically significant” renal carcinomas was 2.13 cm/year (SD 1.45, range 0.2–6.5 cm/year). Tumor growth rate correlated inversely with patient’s age (p = 0.007). Patient gender or Fuhrman’s grade did not correlate however. The growth rate of “clinically significant” renal cancer appears to be higher than the rate reported in surveillance trials. Renal tumors tend to grow faster in young patients. As such, variable growth rate should be taken into account when considering active surveillance in young patients and when designing trials for evaluation of anti-cancer agents.

[Active surveillance: concept for renal cell carcinoma?]

More than 80% of renal cell carcinomas are currently being detected incidentally by ultrasonic imaging and often affect elderly patients with substantial comorbidities. Surgical options cannot be applied in this cohort as routinely as in younger patients, as in some cases the perioperative risk factors may outweigh the risk of tumor-related death. In this context the concept of active surveillance for localized renal cell cancer in elderly patients is becoming increasingly important. The aim of active surveillance is to avoid surgery-related adverse effects and to achieve a controlled observation of tumor behavior with an option of delayed intervention in cases of aggressive clinical tumor features. This review sheds light on the current status of this strategy.

Current management options for the small renal mass in a solitary kidney

The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has resulted in an increase in the frequency of incidentally identified small renal masses (SRMs). With high cancer-specific survival rates following radical nephrectomy, there is an increasing patient cohort at risk of developing a metachronous contralateral tumour. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) has been shown to reduce progression of chronic kidney disease, being the impetus to utilize NSS for the management of SRMs in an anatomical or functional solitary kidney. At present, open partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for an SRM in a solitary kidney; however, there are a number of other minimally invasive options, including laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and in situ ablative procedures. In addition, variables such as warm and cold ischaemia and renal vascular clamping have been shown to affect outcomes. In this review, we summarize contemporary management options focusing specifically on oncological and functional outcomes.

The changing face of renal-cell carcinoma

The present decade can be credited with the improved understanding of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), its local and systemic management, and various controversies from diagnosis to types of various available interventions. The old paradigms and dogmas are no longer accepted as "the best way" without evidence, and many "old" principles are cautiously questioned. These notions have resulted in new knowledge, questions, arguments, and treatment options. This article will describe the "changing face of RCC" over the past several years and will briefly summarize the major changes and issues in the field of renal oncology. The discussed topics include improved molecular understanding of RCC, management of small renal masses, the safety and accuracy of renal mass biopsy, the emerging role of molecular imaging, the importance of maximal renal preservation, and the evolving role of laparoscopy, robotics, and ablation.