Minimally invasive percutaneous cystolithotomy: an effective treatment for bladder stones in infants aged <1 year

Mini-percutaneous cystolithotripsy (mPCCL) versus transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUC) in pre-school children: Prospective comparative non-randomized outcomes over 8 years

INTRODUCTION

Bladder stones in children can often be challenging to manage. We present our experience of minimally invasive percutaneous cystolithotripsy using 'mini-perc' instruments in the treatment of the bladder stones in pre-school children. The study also compares the outcomes of mini-percutaneous cystolithotripsy (mPCCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUC).

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that mPCCL is a new minimally invasive technique with comparable outcomes to TUC.

STUDY DESIGN

After parental consent and institutional review board approval, consecutive pre-school children with bladder stones were included from January 2011-December 2018. We shifted from the TUC to mPCCL in 2014, with mPCCL introduced as a new technique. Outcomes including stone free rate (SFR) and complication rates were compared for patients aged between 1 and 5 years of age who underwent mPCCL or TUC.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients (16 patients in Group 1 (mPCCL) and 15 patients in Group 2 (TUC) underwent the procedure. The mean age, stone size and operative times were 2.4 ± 0.96 years and 3.8 ± 0.77 years; 1.86 ± 0.65 cm and 1.34 ± 0.52 cm; and 33.5 ± 8.42 min and 38.2 ± 6.76 min for groups 1 and 2 respectively. While there were no intra or post-operative complications in group 1, in group 2 one patient required conversion to mPCCL due to difficulty in fragment removal per urethra and one with residual fragment needed repeat cystoscopy and fragment removal (Clavien IIIb). All patients in both groups were discharged the following day after catheter removal and remained stone free at 1- and 6-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Our study shows good outcomes in managing bladder stones with the use of both TUC and mPCCL. We shifted from the former to mPCCL in 2014 during which there was an overlap of both these techniques, while mPCCL was being introduced. Subsequently, all stones have been managed with mPCCL without the need to revert back to TUC. In Group 1, we performed mPCCL, where the puncture was performed under ultrasound-guidance and fragment retrieval was accomplished with the vacuum-cleaner effect through the operating sheath. Complete stone clearance was achieved in all cases with no complications or need for secondary procedures. Limitations of our study include small sample size, single-centre experience, and lack of randomization. Further prospective randomized multicenter studies may be required to validate our results.

CONCLUSION

The technique of percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy using mini-nephroscope is an alternate to transurethral cystolithotripsy. While both these techniques are suitable for smaller bladder stones, PCCL may be considered as the preferred management option of especially large bladder calculus in preschool children.

Retrograde-Assisted Percutaneous Cystolitholapaxy Versus Transurethral Cystolithotripsy With Holmium-YAG Laser: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: The retrograde approach is a modification that makes the percutaneous cystolitholapaxy (PCCL) a more trendy method, especially in operating rooms with limited facilities. The transurethral approach for bladder calculi lithotripsy by a laser has become popular among urologists. In this study, we investigate the feasibility and safety of retrograde assisted access for PCCL in comparison with transurethral cystolithotripsy by the holmium-YAG laser (Ho: YAG). Methods: According to the type of intervention, the patients were stratified to two matched groups. In the retrograde-assisted percutaneous cystolitholapaxy (RPCCL) group, a Benique was conducted through the urethra into the bladder; palpating the suprapubic region, an about 1.5 cm incision was done over the tip, then an Amplatz sheath was placed over it, treading into the bladder; further cystolitholapaxy was done by a routine order. In transurethral Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (TULL) via 200 µm fiber vaporize the stone. Results: A total of 124 male patients with the mean age of 50.33±9.64 years and the average stone burden of 3.35±1.07 cm were included in the study. The most common cause of vesical calculi was spinal cord injury. Statistically significant differences were found in terms of the mean operation time in favor of the RPCCL group (P≤0.05) and the mean hospital stay in favor of the TULL group (P≤0.05). The stone-free rate (SFR) was 100% in both methods after a onemonth follow-up. None of the interventions changed to open surgery. There were not any major complications in both methods. Conclusion: RPCCL is a safe and effective method in bladder stone treatment and is applicable in medical centres without Ho: YAG equipment.

The initial experience of pneumovesicoscopic bladder stone removal using a laparoscopic entrapment sac

INTRODUCTION

In this article, we aim to present our novel experience of bladder stone removal under pneumovesicoscopic field using a laparoscopic entrapment sac.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients who had pneumovesicoscopic bladder stone removal to assess a variety of patient characteristics and surgical outcomes. We considered stone burden, stone removal time including pneumovesicoscopic procedure time, postoperative catheter indwelling duration, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. The procedure was performed in the following steps: Under cystoscopy filled with saline solution, a 10-mm suprapubic transvesical trocar was inserted. After changing optical transmission medium from saline to CO(2) gas, pneumovesicoscopic procedure was performed to put stones in an entrapment sac inserted through the trocar. The stones trapped in the sac were extracorporeally broken with a lithotripter via the suprapubic route. The mean patient age was 58.95 ± 22.03 years. The mean stone burden was 4.88 ± 2.63 cm. Eleven patients had a single stone, whereas 10 had multiple stones. All stones were completely removed. The mean operative time was 31.66 ± 7.25 minutes, including the pneumovesicoscopic procedure time of 13.81 ± 7.30 minutes. In all but 6 patients with a cystostomy or a combined transurethral resection of the prostate, the urethra catheter was removed on the day after surgery; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.67 ± 0.49 days. There were 5 postoperative complications of Clavien grade I or II.

CONCLUSION

We report the technical feasibility of pneumovesicoscopic bladder stone removal using a laparoscopic entrapment sac as a minimally invasive method. This technique will likely become more important as a useful option for treating bladder stones.

Endoscopic cystolithotomy by mini nephroscope: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a novel endoscopic surgical technique with mini-nephroscope by suprapubic transvesical route for cystolithotripsy in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a non-randomized study with a series of 12 boys, between February 2012 and September 2013. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were recorded. Our new endoscopic surgery technique could be performed in all patients. Complications were noted.

RESULTS

Mean age was 35.1 ± 8.6 months (19-46 months), the average stone size was 16.5 ± 5.2 mm (10-20 mm). Mean operation time was 28.9 min (21-40), and mean hospital stay was 2.2 (2-3) days. In all procedures, stones were successfully fragmented and extracted by the new surgical technique. There was no intraoperative and/or postoperative complication or urethral stricture during follow-up period. In stone analyses, the main components were ammonium acid urate, calcium oxalate, and struvite.

CONCLUSIONS

The new endoscopic surgery technique is safe and effective for bladder stones in children. Thus, our technique can be a strong candidate for an alternative treatment of childhood bladder stones.

Percutaneous treatment of bladder stones in children: 10 years experience, is blind access safe?

PURPOSE

Bladder stones are more commonly found in children from developing countries. Open cystolithotomy or transurethral cystolithalopaxy are the traditional treatments but a percutaneous approach has been advocated. We present our experience with percutaneous cystolithotomy in children with bladder stones without any ultrasonic or fluoroscopic guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

From April 2001 to October 2011, a total of 147 children (135 boys and 12 girls) with a mean (range) age of 4.07 (1-12.5) years underwent percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL). The mean (range) stone diameter was 2.74 (0.8-5) cm. 138 children (94 %) had a solitary stone while nine (6 %) had more than one stone. The main component of the stones was calcium oxalate in 70 patients (48.6 %).

RESULTS

All children were stone-free after one PCCL; no recurrent stones developed. The mean (range) PCCL procedure time was 29.6 (12 to 48) min and intraoperative blood loss was scant. Perioperative complications were few. The mean (range) hospital stay was 1.2 (1-3) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Blind access PCCL (without any ultrasonic or fluoroscopic guidance) is a facile and safe approach for removing stones in the pediatric bladder stones. Advantages include the lack of ionizing radiation, no need for opacification by iodine contrast media and low relative cost. We recommend this minimally invasive technique for management of large bladder stones (larger than 1 cm) in children. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center series reported on percutaneous cystolithotripsy of endemic bladder stones in children.

Cystoscopically guided percutaneous suprapubic cystolitholapaxy in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopically guided percutaneous suprapubic artery forceps litholapaxy for pediatric vesical and posterior urethral stone <1 cm in diameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective series study of 73 children (68 boys and 5 girls) with vesical and urethral stones less than 1 cm in diameter with an average age of 3.5 years (range 1-9 years) were included in this study. Cases with previous suprapubic surgery, stones of more than 1 cm in diameter, multiple bladder or urethral stone, anterior urethral stones and cases with neurological or anatomical abnormalities were excluded from our study. The bladder was filled and punctured suprapubically by an artery forceps under the vision of the pediatric cystoscopy then the stone is completely crushed. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. The stone-free rate status was evaluated 2 weeks postoperatively using plain X-ray/ultrasonography.

RESULTS

All cases were successful, and the stones were completely crushed to smaller insignificant fragments in a single session. No intraoperative bladder perforation or bleeding was recorded. The mean operative time was 12.5 min (ranging from 9 to 17 min). There were no postoperative complications apart from 2 cases of persistent suprapubic leakage postoperatively for 24 h and the leakage stopped after 48 h with the insertion of 8 Fr Foley catheter. In all cases, no significant stone fragments were found 2 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Our technique for management of pediatric vesical and posterior urethral stone less than 1 cm is an easy and safe with no intraoperative or postoperative significant complications.

Tratamento cirúrgico da litíase vesical: revisão de literatura

Cálculos vesicais são raros e a maioria dos casos ocorre em homens adultos com obstrução infravesical. Atualmente, existem poucos dados sobre o melhor tratamento desta doença. O objetivo desta revisão foi discutir alguns aspectos da patogênese e abordar o tratamento da litíase vesical. Uma ampla pesquisa na base de dados da "National Library of Medicine"/Pubmed foi realizada com os seguintes unitermos e descritores: vesical ou bexiga associados a cálculo, pedra ou litíase, e cistolitotripsia. Cento e setenta e um artigos foram identificados. Os artigos foram avaliados independentemente por dois revisores com experiência em urolitíase. Foram incluídos quando os resultados, complicações e seguimento foram claramente reportados. No final, 32 estudos preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Nota-se que diversas opções para o tratamento da litíase vesical estão disponíveis, porém não há estudos randomizados comparando-as. Diferentes taxas de pacientes livres de cálculo são descritas, sendo: litotripsia extracorpórea com ondas de choque (75-100%), cistolitotripsia transureteroscópica (63-100%), cistolitotripsia percutânea (89-100%) e cirurgia aberta (100%). O acesso percutâneo apresenta menor morbidade com resultados semelhantes ao tratamento transuretral, enquanto a litotrispsia extracorpórea apresenta as menores de taxas de eliminação de cálculos e fica reservada aos pacientes de alto risco cirúrgico.

The management of bladder lithiasis in the modern era of endourology

The recent evolution in the management of vesical lithiasis is a result of the major advancements of modern endourology. The ideal method for achieving stone clearance, however, remains an issue of debate and evidence-based recommendations are lacking. Contemporary literature focuses on management options, such as extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, transurethral, percutaneous and minimally-invasive surgery, as well as state-of-the-art energy sources. Issues of particular interest include the results of comparative studies, the management of lithiasis in the paediatric population and the recent challenge of the traditional dogma that dictated BPH surgery for the management of vesical lithiasis secondary to bladder outlet obstruction.

Cystoscopy-assisted percutaneous removal of impacted urethral stone: a case report

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although cystolitholapaxy is possible in children, the instruments are not available everywhere. For tiny impacted urethral stone, an alternate technique is described.

CASE REPORT

A 3-year-old boy came with retention of urine and dysuria. On examination: bladder was full, suprapubic region was tender, and a stone could be felt at posterior urethra. We planned push back and suprapubic cystolithotomy. After general anesthesia, the stone was pushed back by instillation of lignocaine jelly into the urethra. Then, a cystoscope was introduced, and a stone was found inside the urinary bladder. Under cystoscopic view, a 5 mm laparoscopic port was inserted into the bladder just above the pubic symphysis in the midline. A 5 mm tissue holding forceps was introduced through this port, and the tiny stone was grasped and brought out along with the port. The port site was closed by a single stitch. A penile catheter was kept for 5 days.

RESULTS

The boy did well in the postoperative period, and voiding was normal after removal of the catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

Impacted posterior urethral stone can be retrieved by simple percutaneous technique.