A placebo-controlled exploratory study investigating the efficacy and safety of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor UK-369,003 for the treatment of men with storage lower urinary tract symptoms associated with a clinical diagnosis of overactive bladder

Pharmacological Management of Urinary Incontinence: Current and Emerging Treatment

Pharmacological management of urinary incontinence (UI) is currently based on antimuscarinic and beta-3-agonist drugs. Botulinum toxin A detrusor injections represent an effective but more invasive alternative. This review covers the latest developments of the currently available drugs and the emerging compounds for the treatment of UI. Evidence shows that new antimuscarinics and beta-3-agonists with improved safety profiles may offer unique options to patients intolerant to currently available drugs. Combination therapy proved to be a non-invasive alternative for patients refractory to first-line monotherapy. Exciting advances are ongoing in the research to improve the efficacy/tolerability profile of botulinum toxin, through innovative routes of administration. Several new agents emerged from preclinical studies, some of which have now entered the clinical phase of development and could represent, in the coming years, a new way for the treatment of UI. Recent evidence on the existence of different overactive bladder phenotypes could be the key to tailored treatment. Rather than discovering new molecules, reaching the ability to identify the right drug for the right patient could be the real gamechanger of the future.

Beyond Antimuscarinics: A Review of Pharmacological and Interventional Options for Overactive Bladder Management in Men

CONTEXT

The role of overactive bladder (OAB) treatment in women beyond antimuscarinics has been evaluated extensively. Beta-3 agonists, botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A), and nerve stimulation are indicated in these patients. However, data on male patients in this clinical scenario are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on treatment options beyond antimuscarinics in men with OAB.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Central Database of Systematic Reviews databases was performed for relevant articles published between January 2000 and October 2020, using the following Medical Subject Headings: "male/man," "LUTS," "overactive bladder," "storage symptoms," "urgency," "nocturia," "incontinence," "beta-3 agonist," "PDE-5 inhibitors," "botulinum toxin," "sacral nerve stimulation/neurostimulation," "percutaneous/transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation," "PTENS," and "combination therapy." Evidence acquisition was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42020201223.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 24 studies were retrieved. In male OAB, mirabegron (MIRA) is the most intensively investigated pharmacological option. A pooled analysis of five randomized clinical trials (RCTs), including 1187 patients, concluded that MIRA 50 mg was associated with a greater reduction in frequency versus placebo (-0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.74, -0.01, p <  0.05). A pooled analysis of three RCTs, including 1317 male patients, has also shown that the addition of MIRA 50 mg in men receiving the α₁-blocker tamsulosin improved the mean number of micturitions per day (-0.27, 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.09, p <  0.05), urgency episodes (-0.50, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.22, p <  0.05), total OAB symptom score (-0.66, 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.38, p <  0.05), and mean volume voided (+10.76 ml, 95% CI: 4.87-16.64, p <  0.05). MIRA treatment is well tolerated in men. Other pharmacological treatment options, such as phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, should be considered investigational. BTX-A seems to be effective as third-line treatment in male OAB patients. A higher rate of intermittent self-catheterization (5-42%) is observed in male than in female patients. Data on nerve stimulation are scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

MIRA has the most robust data in terms of safety and efficacy in this patient population. Preliminary data in men suggest that BTX-A is indicated as an interventional treatment. Evidence for PDE-5 inhibitors and nerve stimulation is too limited to provide recommendations. Future studies in this population should aim to better define the best treatment sequence and to identify predictors for treatment response and failure, to determine a therapeutic approach tailored to patients' characteristics.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Overactive bladder is highly prevalent in men. Mirabegron 50 mg is the treatment option supported by the highest level of evidence when antimuscarinics failed. Botulinum toxin A injections seems to be an effective treatment as interventional option. Roles of nerve stimulation and phosphodiesterase inhibitors in male OAB patients are still to be defined.

Managing urinary incontinence in women - a review of new and emerging pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacological treatment of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder (OAB) has been, for a longer time, based on antimuscarinic agents. In recent years, two other pharmacological principles have been introduced for the treatment of OAB and urgency urinary incontinence: the β3-adrenergic agent mirabegron and botulinum neurotoxin. Meanwhile, there is lack of effective drugs for the treatment of stress incontinence.

AREAS COVERED

This literature review presents synthetic compounds aimed to treat female urinary incontinence that are in phase II-III clinical development.

EXPERT OPINION

Antimuscarinic agents will continue to represent the current gold standard for the first-line pharmacological management of OAB and urgency urinary incontinence. The class of β3-agonists will certainly expand with the discovery and clinical development of novel agents. Combination therapy of antimuscarinic agents and β3-agonists could offer an alternative treatment in these patients, including those with symptoms refractory to first-line monotherapy. A huge number of preclinical studies are underway in this field exploring the therapeutic potential of many novel compounds while some have advanced to clinical phases of development.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: What's New in Medical Treatment?

CONTEXT

Pharmacological treatment is a cornerstone in the management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

OBJECTIVE

To review emerging evidence in the medical treatment of LUTS.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An Embase/Pubmed-based literature search was conducted in December 2017, screening for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective series, animal model studies, and reviews on medical treatment of LUTS.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The main medical innovation in recent years in overactive bladder (OAB) has been the approval of the first β₃-adrenoceptor agonists (mirabegron) and intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A, while several other drugs such as antiepileptics, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, or other β₃-agonists have brought promising results in phase 3 trials. Intraprostatic injections of various drugs for LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia have been investigated, but results of phase 3 trials are still pending, while combination therapies of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors+α-blockers or finasteride have been proved as superior to single therapies in RCTs conducted in these patients. Two new formulations of desmopressin have been approved for nocturia in the USA (desmopressin nasal spray) and Europe/Canada/Australia (desmopressin orally disintegrated tablet). Fedovapagon, a vasopressin V₂ receptor agonist, has recently completed a large phase 3 trial in male patients with nocturia. Other phase 3 trials are ongoing in bladder pain syndrome (AQX 11-25, a SHIP-1 activator) and in neurogenic detrusor overactivity (mirabegron and abobotulinum toxin A).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical treatment of LUTS is a very active research field with recently approved drugs for nocturia (desmopressin acetate nasal spray/orally disintegrated tablet) and numerous emerging drugs currently investigated in OAB, LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia, nocturia, bladder pain syndrome, and neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms is a very active research field with recently approved drugs for nocturia (desmopressin acetate nasal spray/orally disintegrated tablet) and numerous emerging drugs in overactive bladder, nocturia, neurogenic detrusor overactivity, bladder pain syndrome, or benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Randomized trial of tofacitinib in active ulcerative colitis: analysis of efficacy based on patient-reported outcomes

Background

Tofacitinib, a novel, oral Janus kinase inhibitor, demonstrated a dose-dependent efficacy for induction of clinical response and remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective of the current study was to determine the effect of tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

Eligible patients (≥18 years of age) with a diagnosis of active UC (total Mayo score of 6-12 points and moderately-to-severely active disease on sigmoidoscopy) were randomized in a 2:2:2:3:3 ratio to receive oral tofacitinib 0.5 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg, or placebo twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks. PROs were assessed by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (IBD PRTI) survey.

Results

At Week 8, mean IBDQ total scores had improved relative to baseline across all five treatment groups (baseline range 123.2-134.5; Week 8 range 149.6-175.4). Improvement from baseline was significantly greater (P = 0.001) for tofacitinib 15 mg BID versus placebo. For tofacitinib 15 mg BID, most patients reported satisfaction or extreme satisfaction, definite preference for tofacitinib, and definite willingness to use tofacitinib again on the IBD PRTI at week 8. Patients achieving endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopy score of 0) had significantly higher IBDQ scores and favorable PRTI scores than those not achieving endoscopic remission.

Conclusions

Short-term treatment with tofacitinib BID was associated with dose-dependent improvement in health-related quality of life and patient preferences for tofacitinib. The results complement previously reported efficacy and safety data for the Phase II study. (NCT 00787202, November 6, 2008).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-015-0239-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

New therapies in the treatment of overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition which affects both men and women across many age groups with significant impact on quality of life. There is currently an armamentarium of treatment options available ranging from conservative, medical therapy to radical surgeries. Increasing understanding of OAB is resulting in the rapid development of new therapies today.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this article was to summarise the latest developments in non-neurogenic OAB treatment, discuss the evidence and results of current and new treatment modalities available through review of published data and results presented at recent international meetings.

EXPERT OPINION

The ultimate goal in OAB therapy is to provide good clinical efficacy, safe, non-invasive and easy to administer. There is definitely room for development of new therapies in OAB and current progress is encouraging.

Les inhibiteurs de la phosphodiestérase de type 5 : une révolution dans le traitement des symptômes du bas appareil urinaire?

Contexte

L’incidence des symptômes du bas appareil urinaire (SBAU) liés à une hypertrophie bénigne de prostate (HBP) augmente avec l’âge puisqu’ils touchent 50 % des patients âgés de plus de 50 ans et 90 % de ceux âgés de plus de 80 ans. La prévalence et la sévérité de la dysfonction érectile (DE) augmentent également avec l’âge. Sa prévalence est évaluée à 31,6 % dans une population générale d’adultes âgés de plus de 40 ans. Les SBAU comme la DE altèrent de façon significative la qualité de vie (QdV) des patients et de leur partenaire. Plusieurs études ont montré que les SBAU constituent un facteur de risque de DE indépendant de l’âge et des autres comorbidités. La sévérité des SBAU est corrélée à celle de la DE. Les hypothèses physiopathologiques pour expliquer le lien entre SBAU et DE sont : une augmentation du tonus sympathique, une altération du système NO/cGMP, une altération du système rho-kinase et une athéromatose pelvienne.

Objectif

Évaluer les résultats et comprendre le mécanisme d’action de l’administration d’un inhibiteur de la phosphodiestérase de type 5 (IPDE 5) sur les SBAU liés à une HBP.

Matériels et méthodes

Une revue de la littérature a été réalisée à partir des articles originaux et des articles de synthèse déjà disponibles, sélectionnés par le moteur de recherche Pubmed de la National Library of Medecine. Les mots clés utilisés pour cette recherche ont été : benign prostatic hyperplasia; cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 5; LUTS; erectile dysfunction.

Résultats

Cette revue de la littérature montre que l’administration d’un inhibiteur de la phosphodiestérase de type 5 améliore les SBAU de manière significative dans 12 essais cliniques randomisés, avec un bénéfice également sur la DE et l’absence d’effets secondaires indésirables graves rapportés.

Conclusion

Le traitement des SBAU par les IPDEs 5 semble très prometteur, même s’il ne dispose pas d’une AMM dans cette indication en France. Récemment, le tadalafil à la posologie de 5 mg a été approuvé aux États-Unis par la FDA dans les troubles mictionnels liés à l’HBP, avec ou sans DE.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms: critical analysis of current evidence

CONTEXT

A large body of epidemiologic data suggests a causal relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Recently reported studies on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) and LUTS have further contributed to the understanding of mechanisms involved in this relationship and of potential treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

A nonsystematic descriptive review was performed to summarize the literature concerning the role of PDE5-Is in men with LUTS, particularly looking at data derived from clinical trials in relation to the different PDE5-Is or their association with α-blockers.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted in October 2010 using the Medline database to identify all publications relating to ED and BPH and treatment with sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, udenafil, UK-369003, and combination therapy with alfuzosin and tamsulosin.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In studies in which either ED or LUTS was the entry criterion, sildenafil appears to improve both erectile function and LUTS in subjects with ED. Placebo-controlled trials of tadalafil and vardenafil showed improvement of LUTS secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but none of the studies showed a significant effect on urodynamic measures. Exploratory studies with UK-369003 showed improvements in LUTS and ED. Sildenafil or tadalafil associated with alfuzosin or tamsulosin showed greater benefits for the combination therapy for both LUTS and ED. The coadministration of udenafil and an α-blocker in patients with BPH and ED also appeared to improve both LUTS and ED severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent evidence of improvements in LUTS has been shown with PDE5-Is, either alone or in combination with α-blockers. However, effects on urodynamics or objective measures of urinary flow are lacking. Further areas of research include investigation of mechanism of PDE5-Is, urodynamic studies, identification of new efficacy end points, head-to-head comparison with standard of care, potential benefit of add-on treatment, and long-term outcomes.

The role of antimuscarinics in the management of men with symptoms of overactive bladder associated with concomitant bladder outlet obstruction: an update

CONTEXT

This review focuses on the contemporary role of antimuscarinics in the management of men with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and concomitant overactive bladder (OAB). Safety issues of antimuscarinics in this subpopulation of men are also reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the current literature and performed an analysis of the efficacy, suitability, and the safety of antimuscarinics in this subpopulation of men.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic search of Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant articles published between 1990 and September 2010, restricted to studies in humans published in English. In addition, published abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the European Association of Urology, the American Urological Association, and the International Continence Society in the last decade (2000-2010) were hand-searched and evaluated. Each article's title and abstract were reviewed for their appropriateness and relevance to the use of antimuscarinics in patients with BOO and concomitant OAB. Relevant articles were fully reviewed and included in the final data acquisition.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Treatment options include combination treatment with α-blockers and antimuscarinics, sequential use of α-blockers and antimuscarinics, monotherapy with antimuscarinics, and a combination of antimuscarinics and 5α-reductase inhibitors. The sequential use of α-blockers and antimuscarinics seems to be the most appropriate approach, and the use of antimuscarinics and α-blockers appears generally to be safe and efficacious. Data are insufficient for a possible stratification of patients for a specific sequence of the drugs reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

This review infers that the existing data confirm the safety of antimuscarinics administered for the treatment of these patients. The efficacy of antimuscarinics has been proven in different trials regarding different storage symptom end points, but not all end points regarding OAB reached significance. All the reported trials are of short duration (4-12 wk) and include only men with low postvoid residual urine volumes at baseline (<200ml). Overall, the addition of an antimuscarinic to the treatment of a patient with BOO and concomitant OAB seems to offer an amelioration of the symptoms and a moderate improvement in quality of life.

A placebo-controlled study investigating the efficacy and safety of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor UK-369,003 for the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor UK-369,003 for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with and without erectile dysfunction (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study conducted across 45 centres in North and South America, Europe, and Australia. In all, 418 men aged ≥ 40 years with a clinical diagnosis of BPH, an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥ 13, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max) ) of 5-15 mL/s for a voided volume of > 150 mL were stratified into two groups (with and without ED) and randomized to one of seven treatment groups, i.e. UK-369,003 at 10, 25, 50 or 100 mg modified release (MR), UK-369,003 40 mg immediate release (IR), tamsulosin 0.4 mg prolonged release, or placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary study endpoint was the change in total IPSS after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary efficacy measures were IPSS storage and voiding subscores, Q(max) , International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain, questions 5 and 6 of the Quality of Erection Questionnaire, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Male LUTS, the patient-reported treatment-impact questionnaire, and a bladder diary in which patients recorded the number of voluntary urinary voids, volume of urine voided per micturition, leaks, and urgency episodes.

RESULTS

The mean change in the IPSS from baseline at week 12 for UK-369,003 100 mg MR and 40 mg IR was -2.91 and -2.50 better than placebo, respectively. There was increasing efficacy with increasing dose of the MR formulation. For UK-369,003 100 mg MR, Q(max) improved by 2.10 mL/s compared with 0.84 mL/s in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

UK-369,003 had clinically meaningful efficacy and was well tolerated in men with LUTS associated with BPH. The Bayesian statistical analysis gave high posterior probabilities for true differences between UK-369,003 100 mg MR and placebo. There was greater preference, satisfaction and willingness to use UK-369,003 again for all treatment groups compared with placebo.

Activity of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

• To evaluate the impact and distribution of a single phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5 I) dose (udenafil or tadalafil) in prostate tissue and plasma in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• Thirty BPH patients complaining of erectile dysfunction along with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were enrolled in the present study. • The patients were randomly divided into the three groups: group 1, TURP without PDE5 Is; group 2, 200 mg of udenafil given 1 h before TURP; and group 3, 20 mg of tadalafil given 1 h before TURP. • We evaluated the concentrations of PDE5-I, cAMP and cGMP in prostate tissues and plasma, and calculated the prostate tissue-to-plasma (T/P) ratio.

RESULTS

• The concentration of udenafil in prostate tissue and plasma was 2028.6 ± 360.8 ng/g and 463.7 ± 39.1 ng/mL, respectively, and the resulting T/P ratio was 4.4. The tadalafil concentration in prostate tissue and plasma was 385.7 ± 83.8 ng/g and 305.8 ± 41.1 ng/mL, respectively, and the T/P ratio was 1.3. • Udenafil and tadalafil significantly increased the cAMP and cGMP levels in plasma and prostate tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

• Udenafil and tadalafil significantly increased cAMP and cGMP levels and were more highly distributed in the prostate than plasma. The T/P ratio of udenafil was higher than tadalafil. • These findings may help in the assessment of the feasibility of using PDE5 Is to concurrently treat both LUTS and erectile dysfunction.

[Treatment of the lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia by phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Review article]

CONTEXT

In aging males, there is an increased prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED) whose affect significantly their quality of life. LUTS would represent for ED an independent risk factor. Some treatment of LUTS have undesirable effects on the erectile function. The phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (IPDE 5) revolutionized the treatment of ED. Several recent clinical studies evaluated the effect daily treatment by IPDE 5 on the LUTS secondary to BPH among patients with or without ED.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

we searched Medline for the peer-reviewed articles in English published, pertaining to findings of potential interest supporting a role of IPDE5 in LUTS due to BHP. The keywords used were: benign prostatic hyperplasia; cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 5; lower urinary tract symptoms; erectile dysfunction.

RESULTS

Generally, daily treatment with IPDE 5 improves the LUTS secondary to BPH as well as in both the storage and voiding domains of the international prostate symptom score (IPPS) and in quality of life questionnaire. It was not observed adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The first results of the use of IPDE 5 in the LUTS treatment secondary to the HBP seem promising. However, a direct comparison of efficacy of IPDE 5 and alpha-blockers or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors is not yet available. The mechanism(s) of action(s) of these compounds in this indication remain difficult to affirm even if new hypotheses can be formulated.