1
|
Branger N, Pignot G, Lannes F, Koskas Y, Toledano H, Thomassin-Piana J, Giusiano S, Alessandrini M, Rossi D, Walz J, Bastide C. Comparison between Zumsteg classification and Briganti nomogram for the risk of lymph-node invasion before radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2019; 38:1719-1727. [PMID: 31560121 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02965-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of the Zumsteg classification to estimate the risk of lymph-node invasion (LNI) compared with the Briganti nomogram (BN) in prostatectomy patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC). METHODS We included consecutive patients who had extended pelvic lymph-node dissection associated with radical prostatectomy for IRPC. To be classified favorable intermediate risk (FIR), patients could only have one intermediate-risk factor, fewer than 50% positive biopsies and no primary Gleason score of 4. RESULTS On the 387 patients included, 149 (38.5%) and 238 (54.3%) were classified FIR and unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR), respectively, and 212 (54.8%) had a BN inferior to 5%. Thirty-eight patients (9.8%) had LNI: 6 FIR patients (4.0%) versus 32 UIR patients (13.4%) and 14 patients (6.6%) with a BN inferior to 5% versus 24 patients (13.7%) with a BN superior to 5%. Eight patients with a BN inferior to 5%, but classified UIR, had LNI. Sensitivity to detect LNI was higher with the Zumsteg classification than with the BN: 84.2% (CI 95% [68-93]) versus 63.2% (CI 95% [46-78]). Both screening tests were concordant to predict LNI (kappa coefficient of 0.076, p < 0.05 for Zumsteg and Briganti) CONCLUSIONS: Zumsteg classification appeared to be more sensitive and as effective (despite the impossibility to make decision curve analysis) than the BN to estimate the risk of LNI. Regarding the modest number of pN+ patients, further studies are needed to see the interest of proposing ePLND for UIR patients only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Branger
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. .,Urology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
| | | | - François Lannes
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| | - Yoann Koskas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Urology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Harry Toledano
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Marine Alessandrini
- EA 3279-Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, 13005, France
| | - Dominique Rossi
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Walz
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| | - Cyrille Bastide
- Urology Department, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ganesh V, Zaki P, Chan S, Turner A, Bristow B, Di Prospero L, Gibson L, DeAngelis C, Chow E. Adverse Health Outcomes Associated with Postdiagnosis Smoking in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Literature Review. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2017; 48:103-110. [PMID: 31047202 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2016] [Revised: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This literature review presents what is currently known about the association between postdiagnosis smoking and adverse health outcomes in prostate cancer. A literature search was conducted using Ovid Embase and Ovid MEDLINE. Information from 36 studies was summarized. There is strong evidence across the included studies of higher overall mortality and biochemical recurrence in current smokers diagnosed with prostate cancer. In addition, enhanced adverse effects following surgery, radiation, and hormone therapy have also been identified in current smokers of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vithusha Ganesh
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pearl Zaki
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Chan
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Turner
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bonnie Bristow
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Di Prospero
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leslie Gibson
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlo DeAngelis
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ohashi T, Yorozu A, Saito S, Momma T, Nishiyama T, Yamashita S, Shiraishi Y, Shigematsu N. Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:13. [PMID: 24401540 PMCID: PMC3904455 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To report the outcomes of patients treated with combined iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk prostate cancer. Methods Between 2003 and 2009, I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy plus EBRT was performed for 206 patients with high-risk prostate cancer. High-risk patients had prostate-specific antigen ≥ 20 ng/mL, and/or Gleason score ≥ 8, and/or Stage ≥ T3. One hundred and one patients (49.0%) received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but none were given adjuvant ADT. Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) was determined using the Phoenix definition. Results The 5-year actuarial BFFS rate was 84.8%. The 5-year cause-specific survival and overall survival rates were 98.7% and 97.6%, respectively. There were 8 deaths (3.9%), of which 2 were due to prostate cancer. On multivariate analysis, positive biopsy core rates and the number of high-risk factors were independent predictors of BFFS. The 5-year BFFS rates for patients in the positive biopsy core rate <50% and ≥50% groups were 89.3% and 78.2%, respectively (p = 0.03). The 5-year BFFS rate for patients with the any single high-risk factor was 86.1%, compared with 73.6% for those with any 2 or all 3 high-risk factors (p = 0.03). Neoadjuvant ADT did not impact the 5-year BFFS. Conclusions At a median follow-up of 60 months, high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing combined I-125 brachytherapy and EBRT without adjuvant ADT have a high probability of achieving 5-year BFFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshio Ohashi
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|