Risk factors and clinical management of haemorrhage after open nephron-sparing surgery

iRESCUE - Interventional embolization of Renal artEries after SurgiCal or traUmatic injury with hEmorrhage

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of urgent percutaneous embolization for the treatment of acute renal hemorrhage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing endovascular embolization at our hospital for bleeding from renal artery branches between January 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Periprocedural characteristics, technical details, clinical outcomes, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 12.9 underwent 86 procedures. The most common cause of hemorrhage was iatrogenic (63/76), including 44 patients presenting after partial nephrectomy. Bleeding was successfully controlled in 80 of 86 procedures (92.8 % technical success), and clinical success (defined as control of bleeding with endovascular embolization) was achieved in 72 of 76 patients (94.5 %) with embolization, including seven patients undergoing re-intervention. In univariate analysis, risk factors for clinical failure were antiplatelet agents (p = 0.033), and technical failure (p < 0.001); and technical failure was the only significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. Only one patient (1.3 %) needed nephrectomy. AKI was seen after 16 (21 %) procedures, and preprocedural increased creatinine (≧1.8) and decreased GFR (<60) were risk factors for AKI (p = 0.022 and p = 0.020). In all patients except one, renal functions returned to baseline. One patient died because of pulmonary embolism (in-hospital mortality 1.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Interventional embolization is feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of renal hemorrhages. Among others, the complication management with minimally invasive procedures allows urologists to safely perform partial nephrectomy even in patients with central, large, and endophytic tumors, thereby preserving kidney function in these patients.

[AN EXPERIENCE OF PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY IN A PATIENT WITH VON WILLEBRAND DISEASE]

A 28-year-old male visited a nearby hospital with chief complaint of bilateral back pain and fever. He was diagnosed with a right complex renal cyst (Bosniak classification, IIF) with a kidney stone and was referred to our hospital. We first suspected an incarcerated kidney stone and performed flexible transurethral lithotomy; however, his symptoms did not improve. Blood examination revealed prolonged APTT; subsequently, he was diagnosed with von Willebrand disease (VWD). Because he experienced pain due to the hemorrhagic renal cyst, we performed partial nephrectomy. Preoperatively, we supplemented the von Willebrand factor (VWF) based on the VWF activity in the patient. Although intraoperative bleeding was well controlled, he developed bleeding from pseudoaneurysms on the postoperative day (POD) 6. We immediately performed transarterial embolization along with VWF replenishment. VWF supplementation was discontinued on POD 14, and the patient was discharged on POD 23. Since then, he has not experienced a bleeding recurrence or pain. In patients with VWD, the perioperative administration of desmopressin or VWF is recommended. Although several reports showed that surgeries involving these treatments are safe, only three cases with VWD, including the present case where the patient underwent partial nephrectomy, have been reported. In the present case, postoperative bleeding occurred despite exhibiting adequate perioperative VWF activity. Thus, bleeding complications in patients with VWD undergoing partial nephrectomy must be considered and should be carefully followed up.

Nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma: current perspectives on technical issues

Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma. Although historically the concept of wide excision of the affected kidney dictated surgical thinking for more than half a century, a better understanding of the biology of this tumor, standardized staging, and changing patterns of presentation permit today a refined management approach with nephron-sparing surgery, thus limiting potential long-term morbidity by maximizing the preservation of functional renal parenchyma. This paper aims to review the current status of nephron-sparing surgery for solid renal masses with an emphasis on indications, preoperative assessment, and operative technical issues, summarizing the most recent existing data on the subject.

Ultrasound-guided open nephron sparing surgery without renal artery occlusion for central renal tumors

From January 2008 to January 2013, 11 patients with central renal tumors underwent ultrasound-guided open nephron sparing surgery (ONSS) without renal artery occlusion. We removed the lesions, and the cut edges of the tumors were negative. Thus, we deduced that ultrasound-guided ONSS is suitable for the cases with obscure tumor boundary or multiple lesions. It could achieve the purpose of thoroughly removing lesions, as well as to expand the application range of nephron sparing surgery.