A novel cost-effective approach to post-vasectomy semen analysis

Scheduling Appointments for Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Has No Impact on Compliance

BACKGROUND

A postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is recommended 8-16 wk after vasectomy to ensure azoospermia. Patient compliance with submitting a semen sample for PVSA has historically been low. To increase patient compliance, a policy change was made to schedule patients for PVSA appointments instead of a previous "drop-in" option.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient compliance for PVSA when scheduling appointments as opposed to a "drop-in" appointment 8-16 wk after the procedure.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Ethical approval was obtained to retrospectively evaluate patients undergoing vasectomy. A total of 400 patients were evaluated, 200 consecutive patients before and 200 after the policy change. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had other surgeries at the same time of vasectomy or if the vasectomy was a repeat procedure.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Percent of patients attending PVSA and time to PVSA were assessed. Nominal data were compared using chi-square analysis and interval data were compared using Student unpaired t test.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Thirteen patients were excluded from analysis: six before and seven after the policy change. Compliance rates were similar before and after the policy change (144/194 [74%] and 154/193 [80%], p = 0.19). There was no difference in the time from vasectomy to PVSA between groups (before: mean [standard deviation] 69 [55] d vs after: 74 (63) d, p = 0.44). This study is limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Scheduling appointments for PVSA has no impact on compliance rates or the time between vasectomy and semen analysis when compared with "drop-in" appointments.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Sterility after a vasectomy is guaranteed by delivering a semen sample. Many men do not deliver this sample, and sterility cannot be guaranteed. This study found that scheduling appointments did not increase the number of men who delivered a semen sample compared with "drop-in" appointments.

Is azoospermia the appropriate standard for post-vasectomy semen analysis? Or an unachievable goal of best practice laboratory guidelines

The increasingly stringent laboratory-approach to diagnosing azoospermia for post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) continues to be at odds with the simpler approach desired by clinicians. This study describes the analysis of 10 years of PVSA and discusses the outcome in relation to risk, cost and assesses whether more stringent procedures are required. PVSA was performed on 4788 patients initially using a 2-test strategy (16 and 20 weeks post-surgery), moving to 1 test during 2013-2014. Azoospermia was confirmed by the analysis of 10 µl of semen followed by 10 µl of centrifuged pellet. In total, there were 9260 tests with a median of 1.93 tests/patient and 18.7 weeks to clearance. Surgical failure occurred in 1.75%, falling to 1.1% between 2011 and 2016. There were no cases of unwanted pregnancy, recanalization or complaints although misdiagnosis was detected in 1 case as a result of failure to confirm patient identification. Azoospermia performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines is sufficiently robust to confirm success/failure of vasectomy. With uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis, efforts to improve detection of occasional non-motile sperm are futile, cost more and fail to reduce risk of inappropriate clearance. Misdiagnosis is more likely from patient identification error and mitigation may include reverting to the safety net of a 2-test strategy.

2016 Laboratory guidelines for postvasectomy semen analysis: Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the British Andrology Society and the British Association of Urological Surgeons

Post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is the procedure used to establish whether sperm are present in the semen following a vasectomy. PVSA is presently carried out by a wide variety of individuals, ranging from doctors and nurses in general practitioner (GP) surgeries to specialist scientists in andrology laboratories, with highly variable results.

Key recommendations are that: (1) PVSA should take place a minimum of 12 weeks after surgery and after a minimum of 20 ejaculations. (2) Laboratories should routinely examine samples within 4 h of production if assessing for the presence of sperm. If non-motile sperm are observed, further samples must be examined within 1 h of production. (3) Assessment of a single sample is acceptable to confirm vasectomy success if all recommendations and laboratory methodology are met and no sperm are observed. Clearance can then be given. (4) The level for special clearance should be <100 000/mL non-motile sperm. Special clearance cannot be provided if any motile sperm are observed and should only be given after assessment of two samples in full accordance with the methods contained within these guidelines. Surgeons are responsible both preoperatively and postoperatively for the counselling of patients and their partners regarding complications and the possibility of late recanalisation after clearance. These 2016 guidelines replace the 2002 British Andrology Society (BAS) laboratory guidelines and should be regarded as definitive for the UK in the provision of a quality PVSA service, accredited to ISO 15189:2012, as overseen by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS).

Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on post-vasectomy outcomes

PURPOSE

The 2012 American Urological Association (AUA) vasectomy guidelines recommend the finding of rare nonmotile sperm, representing 100,000 or fewer nonmotile sperm per ml, as a metric of post-vasectomy success. At our institution success was previously defined as 2 sequential azoospermic centrifuged semen pellets. The criteria change of including rare nonmotile sperm as a success end point may simplify post-vasectomy followup and decrease the number of post-vasectomy semen analyses required to assure occlusive success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the context of the new 2012 guidelines we retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the records of 972 of the 1,740 vasectomies (55.9%) performed between January 2000 and June 2012 after which at least 1 post-vasectomy semen analysis was done.

RESULTS

A total of 1,919 post-vasectomy semen analyses were obtained from 972 patients with a mean ± SE age of 39.7 ± 0.2 years. Occlusive success was evident in 337 azoospermic men (36.4%), while 514 (52.9%) underwent 2 or more post-vasectomy semen analyses and 458 (47.1%) returned for a single post-vasectomy semen analysis but were lost to followup. Of these noncompliant patients 76.0% were azoospermic, 19.7% had rare nonmotile sperm, 1.5% had greater than 100,000 nonmotile sperm per ml and 2.8% had motile sperm. Three patients underwent repeat vasectomy for persistent rare nonmotile sperm. If the criteria defined by the 2012 guidelines had been used to monitor these men, the occlusive success rate would have improved to 97.6% (949 patients) (p <0.05). Repeat vasectomies as well as 896 subsequent post-vasectomy semen analyses would have been avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUA vasectomy guidelines provide clear, evidence-based criteria for vasectomy success. The guidelines simplify followup protocols, improve patient compliance and help avoid unnecessary post-vasectomy semen analyses and repeat vasectomies.

Compliance with semen analysis

PURPOSE

We calculated the compliance rate and determined which population of men would be more or less likely to be compliant with semen analysis followup based on demographic information and complication rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 946 consecutive patients who underwent vasectomy at an ambulatory clinic, as performed by 1 urologist. Standard followup consisted of a telephone call or prebooked appointment 2 months after vasectomy and 2 semen analyses 4 months after vasectomy.

RESULTS

Average ± SD patient age was 33.6 ± 5.4 years. Of the 946 study patients 47.9% did not submit a negative semen sample, 15.7% submitted 1 and 36.4% submitted the required 2 negative samples to confirm successful vasectomy according to the sampling protocol. Mean time to semen analysis was 4.53 ± 2.14 months. Complications included infection in 1.9% of cases, hematoma in 1% and sperm granuloma in 0.5%. Men 34 years or younger, men with 3 or more children and men without complications were more likely to be noncompliant with semen analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of men who provided samples for semen analysis in this study was low, although they were given written and verbal reminders. This poor patient compliance is similar to that in previous studies. We identified a subset of patients with poor compliance, which may allow urologists to target preprocedure counseling more appropriately.