Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

A Review of Combined Phosphodiesterase-5-Inhibitors and α-Blockers versus Phosphodiesterase-5-Inhibitors Alone for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) present conflicting recommendations regarding combination therapy of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) with α-blockers to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Use of PDE5is is widespread in the population of patients with LUTS/BPH. In this scoping review, we examine the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of combined PDE5is and α-blockers compared to PDE5i medications alone. A search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science to identify manuscripts discussing the safety of PDE5i and α-blockers in combination or comparing this combination to PDE5is alone in the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Study designs, data, and conclusions were qualitatively analyzed. Combination therapy was found to be safe across all studies; importantly, no evidence documents increased risk of hypotension. Most studies reported added improvement in symptom and quality of life scores compared to PDE5i alone, with additional International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) change ranging from -1.30 to -8.50 and IPSS quality of life score change ranging from -0.15 to -1.50. Objective metrics such as postvoid residual volumes and maximum flow rate were inconsistently reported. Taken together, the current body of data suggests that combining PDE5i α-blocker therapy is safe and that there are opportunities for additional symptomatic improvement, though it should be utilized for select patients. Situations with particular utility could include patients with comorbid erectile dysfunction or without sufficient improvement on monotherapy.

Prospective comparison of tadalafil 5 mg alone, silodosin 8 mg alone, and the combination of both in treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), will have deterioration in the quality of life. Likewise, BPH can be complicated by damage to bladder function, bladder stones formation, hematuria, and impaired kidney function. The goal of treatment is to avoid all those effects caused by BPH.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of tadalafil alone, silodosin alone, and the combination of both in the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients in our department with BPH who had LUTS were assigned randomly to three groups: A (101 patients) received tadalafil, 5 mg; B (102 patients) received silodosin, 8 mg; and group C (105 patients) received the combination of tadalafil, 5 mg, and silodosin, 8 mg. For all participants, we asses changes in the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, Post-voiding urine (PVR) and all results were recorded and analyzed with the (SPSS) and Microsoft Excel 2010.

RESULTS

Qmax, IPSS, PVR and IIEF score improved significantly more with the combination of tadalafil and silodosin than with either drug alone (p < 0.001). Three months after treatment, the mean Qmax values were 14.4 ml/sec in group A, 15.2 ml/sec in group B, and 15.8 ml/sec in group C; and the mean IPSSs were 17.6 in group A, 16.7 in group B, and 15.6 in group C (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tadalafil and silodosin are effective treatment options in men with BPH who have LUTS, but the combination of both is more effective and feasible in treating LUTS of BPH.

Role of tadalafil in enhancing visualization of posterior urethra prior to combined voiding cystourethrogram and retrograde urethrogram: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

To show utility of tadalafil in enhancing visualization of posterior urethra in patients with urethral stricture.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of adults male who failed to delineate the posterior urethra while undergoing combined voiding cystourethrogram and retrograde urethrogram (VCUG and RUG), as a part of preoperative assessment of stricture length and location before urethral reconstruction. The study was repeated 24 h later after a single dose of tadalafil 20 mg was administrated 2 h before the procedure (Tadalafil group). A control group who did not receive any medication was used for comparison (control group). This study was carried out in between March 2016 and August 2019.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in the tadalafil group and equal number of patients was used as control group for comparison. The etiologies of strictures were pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (39 patients), bulbar stricture with complete obliteration (15 patients) and post catheterization (6 patients). Success rate of opening bladder outlet on initiation of voiding was 90% in tadalafil group and 40% in the control group (P = 0.0004). None of the men reported any serious adverse events after oral administration of the drug. Almost all AEs were mild and well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Tadalafil effectively relaxes the bladder neck and the posterior urethra prior to combined VCUG and RUG in urethral stricture patients. Tadalafil was safe with no serious adverse effects when administered prior to performing the test. This prevents the patients from undergoing further invasive or expensive diagnostic techniques, moreover, tadalafil assisted in preoperative surgical preparation and patient's counseling.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Comprising Tamsulosin and PDE5-Is, Relative to Monotherapies, in Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis

We report safety and efficacy of a combination therapy, comprising tamsulosin and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is), relative to monotherapy, to ascertain its potential in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) after 3 months’ treatment. We screened MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases, for randomized controlled trials, and obtained eight articles comprising 1144 participants. Results showed that the combination group had superior outcomes with regard to International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Qmax, compared to the other two groups. The combination group also had superior efficacy with regard to International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) than the tamsulosin group, but not over the PDE5-Is group. Further, the combination group showed better efficacy in IPSS voiding and quality of life (QoL) compared to the PDE5-Is group. An analysis of safety outcomes revealed extremely high adverse events (AEs) and pain in the combination group. However, therapy discontinuation due to pain and AEs did not increase with increase in AEs. Overall, our findings indicate that a combination of tamsulosin and PDE5-Is is superior to individual tamsulosin and PDE5-Is monotherapy, with regard to improving LUTS and ED secondary to BPH.

Defining the Efficacy and Safety of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors with Tamsulosin for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with or without Erectile Dysfunction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative safety and efficacy of different types of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) with tamsulosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) (BPH-LUTS) with or without erectile dysfunction (ED).

Methods

We use the Stata version 13.0 to conduct the network meta-analysis (NMA) with a random effects model of the Bayesian framework. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Maximum Urinary Flow Fate (Q_max), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and their credible intervals (CI) were used to compare the efficacy and safety of every medical intervention, including sildenafil plus tamsulosin, tadalafil plus tamsulosin, and vardenafil plus tamsulosin.

Results

Seven RCTs including 531 participants with seven interventions were analyzed. The results of NMA SUCRA showed that compared with different doses or types of PDE5-Is combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd), the sildenafil (25 mg qd) combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd) group had the greatest probabilities of being the best in the achievement of improving IIEF. The sildenafil (25 mg 4 days per week) combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd) group had the greatest probabilities of being the best in the achievement of improving Q_max, whereas sildenafil (25 mg qd) combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd) ranked the best for the safety outcomes.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicates that sildenafil combined with tamsulosin is the best effective and tolerated treatment option for BPH-LUTS with or without ED. Further RCTs are strongly required to provide more direct evidence.

Which Drug to Discontinue 3 Months After Combination Therapy of Tadalafil plus Tamsulosin for Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptom and Erectile Dysfunction? Results of a Prospective Observational Trial

BACKGROUND

Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin and tadalafil for men with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and/or erectile dysfunction (ED) are defined. However, there are only a few pilot studies on combination therapy with these drugs for men with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS)/BPE and ED. Moreover, preliminary reports are limited to 12 wk, without any information about subsequent therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of discontinuation of tamsulosin versus tadalafil 12 wk after combination therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Fifty consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] > 7) and mild-to-severe ED (International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] < 22) were treated with combination therapy (tamsulosin 0.4mg/d plus tadalafil 5mg/d) for 12 wk. After 12 wk, 25 patients discontinued tamsulosin (Group TAD), while 25 patients discontinued tadalafil (Group TAM).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Efficacy variables were IPSS (total, voiding, storage) and IIEF-5. Paired samples t test and analysis of variance were used.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Groups TAD and TAM presented similar features (age, BMI, metabolic profile) including symptoms scores at baseline. Similar and significant improvements in IPSS (total, voiding, and storage) and IIEF-5 were recorded in both groups after 12 wk of combination therapy (all p< 0.001). Total IPSS was similar between the two groups at the end of the trial. However, we found between-group significant differences from baseline to 24 wk and from 12 to 24 wk in storage-IPSS (Group TAD: -3.32 vs Group TAM: -1.24, p= 0.002; Group TAD: +0.24 vs Group TAM: +1.20, p= 0.040, respectively) and in IIEF-5 (Group TAD: +4.64 vs Group TAM: +0.16, p< 0.001; Group TAD: -1.64 vs Group TAM: -4.40, p= 0.003). No significant treatment-related adverse event was recorded in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After 12 wk of combination therapy, monotherapy with tadalafil for further 12 wk allows to preserve the improvement of storage IPSS and IIEF-5, in addition to total IPSS.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report we evaluated the discontinuation of tamsulosin or tadalafil after 12 wk of combination therapy. We found that tadalafil monotherapy, for a further 12 wk, aids in retaining the improvement of storage symptoms and erectile function.

Tadalafil 5 mg Alone or in Combination with Tamsulosin 0.4 mg for the Management of Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Prospective Observational Trial

Tadalafil 5 mg represents the standard for men with Erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). We carried out an observational trial aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of Tadalafil compared with Tadalafil plus Tamsulosin. Seventy-five patients complaining of ED and LUTS were treated for 12-weeks with Tadalafil plus placebo (TAD+PLA-group) or with combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin (TAD+TAM-group). Efficacy variables were: International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and safety assessments. Data were evaluated using paired samples T-test (baseline vs. 12-weeks) and analysis of variance (Δgroup-TAD+PLA vs. Δgroup-TAD+TAM). At baseline, both groups presented similar characteristics and symptoms scores (all: p > 0.05). From baseline to 12-weeks, all the subjects showed a significant improvement of IIEF, total-IPSS, storage-IPSS, Qmax (all: p < 0.001). Conversely, a significant improvement of voiding-IPSS was observed in TAD+TAM-group (−3.5 points, p < 0.001). Indeed, TAD+PLA-group showed a not significant improvement of voiding-IPSS (−2.0 points, p = 0.074). When we compared between-groups differences at 12-weeks, IIEF (p = 0.255), total-IPSS (p = 0.084) and storage-IPSS (p = 0.08) did not show any statistically significant differences, whereas, voiding-IPSS and Qmax were significantly better in TAD+TAM-group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.027, respectively). No severe treatment adverse events (TAEs) were reported in both groups. Tadalafil achieved the same improvements of IIEF, total-IPSS, storage-IPSS when compared to combination therapy. Instead, Qmax and voiding-IPSS were better managed with combination therapy, without change of TAEs.

Efficacy of tadalafil against lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy in prostate cancer patients

Objectives:

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin in the treatment of brachytherapy patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Methods:

Localized prostate cancer patients who developed LUTS after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) were first treated with alpha-1 blockers (tamsulosin, 0.2 mg per day). Those still suffering from LUTS were additionally treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (tadalafil, 5 mg/day). LUTS was evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life (QOL) score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) score before brachytherapy, before treatment with tadalafil, and after three months of treatment with tadalafil.

Results:

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Each subscore of the IPSS (storage symptom, voiding symptom, and postvoiding symptom) and the QOL score improved, but OABSS and IIEF5 did not show significant recovery after addition of tadalafil treatment. When patient characteristics and each question score were surveyed, time from seed implantation until treatment with tadalafil showed the strongest correlation with recovery.

Conclusions:

Addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin treatment was effective against LUTS in localised prostate cancer patients after brachytherapy.

Evidence level:

2b

Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, augments sphincter bursting and bladder afferent activity to enhance storage function and voiding efficiency in mice

Objectives

To investigate the influence of low‐dose sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5‐I), on the function of the mouse lower urinary tract (LUT).

Materials and Methods

Adult male mice were decerebrated and arterially perfused with a carbogenated Ringer's solution to establish the decerebrate arterially perfused mouse (DAPM). To allow distinction between central neural and peripheral actions of sildenafil, experiments were conducted in both the DAPM and in a ‘pithed’ DAPM, which has no functional brainstem or spinal cord. The action of systemic and intrathecal sildenafil on micturition was assessed in urethane‐anaesthetised mice.

Results

In the DAPM, systemic perfusion of sildenafil (30 pm) decreased the voiding threshold pressure [to a mean (sem) 84.7 (3.8)% of control] and increased bladder compliance [to a mean (sem) 140.2 (8.3)% of control, an effect replicated in the pithed DAPM]. Sildenafil was without effect on most voiding variables but significantly increased the number of bursts of the external urethral sphincter (EUS) per void in DAPM [to a mean (sem) 130.1 (6.9)% of control at 30 pm] and in urethane‐anaesthetised mice [to a mean (sem) 117.5 (5.8)% of control at 14 ng/kg]. Sildenafil (10 and 30 pm) increased pelvic afferent activity during both bladder filling and the isovolumetric phase [to a mean (sem) 205.4 (30.2)% of control at 30 pm]. Intrathecal application of sildenafil (5 μL of either 150 pm or 1.5 nm) did not alter cystometry and EUS‐electromyography variables in urethane‐anaesthetised mice.

Conclusions

Low‐dose sildenafil increases bladder compliance, increases pelvic nerve afferent activity, and augments the bursting activity of the EUS. We propose that the novel actions on afferent traffic and sphincter control may contribute to its beneficial actions to restore storage and voiding efficiency in LUT dysfunction.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms consistent with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to non-malignant enlargement of the prostate gland that may cause bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Alpha-blockers (ABs) and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) are the mainstay of medical treatment. Recently, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) that so far have been used mainly to treat erectile dysfunction were introduced to treat male LUTS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of PDEIs compared to placebo and other standard of care drugs (ABs and 5-ARIs) in men with LUTS consistent with BPH.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trials registries of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (updated 2 August 2018). We performed citation tracking and handsearching of abstracts and conference proceedings. We also contacted study authors to ask for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered for inclusion in this systematic review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PDEIs versus placebo, ABs, or 5-ARIs for at least four weeks in men with BPH-LUTS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently screened the literature and extracted data. Primary outcomes were effects on urinary symptoms as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS-total; score ranging from 0 to 35, with higher values reflecting more symptoms), urinary bother as assessed by the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII; score ranging from 0 to 13, with higher values reflecting more bother), and adverse events (AEs). We used GRADE to rate the quality of evidence. We considered short-term (up to 12 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks or longer) results separately.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 16 randomised trials in this review. The results for primary outcomes are as follows.PDEI versus placebo: PDEIs may result in a small improvement in IPSS-total score (mean difference (MD) 1.89 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27 lower to 1.50 lower; n = 4293; low-quality evidence) compared to placebo, and may reduce the BPHII score slightly (MD 0.52 lower, 95% CI 0.71 lower to 0.33 lower; n = 3646; low-quality evidence). Rates of AEs may be increased (risk ratio (RR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.67; n = 4386; low-quality evidence). This corresponds to 95 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 more to 151 more per 1000). Study results were limited to a treatment duration of six to 12 weeks.PDEI versus AB: PDEIs and ABs probably provide similar improvement in IPSS-total score (MD 0.22 higher, 95% CI 0.49 lower to 0.93 higher; n = 933; moderate-quality evidence) and may have a similar effect on BPHII score (MD 0.03 higher, 95% CI 1.10 lower to 1.16 higher; n = 550; low-quality evidence) and AEs (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.30; n = 936; low-quality evidence). This corresponds to 71 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 41 fewer to 264 more per 1000). Study results were limited to a treatment duration of six to 12 weeks.PDEI and AB versus AB alone: the combination of PDEI and AB may provide a small improvement in IPSS-total score (MD 2.56 lower, 95% CI 3.92 lower to 1.19 lower; n = 193; low-quality evidence) compared to AB alone. We found no evidence for BPHII scores. AEs may be increased (RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.53 to 5.17; n = 194; moderate-quality evidence). This corresponds to 235 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 69 more to 542 more per 1000). Study results were limited to treatment duration of four to 12 weeks.PDEI and AB versus PDEI alone: the combination of PDEI and AB may provide a small improvement in IPSS-total (MD 2.4 lower, 95% CI 6.47 lower to 1.67 higher; n = 40; low-quality evidence) compared to PDEI alone. We found no data on BPHII or AEs. Study results were limited to a treatment duration of four weeks.PDEI and 5-ARI versus 5-ARI alone: in the short term (up to 12 weeks), the combination of PDEI and 5-ARI probably results in a small improvement in IPSS-total score (MD 1.40 lower, 95% CI 2.24 lower to 0.56 lower; n = 695; moderate-quality evidence) compared to 5-ARI alone. We found no evidence on BPHII scores or AEs. In the long term (13 to 26 weeks), the combination of PDEI and 5-ARI likely results in a small reduction in IPSS-total score (MD 1.00 less, 95% CI 1.83 lower to 0.17 lower; n = 695; moderate-quality evidence). We found no evidence about effects on BPHII scores. There may be no difference in rates of AEs (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.36; n = 695; low-quality evidence). This corresponds to 19 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 43 fewer to 98 more per 1000).We found no trials comparing other combinations of treatments or comparing different PDEI agents.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to placebo, PDEI likely leads to a small reduction in IPSS-total and BPHII sores, with a possible increase in AEs. There may be no differences between PDEI and AB with regards to improvement in IPSS-total, BPHII, and incidence of AEs. There appears to be no added benefit of PDEI combined with AB compared to PDEI or AB alone or PDEI combined with 5-ARI compared to ARI alone with regards to urinary symptoms. Most evidence was limited to short-term treatment up to 12 weeks and of moderate or low certainty.

Efficacy and safety of PDE5-Is and α-1 blockers for treating lower ureteric stones or LUTS: a meta-analysis of RCTs

BACKGROUND

Lower ureteric stones and lower urinary tract symptoms are common in urology.Drug treatment is one of standard therapy,but the efficacy was controversial.Thus we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy or combination therapy of adrenoceptor1 blockers and phosphodiesterase5 inhibitors for treatment.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials up to November 2016 were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase. A total of 17 studies were included. We analyzed data through random or fixed effect models. The heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the I² test statistic.

RESULTS

As for lower ureter stones, our analysis demonstrated tadalafil had a significantly lower incidence of abnormal ejaculation than adrenoceptor1 blockers (2.31 95%CI 0.22to0.84, P = 0.01),while combination therapy had a higher expulsion rate (2.49 95%CI 1.44to4.29, P = 0.001) and shorter expulsion time (- 1.98 95%CI -3.08to0.88, P = 0.0004) than tamsulosin. As for lower urinary tract symptoms, our analysis indicated adrenoceptor1 blockers was more effective than phosphodiesterase5 inhibitors on decreasing International Prostate Symptom Score (1.96 95%CI 0.03to3.89, P = 0.05) and Post-Void Residual (9.41 95%CI 1.40to14.41, P = 0.02) and phosphodiesterase5 inhibitors showed a greater effect than adrenoceptor1 blockers on improving Erectile Dysfunction (2.23 95%CI 1.24to3.22, P<0.0001).Combination therapy had a significantly better effect on International Prostate Symptom Score (1.47 95%CI 1.25to1.69, P<0.0001), Maximum flow rate (0.87 95%CI 0.71to1.04, P<0.0001), Post-Void Residual (10.74 95%CI 3.53to17.96,P = 0.004) and Quality of life (0.59 95%CI 0.22to0.97, P = 0.002) but was associated with higher incidences of adverse events (3.40 95%CI 1.82to6.36, P = 0.0001) than adrenoceptor1 blockers. Combination therapy had a significantly better effect on International Prostate Symptom Score (4.19 95%CI 3.34to5.04, P<0.0001), Maximum flow rate (1.86 95%CI 1.32to2.39, P<0.0001), Post-Void Residual (22.58 95%CI 9.13to36.04, P = 0.001) and Quality of life (0.68 95%CI 0.37to1.00, P<0.0001) without higher incidences of adverse events than PDE5-Is.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested combination therapy had a best efficacy of therapy for lower ureteric stones or lower urinary tract symptoms correlated with benign prostatic hyperplasia than monotherapy. Adrenoceptor1 blockers was more effective than phosphodiesterase5 inhibitors on International Prostate Symptom Score and Post-Void Residual. Both monotherapy and combination therapy were safe.

Factors affecting the efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor and placebo in treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms: meta-analysis and meta-regression

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the real benefit and safety of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE 5I) for benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) by determining the affecting factors and to overcome the previous meta-analysis studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of improvements in LUTS using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), voiding subscore of IPSS (voiding IPSS), storage subscore of IPSS (storage IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-voided residual volume (PVR), and also investigated adverse events and relevant withdrawal rate.

RESULTS

Final included studies were 28 studies with 19,820 subjects (9800 treatment group and 10,020 control group). The overall weighted mean differences of total IPSS, voiding IPSS, storage IPSS, and QoL showed significant improvement. Single placebo group showed significant improvement in all outcomes except PVR. The weighted prevalence of overall withdrawal rate and adverse event-specific withdrawal rate was 10 and 3%, respectively. Meta-regression showed that baseline IPSS, dosage of PDE 5I, and country affect clinical improvement compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clarifies the efficacy of PDE 5I on treatment of BPH/LUTS as an initial treatment strategy. However, baseline IPSS, dosage of PDE 5I and country affected the clinical improvement. Moreover, adverse event-specific withdrawal rate was not as high as suspected based on the overall withdrawal rate.

Daily use of sildenafil 50mg at night effectively ameliorates nocturia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: an exploratory multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of sildenafil 25 mg qd, 25 mg bid or 50 mg qd - on treating lower urinary tract symptoms with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men aged > 45 years with LUTS/BPH were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil 25 mg qd (n = 42), bid (n = 41), 50 mg qd (n = 38) or placebo (n = 41) for 8 weeks. Changes from baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) were assessed at week 4 and week 8.

RESULTS

Sildenafil 25 mg qd (-7.3 ± 5.8) and 25 mg bid (-7.0 ± 5.7) exhibited significant improvements of I-PSS compared to placebo (-5.2 ± 6.4) (p = 0.020, 0.025, respectively). In particular, voiding domain was more affected than storage domain. Only sildenafil 50 mg qd improved nocturia significantly (versus placebo, p = 0.027). Quality of life score was improved in all treatment groups. Q_max and PVR did not change significantly in all groups. All regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil 25 mg qd, 25 mg bid and 50 mg qd are safe and effective to improve LUTS/BPH in long term, along with coexisting ED. In particular, nocturia is most well-controlled by 50 mg qd.

Sildenafil citrate in combination with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin monotherapy for management of male lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objective

To assess the additive effect of sildenafil citrate to tamsulosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) in men with or without erectile dysfunction (ED).

Patients and methods

In all, 150 men with untreated LUTS/BPH with or without ED were randomised to receive sildenafil 25 mg once daily (OD) or placebo OD (night time) combined with tamsulosin 0.4 mg OD (day time) for 6 months. Changes from pre-treatment scores in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-quality of life (QoL) score, maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max), and the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5) were assessed at 3 and 6 months. Safety profiles were assessed by physical examination and monitoring clinical adverse events.

Results

Group A comprised of men who received tamsulosin and sildenafil (75 men), whilst those in Group B received tamsulosin and placebo (75). The IPSS was significantly improved in Group A compared to Group B, at −29.3% vs −13.7% (P = 0.039) at 3 months and −37% vs −19.6% (P = 0.043) at 6 months after treatment. Q_max significantly improved in both groups compared with before treatment (P < 0.001). The IIEF-5 scores improved more in Group A than in Group B, at 58.7% vs 11.7% at 3 months and 62.4% vs 12.4% at 6 months after treatment (both P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Sildenafil citrate combined with tamsulosin improved LUTS, erectile function, and patient QoL more than tamsulosin monotherapy with the merit of a comparable safety profile in patients with LUTS/BPH.

New medical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in men are a common clinical problem in urology and have been historically strictly linked to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which may lead to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). New molecules have been approved and have entered the urologists' armamentarium, targeting new signaling pathways and tackling specific aspects of LUTS. Objective of this review is to summarize the evidence regarding the new medical therapies currently available for male non-neurogenic LUTS, including superselective α1-antagonists, PDE-5 inhibitors, anticholinergic drugs and intraprostatic onabotulinum toxin injections.

METHODS

The National Library of Medicine Database was searched for relevant articles published between January 2006 and December 2015, including the combination of "BPH", "LUTS", "medical" and "new". Each article's title, abstract and text were reviewed for their appropriateness and their relevance. One hundred forty eight articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 148 articles reviewed, 92 were excluded. Silodosin may be considered a valid alternative to non-selective α1-antagonists, especially in the older patients where blood pressure alterations may determine major clinical problems and ejaculatory alterations may be not truly bothersome. Tadalafil 5 mg causes a significant decrease of IPSS score with an amelioration of patients' QoL, although with no significant increase in Qmax. Antimuscarinic drugs are effective on storage symptoms but should be used with caution in patients with elevated post-void residual. Intraprostatic injections of botulinum toxin are well-tolerated and effective, with a low rate of adverse events; however profound ameliorations were seen also in the sham arms of RCTs evaluating intraprostatic injections.

CONCLUSION

New drugs have been approved in the last years in the medical treatment of BPH-related LUTS. Practicing urologists should be familair with their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and α-adrenoceptor antagonists used alone or combined for treatment of LUTS due to BPH

The aim of this systematic review is to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) and α-blockers used alone or combined for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase up to January 2014 was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of PDE5-Is and α-blockers for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, which assessed IPSS score, maximum flow rate, postvoided residual urine, quality of life and Erectile Function (IIEF) score as outcomes. Data were analyzed by fixed or random effect models using Cochrane Collaboration review manager software. A total of 12 studies were included. Our novel data demonstrated that there was a trend that α-blockers were more efficacious than PDE5-Is on decreasing IPSS score and increasing maximum flow rate. α-blockers were significantly more effective than PDE5-Is on reduction of postvoided residual urine with a mean difference of 3.67 (95% CI 1.56 to 5.77, P = 0.0006) and PDE5-Is showed greater effect than α-blockers on increasing IIEF score with a mean difference of 9.82 (95% CI 3.80 to 15.85, P = 0.001). In conclusion, our novel data demonstrated that PDE5-Is plus ABs ranked the highest on the improvement of LUTS/BPH. PDE5-Is monotherapy was also effective in this kind of disorder except less reduction of PVR than ABs. In addition, both combined- or mono-therapy were safe.

Determination of the potency of a novel saw palmetto supercritical CO2 extract (SPSE) for 5α-reductase isoform II inhibition using a cell-free in vitro test system

BACKGROUND

The nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent membrane protein 5α-reductase catalyses the conversion of testosterone to the most potent androgen - 5α-dihydrotestosterone. Two 5α-reductase isoenzymes are expressed in humans: type I and type II. The latter is found primarily in prostate tissue. Saw palmetto extract (SPE) has been used extensively in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The pharmacological effects of SPE include the inhibition of 5α-reductase, as well as anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects. Clinical studies of SPE have been inconclusive - some have shown significant results, and others have not - possibly the result of varying bioactivities of the SPEs used in the studies.

PURPOSE

To determine the in vitro potency in a cell-free test system of a novel SP supercritical CO2 extract (SPSE), an inhibitor of the 5α-reductase isoenzyme type II.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The inhibitory potency of SPSE was compared to that of finasteride, an approved 5α-reductase inhibitor, on the basis of the enzymatic conversion of the substrate androstenedione to the 5α-reduced product 5α-androstanedione.

RESULTS

By concentration-dependent inhibition of 5α-reductase type II in vitro (half-maximal inhibitory concentration 3.58±0.05 μg/mL), SPSE demonstrated competitive binding toward the active site of the enzyme. Finasteride, the approved 5α-reductase inhibitor tested as positive control, led to 63%-75% inhibition of 5α-reductase type II.

CONCLUSION

SPSE effectively inhibits the enzyme that has been linked to BPH, and the amount of extract required for activity is comparatively low. It can be confirmed from the results of this study that SPSE has bioactivity that promotes prostate health at a level that is superior to that of many other phytotherapeutic extracts. The bioactivity of SPSE corresponds favorably to that reported for the hexane extract used in a large number of positive BPH clinical trials, as well as to finasteride, the established standard of therapy among prescription drugs. Future in vitro and clinical trials involving SPEs would be useful for elucidating their comparative differences, as well as appropriate patient selection for their use.

Latest Evidence on the Use of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

CONTEXT

Several preclinical reports, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and posthoc analyses corroborate the role of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).

OBJECTIVE

Update of the latest evidence on the mechanisms of action, evaluate the current meta-analyses, and emphasize the results of pooled data analyses of PDE5-Is in LUTS/BPE.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature analysis of basic researches on PDE5-Is, systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus until May 2015 on reviews of trials on PDE5-Is, and collection of pooled data available on tadalafil 5mg.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Latest evidences on the pathophysiology of LUTS/BPE has provided the rationale for use of PDE5-Is: (1) improvement of LUT oxygenation, (2) smooth muscle relaxation, (3) negative regulation of proliferation and transdifferentiation of LUT stroma, (4) reduction of bladder afferent nerve activity, and (5) down-regulation of prostate inflammation are the proven mechanisms of action of PDE5-Is. Data from eight systematic reviews demonstrated that PDE5-Is allow to improve LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score mean difference vs placebo: 2.35-4.21) and erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function mean difference vs placebo: 2.25-5.66), with negligible change in flow rate (Qmax mean difference vs placebo: 0.01-1.43). Pooled data analyses revealed that tadalafil 5mg once daily allows the clinically-meaningful improvement of LUTS and nocturnal voiding frequency independent of both erectile dysfunction severity and improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

PDE5-Is are safe and effective in improving both LUTS and erectile function in appropriately selected men with LUTS/BPE. Data on the reduction of disease progression, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness analyses are still lacking.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed recent literature on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with prostatic enlargement. We found evidence to confirm that phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are a valid treatment option for men affected by bothersome urinary symptoms with or without erectile dysfunction.

A Meta-Analysis of Long- Versus Short-Acting Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors: Comparing Combination Use With α-Blockers and α-Blocker Monotherapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction

Purpose:

Combination therapy with an α-1-adrenergic blocker and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) has shown improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with negligible side effects. Nonetheless, decisive advantages in symptom improvement were insufficient, and there were no clinical differences between long- or short-acting PDE5Is in combination with combination medication.

Methods:

To review the studies on α-1-adrenergic blocker monotherapy and combination therapy with long vs. short-acting PDE5Is in their use in LUTS and erectile dysfunction (ED). A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases was conducted from 2000 to 2014 using combinations of the relevant terms. Among the 323 relevant references discovered, 10 were selected for meta-analysis. The data showed that 616 men received combination therapy (PDE5Is with α-1-adrenergic blockers) or α-1-adrenergic blocker monotherapy.

Results:

Meta-analysis of the combination therapy showed it was more effective than α-blockers in improving symptoms, with a mean International Prostrate Symptom Score change difference of –1.93 while those of the long- vs. short-acting PDE5I were –2.12 vs. –1.70. Compared to maximum flow rate (Qmax) value with monotherapy, the Qmax increased more with the combination therapy (mean difference of 0.71) while change values were 0.14 and 1.13 for the long- and short-acting PDE5Is, respectively. Residual urine decreased more with the combination therapy than it did with α-1-adrenergic blocker monotherapy with a mean difference of –7.09 while the mean residual urine change values for long- vs. short-acting PDE5Is were –18.83 vs. –5.93. The International Index of Erectile Function value increased by 3.99, 2.85, and 4.85 following combination therapy, and therapy with long- and short-acting PDE5Is.

Conclusions:

Our meta-analysis suggests that PDE5Is can significantly improve LUTS in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia/ED. Furthermore, combination PDE5I and α-1-adrenergic blocker could be a more effective treatment than α-1-adrenergic blocker monotherapy, and the differences between long and short-acting agents were minimal.

PDE5-Is for the Treatment of Concomitant ED and LUTS/BPH

Epidemiologic data in adult men exhibit a strong relationship between erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), indicating that men affected by ED should also be investigated for LUTS/BPH and those presenting with storage or voiding LUTS should be investigated for co-morbid ED. Common pathophysiolgical mechanisms underlying both LUTS/BPH and ED, including alteration of NO/cGMP or RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling and/or vascular or neurogenic dysfunction, are potential targets for proposed phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is). Several randomized controlled trials and only a few reviews including all commercially available PDE5-Is demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these drugs in the improvement of erectile function and urinary symptoms, in patients affected either by ED, LUTS, or both conditions.

The mechanism of action of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia

CONTEXT

Clinical trials of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have consistently demonstrated a significant reduction in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and small urinary flow rate changes in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

OBJECTIVE

This review presents the proposed mechanisms of action of PDE5-Is in the treatment of BPH-LUTS focusing on the localization of PDE5 isoenzymes in the pelvic structures; smooth muscle relaxation in the bladder, prostate, and supporting vasculature; increased blood perfusion of the bladder and prostate; and modulation of sensory impulses from these organs.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature describing in vitro, preclinical, or clinical studies of pathologic processes contributing to LUTS or effects of PDE5 inhibition on the lower urinary tract (LUT) was selected for review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We objectively assessed and summarized the published data focusing on articles published within the past 10 yr. Articles before the time cut-off were included if historically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

The PDE5 isoenzymes are highly expressed in the LUT including the bladder, prostate, and their supporting vasculature. In vitro assays have demonstrated PDE5-Is by regulating cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) degradation and enhancing the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway to relax human smooth muscle strips from the prostate, bladder, and LUT arteries. In animals characterized by ischemia/hypoxia of the genitourinary tract, treatment with PDE5-Is increases bladder and prostate tissue oxygenation. PDE5-Is have been shown to reduce nonvoiding contractions and bladder afferent nerve firing in decerebrate spinal cord-injured rats, and to reduce mechanosensitive afferent activities of both Aδ- and C-fibers in an irritated or overextended bladder model.

Is testosterone treatment good for the prostate? Study of safety during long-term treatment

INTRODUCTION

For men with androgen deficiency on testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), clinical concern relates to the development of prostate cancer (PCa).

AIM

An updated audit of prostate safety from the UK Androgen Study was carried out to analyze the incidence of PCa during long-term TRT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnosis of PCa in men receiving TRT, by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE), and its relation to different testosterone preparations.

METHODS

One thousand three hundred sixty-five men aged 28-87 (mean 55) years with symptomatic androgen deficiency and receiving TRT have been monitored for up to 20 years. All patients were prescreened for PCa by DRE and PSA along with endocrine, biochemical, hematological, and urinary profiles at baseline and every 6 months. Abnormal findings or rising PSA were investigated by transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsy. The data were compared for the four different testosterone preparations used in TRT, including pellet implants, Restandol, mesterolone, and Testogel.

RESULTS

Fourteen new cases of PCa were diagnosed at one case per 212 years treatment, after 2,966 man-years of treatment (one case per 212 years). Time to diagnosis ranged from 1 to 12 years (mean 6.3 years). All tumors were clinically localized and suitable for potentially curative treatment. Initiating testosterone treatment had no statistically significant effect on total PSA, free PSA or free/total PSA ratio, and any initial PSA change had no predictive relationship to subsequent diagnosis of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PCa during long-term TRT was equivalent to that expected in the general population. This study adds to the considerable weight of evidence that with proper clinical monitoring, testosterone treatment is safe for the prostate and improves early detection of PCa. Testosterone treatment with regular monitoring of the prostate may be safer for the individual than any alternative without surveillance.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

CONTEXT

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have showed significant improvements in both lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in men affected by one or both conditions, without a significant increase in adverse events. However, the results are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of available prospective and cross-sectional studies on the use of PDE5-Is alone or in combination with α1-adrenergic blockers in patients with LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through September 2011 including the combination of the following terms: LUTS, BPH, PDE5-Is, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, udenafil, α-blockers, and α1-adrenergic blocker. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines for observational studies in epidemiology.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of 107 retrieved articles, 12 were included in the present meta-analysis: 7 on PDE5-Is versus placebo, with 3214 men, and 5 on the combination of PDE5-Is with α1-adrenergic blockers versus α1-adrenergic blockers alone, with 216 men. Median follow-up of all RCTs was 12 wk. Combining the results of those trials, the use of PDE5-Is alone was associated with a significant improvement of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score (+5.5; p<0.0001) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (-2.8; p<0.0001) but not the maximum flow rate (Q(max)) (-0.00; p=not significant) at the end of the study as compared with placebo. The association of PDE5-Is and α1-adrenergic blockers improved the IIEF score (+3.6; p<0.0001), IPSS score (-1.8; p = 0.05), and Q(max) (+1.5; p<0.0001) at the end of the study as compared with α-blockers alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of the available cross-sectional data suggests that PDE5-Is can significantly improve LUTS and erectile function in men with BPH. PDE5-Is seem to be a promising treatment option for patients with LUTS secondary to BPH with or without ED.

Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Tadalafil improved lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; LUTS/BPH) in clinical studies but has not been evaluated together with an active control in an international clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

Assess tadalafil or tamsulosin versus placebo for LUTS/BPH.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomised, double-blind, international, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessed men ≥45 yr of age with LUTS/BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥13, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) ≥4 to ≤15ml/s. Following screening and washout, if needed, subjects completed a 4-wk placebo run-in before randomisation to placebo (n=172), tadalafil 5mg (n=171), or tamsulosin 0.4mg (n=168) once daily for 12 wk.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or ranked analysis of variance (ANOVA) (continuous variables) and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test or Fisher exact test (categorical variables).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

IPSS significantly improved versus placebo through 12 wk with tadalafil (-2.1; p=0.001; primary efficacy outcome) and tamsulosin (-1.5; p=0.023) and as early as 1 wk (tadalafil and tamsulosin both -1.5; p<0.01). BPH Impact Index significantly improved versus placebo at first assessment (week 4) with tadalafil (-0.8; p<0.001) and tamsulosin (-0.9; p<0.001) and through 12 wk (tadalafil -0.8, p=0.003; tamsulosin -0.6, p=0.026). The IPSS Quality-of-Life Index and the Treatment Satisfaction Scale-BPH improved significantly versus placebo with tadalafil (both p<0.05) but not with tamsulosin (both p>0.1). The International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain improved versus placebo with tadalafil (4.0; p<0.001) but not tamsulosin (-0.4; p=0.699). Q(max) increased significantly versus placebo with both tadalafil (2.4ml/s; p=0.009) and tamsulosin (2.2ml/s; p=0.014). Adverse event profiles were consistent with previous reports. This study was limited in not being powered to directly compare tadalafil versus tamsulosin.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin resulted in significant and numerically similar improvements versus placebo in LUTS/BPH and Q(max). However, only tadalafil improved erectile dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT00970632.

Causative significance of bladder blood flow in lower urinary tract symptoms

The association between metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms has been attracting enormous interest and attention. This enthusiasm is based on the presence of many common risk factors being involved in both metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms, as shown by various epidemiological studies. Metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms have many pathophysiological features in common, particularly overactive bladder. Herein, we analyze the pathophysiological relationship between metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms with a special emphasis on bladder blood flow. We also propose a new treatment strategy for treating lower urinary tract symptoms from the viewpoint of bladder blood flow.

[Benign prostatic hyperplasia and urolithiasis]

The Academy Spring Forums held as part of the Southwest German Congress in Tübingen and the Congress of North Rhine-Westphalia in Aachen offer urologists in private practice and likewise hospital urologists a compact overview of new developments. This article summarizes the newest work on e.g. interventional therapy, uroliths, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for benign prostatic hyperplasia and urolithiasis.

PPARγ: a molecular link between systemic metabolic disease and benign prostate hyperplasia

The emergent epidemic of metabolic syndrome and its complex list of sequelae mandate a more thorough understanding of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) in the context of systemic metabolic disease. Here we discuss the nature and origins of BPH, examine its role as a component of LUTS and review retrospective clinical studies that have drawn associations between BPH/LUTS and type II diabetes, inflammation and dyslipidemia. PPARγ signaling, which sits at the nexus of systemic metabolic disease and BPH/LUTS through its regulation of inflammation and insulin resistance, is proposed as a candidate for molecular manipulation in regard to BPH/LUTS. Finally, we introduce new cell and animal models that are being used to study the consequences of obesity, diabetes and inflammation on benign prostatic growth.