Does repeat biopsy affect the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy? Analysis by the number of cores taken at initial biopsy

Repeat biopsy of primary disease negatively affects the outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer treated with definitive intensity-modified radiotherapy: a cohort analysis of 795 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pretreatment repeat biopsy of nasopharynx is associated with an impaired outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in an intensity-modified radiotherapy era.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective data review of the association between pretreatment nasopharyngeal biopsy and outcomes for all nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated at our center between January 2007 and December 2011. Of the 720 patients enrolled, 693 (96.3%) were diagnosed after initial biopsy and 27 (3.7%) after repeat biopsy. Five-year cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival for the two groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the effects of repeat biopsy on the outcome.

RESULTS

Five-year estimated cancer-specific survival (75.9 vs. 88.5%, P= 0.045) and disease-free survival (63.3 vs. 77.1%, P= 0.041) were significantly poorer in the repeat biopsy group than the initial biopsy group. After adjustment for other prognostic factors (age, gender, T and N stage), pretreatment biopsy remained independently associated with poorer both 5-year cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival. The hazard ratios for cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival in the repeat biopsy group were 2.73 (95% confidence interval 1.09-6.82) and 2.22 (95% confidence interval 1.12-4.37) compared with the initial biopsy group (reference), respectively. The repeat biopsy group also had a higher risk of distant failure compared with the initial biopsy group (hazard ratio 2.82, 95% confidence interval 1.22-6.51, P= 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment repeat biopsy of nasopharynx has a detrimental effect on survivals of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, which may be partly due to an increased frequency of distant metastasis.

Clinicopathologic differences between prostate cancers detected during initial and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in Korea

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate clinicopathologic differences between prostate cancer (PCa) detected at initial and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in a large Korean cohort.

Materials and Methods

From 2000 through 2012, a total of 7,001 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at 6 centers in Daegu and Gyeongbuk provinces. Of these 7,001 patients, the initial biopsy was positive for PCa in 2,118 patients. Repeat biopsy was performed in 374 of the 4,883 patients with an initial negative finding and a persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, nodules or asymmetry by digital rectal examination (DRE), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or atypical small acinar proliferation. Numbers of biopsy cores varied from 6 to 12 according to center and biopsy date.

Results

Cancer was diagnosed in 2,118 of the 7,001 patients (30.3%) at initial biopsy and in 86 of the 374 patients (23.0%) at repeat biopsy. The repeat biopsy rate was 5.3%. Mean PSA values were 68.7±289.5 ng/mL at initial biopsy and 18.0±55.4 ng/mL at repeat biopsy (p<0.001). The mean number of cancer-positive cores per biopsy was 5.5±3.5 for initial biopsy and 3.0±2.9 for repeat biopsy (p<0.001). Mean Gleason score was 7.5±1.4 at initial biopsy and 6.6±1.3 at repeat biopsy (p<0.001). For detected cancers, the low-stage rate was higher for repeat biopsy than for initial biopsy (p=0.001).

Conclusions

Cancers detected at repeat biopsy tend to have lower Gleason scores and stages than cancers detected at initial biopsy. The present study shows that repeat biopsy is needed in patients with a persistently high PSA or abnormal DRE findings.

Are more low-risk prostate cancers detected by repeated biopsy? A retrospective pilot study

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that there might be a higher incidence of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in men diagnosed at a repeated biopsy. Thus, we investigated differences in clinicopathological results of PCa after primary and repeated biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with PCa at a primary or repeated biopsy from January 2004 to April 2011. Patients were stratified into primary biopsy and repeated biopsy groups. We analyzed prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason score (GS), positive core ratio, and low-risk group by using D'Amico classification. We also investigated GS upgrading and upstaging after radical prostatectomy (RP).

RESULTS

Among 448 primary and 37 repeated biopsy PCa patients, 82 (group 1) and 25 (group 2) underwent RP. The percentage of low-risk patients did not differ significantly between the groups. The positive biopsy core ratio was significantly lower in group 2 (p=0.009). The percentages of GS upgrading and upstaging were 42.7% and 47.6% in group 1, respectively (p=0.568), and 48.0% and 52.0% in group 2, respectively (p=0.901). In the analysis of low-risk patients, GS upgrading and upstaging were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.615 and p=0.959, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower positive core ratio may imply a small volume of PCa and possibly insignificant PCa in the repeated biopsy group. However, no significant differences were observed for the ratio of low-risk cancers, GS upgrading, or upstaging between the groups. Therefore, PCa diagnosed at a repeated biopsy is not an additional indication for active surveillance.

Differences in Postoperative Pathological Outcomes between Prostate Cancers Diagnosed at Initial and Repeat Biopsy

Purpose

We evaluated the differences in pathological outcomes between prostate cancers (PCas) diagnosed at initial and repeat biopsy.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 287 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy from 2005 to 2010. We investigated preoperative factors, such as age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE) results, biopsy schema, clinical stage, and number of prior biopsies, and postoperative pathological outcomes, including specimen volume, percent tumor volume, Gleason score (GS), tumor bilaterality, pathological stage, positive surgical margin (PSM), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Patients were then classified into two groups by the number of prior biopsies (initial biopsy vs. repeat biopsy). We compared preoperative factors and postoperative pathological outcomes between the two groups.

Results

Of the 287 patients, 246 (85.7%) were diagnosed with cancer at the initial biopsy and 41 (14.3%) at the repeat biopsy. The repeat biopsy group was older (p=0.048), had a larger PV (p=0.009), had a significantly different biopsy schema (p<0.001), and had a lower (<10%) percentage tumor volume (p=0.016). In the multivariate analysis (after adjustment for biopsy schema, age, serum PSA, PV, and DRE), repeat biopsy was not an independent predictor of GS, tumor bilaterality, pathological stage, PSM, LVI, or PNI (p=0.212, 0.456, 0.459, 0.917, 0.991 and 0.827, respectively), but repeat biopsy could predict lower percentage tumor volume (p=0.037).

Conclusions

The pathological outcomes of PCas detected at repeat biopsy were not significantly different from those of PCas detected at initial biopsy except for a lower (<10%) percentage tumor volume.